Evaluation of the n-alkane technique for estimating the individual intake of dairy cows consuming diets containing herbage and a partial mixed ration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114524Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The n-alkane method accurately measured intake of cows fed both herbage and a partial mixed ration.

  • Discrepancies between estimated and measured intakes were 5.1 % or less.

  • Accuracy in estimating herbage DMI was slightly better when less herbage was fed.

Abstract

Estimation of dry matter intake (DMI) using the n-alkane technique was evaluated in lactating dairy cows fed fresh herbage and a partial mixed ration (PMR). Four dietary treatments were investigated in a 2 × 2 factorial experiment using 16 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Dietary treatments were combinations of low and high amounts of fresh herbage (8 or 14 kg DM/cow per day) and PMR supplement (6 or 12 kg DM/cow per day). The pre-experimental period was 14 days followed by a 10-day experimental period. Cows were housed in individual metabolism stalls to allow for accurate measurement of DMI and total fecal output. Fecal n-alkane recovery rates were calculated to determine the most accurate corrections for incomplete fecal n-alkane recovery. The n-alkane technique accurately estimated DMI when corrected for incomplete fecal recovery using both published recovery rates and recovery rates calculated in this experiment. The most accurate application of recovery rates was with those calculated for each combination of dietary treatments, compared with using an average recovery rate. This research has important implications for the future use of the n-alkane technique, especially in PMR feeding systems. The discrepancy between estimated (when treatment recovery rates were applied) and measured herbage DMI increased with the amount of herbage offered but was not affected by amount of PMR. It was also found that the recovery rates of all natural n-alkanes increased as the amount of herbage increased. This research demonstrates that the n-alkane technique can be used to accurately estimate individual cow intake when fresh herbage and PMR are offered separately, evidenced by strong Lin’s concordance estimates.

Introduction

Researchers and farmers alike continue to be challenged by the need to accurately measure individual dry matter intake (DMI) of livestock in pasture-based production systems. In dairy cows, energy intake often limits milk production in high producing cows. Energy intake is defined as the product of feed DMI and the metabolizable energy (ME) concentration of that feed (Allen, 2000). Consequently, the estimation of DMI is important in assessing the efficiency of the conversion of DM into milk in dairy cows (Vazquez and Smith, 2000). Knowledge of pasture DMI is also essential for formulating supplementary rations that complement the nutrients received from pasture. Estimating DMI in grazing systems is problematic as herbage intake varies substantially at both a herd and an individual cow level (Smit et al., 2005; Wright et al., 2016; Wright, 2017). A number of techniques have been developed including the use of indigestible markers, sward difference measurements, reversed feeding standards, water intake methods, feeding behavior measurements and, more recently, the development of motion sensors (Langlands and Donald, 1978; Dillon, 1993; Mayes and Dove, 2000; Dove, 2010; Dutta et al., 2014). However, many of these techniques disrupt normal grazing behavior and cannot be used when cows are consuming heterogeneous herbage swards.

An indigestible marker method called the n-alkane technique has become a common method used in research for estimating individual intake in cattle. It is commonly used because of the presence of various n-alkanes in plant species, its ease of analysis, ability to determine diet selection in grazing animals and its accuracy when estimating intake (Mayes et al., 1986; Dove, 1993; Wright et al., 2019). Alkanes are saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, present in various chain lengths (C21 to C37) in the cuticular wax component of plant species, and are mostly indigestible to ruminant species (Mayes et al., 1986). The n-alkane technique can be used to estimate DMI and diet composition from the concentrations of n-alkanes of ingested feed and feces excreted, and is unique in that it estimates digestibility in individual animals, allowing for a true estimation of individual DMI (Dove and Mayes, 1991, 1996; Dove, 2010). Alkanes found in plant species are predominantly odd-chain length and can be used, in combination, with orally dosed synthetic even-chain length alkane(s) to obtain estimates of individual intakes (Dove and Mayes, 1996). If using a single natural n-alkane and a synthetic n-alkane that is similar in carbon-chain length then a correction for incomplete fecal recovery is not required. However, when using the n-alkane technique to estimate diet composition using the differences in the concentrations of n-alkanes in various plant species, the various n-alkanes must be corrected for incomplete fecal recovery. Generally, n-alkane recovery rates increase curvilinearly with increasing n-alkane chain length and may be affected by the composition of the diet (Dove and Mayes, 2005; Dove et al., 2010).

