Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Aerodynamic Forces and Moments Calculated by Three-dimensional Unsteady Blade Element Theory and Computational Fluid Dynamics

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In previous work, we modified blade element theory by implementing three-dimensional wing kinematics and modeled the unsteady aerodynamic effects by adding the added mass and rotational forces. This method is referred to as Unsteady Blade Element Theory (UBET). A comparison between UBET and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for flapping wings with high flapping frequencies (>30 Hz) could not be found in literature survey. In this paper, UBET that considers the movement of pressure center in pitching-moment estimation was validated using the CFD method. We investigated three three-dimensional (3D) wing kinematics that produce negative, zero, and positive aerodynamic pitching moments. For all cases, the instantaneous aerodynamic forces and pitching moments estimated via UBET and CFD showed similar trends. The differences in average vertical forces and pitching moments about the center of gravity were about 10% and 12%, respectively. Therefore, UBET is proven to reasonably estimate the aerodynamic forces and pitching moment for flight dynamic study of FW-MAV. However, the differences in average wing drags and pitching moments about the feather axis were more than 20%. Since study of aerodynamic power requires reasonable estimation of wing drag and pitching moment about the feather axis, UBET needs further improvement for higher accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shyy W, Berg M, Ljungqvist D. Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro vehicles. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1999, 35, 455–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen Q V, Truong Q T, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D. Measurement of force produced by an insect-mimicking flapping-wing system. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S94–S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrison C L, Vandenheede R B R, Kumar D, Bernal L P, Cesnik C. Force measurements of a flapping wing with two angular degrees of freedom and bio-inspired kinematics. Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 2012, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nagai H, Isogai K, Hayase T. Measurement of unsteady aerodynamics forces of 3D flapping wing in hovering to forward flight. Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 2008, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stefanescu D M, Butoescu V. Equipment for determining aerodynamic forces on flapping wings. Proceedings of the 19th IMEKO World Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 2009, 311–315.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mueller D, Bruck H A, Gupta S K. Measurement of thrust and lift forces associated with drag of compliant flapping wing for micro air vehicles using a new test stand design. Experimental Mechanics, 2010, 50, 725–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu H, Ellington C P, Kawachi K, Berg C V D, Willmott A P. A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1998, 201, 461–477.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu L, Peskin C S. Simulation of a flapping flexible filament in a flowing soap film by the immersed boundary method. Journal of Computational Physics, 2002, 179, 452–468.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun M, Tang J. Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tay W B, van Oudheusden B W, Bijl H. Numerical simulation of X-wing type biplane flapping wings in 3D using the immersed boundary method. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2014, 9, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vanella M, Fitzgerald T, Preidikman S, Balaras E, Balachandran B. Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller L A, Peskin C S. A computational fluid dynamics of “clap and fling” in the smallest insects. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005, 208, 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller L A, Peskin C S. Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 3076–3090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z J, Birch J M, Dickinson M H. Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: Two-dimensional computation? vs robotic wing experiments. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meng X, Liu Y. Aerodynamics of ascending flight in fruit flies. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2017, 14, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Phan H V, Au T K L, Park H C. Clap-and-fling mechanism in a hovering insect- like two-winged flapping-wing micro air vehicle. Royal Society Open Science, 2016, 3, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. I. The quasi-steady analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 1984, 305, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weis-Fogh T. Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1973, 59, 169–230.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lighthill M J. On the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1973, 60, 1–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Maxworthy T. Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1979, 93, 46–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ellington C P, Van Den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ellington C P. The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: Application to micro-air vehicles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1999, 202, 3439–3448.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van Den Berg C, Ellington C P. The vortex wake of a hovering model hawkmoth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 1997, 352, 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickinson M H, Lehmann F-O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sane S P, Dickinson M H. The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 1087–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Birch J M, Dickinson M H. The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, 2257–2272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lehmann F O, Sane S P, Dickinson M H. The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005, 208, 3075–3092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight II Morphological parameters. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 1984, 305, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sane S P, Dickinson M H. The control of flight force by a flapping wing: Lift and drag production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2001, 204, 2607–2626.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ansari S A, Zbikowski R, Knowles K. Aerodynamic modeling of insect-like flapping flight for micro air vehicles. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2006, 42, 129–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan Z A, Agrawal S K. Force and moment characterization of flapping wings for micro air vehicle application. Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2005, 1515–1520.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Truong Q T, Nguyen Q V, Truong V T, Park H C, Byun D, Goo N S. A modified blade element theory for estimation of forces generated by a beetle-mimicking flapping wing system. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidt L V. Introduction to Aircraft Flight Dynamics, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, USA, 1998, 397.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Theodorsen T. General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter, NACA annual report, 1935, 20, 413–433.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wagner H. Über die Entstehung des dynamischen Auftriebes von Tragflügeln. ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/ Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 1925, 5, 1–17. (in German)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Küssner H G. Zusammenfassender Bericht über den instationären Auftrieb von Flügeln. Luftfahrtforschung, 1936, 13, 410–424. (in German)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Keenon M, Klingebiel K, Won H, Andriukov A. Development of the nano hummingbird: A tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle. Proceedings of AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 2012, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyen Q V, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D. Characteristics of a beetle’s free flight and a flapping wing system that mimics beetle flight. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ma K Y, Chirarattananon P, Fuller S B, Wood R J. Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science, 2013, 340, 603–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lua K B, Lai K C, Lim T T, Yeo K S. On the aerodynamic characteristics of hovering rigid and flexible hawkmoth-like wings. Experiments in Fluids, 2010, 49, 1263–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Han J S, Kim J K, Chang J W, Han J H. An improved quasi-steady aerodynamic model for insect wings that considers movement of the center of pressure. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2015, 10, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Truong Q T, Phan H V, Sane S P, Park H C. Pitching moment generation in an insect-mimicking flapping-wing system. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Meng X G, Sun M. Aerodynamics and vortical structures in hovering fruitflies. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Advanced Technology Fusion and Artificial Muscle Research Center, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea

    Loan Thi Kim Au, Hoang Vu Phan & Hoon Cheol Park

Authors
  1. Loan Thi Kim Au
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hoang Vu Phan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hoon Cheol Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoon Cheol Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Au, L.T.K., Phan, H.V. & Park, H.C. Comparison of Aerodynamic Forces and Moments Calculated by Three-dimensional Unsteady Blade Element Theory and Computational Fluid Dynamics. J Bionic Eng 14, 746–758 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60440-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60440-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation