Pilot field trial of the EG95 vaccine against ovine cystic echinococcosis in Rio Negro, Argentina: Early impact and preliminary data
Graphical abstract
A field trial of the EG95 vaccine against cystic echinococcosis was initiated in the Rio Negro province of Argentina. Base-line data are presented for the field trial region as well as preliminary data on the effects of the vaccine's use on Echinococcus granulosus prevalence in sheep.
Introduction
Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a parasitic zoonosis caused by infection with a taeniid cestode parasite, Echinococcus granulosus. The parasite requires two mammalian hosts to complete its life cycle. In South America the most important definitive host is the dog (which develops the adult tapeworm stage) and the most common intermediate host is the sheep (which develops the larval stage). Goats, pigs and cattle can be involved also as intermediate hosts (Eckert et al., 2001, Larrieu and Zanini, 2012). CE is one of the most prevalent zoonoses in Argentina, causing a significant burden for the health system due to the high costs of surgery and days spent in hospitals. It also causes losses in livestock due to the condemnation of infected viscera and decreases in production of wool, milk and meat (Budke et al., 2006).
Since the introduction of the cestocidal drug praziquantel, control programmes for CE have been based largely on dog treatment with this drug every 45–90 days in an attempt to eliminate the adult tapeworms. Hypothetically, if all dogs in a region were treated every 45 days the risk of transmission to humans and animals as intermediate hosts would decrease rapidly to reach a level where transmission was totally interrupted. In situations such as in the Rio Negro Province of Argentina, where sheep are responsible for acting as intermediate hosts, renewal of the sheep with animals born after interruption of transmission would cause the elimination of E. granulosus (Eckert et al., 2001).
However, where CE control has relied on frequent treatment of dogs with praziquantel, more than 10 years of intensive, compulsory intervention has been required before CE transmission reached a low level and almost 30 years has been required to achieve freedom from the disease (Craig and Larrieu, 2006). In other areas where CE control activities have been undertaken in the past century, the infrastructure required to treat the dogs 8–12 times per year for a long period of time (10 years or more) has not been sustainable, often because CE endemic areas are the poorest in each endemic country (Larrieu and Zanini, 2012).
A control programme for CE started in 1980 in the Rio Negro Province based on treatment of dogs with praziquantel every 90 days, using the existing primary health care infrastructure to deworm dogs. A group of health care assistants (non-professional staff) conducted home visits, while veterinarians from the health department lent support and managed the surveillance system. This network carried out four rounds of home visits annually. The health care assistants visited rural areas distributing praziquantel tablets to dog owners who were ultimately responsible for carrying out the deworming. Education activities were also undertaken in the community concerning the nature of the disease, lifecycle and the need to prevent dogs gaining access to sheep offal. Serological testing and untrasonography were undertaken on the human population in order to effect early diagnosis of CE infections (Larrieu et al., 2000, Larrieu et al., 2011, Larrieu and Zanini, 2012). The programme has been successful in decreasing the prevalence of E. granulosus in dogs and humans, although a proportion of infected sheep remain and this has been sufficient to lead to a continued incidence of CE in children (Larrieu et al., 2001, Larrieu et al., 2000).
Vaccination of potential intermediate hosts of E. granulosus with the EG95 recombinant vaccine (Heath et al., 2003, Lightowlers et al., 1996) could potentially be used to reduce the level of E. granulosus transmission and decrease the incidence of human infections (Bethony et al., 2011). Torgerson, 2003, Torgerson, 2006 and Torgerson and Heath (2003) have used mathematical models to predict the impact of various options for control of CE and considered that a programme involving vaccination of intermediate hosts together with 6-monthly treatment of dogs with praziquantel would decrease the time needed to achieve control of disease transmission.
The EG95 vaccine is a recombinant protein cloned from mRNA from the oncosphere life cycle stage of the parasite. The vaccine comprises the EG95 protein together with the adjuvant Quil A. Two immunizations in young animals protects against a challenge infection with E. granulosus by inducing specific antibodies against the oncosphere, eliminating it before it can establish and develop in the tissues of the intermediate host. EG95 is a defined protein, non-infectious, non-toxic and is produced using genetic engineering and expressed in Escherichia coli (Heath et al., 2003, Lightowlers et al., 1996, Lightowlers et al., 1999). However, other than some data about the use of the vaccine in China (Heath et al., 2003, Heath et al., 2006), there is little published information about the impact of the EG95 vaccine when used in field conditions nor about potential problems that could arise when the vaccine was applied on a large scale in livestock flocks (Larrieu and Zanini, 2012).
