Original Research PapersSetting an agenda for strengthening the evidence-base for traditional and complementary medicines: Perspectives from an expert forum in Australia
Section snippets
Background
Many people across the world use traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) products, practitioners and practices, and in some regions, this use is increasing [1,2]. Definitional and methodological issues related to T&CM products and practices prevent clear global comparisons of T&CM use. It is estimated that up to 70% of people in Australia use at least one T&CM modality within a given year [3,4]. Twelve-month prevalence rates reported elsewhere range from 36%–42% in the USA [1], 20%–44% in
Aims & design
A descriptive qualitative design was used to explore the themes arising from an experts’ forum toward furthering understanding of how ‘evidence’ for complementary medicine products is conceptualised, and to develop an agenda to guide how it should be conceptualised and supported going forward into the future.
Participants
A purposeful sample of academic, industry and consumer participants for the expert complementary medicine evidence forum were identified by NICM and ASMI staff through known academic and
Results
While the aim of the forum was to discuss challenges related to evidence for T&CM products, the forum discussion promptly expanded to incorporate T&CM practitioners and practice. Table 2 summarises the key areas and themes arising, organised into a linked framework that can be used to guide agenda-setting and actions towards strengthening appropriate evidence for T&CM (noting that a T&CM leadership group or other similar entity is needed to operationalise the strategies and coordinate the
Discussion
This paper presents an Australian-focused agenda for strengthening the evidence-base for T&CM. It is the outcome of a roundtable discussion of experts who collectively brought together many decades of accumulated knowledge from research, clinical practice and/or teaching experience in the fields of T&CM (Chinese medicine, naturopathy, herbal medicine and others), medicine (including general practice), nursing, pharmacology, social sciences and philosophy. The interweaving of the themes
Conclusion
The time is ripe in Australia to establish a leadership group to change the nature of debate around what is appropriate evidence for T&CM and to lead action to advance this area. Clinicians and T&CM consumers should be mobilised to lobby for greater recognition. This paper provides a framework that can be used to guide such work. The framework is broad but encapsulates: focus on consumers; the importance of evidence, regulation and policy; challenges arising from the modernisation of T&CM; and
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Formal ethics approval was not required for the roundtable discussion (the forum). All forum participants recorded their consent for their de-identified contributions to be reported, all were provided opportunity to comment on the draft manuscript, and all provided written consent to be named in the acknowledgements of this paper.
Consent for publication
The authors and forum participants have read the manuscript and provided written consent for publication.
Competing interests
Author JH, is engaged in integrative medicine clinical practice and is an academic researcher at NICM. As a medical research institute, NICM receives research grants and donations from foundations, universities, government agencies, individuals and industry. Sponsors and donors provide untied funding for work to advance the vision and mission of NICM. The project that is the subject of this article was not undertaken as part of a contractual relationship with any organisation or donor. Authors
Authors’ contributions
RC and ML undertook data analysis. RC conceptualized and drafted the paper with input from ML and JH. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript.
Funding
This work was jointly funded by NICM, Western Sydney University, and the Australian Self-Medication Industry (ASMI).
Acknowledgements
The forum was co-convened by NICM and the Australian Self-Medication Industry (ASMI) and hosted at the ASMI Offices in Sydney and facilitated by Robert Lippiatt, Southern Pacific Consulting. Thank you to the forum participants and also Annaliese Scholz (ASMI) and Adjunct Professor Michael Smith (National Center for Natural Product Research, University of Mississippi and Adjunct Fellow NICM) for their input into this paper. In addition to the authors, forum participants were: Professor Alan
References (56)
- et al.
Complementary and alternative medicine use in multiracial Singapore
Complement. Ther. Med.
(2005) - et al.
Women’s use of complementary and alternative medicines during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study
Midwifery
(2014) - et al.
Positive correlation between the use of complementary and alternative medicine and internal health locus of control
Explore
(2008) Complementary/alternative medicine in the context of prevention of disease and maintenance of health
Prev. Med.
(2009)The role of evidence in alternative medicine: contrasting biomedical and anthropological approaches
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2006)- et al.
Evidence based practice in traditional & complementary medicine: an agenda for policy, practice, education and research
Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract.
(2018) - et al.
Pharmacovigilance of herbal medicine
J. Ethnopharmacol.
(2012) - et al.
Pharmacovigilance of herbal medicines in Africa: questionnaire study
J. Ethnopharmacol.
(2015) - et al.
Integrating complementary and alternative medicine into medical intern teaching: preliminary findings from an Australian Hospital
Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract.
(2013) Teaching conventional medicine to acupuncture students: from necessary evil to part of the fabric
Explore (NY)
(2013)