Probabilistic modeling and assessment of the impact of electric heat pumps on low voltage distribution networks
Introduction
In order to meet the challenging environmental targets that have been set out by Governments worldwide in the attempt to fight climate change, there are clear paths towards decarbonising the electricity sector by means of renewable sources such as wind. However, in order to drastically reduce the environmental impact of the entire energy sector, decarbonisation of the heat sector represents an even more strategic and challenging point, particularly in the UK and for the domestic sector. Various “heat strategies” documents have therefore been issued (see for instance [1]) in the attempt of steering the most cost effective evolution towards low carbon domestic heating. In the envisioned energy futures, there is a widespread utilization of the Electric Heat Pump (EHP) technology, with an extreme scenario, an electric-only future, where EHPs supplied by renewable electricity, and in case supported by thermal storage [2] and/or possibly coupled to heat networks [3], allow supply of virtually zero carbon heating. However, an open key point to address is the impact that widespread adoption of EHPs would have on the electrical distribution network, particularly at the low voltage (LV) level in the case of domestic systems. In fact, the additional electrical load at households could be substantial [4] and trigger significant technical issues, eventually either calling for network reinforcements or impeding further EHP connections beyond a certain level.
The use of smart strategies to decrease network impact has also been advocated in [5], [6], but practical implementations are still far or might not bring expected benefits [4] while EHPs are already becoming a reality today thanks to technology improvements and financial incentives that are allowing overcoming early stage economic limitations [7]. In this respect, there is lack of suitable tools and relevant studies to actually quantify the impact at a LV level for different scenarios, technologies and types of networks, including a detailed modeling of the LV network. Studies in this direction have been performed for instance in [8] by assuming three-phase balanced connections and based on average profiles only. In addition, those studies and other “classical” studies use hourly profiles, while [9] has indicated that much finer resolution, in the order of 5–10 min, is needed to properly account for the impact at a household level and particularly for individual peaks that might arise. An attempt to consider load diversity has been performed in [10], where the correlation between electricity and heat profiles is modeled through a heuristic approach; no network impact is however analysed. The paper [11] has considered the impact of EHPs on distribution networks based on experimental data available. However, there is no attempt to model the EHP performance characteristics in dependence of operating (and particularly external) conditions and to take into account the need for back-up heating under harsh conditions. Similarly, reference [6] has considered a number of worst-case situations, but without detailing the impact on LV networks. In addition, the impact might change significantly with different types of EHP such as Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs) or Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs) and different types of buildings and operating conditions. An interesting analysis of the different types of EHP and their main characteristics for applications in the UK can for instance be found in [12]. No such studies allowing for detailed network impact analysis from different EHP types in different buildings are available in the literature.
On these premises, this paper introduces a comprehensive probabilistic methodology and an associated modeling tool that are capable to understand and quantify in a systematic way the impact on LV distribution networks of different types of EHPs, namely, GSHP and ASHP (but the model could also be extended to other types such as water-source heat pumps, for instance), with and without back-up Auxiliary Heater (AH) of different types (for instance, fuel-based or electricity-based), different conditions (outdoor or ground temperatures, etc.), different types of buildings (for instance, with different insulation levels), and different consumption of reactive power (different power factors). The analysis is carried out starting from real high resolution electricity and heat consumption profiles taken from field trials on micro-generation [13]. An input–output black box approach, such as in [14], [15], [16], is then used to model the EHP for different types and operating characteristics, which “transforms” heat profiles into electricity ones taking into account real-time varying performance of the EHP (from manufacturers’ curves) and the relevant AH operation. The electricity profiles obtained by combination of the base consumption profiles and the ones from the EHP are then input into an LV network analysis tool specifically developed. The tool is implemented in Microsoft Excel-VBA and integrates the OpenDSS software tool [17] (which is able to solve three-phase unbalanced power flows, intrinsic characteristic of LV networks) as a load flow engine. A number of numerical studies are performed in a Monte Carlo fashion to test the model developed and identify implications of electrification of heating under different conditions and for different applications and scenarios, with particular reference to the UK situation. This Monte Carlo approach is crucial to cope with the uncertainties that Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) could face with respect to EHP location, size, operation pattern, and so forth. Thus, the impact results are given in terms of expected values and relevant uncertainty (measured through the standard deviation indicator) rather than in a deterministic fashion as in most studies.
