Research PaperLarge-scale additive manufacturing of self-heating molds☆
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
The development of high-performance fiber reinforced polymer composites brought a revolution in the polymer-based manufacturing community. Their higher strength-to-weight ratio, mechanical reinforcement, improved thermal & electrical conductivity, and multifunctional applications greatly benefited the automotive, renewable energy, and aerospace manufacturing industries [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Decade-long research and development activities made it possible to develop state-of-the-art fiber-reinforced high-performance polymer composite manufacturing technology, namely autoclave processing [6], [7]. The sequential construction of Boeing’s autoclave vessel, which has been used to manufacture the entire wingspan (71.6 m in length) of the 777-X aircraft since 2014, is the perfect example of the recent progress in autoclave processing technology [8], [9]. The autoclave curing process involves material layup on a rigid mold, followed by heating in an oven under pressure (typically 10–20 bar). The pressures and temperatures achieved by the autoclave curing process produce fiber-reinforced net shape and high-quality parts with low void contents. Undoubtedly, the autoclave process is a well-developed and reliable method of manufacturing high-performance composite structures. However, some of the disadvantages of the autoclave process are hindering the growth of the small - to mid-size composite tooling industries and causing existing business to shift from the United States to other territories of the world [10]. The disadvantages of autoclave processing are: (a) high capital costs, (b) highly labor intensive, (c) long cycle times, (d) a high ratio of operating cost to part size, (e) parts with internal cavities require complex tooling and bagging, (f) inefficient conduction heating, and (g) high energy consumptions [11], [12] just to list a few. This warranted the continued pursuit of processes with characteristics such as efficient heating, faster cycle times, and lower labor intensive. Undeniably, out-of-autoclave (OOA) processing was able to resolve some of those issues, for instance, it reduced the initial cost and decreased cycle time.
OOA processing technology refers to the process of fabricating composite structures via vacuum-assisted consolidation while still producing autoclave-quality parts. In brief, the OOA process consists of making the mold, laying down the prepreg, vacuuming to remove voids, consolidating the prepreg fiber system, curing of the resin while heating in an oven, post-curing heating, and finally removing the final part from the mold [13]. While the OOA process reduces the acquisition and operating costs compared to its autoclave counterpart, the use of an inefficient heating mechanism (thermal oven) still leaves room to further improve and reduce the cost of operation. Therefore, an efficient heating method, such as an embedded heating element in the OOA mold, is paramount for the adoption of this technology in the high-performance composite manufacturing industry.
Material extrusion additive manufacturing (AM) in large scale is becoming a mainstream technology for the fabrication of scaled-up composite molds with reduced costs, lead times, and cycle times compared to traditional autoclave tooling [10], [14], [15]. The Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) system at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has successfully demonstrated the use of fiber-reinforced thermoplastic-based composite pellet extrusion to manufacture autoclave molds [10], [14]. The transition from traditional manufacturing methods to AM reduced the cost to fabricate autoclave molds by 10–100 times (based on the size: ≥$100,000 to ~$5000) and reduced the amount of time from conceptual design to the final tool by an order of magnitude (from months to weeks). Although the thermal conductivity of the fiber-reinforced composite was improved marginally (0.177 Wm/K for ABS and 0.397 Wm/K for 13 wt.% CF reinforced ABS measured along the deposition direction, and 0.156 Wm/K measured perpendicular to the deposition direction) [16], heating of the printed autoclave molds using an oven remained on the list of expensive items. Therefore, manufacturing of OOA molds using the BAAM system becomes a potential solution for energy-efficient manufacturing.
Considering the fabrication of an embedded and self-heated OOA composite mold, the BAAM system is equipped with a wire co-extrusion technology. The integrated wire co-extrusion tool in the BAAM system allows the embedding of a resistive heating wire, such as nichrome wire, within the printed part. A detailed description of the wire coextrusion tool design and integration within the BAAM system was presented in [17], [18]. The embedding of resistance wire (nichrome) in each layer of deposited materials during 3D printing adds a new area of research in the OOA tooling manufacturing community.
This research paper investigated the pioneering yet exploratory manufacturing method of self-heated OOA composite molds, using the BAAM system. Two different composite materials were chosen for fabrication of wire-embedded and self-heating composite molds. Thermal testing was performed to characterize the temperature uniformity over the mold panel surface. Mechanical characterizations were performed to investigate the impact of the embedded heating wire as well as the effect of the fiber loading in the composites. Considering the mechanical [19] and thermal [20] anisotropy of the BAAM-printed parts, the mechanical properties of the printed mold were evaluated and recommendations for future improvement are made. The authors believe that utilizing the developed technology to manufacture self-heated molds will reduce the capital expenditures and manufacturing bottlenecks in the composite manufacturing industry.
