Original article
Participation Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of 2 Models of Upper-Limb Rehabilitation for Children With Congenital Hemiplegia

Presented in part to the Australasian Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine, March 3–6, 2010, Christchurch, New Zealand; and the International Cerebral Palsy Conference, February 18–21, 2009, Sydney, Australia.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Abbott DF, Macdonell RA, Jackson GD, Boyd RN. Participation outcomes in a randomized trial of 2 models of upper-limb rehabilitation for children with congenital hemiplegia.

Objective

To determine if constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is more effective than bimanual training to improve occupational performance and participation in children with congenital hemiplegia.

Design

Single-blind randomized comparison trial with evaluations at baseline, 3, and 26 weeks.

Setting

Community facilities in 2 Australian states.

Participants

Referred sample of children (N=64; mean age ± SD, 10.2±2.7y, 52% boys) were matched for age, sex, side of hemiplegia, and upper-limb function and were randomized to CIMT or bimanual training. After random allocation, 100% of CIMT and 94% of the bimanual training group completed the intervention.

Interventions

Each intervention was delivered in day camps (total 60h over 10d) using a circus theme with goal-directed training. Children receiving CIMT wore a tailor-made glove during the camp.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Secondary measures included the Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H), Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment, and School Function Assessment.

Results

There were no between-group differences at baseline. Both groups made significant changes for COPM performance at 3 weeks (estimated mean difference =2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–3.6; P<.001 for CIMT; estimated mean difference=2.8; 95% CI, 2.2–3.4; P<.001 for bimanual training) that were maintained at 26 weeks. Significant gains were made in the personal care LIFE-H domain following CIMT (estimated mean difference=0.5; 95% CI, 0.1–0.9; P=.01) and bimanual training (estimated mean difference=0.6; 95% CI, 0.2–1.1; P=.006).

Conclusions

There were minimal differences between the 2 training approaches. Goal-directed, activity-based, upper-limb training, addressed through either CIMT or bimanual training achieved gains in occupational performance. Changes in participation on specific domains of participation assessments appear to correspond with identified goals.

Section snippets

Participants

The study was approved by the Ethics in Human Research Committees at The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne; La Trobe University; The Royal Children's Hospital and Health Services District, Brisbane; and The University of Queensland.

Children were eligible if they had: (1) congenital hemiplegia (5–16y); (2) the ability to follow instructions; (3) predominant spasticity with Modified Ashworth Scale score higher than 1 and 3 or less for wrist flexors, forearm pronators, and/or thumb adductors

Results

Sixty-four children with congenital hemiplegia entered the study and 62 completed the intervention. One child from bimanual training withdrew after the first day due to preexisting emotional difficulties, and 1 was injured prior to the commencement of intervention. There were 18 TDC recruited (11 girls) with a mean age 8.7 years (range, 5–14y). The trial profile is depicted in figure 1.

Discussion

This randomized comparison trial of CIMT and bimanual training for children with congenital hemiplegia aimed to determine whether an activity-based intervention could impact perceived occupational performance and societal participation, an important consideration given the resource intensive nature of the interventions. Overall, results suggest there were minimal differences between the 2 intervention groups for the achievement of individualized outcomes and reduction of participation

Conclusions

In our large randomized comparison trial of CIMT and bimanual training, both interventions lead to equivalent gains in perceived occupational performance. Modest changes in participation in specific life habits were achieved by both groups, which corresponded with goals identified by children and their caregivers. Specifically focused interventions impacting participation would need to address a range of environmental, attitudinal, and child-related factors restricting societal participation.

Acknowledgements

We thank Rose Gilmore, OT, for the coordination of the Melbourne camps and Kerry Provan, OT, for the coordination of the Brisbane camps. We thank and acknowledge the support of the YMCA of Victoria and all the volunteers who helped during the camps, visiting volunteer therapists (Katrijn Klingels, Hilda Feys, PhD, from the Katholeik University Leuven, Anna Mackey, PhD, from the University of Auckland, Madonna Jeffries from Sunshine Coast Children's Therapy Centre, Queensland), the therapy staff

References (26)

  • T.L. Sutcliffe et al.

    Cortical reorganization after modified constraint-induced movement therapy in pediatric hemiplegic cerebral palsy

    J Child Neurol

    (2007)
  • A. Martin et al.

    Case report: ICF-level changes in a preschooler after constraint-induced movement therapy

    Am J Occup Ther

    (2004)
  • P.B. Aarts et al.

    Effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial

    Neurorehabil Neural Repair

    (2010)
  • Cited by (55)

    • At-home and in-group delivery of constraint-induced movement therapy in children with hemiparesis: A systematic review

      2018, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most found a significant improvement at both posttreatment and follow-up. Four revealed a significant improvement at both posttreatment and follow-up [11,46,50,57]. One study showed a significant improvement at only posttreatment [48], whereas another found a significant improvement at only follow-up [47].

    • Relation between unimanual capacities and bimanual performance in hemiplegic cerebral-palsied children: Impact of synkinesis

      2015, European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Few tools, however, are reliable and usable to assess bimanual capacities, and hardly any of them focus on bimanual performance. Yet the aim of any therapeutic action is not only to improve analytic or test situations, that is to say functional “capacities”, or what the child can do … but therapeutic action tends to improve real life situations, that is to say “performance”, or what the child really does, trying to have an effect on participation.2,3 Recent studies have focused on the relation between global motor capacity and global motor performance in CP children by using GMFM4,5; others have searched for a link between lesion aspects and unilateral motor capacity in the upper limb6; but few studies have focused specifically on the link between unimanual capacity and bimanual performance in the upper limb.7

    • Comparison of dosage of intensive upper limb therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy: How big should the therapy pill be?

      2015, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Each task was capped at 120 s to reduce frustration with a maximum possible total score of 720 s. Outcomes of Study 1 (mCIMT vs bimanual therapy: 60 h full dose) have been previously reported (Sakzewski et al., 2011a, 2011b, 2011c). In this paper, we report secondary analysis comparing results from Study 1 to unpublished results of Study 2 (mCIMT vs bimanual therapy: total 30 h, half dose).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) for Dora Lush postgraduate scholarship (scholarship no. NHMRC 384488), a Career Development (grant no. NHMRC 473860), and a project grant for INCITE: A Randomised Trial of Novel Upper Limb Rehabilitation in children with Congenital Hemiplegia (grant no. NHMRC 368500).

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

    Trial Registration Number: ANZCRT00320714.

    View full text