It has been demonstrated that estimates of DMI using the n-alkane technique are most accurate when groups of animals are consuming herbage monocultures. Dove and Mayes (1996) reviewed nine scientific articles evaluating the n-alkane technique in both cattle and sheep and reported that the average discrepancies between known and estimated herbage DMI, at a group level, ranged from -2.60 % to 2.57 %. More recently, the n-alkane technique was validated in a herbage-only feeding system, and it was reported that the n-alkane technique accurately estimated herbage DMI and that its accuracy was not influenced by changes in herbage nutritive characteristics induced by changes pre-harvested herbage mass and season (Wright et al., 2019). Despite the success of the n-alkane technique in homogenous herbage swards, there is negligible research evaluating the use of this technique for the determination of DMI of grazing dairy cows offered more complex diets, where herbage is supplemented with large amounts of forage and grain/concentrates. To date the n-alkane technique has been used to estimate DMI of mixed grains and forage in sheep (Valiente et al., 2003). In dairy cows, the n-alkane technique has been used to estimate forage DMI in grazing systems, where individual supplement intakes were known or estimated using other techniques (Malossini et al., 1996; McEvoy et al., 2008; O’Neill et al., 2012). Bani et al. (2014) estimated individual DMI of dairy cows consuming total mixed rations using the n-alkane technique, however no fresh herbage was consumed in that study.

In temperate regions of the world, including Australia and New Zealand, dairying is primarily pasture-based due to its low to medium cost (Jacobs, 2014). Traditionally, pasture-based systems involve feeding cereal grain or concentrates in the parlor during milking however, an increasing number of dairy producers are increasing the amount of supplements offered to their cows, and as a result are transitioning to other supplementary feeding strategies (Auldist et al., 2019). One such strategy is feeding a partial mixed ration (PMR), where a mixed ration, is fed on a feed pad between periods of grazing. The PMR feeding system is used by approximately 12 % of dairy producers in Australia, with this number likely to increase (Wales and Kolver, 2017). Implementing a PMR feeding system can result in energy-corrected milk (ECM) production increases of between 2 to 5 kg/cow per day compared with offering equivalent amounts of energy as grain in the dairy and conserved forage in the paddock (Auldist et al., 2019). While the benefits of this feeding system have been demonstrated, the ability to measure individual cow DMI of fresh herbage and PMR has not been researched nor has the accuracy and precision of the n-alkane technique in this feeding system. As pasture-based dairying systems shift towards feeding more supplements, there is a requirement for a method to accurately estimate individual DMI of both fresh herbage and large amounts of supplements.

The objectives of this experiment were as follows: (1) to determine the accuracy and precision of the n-alkane technique for estimating individual cow DMI of fresh herbage and PMR; and (2) to determine the accuracy and precision of the technique at high and low amounts of fresh herbage and PMR.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The experiment was conducted at the Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions (DJPR) Ellinbank Centre, Victoria, Australia (latitude 38°14′S, longitude 145°56′E). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013). Approval to proceed was obtained from the Agriculture Victoria Agricultural Research and Extension Animal Ethics Committee.

Accuracy and precision of the n-alkane technique

Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients contain measures of accuracy, with a bias correction factor, and precision was determined using Pearson correlation coefficient. The comparison of measured total DMI and estimated total DMI using the recovery rate corrections of Dillon (1993) resulted in a Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient of 0.96 (bias factor 0.99). When comparing measured and estimated total DMI with the average recovery rate correction, Lin’s concordance correlation

Discussion

The n-alkane technique accurately and precisely estimated total DMI in dairy cows fed fresh herbage in combination with a mixed ration. This is the first research that has reported the DMI of fresh herbage diets and mixed ration in dairy cows, where estimation has occurred without the application of artificial n-alkanes or beeswax mixtures onto the concentrate component of the diet. This finding, that the n-alkane technique can be accurately applied to a mixed ration feeding system in dairy

