Elsevier

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volume 315, 15 December 2017, Pages 319-330
Applied Mathematics and Computation

Distributional study of finite-time ruin related problems for the classical risk model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.07.054Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we study some finite-time ruin related problems for the classical risk model. We demonstrate that some techniques recently developed in [37] and [6] can be used to study the joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum surplus prior to ruin, the joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum severity of ruin, and the distribution of the two-sided first exit time. Especially, by solving a Seal’s type partial integro-differential equation we obtain an explicit (integral) expression for the finite-time Gerber–Shiu function, which is expressed in terms of the (infinite time) Gerber–Shiu function introduced in [12].

Introduction

Consider a classical risk process in which the insurer’s surplus level at time t(≥0), U(t), is described as U(t)=u+cti=1N(t)Xi,t0,where u (>0) is the initial surplus, c(>0) is the constant premium rate per unit of time, and {Xi}i ≥ 1 is a sequence of i.i.d. random variables representing the individual claim amounts, with common probability distribution function (d.f.) P, density function p, mean μ and Laplace transform (LT) p^. The counting process {N(t); t ≥ 0} denotes the number of claims up to time t and is assumed to be Poisson with parameter λ (>0), and independent of {Xi}i ≥ 1. Furthermore, we assume that c=(1+θ)λμ, where θ (>0) is the loading factor.

Define Tu=inf{t0:U(t)<0} to be the time of ruin, with Tu=, if U(t) ≥ 0 for all t ≥ 0. Define ψ(u,t)=P(Tut)=1ϕ(u,t) to be the probability of ruin by (finite) time t with ϕ(u, t) being the corresponding finite-time survival probability; then ψ(u,)ψ(u)=1ϕ(u)=P(Tu<) is the probability of ultimate ruin.

Let S(t)=i=1N(t)Xi be the aggregate amount of claims by time t and define F(x, t) to be the distribution function of S(t), i.e., F(x,t)=P(S(t)x)=eλt+n=1(λt)neλtn!Pn*(x),x>0,t0,and denote f(x,t)=F(x,t)/x.

The finite-time ruin related problems have been studied extensively for the classical risk model. Prahbu [33] and Seal [35] study the finite-time non-ruin (survival) probability; see also other references therein for early contributions and relevant results in classical risk theory. They show that the finite-time survival probability, ϕ(u, t), satisfies a partial integro-differential equation; through the Laplace inversion an explicit (integral) expression of ϕ(u, t) is obtained in terms of functions F(x, t) and f(x, t), as well as its (initial) expression at u=0, which can be expressed as a function of F(x, t) through integration.

For the continuous time classical risk model, Picard and Lefèvre [32] show that when the claim sizes are integer-valued, the distribution of the time of ruin Tu can be expressed in terms of generalized Appell polynomials, where Tu is viewed as the time of first crossing between a compound Poisson trajectory and an upper increasing boundary. The elegant work by Picard and Lefèvre [32] has stimulated further research in developing techniques and algorithms for the analytically or numerically evaluation of finite-time ruin probabilities. De Vylder [1] develops some techniques to numerically calculate finite-time ruin probabilities in the classical risk model based on the remarkable formula derived in [32], while De Vylder and Goovaerts [2] further derive general explicit analytic expressions for finite-time and infinite-time ruin probabilities assuming that the claim size distribution has a density on [0, ∞), which are continuous versions of discrete ones obtained in [32]. Ignatov and Kaishev [13] derive explicit two-sided bounds for the finite-time non-ruin probability of an insurance company, where the premium income is described by an increasing function, the claim sizes are dependent and integer-valued random variables, and their inter-occurrence times are non-identically and exponentially distributed (parallel results for the same model when claim sizes are dependent and follow any continuous joint distribution can be found in [14]); see, also [15], for an improved version of the finite-time ruin probability formula of Ignatov and Kaishev [13] and numerical illustrations using Mathematica. Moreover, Rullière and Loisel [34] propose exact recursive formulas and a Seal-type formula to compute the finite-time ruin probability and compared the computational efficiency of their proposed formulas with Picard-Lefèvre and other existing formulas. Beside, Lefèvre and Loisel [20] generalize the formula derived in [32] for the finite-time ruin probabilities to the classical compound binomial and compound Poisson risk models.

