Elsevier

Atmospheric Environment

Volume 99, December 2014, Pages 77-84
Atmospheric Environment

Reassessing the photochemical production of methanol from peroxy radical self and cross reactions using the STOCHEM-CRI global chemistry and transport model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.056Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Photochemical production contributes significantly to the global CH3OH sources.

  • The atmospheric life-time of CH3OH is found to be 6.1 days.

  • The reaction of CH3O2 with OH could be a significant source of CH3OH.

Abstract

Methanol (CH3OH) is an oxygenated volatile organic compound (VOC) and one of the most abundant species present in the troposphere. The mass of CH3OH in the atmospheric reservoir, its annual mass flux from sources to sinks, and its global budget have been investigated using STOCHEM-CRI, a global three-dimensional chemistry transport model. Our study shows that the global burden of methanol is 5 Tg. The atmospheric life-time of CH3OH is found to be 6.1 days which falls within the range of previous modelling studies. The impact of peroxy radicals on the photochemical production of CH3OH has been studied and suggests that NMVOCs (non-methane Volatile Organic Compounds) are an important source of both peroxy radicals and CH3OH. The photochemical production routes of CH3OH are found to be 48 Tg/yr, which are higher than the previous studies and contributes significantly to the total global methanol sources of 287 Tg/yr. An additional CH3OH production of 8.2 Tg/yr from the reaction of methyl peroxy radicals (CH3O2) with hydroxyl radicals (OH) could be a significant additional source of CH3OH particularly over the tropical oceans which would lead to a revision of the global sources and life cycle of CH3OH.

Introduction

Methanol (CH3OH) is one of the most abundant Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) with concentrations of 1–10 ppbv in the continental boundary layer (Singh et al., 1995, Heikes et al., 2002). CH3OH is transported globally (Singh et al., 2001) and accounts for a minor role in tropospheric oxidant photochemistry (Fehsenfeld et al., 1992, Kelly et al., 1994, Monod et al., 2000). CH3OH oxidation is a non-negligible source of formaldehyde and carbon monoxide and leads to production of tropospheric ozone (Tie et al., 2003). However, CH3OH sources and sinks are poorly quantified, with an estimated global source strength ranging from 120 to 340 Tg/yr and total sinks ranging from 40 to 270 Tg/yr (Jacob et al., 2005, Millet et al., 2008). There are large regional differences in the atmospheric mixing ratios of CH3OH as a result of the wide variation in the source strengths from biogenic and anthropogenic contributions.

The loss due to OH oxidation is the main sink for atmospheric CH3OH. The other minor removal processes including dry deposition, wet removal and oceanic up-take are poorly constrained. The overall atmospheric lifetime for CH3OH with respect to the gross oceanic uptake, OH, and deposition is approximately 5–10 days (Jacob et al., 2005, Millet et al., 2008, Stavrakou et al., 2011). The resultant atmospheric lifetime implies that CH3OH distribution is affected by surface emission and chemistry as well as by atmospheric transport. Direct emission sources of CH3OH include living plants, plant decay, anthropogenic production, and biomass burning. CH3OH is produced in most land plants during cell wall growth (Fall, 2003). The biogenic emissions are supposed to constitute the largest fraction of the global source of CH3OH (Stavrakou et al., 2011). Photochemical production is another important source of CH3OH, produced by the reaction of methyl peroxy radicals with itself and other higher organic peroxy radicals (RO2) (e.g. Lightfoot et al., 1992, Tyndall et al., 2001), which provide a diffuse source most importantly in the remote atmosphere (e.g. Lewis et al., 2005).CH3O2 + CH3O2 → CH3OH + HCHO + O2CH3O2 + CH3O2 → CH3O + CH3O + O2CH3O2 + RO2 → CH3OH + R–HO + O2CH3O2 + RO2 → ROH + HCHO + O2

Jacob et al. (2005) found that reaction (1a) contributed 85% of the photochemical source and the remaining 15% was contributed by reaction (2a), where RO2 radicals were predominantly derived from biogenic isoprene, for CH3OH production and was confined largely to the continental boundary layer (CBL). CH3OH mixing ratios predicted by their global chemical transport model for the CBL were significantly smaller than measured values-suggesting a large missing source of CH3OH in the CBL (Jacob et al., 2005). Thus, reassessing the photochemical production of CH3OH from RO2 may improve global estimates of the CH3OH budget.