In order to assess the impact of the introduction of the EG95 vaccine in the control programme in Rio Negro, the authorities in charge of the programme decided to trial the introduction of the vaccine as an additional control tool. It is considered that optimal protection with the EG95 vaccine would be afforded by two immunizations in lambs followed by annual booster immunizations (Heath et al., 2003). However the resources available for hydatid control in Rio Negro were insufficient to support the requirements of this regime and it was decided to undertake a vaccination programme in which lambs received two vaccinations followed by a single booster immunization when the animals were 1–1.5 years of age. The objective of this work was as assessment of the baseline data in the regions selected for the control programme with vaccination and a preliminary assessment of the effects of EG95 vaccination on lambs born following the introduction of the vaccine. Secondary objectives include the assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the diagnostic tests available for epidemiological surveillance of CE and also an analysis of the usefulness of the geospatial analysis in the CE control activities.
Section snippets
Work area
The regions chosen for the programme were Anecon Grande, Rio Chico Abajo, Nahuel Pan, Manuel Choique, Blancura Centro and Lipetren. Each farm was defined as an Epidemiologic Unit (EU); each of them contained a house. The geographic region was the Rio Negro Province in Argentina comprising in total an area of 5820 km2. The geographic position of every EU was localized to create a geographic information system (GIS) (Fig. 1).
In these communities there are five health centres, with each of them
Initial diagnostic in areas control and vaccination
An initial census (2009) of the trial identified 150 sheep farmers in the area used for vaccination and control. Animals in these areas were 16511 sheep, 4696 lambs and 452 dogs (Table 1). The EU in which vaccination was performed included 79 farmers, which incorporated 3146 lambs and 311 dogs. Data concerning evidence for E. granulosus transmission in each of the regions chosen for inclusion in the vaccination programme are summarized in Table 2. Statistical comparisons of the prevalences
Discussion
Six areas involved in the on-going CE control programme in Rio Negro Province were selected for investigations into the impact of the EG95 vaccine. Comparison of various indicators of E. granulosus transmission in these areas obtained as base-line data prior to the initiation of vaccination activities in 2009 indicated that there was active transmission of the disease in all areas. Comparison of the areas selected for inclusion in the vaccination programme and for inclusion as control,
Acknowledgements
Invaluable support for this work was provided by health workers Casimiro Prafil, Bernardo Geraghty, Miguel Lopez, Sixto Uribe, Lorena Marilef, Eugenio Calfual and Gustavo Tartaglia. We thank them and their communities of Anecon Grande, Nahuel Pan, Mamuel Choique, Lipeteren and Rio Chico. We thank to Lic. Mario Lamfri, CONAE, Argentina for your help in the spatial analysis. Funding is acknowledged from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council grants 628320, 100354 and from
References (31)
- et al.
National prevalence of larval echinococcosis in sheep in slaughtering plants Ovis aries as an indicator in control programmes in Uruguay
Acta Trop.
(2003) - et al.
Control of cystic echinococcosis/hydatidosis: 1863–2002
Adv. Parasitol.
(2006) - et al.
Evaluation of the enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) for ovine hydatidosis relative to age and cyst characteristics in naturally infected sheep
Vet. Parasitol.
(2003) - et al.
Ovine echinococcosis I. Immunological diagnosis by enzyme immunoassay
Vet. Parasitol.
(2007) - et al.
Ecological epidemiology: landscape metrics and human alveolar echinococossis
Acta Trop.
(2004) - et al.
Canine echinococcosis: an alternative for surveillance epidemiology
Vet. Parasitol.
(2000) - et al.
Control of hydatidosis
Parasitol. Int.
(2006) - et al.
Progress in control of hydatidosis using vaccination – a review of formulation and delivery of the vaccine and recommendations for practical use in control programmes
Acta Trop.
(2003) - et al.
Screening for Echinococcus granulosus in dogs: comparison between arecoline purgation, coproELISA and coproPCR with necropsy in pre-patent infections
Vet. Parasitol.
(2007) - et al.
Ovine Echinococcus granulosus transmission dynamics in the province of Rio Negro, Argentina, 1980–1999
Vet. Parasitol.
(2001)