Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 39, Issue 11, November 2014, Pages 1652-1657
Addictive Behaviors

Discounting of money and sex: Effects of commodity and temporal position in stimulant-dependent men and women

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.026Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cocaine users delay discounting rates were higher for delayed sex than money.

  • For men, this appeared to be because delayed sex did no maintain its value.

  • For women, delayed sex was rapidly discounted because it did not retain its value.

  • Women also rapidly discounted sex because immediate sex was particularly appealing.

Abstract

Research on delay discounting has contributed to the understanding of numerous addiction-related phenomena. For example, studies have shown that substance dependent individuals discount their addictive substances (e.g., cocaine) more rapidly than they do other commodities (e.g., money). Recent research has shown that substance dependent individuals discount delayed sex more rapidly than delayed money, and their discounting rates for delayed sex were higher than those of non-addicted individuals. The particular reason that delay discounting rates for sex are higher than those for money, however, are unclear. Do individuals discount delayed sex rapidly because immediate sex is particularly appealing or because delayed sex does not retain its value? Moreover, do the same factors influence men and women's choices? The current study examined delay discounting in four conditions (money now versus money later; sex now versus sex later; money now, versus sex later; sex now versus money later) in cocaine dependent men and women. The procedures used isolated the role of the immediate versus delayed commodity. For men, the higher rates of delay discounting for sex were because delayed sex did not retain its value, whereas both the immediate and delayed commodity influenced the female participants' decisions.

Introduction

When individuals choose between immediate and larger-yet-delayed rewards, tradeoffs between the size and the immediacy of the rewards occur. Specifically, the subjective value of the delayed commodity decreases (i.e., is discounted) as the delay increases. This phenomenon, called delay discounting, is often quantified via Mazur's (1987) hyperbolic discounting equation:V=A1+kD,which describes how the value (V) of some amount (A) of the commodity decreases at a given rate (k) as it is delayed (D). Because the discounting rate (i.e., k) is the only free parameter in this equation, k is said to quantify this behavioral process.

Substance-dependent individuals discount delayed rewards at higher rates than controls (see Bickel, Jarmolowicz, Mueller, Koffarnus, & Gatchalian, 2012b, for a review). Moreover, they discount consumable commodities like cocaine (Bickel et al., 2011, Coffey et al., 2003), heroin (Madden et al., 1999, Madden et al., 1997), or food (Estle et al., 2007, Odum and Baumann, 2007) at steeper rates than money. This suggests that addicted individuals exhibit a reduced ability to value future events (Bickel et al., 2012a, Bickel and Yi, 2008), which manifests as impulsive choices, particularly for consumable commodities. Although these studies typically present choices between hypothetical outcomes, studies have demonstrated that both choice (e.g., Johnson and Bickel, 2002, Kirby and Marakovic, 1996, Madden et al., 2003) and patterns of neural activation (Bickel, Pitcock, Yi, & Angtuaco, 2009) are consistent when participants choose between real or between hypothetical outcomes.

Addicted individuals' poor valuation of future events may manifest as impulsive choices for sexual activity (Jarmolowicz et al., 2013, Johnson and Bruner, 2011). For example, Jarmolowicz et al. compared delay discounting rates for money and for sexual activity in samples of alcohol-dependent (n = 20) and control participants (n = 21). After determining how many sex acts would be subjectively equivalent to receiving $1000, participants completed delay discounting assessments for money and for sexual acts. Discounting rates for sexual activity were higher than for money in all participants (cf. Lawyer, Williams, Prihodova, Rollins, & Lester, 2010). Moreover, discounting rates for sexual activity were higher in the alcohol dependent group than in the control group. Hence, like other consumable commodities, delayed sexual activity is discounted at higher rates than delayed money (Lawyer et al., 2010), and addicted individuals discounted delayed sex more steeply than controls.

Impulsive sexual choices may be particularly relevant to cocaine dependence. Cocaine users often make seemingly impulsive sexual choices such as sex with multiple partners, inconsistent condom use, and trading sex for other commodities (typically drugs, food, housing, and/or money; Farley, 2006, Fleming et al., 2006). The risk of spreading sexually transmitted infections (STI) and the potential for unwanted pregnancies, make these behaviors a major public health concern (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998, Center for disease control and prevention, 2014). Understanding the ways which cocaine users devalue delayed sexual activity may inform efforts to curb this seemingly impulsive sexual activity. Using a similar procedure, Johnson and Bruner (2011) examined the discounting of delayed safe sex relative to immediate unprotected sex in sixty cocaine-dependent individuals. After choosing pictures of individuals that they would have sex with, participants indicated the likelihood that they could wait various amounts of time (from 1 h to 3 months) for a condom to have sex with the person 1) they most wanted to have sex with, 2) they least wanted to have sex with, 3) they felt was most likely to have an STI, and 4) they felt was least likely to have an STI. Individuals' ability to wait for a condom decreased as the delays increased, particularly for the individual they most wanted to have sex with, and the individual least likely to have an STI.

As noted above, discounting rates for consumables (e.g., drugs, sex, etc.) tend to be higher than for money. Studies comparing the discounting rates across commodities, however, almost exclusively present choices between some amounts of Commodity A now vs. after a delay. This single-commodity discounting (SCD) may not represent the complex choices encountered outside of the laboratory. In life we often choose between Commodity A now and Commodity B after a delay (e.g., drugs now vs. paycheck later), choices which we will refer to as cross-commodity discounting (CCD).

