Chapter Twenty-Eight - Global prevalence of Toxocara infection in dogs
Introduction
Dogs (Canis familiaris) are ubiquitous and have the widest diversity of roles of any domesticated animal in human societies worldwide. They serve as companion, working or service animals, entertainment or show dogs, working dogs on farms, police or military dogs, shepherds, hunters, guardians, transport, and play an important role in a wide range of comparative animal medicine studies of diseases such as diabetes, narcolepsy and cancer. The dog is widely considered to be ‘man's best friend’ and has important roles in the psychological and physiological well-being of many people, particularly young children, as well as disabled and elderly people (Serpell and Barrett, 2016). The global dog population is estimated at 900 million (https://www.worldatlas.com), ~ 500 million of which are stray or feral animals (https://www.carodog.eu). These numbers probably underestimate the true numbers of dogs, as dogs are not registered in many countries. In 2017, the total number of pet dogs in the European Union was estimated at 85 million (https://www.statista.com). According to the 2017–2018 National Pet Owners Survey in the United States, ~ 60% of households owned a pet, and the number of pet dogs was estimated at 89 million (https://www.iii.org). In addition, according to a previous estimate, 361 million dogs were estimated to live in Asia, 102.2 million in Latin America and the Caribbean, and 87.6 million in Africa (Hughes and Macdonald, 2013).
Although many humans derive great benefits from dogs, these canids can also serve as reservoirs for a wide range of zoonotic pathogens, some of which are of major public health importance (Macpherson et al., 2013; Otranto et al., 2017). In many cases, stray dogs might harbour more infectious agents than pet dogs, such that they represent a significant risk to human populations (Otranto et al., 2017; Paoletti et al., 2015); nevertheless, direct contact of pet dogs with people is a significant risk factor (Dubná et al., 2007; Lucio-Forster et al., 2016; Overgaauw and van Knapen, 2013). Of the important zoonotic pathogens, ascaridoid nematodes of the genus Toxocara, including Toxocara canis and T. cati, are causative agents of human toxocariasis with a worldwide distribution (Aghamolaie et al., 2018; Fisher, 2003; Ma et al., 2018). Toxocariasis can cause four major clinical syndromes in humans, including visceral larva migrans (VLM), ocular larva migrans (OLM), neurotoxocariasis (NT) and common/covert toxocariasis (CT) (Aghaei et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2018; Mohammadzadeh et al., 2018; Rostami et al., 2019). Canids, including dogs, foxes, wolves and jackals serve as definitive hosts of T. canis, releasing eggs into the environment, where, under favourable conditions, they can embryonate and eventually become infective. Infective eggs containing third-stage (L3) larvae can be accidentally ingested by humans and other paratenic hosts via contaminated soil, unwashed raw vegetables, water, or occasionally from the fur of dogs (Ma et al., 2018).
In the past decades, numerous studies have assessed the prevalence of T. canis infection in dogs, often in relatively small geographic regions. Consequently, there are significant gaps in the knowledge of the epidemiology of Toxocara infection/toxocariasis in many countries. Considering the public health implications of toxocariasis, a more comprehensive understanding of the occurrence and prevalence of Toxocara infection would be valuable. This paper provides the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data on the global prevalence of T. canis in dogs.
Section snippets
Methodology
This systematic literature search and meta-analysis study adhered to the protocol recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (Moher et al., 2015).
Eligible studies, their characteristics and datasets
Fig. 1 shows a flow diagram for the selection of articles. The search strategy identified 4370 articles, 4064 of which were excluded after the removal of duplicates and the screening of titles and abstracts. A total of 306 articles with full-texts were assessed for eligibility. A total of 229 studies containing 275 datasets were included in this meta-analysis. These studies provided data on 13,010,004 dogs from 60 different countries in six WHO-regions. In total, 93 datasets were available for
Global and regional prevalence rates of Toxocara infection in dogs
The random-effects, pooled global prevalence of Toxocara infection in dogs was 11.1% (95% CI, 10.6–11.7%; 302,723/13,010,004), with a high heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 99.8). Prevalence was highest in the Eastern Mediterranean region (19.2%, 13.7–25.5%) and lowest in the Western Pacific region (6.4%, 3.3–10.2%). Pooled prevalences in other WHO-regions were 10.8–18%: Africa (18%, 13.7–23.9%), South-East Asia (11.9%, 6.8–18.2%), North America (11.1%, 10.6–11.7%), South America (10.9%,
Prevalence according to type of dogs, age, gender and area (rural vs urban)
In subgroup analyses, with respect to the type of dogs, the prevalences of Toxocara infection worldwide in pet, working and stray dogs were 8.9% (8.3–9.6%), 14.1% (10.1–18.7%) and 18.8% (14.7–23.2%), respectively (P < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, according to age and gender, the pooled prevalence of Toxocara infection was higher in dogs of ≤ 12 months of age (28.7%, 23.5–34.2%) and in male dogs (26.8%, 20.2–33.9%) than in dogs of > 12 months of age (12.9%, 9.6–16.6%) and female (21.7%, 15.4–28.7%)
Prevalence based on selected study characteristics