The atmospheric source of CH3OH from reaction (1a) and (2a) were estimated in previous studies (Singh et al., 2000, Heikes et al., 2002, Galbally and Kirstine, 2002, Tie et al., 2003, von Kuhlmann et al., 2003a, von Kuhlmann et al., 2003b, Jacob et al., 2005, Millet et al., 2008, Wells et al., 2014) using different global tropospheric chemistry models and was found to be in the range of 18–38 Tg/yr. The variation of the estimates for different studies are as a result of the differences in the abundances of NO and HO2 (which can act as dominant sinks of CH3O2), the CH3O2 reaction rate coefficients, the yield of CH3OH from reaction (1a) and (2a), and the amount of higher peroxy radicals RO2 (especially isoprene and terpene derived peroxy radicals). Jacob et al. (2005) found large discrepancies between observations from the PEM-Tropics B aircraft mission over the South Pacific with their modelling results, which they attributed to an under prediction of the photochemical source.

Most of the observations of atmospheric CH3OH concentrations consist of short-term records, with very limited spatial and temporal coverage, so large uncertainties exist in the magnitude and distribution of global CH3OH (Heikes et al., 2002, Jacob et al., 2005). Quantification of CH3OH distributions and its global budget is necessary before accounting for its role in tropospheric oxidant photochemistry. In this study, the global distribution of CH3OH has been produced using the STOCHEM-CRI global 3-dimensional chemistry transport model (Utembe et al., 2010, Archibald et al., 2010, Percival et al., 2013). We also incorporated the yields of CH3OH from the reaction of methyl peroxy radicals (CH3O2) with hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the model that reduce the discrepancies between measurements and models highlighted over the oceans by Jacob et al. (2005).

Section snippets

Global Chemistry Transport Model STOCHEM-CRI

STOCHEM used in this study, is a global 3-dimensional Chemistry Transport Model (CTM) in which 50,000 constant mass air parcels are advected using a Lagrangian approach allowing the chemistry and transport processes to be uncoupled. STOCHEM is an ‘offline’ model with the transport and radiation codes driven by archived meteorological data, generated by the UKMO Unified Model (UM) at a climate resolution of 1.25° longitude × 0.83° latitude × 12 vertical levels (Johns et al., 1997). A detailed

Results and discussion

Table 3 summarizes the global model budget of CH3OH. The global source (287 Tg/yr) of CH3OH includes contributions from direct emission sources (83%) and photochemical production (17%), consistent with the results of Jacob et al. (2005). The photochemical production of CH3OH is dominated by the reaction of CH3O2 with itself. The global sink is dominated by OH oxidation (76%), with another contribution from dry deposition (24%). In this model study, 48 Tg/yr of CH3OH is produced photochemically

Conclusion

In this paper, we used STOCHEM-CRI, a global three-dimensional chemistry transport model to capture the global distribution and seasonal cycle of CH3OH. CH3OH has relatively long lifetime for a VOC of 6.1 days, thus a large amount of CH3OH can potentially be transported from the continental boundary layer into the free troposphere where they have an impact on the formation of photochemical oxidants. The seasonal cycle of photochemical production of CH3OH is controlled to a large extent by the

Acknowledgements

We thank NERC, GWR (Studentship for ATA), EPSRC (studentship for MCC) and EUROCHLOR under whose auspices various elements of this work were carried out.

References (40)

  • J. Burkert et al.