By assuming that the arrival times within a fixed time interval satisfy an order statistic property, independent of claim amounts, Lefèvre and Picard [21] revisit the homogeneous risk model investigated by De Vylder and Goovaerts [2]; the distributional properties of the aggregate claim amount process are discussed and a closed-form expression for the finite-time non-ruin probability is derived, which is expressed in terms of a family of Appell polynomials. It is worth mentioning that Sendova and Zitikis [36] study some properties (including first two moments and related risk measures) of aggregate claims under the same claim arrival process with certain dependence structures between the claim sizes and the inter-claim times. Lefèvre and Picard [22] further consider two special cases of the model studied in [21] and an expression for the finite-time non-ruin probabilities is obtained by exploiting properties of an underlying family of Appell polynomials. See, also [23], for an interesting exploration of the mathematical relationship between the finite-time ruin probability in insurance and the final outcome distribution in epidemics.

Dickson and Willmot [10] find an expression for the probability density function of the time of ruin by inverting its Laplace transform via Lagrange’s implicit function theorem, which provides an efficient way to study the finite-time ruin related quantities. The joint distribution of the time of ruin and some ruin related quantities are studied in [4], [5] and [19]. The density of the time of ruin for the classical risk model with a constant dividend barrier can be found in [25]. The distribution of the number of claims in the two-sided first exit problem in the compound Poisson risk model is investigated in [26]. The finite-time ruin related problems for the Sparre Andersen models are further investigated in [8], [18] and [9]. The finite-time ruin probability for a risk model with a Markovian arrival process (MAP) has been studied in [24].

Recently, Willmot [37] generalizes the approach presented in [33] and [35] and studies the joint distribution of the time of ruin and the deficit at ruin by solving a class of Seal’s type partial integro-differential equations. Dickson [6] shows that the solution to the Seal’s type equation obtained in [37] can be used to find simpler and interpretable expressions for some t-deferred ruin related probabilities (probability of ruin related events with ruin occurring after time t). Inspired by their work, in this paper we intend to show that the ideas and approaches proposed in their papers can be used to find expressions for some more complicated distribution functions and joint distribution functions; they are the joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum surplus prior to ruin, the joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum severity of ruin, and the distribution of the two-sided first exit time. Moreover, these approaches can also be applied to study and derive an explicit expression for the finite-time expected discounted penalty function (also called finite-time Gerber–Shiu function) in the sense that ruin occurs no later than finite time t. See Section 6 for more details on different definitions of the finite-time Gerber–Shiu function and relevant references. Note that the explicit expressions here, as in [37] and [6], are all in terms of known functions and integrations of these known functions such as the ultimate ruin probability and the ordinary (infinite time) Gerber–Shiu function introduced in [12].

The main steps and approaches used in this paper can be described as follows. Instead of considering the finite-time ruin related quantities directly, we consider the t-deferred ones (with the time of ruin occurring after time t) including joint distribution functions and finite-time Gerber–Shiu functions, as in [6]. We then prove that these t-deferred quantities satisfy their corresponding Seal’s type partial integro-differential equation in two variables (initial surplus level u and time t). By applying the main results (see Section 2) from [37], we are able to express these t-deferred functions in terms of known functions and then the finite-time ruin related quantities that we look for can be obtained through their relationships with corresponding t-deferred ones. Because the solution to the Seal’s type equation also depends on its initial value when u=0, it is crucial to be able to determine this aforementioned value. In some cases (see Sections 4 and 5), it can be obtained by solving an integral equation.

