Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 130, 1 November 2018, Pages 286-292
Appetite

Moving beyond the “eating addiction” versus “food addiction” debate: Comment on Schulte et al. (2017)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.025Get rights and content

Abstract

In a recent commentary, Schulte et al. (2017) argued that addictive-like eating should be conceptualized as a substance use disorder rather than a behavioural addiction, and noted that many parallels that Hebebrand et al. (2014) drew between addictive-like eating and behavioural addictions apply likewise to substance use disorders. However, we argue that many of the arguments advanced by Schulte et al. (2017) in support of a substance-based food addiction model, including the important role played by ingested substances, are nonspecific. That is, these arguments apply equally well to behavioural addictions and other mental disorders, notably eating disorders, which raises the question of whether the phenomenon of addictive-like eating is encompassed by existing eating disorder diagnoses. Similarities between addictive-like eating and substance use, no matter how compelling, do not ensure the validity or clinical utility of a substance-based food addiction model and should not drive the conceptualization of addictive-like eating. The present commentary discusses problems with Schulte et al.’s (2017) arguments for substance-based food addiction, and draws attention to alternative conceptualizations of addictive-like eating which risk being overlooked when this conversation is framed as a dichotomous debate between the food and eating addiction models.

Section snippets

The role of ingested substances

In support of the substance-based food addiction model, Schulte et al., 2017a, Schulte et al., 2017b cite evidence for the key role played by ingestion of food in the development of addictive-like eating. They note that the ingestion or absorption of a specific rewarding substance is a defining feature shared by substance use disorders and addictive-like eating, whereas behavioural addictions typically lack an ingested substance. The instrument most frequently used to operationalize

Beyond the “eating addiction” versus “food addiction” debate

The question of how to conceptualize addictive-like eating has often been framed as a debate between two perspectives: substance based “food addiction” and behavioural “eating addiction” (Hebebrand et al., 2014; Schulte et al., 2017). Narrowly framing the question of how best to conceptualize addictive-like eating by contrasting these two models may overlook other potentially valid ways to conceptualize addictive-like eating. At least three other conceptualizations of addictive-like eating have

Future directions

To move toward a valid conceptualization of addictive-like eating, we must generate predictions - ideally falsifiable - to test the theories of eating addiction and food addiction models. Specifically, research is needed to determine to what degree the construct of addictive-like eating holds incremental clinical utility over and above existing eating disorder diagnoses, and to elucidate the mechanisms that drive addictive-like eating.

As a first step toward examining these questions,

Conclusions

The main arguments advanced by Schulte et al., 2017a, Schulte et al., 2017b in support of a substance-based food addiction model—i.e., the important roles played by behaviour and ingested substances– are nonspecific. That is, these arguments apply equally well to behavioural addictions and other mental disorders, including eating disorders. The existing evidence of differential addictive potential of foods is preliminary and insufficient to validate the food addiction model. To support such a

Author note

This work was supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS), Montreal, QC, and by Mitacs Globalink, Canada.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References (63)

  • N.M. Malika et al.

    Low-income women's conceptualizations of food craving and food addiction

    Eating Behaviors

    (2015)
  • C.R. Markus et al.

    Eating dependence and weight gain; no human evidence for a ‘sugar-addiction’ model of overweight

    Appetite

    (2017)
  • P.J. Rogers

    Food and drug addictions: Similarities and differences

    Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

    (2017)
  • H.K. Ruddock et al.

    Eating to live or living to eat? Exploring the causal attributions of self-perceived food addiction

    Appetite

    (2015)
  • E.M. Schulte et al.

    Shared and unique mechanisms underlying binge eating disorder and addictive disorders

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (2016)
  • E.M. Schulte et al.

    A commentary on the “eating addiction” versus “food addiction” perspectives on addictive-like food consumption

    Appetite

    (2017)
  • D.G. Smith et al.

    The neurobiological underpinnings of obesity and binge eating: A rationale for adopting the food addiction model

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • D.W. Tang et al.

