Research paper
Assessment of muscle mass using ultrasound with minimal versus maximal pressure compared with computed tomography in critically ill adult patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2020.10.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Preserved skeletal muscle mass identified using computed tomography (CT) predicts improved outcomes from critical illness; however, CT imaging have few limitations such that it involves a radiation dose and transferring patients out of the intensive care unit. This study aimed to assess in critically ill patients the relationship between muscle mass estimates obtained using minimally invasive ultrasound techniques with both minimal and maximal pressure compared with CT images at the third lumber vertebra level.

Methods

All patients were treated in a single Australian intensive care unit. Eligible patients had paired assessments, within a 72-h window, of muscle mass by ultrasound (quadriceps muscle layer thickness in centimetres, with maximal and minimal pressure) and CT axial cross-sectional area (cm2). Data are presented as mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), and frequencies [n (%)].

Results

Thirty-five patients [mean (standard deviation) age = 55 (16) years, median (interquartile range) body mass index = 27 (25–32) kg/m2, and 26 (74%) men] contributed 41 paired measurements. Quadriceps muscle thickness measured using the maximal pressure technique was a strong independent predictor of lumbar muscle cross-sectional area. Within a multivariate mixed linear regression model and adjusting for sex, age, and body mass index, for every 1 cm increase in quadriceps muscle layer thickness, the lumbar muscle cross-sectional area increased by 35 cm2 (95% confidence interval = 11–59 cm2). Similar univariate associations were observed using minimal pressure; however, as per multivariate analysis, there was no strength in this relationship [8 cm2 (95% confidence interval = –5 to 22 cm2)].

Conclusion

Ultrasound assessment of the quadriceps muscle using maximal pressure reasonably predicts the skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra level of critically ill patients. However, there is substantial uncertainty within these regression estimates, and this may reduce the current utility of this technique as a minimally invasive surrogate for CT assessment of skeletal muscle mass.

Introduction

Reduced skeletal muscle mass, determined by muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) at the lumbar vertebra (L3), using computed tomography (CT), has been shown to be an independent risk factor for increased mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients.[1], [2], [3], [4] Because of the radiation dose involved with CT imaging and the requirements for moving patients out of the intensive care unit (ICU), CT has limited utility as a widespread and repeatable method to quantify body composition.

Accordingly, minimally invasive techniques that can be performed at the bedside, such as ultrasound, may be useful to quantify muscle mass as part of usual care or within a clinical trial evaluating nutritional and/or physical therapy.[5], [6], [7], [8] Ultrasound is minimally invasive, and protocols using multiple anatomical sites for muscle thickness analysis have been validated against whole-body skeletal muscle mass using magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy individuals.6,9 However, in critically ill patients, the most appropriate ultrasound protocol to measure a muscle groups, such as quadriceps, remains uncertain.7,10 There is further uncertainty as to whether the quadriceps muscle group is a robust estimate of the skeletal muscle CSA obtained by CT imaging, which remains the methodology that has proven associations between muscle mass and outcomes.7,10 Therefore, it remains unclear whether ultrasound is a useful tool to assess low muscle muscularity or if it could be used to monitor the effect of interventions, such as nutrition therapy, in critically ill patients.7

The primary aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the skeletal muscle CSA assessed using CT imaging and quadriceps muscle layer thickness (QMLT) measurements using ultrasound with maximal and minimal pressure. These measurements were obtained from critically ill patients who had a CT scan and QMLT measurements within 72 h of each other. The secondary aims were to explore the relationship between low muscularity determined by CT analysis cut points and QMLT measurements, markers of nutritional status, and clinical outcomes. The tertiary aim was to compare two different software techniques to assess skeletal muscle CSA so as to validate a methodology that clinicians/researchers with limited access to radiologist expertise.