In particular, we have shown the feasibility of the above-mentioned techniques by applying them to studying the finite-time Gerber–Shiu functions; they are non-trivial expected value functions other than probability functions studied in [37] and [6]. The result, that the finite-time Gerber–Shiu function is expressed in terms of the ordinary (infinite time) Gerber–Shiu function, is obtained for the first time to the best of our knowledge, which would be considered as a new contribution to the ruin theory literature.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents some preliminary results including the marginal and joint distributions of the maximum surplus prior to ruin and the maximum severity of ruin, and the solution to the Seal’s type equation obtained in [37]. In Section 3, we give an explicit expression for the joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum severity of ruin. The joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum surplus prior to ruin is studied in Section 4, while the distribution of the two-sided first exit time is analyzed in Section 5. In Section 6, a Seal’s type partial integro-differential equation for the finite-time Gerber–Shiu function, defined on ruin occurring after time t, is obtained and solved. The finite-time Gerber–Shiu function is expressed in terms of the infinite time Gerber–Shiu functions. The moments of the time of ruin if ruin occurs before or after t are also obtained. Finally, the Laplace transforms of the first time that the surplus hits a certain level b before t or after t are obtained in Section 7, followed by some concluding remarks.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

We define Mu=max{U(t):0tTu}to be the maximum surplus level prior to ruin. We also define Tub=min{t0:U(t)=b|U(0)=u},ub, to be the first hitting time of b from the initial surplus u. Let ξ(u,b)=P(Mu<b,Tu<)=P(Tu<Tub),0u<b,be the distribution function of the maximum surplus prior to ruin with initial surplus u. It is easy to see that ξ(u, b) is the probability of ruin without surplus reaching b and χ(u,b)1ξ(u,b) is the probability of hitting b without ruin occurring. Dickson and Gray [7]

The joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum severity of ruin

In this section, we investigate the joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum severity of ruin, defined as R(u,t,z)P(Tut,Duz),u,t,z0.Utilizing the same t-deferred idea as in [6], we study R¯(u,t,z)P(t<Tu<,Duz)=J(u,z)R(u,t,z),where J(u, z) is given by (2.2), and clearly we have R¯(u,0,z)=J(u,z),R¯(u,t,)=ψ¯(u,t).

Now conditioning on the events that may occur over an infinitesimal interval (0, h], we can show that R¯(u,t,z) satisfies the following Seal’s type partial

The joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum surplus prior to ruin

In this section, we study the joint distribution of the time of ruin and the maximum surplus prior to ruin, defined as bψ(u,t)P(Tut,Mu<b),0ub,t0.We also define bψ¯(u,t)=P(t<Tu<,Mu<b)=P(t<Tu<Tub),0ub,t0,to be the probability of ruin occurring after time t without the surplus reaching b prior to ruin; here bψ¯(u;t) can be seen as the survival function of the one-sided first exit time. Then the following relationship holds: bψ(u,t)=P(Tu<,Mu<b)bψ¯(u,t)=ξ(u,b)bψ¯(u,t),where ξ(u, b) is

The distribution of the two-sided first exit time

Let Tu,b=min(Tu,Tub),0u<b,be the two-sided first exit time and E(u, t, b) be its distribution function. Define E¯(u,t,b)=P(Tu,b>t)=1E(u,t,b),0u<b.to be the survival function of Tu, b. Clearly, we have E¯(u,0,b)=I(u<b) and E¯(u,t,b)=0, for u=b. Using the same idea as in previous sections, we study E¯(u,t,b) and hence the distribution function E(u, t, b) can be obtained.

Similarly, by conditioning on the events that may occur over an infinitesimal interval, we obtain the following partial

The Gerber–Shiu function: from infinite time to finite-time

Gerber and Shiu [12] define the following expected discounted penalty function (also called Gerber–Shiu function): mδ(u)=E[eδTuw(U(Tu,|U(Tu)|)I(Tu<)],δ>0,u0,where w(x, y) ≥ 0 is a bivariate function. Function mδ(u) has been studied extensively in the classical risk model and other risk models. It can be decomposed into two components as mδ(u)=mδ(u,t)+m¯δ(u,t), where mδ(u,t)=E[eδTuw(U(Tu,|U(Tu)|)I(Tut)],m¯δ(u,t)=E[eδTuw(U(Tu,|U(Tu)|)I(t<Tu<)],u,t0.

Remarks

  • 1.

    mδ(u,0)=0 and m¯δ(u,0)=mδ(u).

  • 2.

