DiscussionInvasive ventilation in the emergency department: Part 2: Implications for patient safety
Introduction
Mechanical ventilation is life-saving technology used to support patients with compromised respiratory function. The use of mechanical ventilation is associated with a range of risks that may be precipitated via the inappropriate application of the technology. Importantly, the cost of care increases exponentially for patients receiving mechanical ventilation when ventilator-associated complications arise. Therefore, it is essential to use the safest and most effective form of ventilation for the shortest possible duration.
Previous studies of ventilation practices describe international trends in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), and in particular, the delivery and discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.1, 2 In contrast to the vast amount of scientific literature informing the use of mechanical ventilation in ICUs, there is a lack of data to describe current ventilation practices in Emergency Departments (EDs) and the role ED nurses have in the management of ventilation.
This article is the second in a two-part series focussing on mechanical ventilation in the ED. Specifically, it will present a critical review of the organisational, educational and socio-political influences that impact upon the management of mechanical ventilation in EDs. In Australia, there are no standards to guide nurses’ decision-making when caring for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Consequently, recommendations for practice, education review and future research to address aspects of current practice that negatively impact upon patient safety will be made.
Section snippets
Implications for patient safety
The morbidity and mortality associated with receiving mechanical ventilation are dependent on both the underlying severity of illness and the development of ventilator-associated complications that include among other risks: ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI), airway trauma, and nosocomial infection.3, 4 Additional complications can occur when ventilation is applied inappropriately. Examples of this include the presence of extra-alveolar gas resulting in pneumothoraces or subcutaneous
Complexity of decision-making
The contextual differences between ED and ICU environments are likely to influence both nurses understanding of the application, risks and benefits of mechanical ventilation, and their level of skill in managing a patient receiving this intervention. Anecdotally, many ED nurses lack confidence in making decisions about mechanical ventilation. Emergency department nurses do not have the same consistent level of daily exposure to ventilators as their ICU colleagues and consequently receive less
Education of ED nurses and scope of practice
Australian specialist nurses are trained through formal postgraduate education programs via the university system. Currently, minimum standards require that 50% of nursing staff employed within ICUs must hold a postgraduate critical care qualification.9 However, there are no similar recommended minimum standards for ED nurses. Arguably, nurses holding a postgraduate qualification in either ICU or ED have a different level of responsibility for mechanical ventilation practices compared with most
Organisational issues and system factors
The duration of ventilation within the ED is not only dependent upon patient related factors but also on a range of external organisational factors. In situations where ICU beds and Operating Room facilities are assured, the duration of mechanical ventilation within the ED is short as patients will be rapidly transferred to the appropriate unit. Increasingly, patients may be ventilated in the ED for extended periods due to resource limitations in other in-patient units.
Rising demand for ED
Monitoring for safety and quality
Despite use of mechanical ventilation in the resuscitation and ongoing ventilatory management of ED patients, there are no comprehensive data available that specifically documents the practices of mechanical ventilation in EDs nationally. Isolated information on subsets of patients is available. For example, the Victorian State Trauma Registry reported, of the 1684 patients requiring hospitalisation due to trauma in 2003/2004, 35% (587 patients) had an ICU stay requiring mechanical ventilation
Recommendations
From this discussion of factors that impact upon the delivery of invasive ventilation in the ED, several recommendations for practice, education, and future research can be made. First, there is a need for a position statement from the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA) and the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) on minimum staffing levels for patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the ED similar to those for ventilated patients in ICU. A further position
Conclusion
To summarise, the use of mechanical ventilation in EDs requires intensive nursing resources, including clinicians who are trained in the application and monitoring of ventilation and the detection of ventilator-associated complications. At local and international levels, ventilation practices in EDs are not documented. Several aspects of the current emergency system have the potential to negatively impact on the safety of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Inappropriate application of
Competing interests
None declared.
Funding
None declared.
References (19)
Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support
Chest
(2001)Can protocolised-weaning developed in the United States transfer to the United Kingdom context: a discussion
Intensive Crit Care Nurs
(2003)- et al.
Outcomes of critically ill patients based on duration of emergency department stay
Am J Emerg Med
(2005) - et al.
How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
(2000) - et al.
Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study
JAMA
(2002) - et al.
The weaning continuum use of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, Burns Wean Assessment Program, Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System, and Wean Index scores to establish stages of weaning
Crit Care Med
(2000) - et al.
Mechanical ventilation
(2006) - et al.
Outcome of emergency department patients with delayed admission to an intensive care unit
Emerg Med
(2002) - et al.
How to choose a mechanical ventilator
Curr Opin Crit Care
(2005)