Section snippets

Study design and setting

This single-centre retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary referral Australian ICU from patients admitted between 2015 and 2019. A local database of patients who had QMLT measurements obtained using ultrasound during ICU admission for another research study was searched.11 Data were included from patients if they also had an abdominal CT scan within 72 h of one of the QMLT measurements.10 All CT scans were performed for clinical purposes other than assessment of muscle

Results

Between August 2015 and July 2019, 96 patients had ultrasound images of the quadriceps muscle obtained during ICU admission (Fig. 1). After all exclusions and inspection of the CT images, data from 35 (64%) patients were included in the study, which provided 41 CT scans that were paired to an ultrasound measurement. CT scans were completed within 24 h of admission to the ICU for 33 (80%) episodes, and for eight (19%) episodes, CT scans were completed at a later time point.

Discussion

In this exploratory study, QMLT assessed by ultrasound using a maximal pressure method was a strong independent predictor of skeletal muscle CSA quantified using CT imaging. However, this signal was not present when QMLT was assessed using the minimal pressure method, and the automatic software program was used to assess the skeletal muscle CSA. Consistent with the skeletal muscle CSA technique, point estimates for the mean QMLT were lower in women and those with defined low muscularity.

The

Conclusions

Although ultrasound assessment of the quadriceps muscle reasonably predicts the mean axial skeletal muscle CSA of critically ill patients, substantial uncertainty within these regression estimates may reduce the utility of this technique as a noninvasive surrogate for CT assessment of skeletal muscle mass. The maximal pressure ultrasound technique appeared to perform better than the minimal pressure technique in predicting skeletal muscle CSA. Further research is warranted to determine if

Conflict of Interest

K.F. has received conference, travel grants, and/or honoraria from Baxter, Fresenius Kabi, Nutricia, Abbott, and Nestle Health Science (not related to this study). A.M.D. or his institution has received honoraria, travel grants, or project grant funding from Baxter, Cardinal Health, Fresenius Kabi, GSK, Medtronic, and Nutricia. A.M.D. has participated in advisory boards for Lyric Pharmaceuticals and Takeda. Y.A.A. has received honoraria from Baxter Healthcare Corporation.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Kate Fetterplace: Conceptualisation, Methodology, acquisition of the data, analysis and the interpretation of the data, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Lucy Corlette: acquisition of the data, Writing - review & editing. Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid: Methodology, acquisition of the data, Writing - review & editing. Jeffrey J. Presneill: analysis and the interpretation of the data, Writing - review & editing. Michael T. Paris: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Damien Stella:

References (28)

  • K.L. Price et al.

    Update on body composition tools in clinical settings: computed tomography, ultrasound, and bioimpedance applications for assessment and monitoring

    Eur J Clin Nutr

    (2019)
  • L.M. Weinel et al.

    Ultrasonography to measure quadriceps muscle in critically ill patients: a literature review of reported methodologies

    Anaesth Intensive Care

    (2019)
  • L.S. Chapple et al.

    Outcome measures in critical care nutrition interventional trials: a systematic review

    Nutr Clin Pract

    (2020)
  • K. Sanada et al.

    Prediction and validation of total and regional skeletal muscle mass by ultrasound in Japanese adults

    Eur J Appl Physiol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Reliability and feasibility of skeletal muscle ultrasound in the acute burn setting

      2023, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      During compression, the position of the rectus femoris in relation to the femur may have been altered, introducing further variability. In the presence of oedema, the maximum-compression technique is nonetheless the more appropriate choice as it is thought to better reflect true muscle size [32,55]. Maximum-compression also offers a solution for exceptionally large thighs that exceed ultrasound penetration.

    • Validation of bedside ultrasound to predict lumbar muscle area in the computed tomography in 200 non-critically ill patients: The USVALID prospective study

      2022, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ultrasound is a promising bedside method, involving no radiation and can be longitudinally performed to assess body composition [7,8]. Until now, five studies related ultrasound muscle thickness of the thigh or upper arm to SMA in the CT at the L3 level in non- or critically ill patients (Supporting Information, Table S1) [3,9–12]. The studies varied in ultrasound measuring points, degree of ultrasound compression and muscle thickness evaluation (Supporting Information, Table S1).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text