    Peroxy radical and related trace gas measurements in the boundary layer above the Atlantic Ocean

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2001)
  • K.E. Cady-Pereira et al.

    Methanol from TES global observations: retrieval algorithm and seasonal and spatial variability

    Atmos. Chem. Phys.

    (2012)
  • W.J. Collins et al.

    Tropospheric ozone in a global-scale three-dimensional Lagrangian model and its response to NOx emission controls

    J. Atmos. Chem.

    (1997)
  • M.C. Cooke

    Global Modelling of Atmospheric Trace Gases Using the CRI Mechanism

    (2010)
  • L.K. Emmons et al.

    Data composites of airborne observations of tropospheric ozone and its precursors

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2000)
  • R. Fall

    Abundant oxygenates in the atmosphere: a biochemical perspective

    Chem. Rev.

    (2003)
  • F. Fehsenfeld et al.

    Emissions of volatile organic compounds from vegetation and the implications for atmospheric chemistry

    Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles

    (1992)
  • G.A. Folberth et al.

    Interactive chemistry in the Laboratorie de Météorologie Dynamique general circulation model: model description and impact analysis of biogenic hydrocarbons on tropospheric chemistry

    Atmos. Chem. Phys.

    (2006)
  • I.E. Galbally et al.

    The production of methanol by flowering plants and the global cycle of methanol

    J. Atmos. Chem.

    (2002)
  • C. Granier et al.

    POET, a Database of Surface Emissions of Ozone Precursors

    (2005)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Changes to simulated global atmospheric composition resulting from recent revisions to isoprene oxidation chemistry

      2021, Atmospheric Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Emissions that fall under surface emissions are biomass burning, vegetation, ocean and soil and are dispersed using monthly two-dimensional source maps at a resolution of 5° longitude by 5° latitude (Olivier et al., 1996). The STOCHEM emissions inventory is discussed in detail in Khan et al. (2014). In STOCHEM, a simple approach of emitting isoprene is used at a rate proportional to the cosine of the solar zenith angle during the day with no emissions at night.

    • Global modelling studies of hydrogen and its isotopomers using STOCHEM-CRI: Likely radiative forcing consequences of a future hydrogen economy

      2020, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      STOCHEM-CRI has been employed to describe the tropospheric distribution of ozone [19–21] and of organic aerosol [22]. It has been used to explore different aspects of tropospheric chemistry involving formaldehyde [23], peroxynitric acid [24], the ozonolysis of ethene [25], Criegee intermediates [26], methanol [27], organic peroxy radicals [28], organic hydroperoxides [29], acetone [30], nitrate radicals [31], alkyl nitrates [32], dimethyl sulphide [33], peroxyacetyl nitrate [34] and sesquiterpenes [35]. These studies each include a comprehensive comparison between observations and the predictions from STOCHEM-CRI.

    • The impact of global aviation NO<inf>x</inf> emissions on tropospheric composition changes from 2005 to 2011

      2016, Atmospheric Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      All sources of surface emissions (anthropogenic, biomass burning, vegetation, soil, oceans, and other) are based on 2-D source maps. The global totals of all the 2-D input emissions can be found in Khan et al. (2014). Emission totals for CH4 have been taken from the inverse model study of Mikaloff-Fletcher et al. (2004), except for the ocean emissions which are from Houweling et al. (2000).

    • Global modeling of the C<inf>1</inf>-C<inf>3</inf> alkyl nitrates using STOCHEM-CRI

      2015, Atmospheric Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      The emissions data employed in the base case STOCHEM model were adapted from the Precursor of Ozone and their Effects in the Troposphere (POET) inventory (Granier et al., 2005) for the year 1998. More details about the emissions data can be found in Khan et al. (2014). The Base simulation as well as a further four simulations were performed in this study which were defined and listed in Table 1.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Now at the Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 3PB, UK.

    2

    Now at the School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

    3

    Now at the NCAS-Climate and the Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

    View full text