Section snippets
Wire co-extrusion system
The BAAM 3D-printing machine was equipped with a wire coextrusion tool to fabricate wire embedded structures. Fig. 1 represents the integrated wire coextrusion tool on the BAAM system. The three main parts of the system are (a) the extruder, (b) the coextrusion tool, and (c) the extrusion nozzle, with a tamper. Details of the system, tool design, and software integration were discussed in [18], and [21]. However, a brief description of the system is provided here. The build volume of the BAAM
Tensile testing
The tensile testing results of the neat and wire-embedded composite specimens are presented in Fig. 5. In general, specimens showed a higher mechanical strength along the X-direction, compared to the Z-direction. In the case of the neat PC/CF composite specimen, excellent mechanical strength was found. When comparing to the 3D-printed polycarbonate plastic (64 MPa), the average ultimate tensile stress of the PC/CF composite along the X-direction, i.e. the direction of extrusion, was increased
Discussion
Self-heated mold fabrication via a large-scale AM machine with an integrated wire coextrusion tool required a significant amount of post-processing work. Several wires were broken during the post-processing operations, which included material removal from each end of the embedded wire within the molds, machining, and specimen harvesting. Thus, thermal testing results showed cold spots within the mold parts. Currently a Generation-2 wire coextrusion system is under development, and initial lab
Conclusion
A custom-made, integrated wire co-extrusion tool was used in the BAAM system at ORNL to fabricate composite molds using two different composites. Wire-embedded composite molds were tested to determine the temperature distribution over the mold panels. Thermal testing results indicated a promising application toward OOA tooling. The inherent anisotropy of the BAAM-printed parts was noticed, regardless of the material selection. In addition to the mesostructured inter-bead voids, intra-bead voids
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Kazi Md Masum Billah: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Visualization, Investigation, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing − original draft. Jesse Heineman: Investigation, Methodology, Data curation. Parithosh Mhatre: Software, Methodology. Alex Roschli: Software, Methodology. Vipin Kumar: Validation, Formal analysis, Writing − review & editing. Seokpum Kim: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing − review & editing. Gregory Haye: Resources, Writing − review & editing. Jerry Jackson:
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Advanced Manufacturing Office, and used resources at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility, a DOE-EERE User Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory ASTRO Program, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy and administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. For large scale additive
References (31)
- et al.
Autoclave processing for composites
Manufacturing Techniques for Polymer Matrix Composites (PMCs)
(2012) - et al.
Lightweight composite materials processing
Lightweight Ballistic Composites: Military and Law-Enforcement Applications
(2016) - et al.
A review of out-of-autoclave prepregs − material properties, process phenomena, and manufacturing considerations
(2015) - et al.
Designing for big area additive manufacturing
Addit. Manuf.
(2019) - et al.
Highly oriented carbon fiber-polymer composites via additive manufacturing
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(2014) - et al.
High-performance molded composites using additively manufactured preforms with controlled fiber and pore morphology
Addit. Manuf.
(2021) - et al.
Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of glass fiber and carbon fiber reinforced polyamide-6 and polyamide-6/clay nanocomposites
Mater. Lett.
(2001) - et al.
Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications
Appl. Compos. Mater.
(2013) - et al.
Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications
Jom
(2006) Trends in the design, manufacture and evaluation of wind turbine blades
Wind Energy
(2003)
Polymer Composites in the Aerospace Industry
“Manufacturing Process. Compos. Mater. Compon. Aerosp. Appl.,”
Manufacturing process of high performance-low cost composite structures for light sport aircrafts
Aerospace
Autoclave processing
Processing of Composites
Boeing: ‘Grand-scale’ autoclave for Boeing’s biggest wings nears completion
Boeing
Boeing: Second autoclave underway for Everett’s Composite Wing Center
Boeing
Cited by (12)
Recycling of CF-ABS machining waste for large format additive manufacturing
2024, Composites Part B: EngineeringHigh-performance carbon fiber reinforced polyether-ether-ketone composite pellets 3D-Printed via screw-extrusion additive manufacturing
2024, Composites Science and Technology3D printing of release-agent retaining molds
2023, Additive ManufacturingImpact of processing defects on microstructure, surface quality, and tribological performance in 3D printed polymers
2023, Journal of Materials Research and Technology
- ☆
Notice of Copyright This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05–00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).