    Food and drug cues activate similar brain regions: A meta-analysis of functional MRI studies

    Physiology & Behavior

    (2012)
  • U. Vainik et al.

    Eating traits questionnaires as a continuum of a single concept. Uncontrolled eating

    Appetite

    (2015)
  • N.D. Volkow et al.

    The brain on drugs: From reward to addiction

    Cell

    (2015)
  • M. Alonso-Alonso et al.

    Food reward system: Current perspectives and future research needs

    Nutrition Reviews

    (2015)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2013)
  • D. Benton et al.

    A meta-analysis of the relationship between brain dopamine receptors and obesity: A matter of changes in behavior rather than food addiction?

    International Journal of Obesity (2005)

    (2016)
  • P.R. Blair et al.

    Is there an allegiance effect for assessment instruments? Actuarial risk assessment as an exemplar

    Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

    (2008)
  • S.A. Brown

    Drug effect expectancies and addictive behavior change

    Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

    (1993)
  • M.C. Cornelis et al.

    A genome-wide investigation of food addiction

    Obesity

    (2016)
  • C. Curtis et al.

    A qualitative study of binge eating and obesity from an addiction perspective

    Eating Disorders

    (2014)
  • C. Davis

    Compulsive overeating as an addictive behavior: Overlap between food addiction and binge eating disorder

    Current Obesity Reports

    (2013)
  • M.J. Dixon et al.

    The impact of sound in modern multiline video slot machine play

    Journal of Gambling Studies

    (2014)
  • G. Finlayson

    Food addiction and obesity: Unnecessary medicalization of hedonic overeating

    Nature Reviews: Endocrinology, Advance Online Publication

    (2017)
  • A.N. Gearhardt et al.

    Can food be addictive? Public health and policy implications

    Addiction

    (2011)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Prevalence and correlates of food addiction: Systematic review of studies with the YFAS 2.0

      2021, Obesity Research and Clinical Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, this perception can reveal more of a disturbed eating attitude, than a proper clinical condition [11,71–73]. As information about obesity on social media, and spread by health professionals, have consistently increased in the past decades, this propaganda might reflect into the fear of “getting fat”, avoidance of certain foods and self-imposed restriction of foods that can be understood as “forbidden” and “addictive” even by normal-weight nonclinical population [10,72]. The social stigma of obesity might also explain the appeal of a cultural fight against “obesogenic” foods and might reflect the fear of general population to develop an addictive-like behavior in relation to food.

    • Body image disturbance partially explains eating-related psychosocial impairment in food addiction

      2021, Eating Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Polarizing debate surrounds the concept of food addiction (FA; Lacroix, Tavares, & von Ranson, 2018), with perspectives ranging from enthusiastic acceptance (Davis et al., 2011), to viewing it as an inappropriate medicalization of hedonic eating behaviour (Finlayson, 2017).

    • Conceptualizing addictive-like eating: A qualitative analysis

      2019, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, although we refrained from aligning ourselves with any one perspective on addictive-like eating and considered multiple interpretations of our findings, complete theoretical neutrality is impossible for any researcher to achieve, particularly in the context of polarizing debate. For this reason, we call for additional original qualitative and quantitative research as well as replications by independent investigators to guard against experimenter allegiance effects (Lacroix et al., 2018). Future qualitative and quantitative research involving clinical and non-clinical populations may clarify whether addictive-like eating contributes incremental clinical utility beyond existing eating disorder diagnoses, and whether the eating pattern itself explains distress beyond what is experienced as a function of anticipated or experienced weight gain.

    • “There is no way to avoid the first bite”: A qualitative investigation of addictive-like eating in treatment-seeking Brazilian women and men

      2019, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      The controversial construct of addictive-like eating has received increasing attention in recent years (Meule, 2015), generating a great deal of theoretical debate (e.g., Lacroix, Tavares, & von Ranson, 2018; Schulte, Potenza, & Gearhardt, 2018).

    • A history of “food addiction”

      2019, Compulsive Eating Behavior and Food Addiction: Emerging Pathological Constructs
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text