With respect to the type of samples, prevalence based on the detection of Toxocara eggs in faecal samples (10.9%, 10.3–11.5%) was lower than for the detection of such eggs on hairs (15.8%, 4.0–33.1%) and of Toxocara worms (adults) at postmortem (15.6%, 9.8–22.4%). Considering the diagnostic approach used, prevalence rates based on flotation, sedimentation, either flotation or sedimentation (unspecified), necropsy (to detect adult worm), and other (Kato–Katz or McMaster) techniques were 10.7%
Impact of socio-demographic, geographical and climatic parameters on prevalence
We also performed subgroup analyses with respect to socio-demographic, geographical and climate parameters, to establish the source of heterogeneity and also the effects of these parameters on the prevalence of Toxocara infection in dogs. With respect to the income level in a country, the highest and lowest prevalence rates were estimated for countries with low income levels (20.0%, 13.7–27.2%) and high income levels (7.7%, 7.2–8.3%), respectively. Prevalence rates in countries with lower-
Discussion and conclusions
This systematic review and meta-analysis of published prevalence studies on Toxocara in dogs found a global prevalence of 11.1%, suggesting that at least 100 million dogs are carriers of Toxocara worldwide. The results reveal that there are significant differences in prevalence among different regions of the world, which are associated with the type of dog, a country's GDP as well as geographical and climatic parameters. The high global prevalence of Toxocara infection is of public health
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Health Research Institute at the Babol University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUBABOL.HRI.REC.1398.129), Babol, Iran (A.R.). RBG's research program is presently supported through funds from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia, the Australian Research Council (ARC), Yourgene Health, Melbourne Water Corporation and The University of Melbourne.
References (51)
- et al.
Prevalence and associated risk factors of Toxocara infection in dogs in northern and southern Egypt
Vet. Parasitol.
(2019) - et al.
Toxocara spp. infection and risk of childhood asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Acta Trop.
(2018) - et al.
What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections?
Lancet Infect. Dis.
(2002) - et al.
Interventions to prevent dog fouling: a systematic review of the evidence
Public Health
(2011) - et al.
Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxocara infection among children in Shandong and Jilin provinces, China
Acta Trop.
(2015) - et al.
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Control. Clin. Trials
(1986) - et al.
The prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs from Prague, rural areas, and shelters of the Czech Republic
Vet. Parasitol.
(2007) - et al.
Toxocara eggs in public places worldwide—a systematic review and meta-analysis
Environ. Pollut.
(2018) - et al.
Factors affecting disease manifestation of toxocarosis in humans: genetics and environment
Vet. Parasitol.
(2013) Toxocara cati: an underestimated zoonotic agent
Trends Parasitol.
(2003)
The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pigs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vet. Parasitol.
An estimation of Toxocara canis prevalence in dogs, environmental egg contamination and risk of human infection in the Marche region of Italy
Vet. Parasitol.
A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife
Biol. Conserv.
In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
Prevalence of intestinal parasites in pet dogs in the United States
Vet. Parasitol.
Comparison of the prevalence of Toxocara egg shedding by pet cats and dogs in the USA, 2011–2014
Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Reports
Human toxocariasis
Lancet Infect. Dis.
Epizootiology of zoonotic parasites of dogs in Abua Area of Rivers State, Nigeria
Vet. Anim. Sci.
Environmental contamination with Toxocara spp. eggs in public parks and playground sandpits of Greater Lisbon, Portugal
J. Infect. Public Health
Zoonotic parasites of sheltered and stray dogs in the era of the global economic and political crisis
Trends Parasitol.
Veterinary and public health aspects of Toxocara spp
Vet. Parasitol.
The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among wild boars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vet. Parasitol.
Human toxocariasis—a look at a neglected disease through an epidemiological ‘prism’
Infect. Genet. Evol.
Larval development of Toxocara canis in dogs
Vet. Parasitol.
Prevalence of hepatitis D virus infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lancet Glob. Health
Cited by (64)
Toxascaris leonina in dogs – A nematode species of high prevalence in some regions of Eurasia
2024, Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and ReportsA walk on the wild side: A review of the epidemiology of Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati in wild hosts
2023, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and WildlifeIs there any change in the prevalence of intestinal or cardiopulmonary parasite infections in companion animals (dogs and cats) in Germany between 2004-2006 and 2015–2017? An assessment of the impact of the first ESCCAP guidelines
2022, Veterinary ParasitologyCitation Excerpt :In fact, most Toxocara egg shedding occurs in dogs and cats aged < 12 months (Rostami et al., 2020a, c). Different sample numbers could be another explanation for different prevalences; in fact, the observed Toxocara prevalence was significantly lower in studies with large sample numbers, such as the present study, than in studies with small sample numbers (Rostami et al., 2020a, c). It should be noted that detection of Toxocara eggs in canine faeces does not necessarily indicate a roundworm infection.
Canine parasitoses in north Patagonia (Argentina): Comparison between different social and environmental factors
2023, Journal of Helminthology