Elsevier

Aquatic Botany

Volume 141, July 2017, Pages 1-9
Aquatic Botany

Biogeographical comparison of the emergent macrophyte, Sagittaria platyphylla in its native and introduced ranges

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2017.05.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sagittaria platyphylla, native to southern USA is highly invasive in Australia and South Africa.

  • We conducted a biogeographical survey to identify factors that might explain its invasion success.

  • Achene production of introduced range plants was 40% greater than for native range plants.

  • We hypothesise that enemy release may induce reproductive plasticity in S. platyphylla.

Abstract

Understanding why some plant species become invasive is important to predict and prevent future weed threats and identify appropriate management strategies. Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain why plants become invasive, yet few studies have quantitatively compared plant and population parameters between native and introduced range populations to gain an objective perspective on the causes of plant invasion. The present study uses a biogeographical field survey to compare morphological and reproductive traits and abundance between the native range (USA) and two introduced ranges (Australia and South Africa) of Sagittaria platyphylla (Engelm.) J.G. Sm (Alismataceae), a highly invasive freshwater macrophyte. Introduced and native populations differed in sexual reproductive output with the number of achenes per fruiting head and individual achene weight found to be 40% and 50% greater in introduced populations respectively. However, no other morphological traits were found to be consistently different between the native and both introduced ranges, especially after taking into account differences in environmental conditions between the three ranges. Although populations in introduced regions were larger and occupied greater percentage cover, no differences in plant density were evident. Our results suggest that, apart from sexual reproduction, many of the trait patterns observed in S. platyphylla are influenced by environmental and habitat conditions within the native and invaded ranges. We conclude that the enemy release hypothesis best explains the results observed for sexual reproduction. In particular, we hypothesise that a release from natural enemies, specifically a pre-dispersal seed predator, may induce reproductive plasticity in S. platyphylla.

Introduction

For many decades, invasion ecologists have sought to determine the key attributes that make some plant species successful invaders (Elton, 1958, Baker et al., 1965, van Kleunen et al., 2014) and why some communities are more susceptible to invasion than others (Crawley, 1987, Kolar and Lodge, 2001). Understanding why certain plants become invasive is important for predicting and preventing future weed threats (Groves et al., 2001) and for identifying appropriate management strategies (Blumenthal, 2006; Herrera et al., 2011).

The contribution of traits to the success of invasive species must be context dependent (Pyšek and Richardson, 2007, van Kleunen et al., 2014). Nevertheless, certain traits appear to be common amongst many invasive plant species. These traits include high phenotypic plasticity, rapid growth to sexual maturity, sexual and asexual reproductive strategies, high tolerance to environmental heterogeneity, dispersal capabilities and an ability to outcompete other species (Baker et al., 1965, Sakai et al., 2001). Such traits may be inherent within the species making the species pre-adapted to being invasive (Baker et al., 1965). Alternatively, rapid evolutionary change within the species may predispose the species to being a successful invader following introduction into a new range (Müller-Schärer et al., 2004).

Along with intrinsic factors, extrinsic factors such as climate, disturbance regimes, resource availability and competitive abilities of the resident species, may also facilitate invasion in the new range (Crawley, 1987, Shea and Chesson, 2002).

Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain why some plant species become invasive (Keane and Crawley, 2002, Shea and Chesson, 2002, Blumenthal, 2005, Catford et al., 2009). A myriad of approaches have been used to test their validity, such as observational and experimental, biogeographical and community comparative studies (see review by van Kleunen et al., 2010).

Prior to testing any hypotheses, empirical comparisons of plant performance between the introduced and native range should be conducted to determine whether there are explicit differences that can be attributed to any of the invasion hypotheses, such as enemy release, evolution of invasiveness, empty niche or novel weapons (Hierro et al., 2005). Surprisingly, few studies have quantitatively compared plant and population parameters between native and introduced ranges to gain an objective perspective on the causes of plant invasion (but see Hinz et al., 2012, Williams et al., 2010), and even fewer have considered more than one invasive range.

Sagittaria platyphylla (Engelm.) J.G.Sm (delta arrowhead, or colloquially referred to as “sagittaria” in Australia) (Alismataceae), is an emergent freshwater perennial macrophyte with phyllodial submersed or emersed lanceolate petiolate leaves up to 150 cm tall (Supplementary material Fig. S1) (Haynes and Hellquist, 2000). It is indigenous to south eastern United States of America (USA) but has become highly invasive in some introduced areas, such as Australia and the Republic of South Africa (South Africa) (Supplementary material Fig. S2), where it rapidly dominates shallow fresh water environments such as wetlands, streams, riverbanks, ditches and irrigation channels (Adair et al., 2012). Plants have a prolonged 5–6 month flowering season (summer-fall) and produce multiple fruiting heads arranged in whorls of three on erect, racemose inflorescences (Haynes and Hellquist, 2000). An average of 850 achenes per fruiting head and 6900 achenes per inflorescence has been recorded on S. platyphylla in Australia (Flower, 2004). The light, buoyant achenes are dispersed along waterways collecting in still pools and river berms (Broadhurst and Chong, 2011). When water levels recede, exposed achenes germinate readily on the saturated mud (Kwong unpublished data). Vegetative reproduction via stolons is prolific throughout spring and summer. Tubers are produced at the base of roots in autumn and allow populations to rapidly regenerate in spring (Adair et al., 2012).

For the present study, we undertook a four-year biogeographical field survey to compare morphological and reproductive traits and abundance of S. platyphylla between the native range (USA) and two introduced ranges (Australia and South Africa). Research questions examined include: (1) Are S. platyphylla populations in Australia and South Africa more abundant in terms of population size and plant density?; (2) Are individual plants larger in the introduced ranges?; (3) Is sexual reproductive performance greater in introduced ranges compared to the native range?; and (4) Are observed effects maintained after accounting for differences in native and introduced environments? The findings are used to hypothesise possible mechanisms of invasion success for S. platyphylla in its introduced ranges.