By presenting the entire array of SCD and CCD conditions, delay discounting studies can isolate the relative roles of the immediate and delayed commodities. For example, Bickel et al. (2011) examined SCD for money and cocaine as well as CCD for both cocaine now vs. money later and money now vs. cocaine later. Consistent with previous findings (Coffey et al., 2003), Bickel et al. found SCD for cocaine was steeper than SCD for money. Novel to their experiment, however, CCD rates for cocaine now vs. money later were intermediate to the two SCD rates, yet rates of CCD for money now vs. cocaine later were higher than SCD for cocaine. Bickel et al.'s findings suggest a strong role of the delayed commodity (i.e., delayed cocaine did not retain its value) and lesser effects of the immediate commodity (i.e., immediate cocaine is very appealing).

The present study built from Bickel et al.'s (2011) and Jarmolowicz et al.'s (2013) findings to examine the relative roles of immediate and delayed sex or money by comparing the SCD and CCD for money and sexual activity in treatment-seeking cocaine-dependent individuals.

Section snippets

Participants

The data in this study were taken from a subset in a larger study of a novel treatment for cocaine and methamphetamine use. Recruitment for the original study consisted of placing fliers in the local community, and referrals from other study participants. We selected participants who met DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) criteria for cocaine dependence and indicated that cocaine was their drug of choice. Exclusion criteria for the study included dependence on other drugs (other

Results

Data from the M–M (median R2 = 0.89; IQR = 0.76–0.95), S–S (median R2 = 0.89; IQR = 0.80, 0.96), M–S (median R2 = 0.55; IQR = 0.16, 0.76), and S–M (median R2 = 0.87; IQR = 0.81, 0.90) conditions were well described by the hyperbolic discounting equation (cf. M–S). Fig. 1 shows the ln(k) in each condition for each individual, as well as the mean ln(k) (± 1 standard error) for each condition. Log transformed discounting rates, ln(k), were highest in the M–S condition (2.7926), followed by the S–S (− 1.4394), M–M (−

Discussion

Patterns of discounting for sexual outcomes bore the same quantitative signature as the discounting of other commodities like money or drugs (Bickel et al., 2012b), further demonstrating the generality of delay discounting processes. Consistent with previous studies, delay discounting rates were higher for sex than money (Jarmolowicz et al., 2013, Lawyer et al., 2010). Moreover, consistent with Bickel et al. (2011), the CCD procedures provided insight into the relative roles of the immediate

Role of the funding source

The current research was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse grant R01DA030241 to Warren K. Bickel. NIDA had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication. This manuscript has been approved by all authors.

Contributors

All authors contributed substantially to this work through the design (Warren Bickel, Darren Christensen, Bryan Jones, and Richard Yi), conduct (Lisa Jackson), analysis (Reid Landes), interpretation (David Jarmolowicz, Warren Bickel) and writing of the final manuscript (all authors).

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to report.

References (28)

  • W.K. Bickel et al.

    Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: Fictive and real money gains and losses

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • W.K. Bickel et al.

    Temporal discounting as a measure of executive function: Insights from the competing neuro-behavioral decision system hypothesis of addiction

  • Center for disease control, prevention

    Reported STDs in the United States: 2012 national data for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis

    CDC fact sheet

    (2014)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Risks for HIV infection among persons residing in rural areas and small cities—Selected sites, Southern United States, 1995–1996

    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

    (1998)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Single- and cross-commodity discounting among adults who use alcohol and cannabis: Associations with tobacco use and clinical indicators

      2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, participants discounted delayed drug rewards more regardless of whether the immediate alternative was the same drug or an equivalent amount of money. This approach was replicated in the same population with sex as the primary reward, yielding similar results (Jarmolowicz et al., 2014). Research on the effects of using multiple substances on delay discounting has thus far focused solely on SCD arrangements, with most of these studies reporting greater discounting among people who regularly use two or more substances relative to those who typically use a single substance (e.g., Moallem and Ray, 2012; Moody et al., 2016).

    • Envisioning a future: Values clarification in early recovery from opioid use disorder

      2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Participants were randomized using a stratified, permuted block list with randomized block sizes by gender (i.e., male vs. female) and age (i.e., age 30 and under, over age 30), resulting in four strata (Kernan et al., 1999). These two demographic features were chosen based on evidence of age and gender differences in both DD and SUD treatment engagement (Brorson et al., 2013; Jarmolowicz et al., 2014; Samanez-Larkin et al., 2011). The experimental group completed the values clarification exercise, which is a version of the Bulls Eye Values Survey (BEVS; Lundgren et al., 2012) adapted and used by Gregg and colleagues (Gregg et al., 2014).

    • Single- and cross-commodity delay discounting of money and e-cigarette liquid in experienced e-cigarette users

      2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Importantly, the current results are the first to generalize these findings to e-cigarette users. It should be noted that prior studies have shown that consumable commodities (e.g., food, drugs), especially those that can be immediately used, are more rapidly discounted than these that serve as an exchangeable commodity (e.g., money) (Hamilton et al., 2015; Jarmolowicz et al., 2014), which may explain why e-cigarette users discount e-cigarette liquid at higher rates than money. Additionally, this study demonstrates differences in discounting across the three discounting tasks.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text