The Laplace transform of the first hitting time before or after t

Recall that Tub=min{t0:U(t)=b|U(0)=u}, u ≤ b, defined in Section 2, is the first hitting time to an upper level b. We define ζ(u;b)=E[eδTub],<ub,to be the Laplace transform of Tub. Gerber and Shiu [12] show that ζ(u;b)=eρδ(bu),ub,where ρδρδ(0) is a unique positive solution to (6.4) with r=0. If u > b, Tub=0 and thus ζ(u;b)=1.

Now define ζ(u,t;b)=E[eδTubI(Tub<t)],ζ¯(u,t;b)=E[eδTubI(Tubt)],<ub,t0.

Remarks

  • 1.

    ζ(u,t;b)+ζ¯(u,t;b)=ζ(u;b).

  • 2.

    If 0t(bu)/c, then ζ¯(u,t;b)=ζ(u;b)=eρδ(bu), as P(

Concluding remarks

In this paper, we obtain some distributions or joint distributions of quantities involving the time of ruin by solving the Seal’s type partial integro-differential equations, given in early days in [33] and [35], and re-investigated in [37] and [6]. The Seal’s type equations seem to be a powerful tool in dealing with finite-time ruin related problems, one-sided or two-sided first exit times, finite time Gerber–Shiu functions, as well as the occupation times in the classical risk model. Problems

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for providing insightful comments and suggestions that improved the presentation of this paper. This research for Dr. Yi Lu was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.

References (37)

  • G. Willmot

    On a partial integrodifferential equation of seal’s type

    Insur.:Math. Econ.

    (2015)
  • F. De Vylder

    Numerical finite-time ruin probabilities by the Picard–Lefèvre formula

    Scand. Actuar. J.

    (1999)
  • D.C.M. Dickson

    Insurance Risk and Ruin

    (2005)
  • D.C.M. Dickson

    Some finite time ruin problems

    Ann. Actuar. Sci.

    (2007)
  • D.C.M. Dickson

    Some explicit solutions for the joint density of the time of ruin and the deficit at ruin

    ASTIN Bull.

    (2008)
  • D.C.M. Dickson et al.

    Approximations to ruin probability in the presence of an upper absorbing barrier

    Scand. Actuar. J.

    (1984)
  • D.C.M. Dickson et al.

    Erlang risk models and finite time ruin problems

    Scand. Actuar. J.

    (2012)
  • D.C.M. Dickson et al.

    The density of the time to ruin in the classical poisson risk model

    ASTIN Bull.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (9)

    • The Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function: A review from practical perspectives

      2023, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      After its first development [78] for the Cramér-Lundberg model (18), the Laplace transform based method has been employed, extended and improved in a wide variety of problem settings. Some examples include dependence between interclaim arrivals and claim sizes [27,141] together with perturbation [224], perturbation with two-sided jumps [226], perturbation and investment with penalty and reward in a finite time [20], delayed claims induced by main claims [204,235], random income modeled by a compound Poisson process [8] and additionally with delayed-claims [71,232], constant interests that can be positive or negative [160], capital injection restoring the surplus to a certain level [61], a finite-time problem with and without perturbation [121,122], and a generalized stochastic income with additional discounting [189]. Those studies succeed to obtain the the Laplace transform of the Gerber-Shiu function, or even the Gerber-Shiu function itself in explicit form by the inverse Laplace transform.

    • Recursive approximating to the finite-time Gerber–Shiu function in Lévy risk models under periodic observation

      2022, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The density of the time to ruin was studied by Dickson and Willmot [13], and an explicit expression was derived by Laplace inversion transform via Lagrange’s implicit function theorem. Since then, some joint distributions of the time to ruin together with other ruin-related quantities were studied in [14–17] and [18,19]. Dickson and Li [20, 21] studied some finite-time ruin problems under some Erlang risk models, and some results were extended to the Markovian arrival process by Li et al. [22].

    • On the distribution of classic and some exotic ruin times

      2019, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
    • Gerber-Shiu analysis in the compound Poisson model with constant inter-observation times

      2023, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences
    • Fourier-Cosine method for finite-time Gerber-Shiu functions

      2021, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text