Section snippets

Field surveys

A total of 84 S. platyphylla populations were sampled, at least for population size, water depth and habitat type. Of these, 41 were from the native USA range and 35 and eight were from the introduced ranges of Australia and South Africa, respectively (Fig. 1). Of these 84 populations, 25 were assessed for plant density, 47 were used for plant morphology measurements, fruit production was measured on 62 and achene production was measured on 64.

Populations were defined as discrete stands located

Population characteristics

There were differences in the habitat type occupied by S. platyphylla between the native and introduced ranges (P = 0.031 using permutation test based on likelihood chi-square statistic; χ2 = 7.16), but there was no difference between the two introduced ranges, Australia and South Africa (P = 0.12 using permutation test based on likelihood chi-square statistic; χ2 = 5.20). In the native range, 59% of populations occurred in natural or semi-natural habitats such as wetlands, riverbanks and along the

Population size and plant density

Several of the most widely cited invasion hypotheses, notably the enemy release (ERH) (Keane and Crawley, 2002) and evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) (Blossey and Nötzold, 1995), predict that a number of plant growth metrics increase in invaded ranges over native areas. In contrast to our first predication we found no difference in plant density between the native range (USA) and two introduced ranges (Australia and South Africa). However, other biogeographical studies have also

Conclusions

Our comparison of key trait patterns associated with invasiveness between introduced and native populations of an aquatic weed, Sagittaria platyphylla revealed that plants differed in achene production per fruiting head and achene weight. However, no other morphological traits were found to be consistently different between the native and two introduced ranges. Although populations in introduced regions were larger and had greater percentage cover, overall, no differences in plant density were

Author contributions

R.M.K., J-L.S. and P.T.G jointly conceived the ideas of the study. Data was collected in each country by various authors: USA (R.M.K, J-L.S. and N.E.H), Australia (R.M.K and J-L.S) and South Africa (R.M.K and G.D.M). K.L.B. performed the statistical analyses. R.M.K led the writing of the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to revisions.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (Project No. PJR-007053), Murrumbidgee Irrigation Ltd. and the Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (formerly Department of Environment and Primary Industries) (Australia) for project funding. In the USA we thank Brian Keener from the University of West Alabama Herbarium for plant identification and staff from the U.S Department of Agriculture, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,

References (36)

  • R.M. Keane et al.

    Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2002)
  • C.S. Kolar et al.

    Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2001)
  • H. Müller-Schärer et al.

    Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2004)
  • K. Shea et al.

    Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2002)
  • R. Adair et al.

    The biology of Australian weeds 60. Sagittaria platyphylla (Engelmann) JG Smith and Sagittaria calycina Engelmann

    Plant Protect. Quart.

    (2012)
  • A.A. Agrawal

    Transgenerational consequences of plant responses to herbivory: an adaptive maternal effect?

    Am. Nat.

    (2001)
  • C. Alba et al.

    Exploring the potential for climatic factors, herbivory, and co-occurring vegetation to shape performance in native and introduced populations of Verbascum thapsus

    Biol. Invasions

    (2012)
  • H.G. Baker et al.

    Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds

  • D. Bastlová-Hanzélyová

    Comparative study of native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria: population characteristics, site and community relationships

  • M. Beckmann et al.

    Local performance of six clonal alien species differs between native and invasive regions in Germany and New Zealand

    Aust. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • B. Blossey et al.

    Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis

    J. Ecol.

    (1995)
  • D. Blumenthal

    Interrelated causes of plant invasion

    Science

    (2005)
  • Broadhurst, L., Chong, C., 2011, Examining clonal propagation of the aquatic weed Sagittaria platyphylla. RIRDC...
  • Y.M. Buckley et al.

    Are invasives bigger? A global study of seed size variation in two invasive shrubs

    Ecology

    (2003)
  • J.A. Catford et al.

    Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework

    Divers. Distrib.

    (2009)
  • M. Chapman et al.

    Sagittaria strategic plan 2009

    Unpublished Report to Goulburn Murray Water

    (2009)
  • M. Crawley

    What makes a community invasible?

  • S.K. Ebeling et al.

    The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range

    Divers. Distrib.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Functional traits in macrophyte studies: Current trends and future research agenda

      2020, Aquatic Botany
      Citation Excerpt :

      This could either lead to loss of genetic diversity, due to hybridization with native species, or higher vigor to hybrids in case of hybridization with non-natives, as observed for Ludwigia spp. in Brazil (Thouvenot et al., 2013). Moreover, Kwong et al. (2017) found that fruit weight and fruit number in Sagittaria platyphylla was higher in introduced ranges than in native habitats, due to the absence of specialist herbivores. This work suggests the importance of evaluating the effects of biotic interactions on various traits categories and not only on biochemistry and productivity, as in most papers analyzed here (e.g., Grutters et al., 2016; Jiménez-Ramos et al., 2018).

    • Could enemy release explain invasion success of Sagittaria platyphylla in Australia and South Africa?

      2019, Aquatic Botany
      Citation Excerpt :

      For S. platyphylla, there is some support for this third prediction. In our other study on the biogeographical comparison of plant and population traits, we found evidence for an increase in plant dominance (percentage cover) and reproductive performance (achene production and weight) in introduced versus native range populations (Kwong et al., 2017). As these trait differences could not be explained by differences in environmental conditions between the native and introduced ranges, we hypothesize that these may be related to release from enemy pressure.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text