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the approach followed to derive electricity, heat and EHP electric load profiles for network studies. Section 3 discusses the methodology developed for LV network impact analysis and the relevant tool that has been built. Section 4 presents and discusses different numerical applications to test the methodology and quantify the impact of different EHP types in different scenarios. Section 5 contains the final remarks and bridges to future work.
Section snippets
Electricity and heat load profiles
A critical aspect to get detailed network impact analysis is to have a proper temporal precision in the electrical load input data, particularly relevant to quantifying voltage quality issues based on equivalent 10-min resolution [18]. However, in most cases DNOs do not have any information at all available for individual residential customers, and in the best case only aggregated profiles at the MV level are available. Likewise, there are currently no detailed data available for EHPs, and it
Generalities about the methodology and OpenDSS
As aforementioned, from the network side it is critical that the methodology to assess EHP impact can model the single-phase connections of individual houses and is then capable to solve unbalanced load flows, properly taking into account temporal and spatial resolutions in order to capture diversity effects for different conditions. In addition, the model needs to be fast and flexible enough to run a number of time-series based scenario studies, possibly based on probabilistic or Monte Carlo
Test network
A number of case studies have been run to test and exemplify the capabilities of the tool developed and to provide strategic insights on the implications of different EHP scenarios in terms of network impact. More specifically, a network based on a LV test network, already used for previous assessment of distributed energy technologies [31], has been implemented to represent suburban areas of the UK, which is the most widespread situation. The main features of the test network (schematically
Concluding remarks
This paper has introduced a novel probabilistic methodology and relevant tool to assess the impact of EHPs on LV distribution networks. Real electricity and heat profiles have been taken as a starting point of the studies. Both Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) and Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) technologies have been modeled as black boxes with performance and heat capacity characteristics changing with operating conditions according to manufacturers’ curves, addressing in particular the need for
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Electricity North West Limited (ENWL) for partly supporting this work.
References (38)
Heat pumps and energy storage – the challenges of implementation
Appl. Energy
(2012)- et al.
Future use of heat pumps in Swedish district heating systems: Short- and long-term impact of policy instruments and planned investments
Appl. Energy
(2007) - et al.
Power requirements of ground source heat pumps in a residential area
Appl. Energy
(2013) - et al.
Energy and economic comparisons of domestic heat pumps and conventional heating systems in the British climate
Appl Energy
(1986) - et al.
Impacts of temporal precision in optimisation modelling of micro-combined heat and power
Energy
(2005) - et al.
Factors influencing the uptake of heat pump technology by the UK domestic sector
Renew Energy
(2010) - et al.
Distributed multi-generation: a comprehensive view
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2009) Cogeneration systems with electric heat pumps: energy-shifting properties and equivalent plant modelling
Energy Convers Manage
(2009)- et al.
Modelling the carbon-saving performance of domestic ground-source heat pumps
Energy Build
(2009) - et al.
Online voltage security assessment considering comfort-constrained demand response control of distributed heat pump systems
Appl Energy
(2012)
Distributed multi-generation systems. Energy models and analyses
Cited by (86)
Impact of locational pricing on the roll out of heat pumps in the UK
2024, Energy PolicyScenario generation of residential electricity consumption through sampling of historical data
2023, Sustainable Energy, Grids and NetworksVariability in electricity consumption by category of consumer: The impact on electricity load profiles
2023, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy SystemsA review of European low-voltage distribution networks
2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsThe effectiveness of decentralised electro-thermal load shifting strategies in low voltage network violation management
2022, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy SystemsCitation Excerpt :If so, then the resulting power flow will accelerate aging, or even immediately damage, existing cables (due to overheating caused by current flows in excess of rated cable capacity) or substations that are undersized for the load. Furthermore, the resistive nature of distribution cabling results in a voltage drop proportional to the current transmitted, and some studies suggest that HPs could cause localized drops that violate both EQSCR and EN 50160 power quality regulations [9,10]. Previous academic and industrial work has focused on determining the ADMD of heat pump installations.