Original article
Prevention of demineralization around orthodontic brackets in vitro

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.043Get rights and content

Introduction

The demineralization of enamel adjacent to orthodontic brackets is a significant clinical problem. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to investigate the effect of sodium fluoride (Colgate Neutrafluor 9000 ppm) (NaF) and 10% casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (GC Tooth Mousse) (TM) on enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets.

Methods

Forty specimens were sectioned from the buccal or lingual surfaces of extracted sound third molars. Twenty specimens had molar tubes bonded with composite resin (Transbond XT, 3M, St Paul, Minn) (CR), and 20 were bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji Ortho LC, GC America, Alsip, Ill) (RMGIC). A 2-mm window for enamel demineralization was prepared. The specimens were randomly divided into 4 treatment groups: control, TM, TM/NaF (50/50 w/w), and NaF. The treatment solutions were placed around the bracket margins, and the specimens were immersed inverted into a carbopol demineralization solution at 37°C. The enamel specimens were exposed for 96 hours, with the demineralization and topical solutions changed every 4 hours. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) images were taken every 8 hours under controlled conditions. The difference in fluorescence (ΔF) and the proportional ΔF (%F) change between baseline and 96 hours was calculated.

Results

RMGIC significantly reduced ΔF and %F when compared with CR (ANOVA, P = .029 and P = .034, respectively). Application of TM with CR, NaF with CR, and TM/NaF with CR significantly reduced ΔF and %F compared with the control CR (Tukey post-hoc test, P <.001). Application of TM/NaF with RMGIC significantly reduced ΔF and %F compared with the control RMGIC (Tukey post-hoc test, P = .008, P = .019, respectively).

Conclusions

With the limitations of any in-vitro study, the following clinical conclusions can be drawn. The use of RMGIC alone can significantly decrease enamel demineralization compared with CR. The application of TM/NaF can provide significant additional prevention of enamel demineralization when RMGIC is used for bonding. The application of TM, NaF, or TM/NaF can significantly prevent enamel demineralization when CR is used for bonding. The use of both agents should be recommended for any at-risk orthodontic patient to provide preventive actions and potentially remineralize early (subclinical) enamel demineralization.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Ethics approval (HREC Project No 050376) was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Melbourne before this research project.

Twenty-five previously collected third molars from a fluoridated community were stored in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution for at least 2 weeks. All teeth were rinsed and stored moist in double deionized water (MilliQ water, Millipore Corp, Billerica, Mass) before experimental use. The outer enamel surface was polished wet to a mirror

Results

The control CR test group showed the greatest amount of enamel demineralization, whereas the TM and NaF RMGIC groups had the least amount of demineralization (Table II). One-way ANOVA showed statistically significant (P <.05) differences between all test groups, but not within each test group (Table III).

The CR specimens showed significantly greater demineralization than the RMGIC specimens at 96 hours (CR %F = 33.71 ± 23.85; RMGIC %F = 20.56 ± 12.23; t test, P = .034). The use of RMGIC alone

Discussion

The use of topical medicaments that can successfully prevent white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment would be beneficial for patients at risk of developing such lesions. The use of topical fluoride in its various forms (toothpaste, mouthrinse, gels, varnishes, fluoride-releasing cements, and elastomeric auxilliaries) has, to date, been the most commonly used caries preventive protocol during orthodontic treatment for at-risk patients, in addition to patient education and

Conclusions

With the limitations of any in-vitro study, the following clinical conclusions can be drawn.

  • 1

    The use of RMGIC for orthodontic bonding would appear to significantly prevent the development of enamel demineralization, even without the additional application of a topical agent.

  • 2

    If composite resin has been used for bonding, it is likely that the separate topical application of either TM or NaF gel (9000 ppmF) will prevent enamel demineralization.

  • 3

    If RMGIC has been used for bonding, the application of

References (52)

  • M.M. O’Reilly et al.

    Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (1987)
  • S. Matalon et al.

    Antibacterial properties of 4 orthodontic cements

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (2005)
  • J. Gorton et al.

    In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (2003)
  • B. Ogaard et al.

    Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralizationPart 2. Prevention and treatment of lesions

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (1988)
  • L. Mitchell

    Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances—an overview

    Br J Orthod

    (1992)
  • H.S. Chang et al.

    Enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatmentAetiology and prevention

    Aust Dent J

    (1997)
  • T. Aoba

    Solubility properties of human tooth mineral and pathogenesis of dental caries

    Oral Dis

    (2004)
  • P.E. Benson et al.

    Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic review

    J Orthod

    (2005)
  • A. Derks et al.

    Caries-inhibiting effect of preventive measures during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliancesA systematic review

    Caries Res

    (2004)
  • S.A. Alexander et al.

    Effects of self-applied topical fluoride preparations in orthodontic patients

    Angle Orthod

    (2000)
  • J.M. ten Cate

    Current concepts on the theories of the mechanism of action of fluoride

    Acta Odontol Scand

    (1999)
  • N.H. de Leeuw

    Resisting the onset of hydroxyapatite dissolution through the incorporation of fluoride

    J Phys Chem

    (2003)
  • E.C. Reynolds

    Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate solutions

    J Dent Res

    (1997)
  • P. Shen et al.

    Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by sugar-free chewing gum containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate

    J Dent Res

    (2001)
  • E.C. Reynolds et al.

    Retention in plaque and remineralization of enamel lesions by various forms of calcium in a mouthrinse or sugar-free chewing gum

    J Dent Res

    (2003)
  • R.K. Rose

    Binding characteristics of streptococcus mutans for calcium and casein phosphopeptide

    Caries Res

    (2000)
  • Cited by (115)

    • An ex vivo evaluation of physico-mechanical and anti-biofilm properties of resin-modified glass ionomer containing ultrasound waves-activated nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans biofilm around orthodontic bands

      2022, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, the use of dental materials that provide bacterial clearance and fluoride release is recommended [14]. Glass ionomer cement may be selected due to its remineralizing and antibacterial properties, which are utilized in orthodontic treatment for bonding brackets and band cementation [15,16]. Due to the poor mechanical properties of glass ionomer when used for bracket bonding, the shear bond strength is significantly reduced compared to composite resin adhesives, but it is used as adhesive for bonding brackets and buccal tubes in at-risk orthodontic patients to provide preventive actions and potentially remineralize subclinical enamel demineralization [17,18].

    • Plant-based milk in arresting caries

      2019, Materials Today: Proceedings
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text