Conclusions

In conclusion, this research is the first to validate the use of the n-alkane technique for estimating intake of both herbage and PMR in dairy cows consuming mixed diets containing a combination of concentrate, conserved forage, and fresh herbage. While there were some discrepancies between estimated and measured intakes that were significantly different from zero, indicating systematic biases under some diets, these were on average ∼ 5% of individual diet component intakes, and are therefore

Conflict of interest

None.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

M.M. Wright: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Project administration, Writing - review & editing. M.J. Auldist: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. E. Kennedy: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. F.R. Dunshea: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. N. Galvin: Resources. M.C. Hannah: Formal analysis, Validation. W.J. Wales:

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to G. Morris, D. Mapleson, A. McDonald, L. Dorling, T. Phillips, T. Hookey, S. Zeiro, D. Wilson, and Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions (DJPR), Ellinbank farm staff for assistance with cow feeding and husbandry. The authors are also grateful for the n-alkane analysis by Teagasc Moorepark, Ireland. This research was funded by DJPR, Victoria, and Dairy Australia (Melbourne, Australia).

References (39)

  • H.J. Smit et al.

    Comparison of techniques for estimating herbage intake of grazing dairy cows

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (2005)
  • O.P. Vazquez et al.

    Factors affecting pasture intake and total dry matter intake in grazing dairy cows

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (2000)
  • M.M. Wright et al.

    Variation in feeding behavior and milk production among dairy cows when supplemented with 2 amounts of mixed ration in combination with 2 amounts of pasture

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (2016)
  • M.M. Wright et al.

    Evaluation of the n-alkane technique for estimating the herbage dry matter intake of dairy cows offered herbage harvested at two different stages of growth in summer and autumn

    Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.

    (2019)
  • AFIA

    AFIA—Laboratory Methods Manual

    (2009)
  • M.J. Auldist et al.

    Milk production of cows grazing pasture supplemented by a partial mixed ration with or without canola meal

    Anim. Prod. Sci.

    (2019)
  • D.B. Baird

    The Design of Experiments with Covariates

    (1994)
  • P. Bani et al.

    Estimation of dry matter intake by n-alkanes in dairy cows fed TMR: effect of dosing technique and faecal collection time

    Anim. Prod. Sci.

    (2014)
  • A. Brosh et al.

    Effects of faecal n-alkane recovery in estimates of diet composition

    J. Agric. Sci.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (5)

    • A dual marker technique to estimate individual feed intake in young pigs

      2022, Animal
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, the in-feed markers may have been better mixed in digesta than the reference markers. The longer chain length of C36 than C32 could also explain the higher recovery of C36 (Wright et al., 2020). It is remarkable and consistent with Méndez Cante (2013) that the errors in the prediction are merely related to erroneous faecal recoveries of the reference rather than that of the in-feed markers.

    • Validating the n-alkane technique for determining herbage dry matter intake in sheep offered perennial ryegrass harvested at varying growth stages and seasons

      2021, Animal Feed Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The fitting statistics show a strong relationship between measured DMI and n-alkane estimated DMI, regardless of whether DMI was estimated using either C31 or C33 as the herbage n-alkane in combination with C32 as the dosed n-alkane. Previous studies examining the usefulness of the n-alkane technique in both sheep and dairy cows have shown that discrepancies between measured and estimated DMI using the n-alkane technique range from -0.02–28.3 kg DM / animal per day with an average discrepancy of ∼0.23 Kg DM / animal per day (Dove and Mayes, 2005; Kaufmann et al., 2011; Wright et al., 2020) which are similar to those identified in this study. Lin’s concordance for each method with in vivo DMI were moderate (rc = 0.46 for C31 and rc = 0.59 for C32) but within a similar range to that observed by Wright et al. (2019) when the difference between measured DMI and n-alkane estimated DMI was evaluated using stall-fed dairy cows.

    • Using multispectral data from an unmanned aerial system to estimate pasture depletion during grazing

      2021, Animal Feed Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      To this end, several techniques have been employed in research for the measurement or estimation of intake of grazing cattle. Examples of such techniques are the use of indigestible markers such as n-alkanes or chromic oxide (Undi et al., 2008; Wright et al., 2020). However, such methods pose several challenges such as being labour intensive, requiring specialized laboratory analysis, and being too time consuming and impractical for on-farm use, as well as not providing DMI data during a grazing session (Moshtaghi Nia and Wittenberg, 2002).

    View full text