Elsevier

Aggression and Violent Behavior

Volume 19, Issue 5, September–October 2014, Pages 579-583
Aggression and Violent Behavior

Intimate partner violence in prisoners: Toward effective assessment and intervention

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.08.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Identifies significant issues in identifying domestic violence in prisoners.

  • Offers specific recommendations for further research and service development.

  • Identifies the need for improved systems of assessment.

  • Calls for the development of treatment programs and integrated victim support.

Abstract

This paper reviews the significant challenges that are involved in the development of services for perpetrators of intimate partner violence who are in prison. It is suggested that difficulties in accurately identifying intimate partner violence, reliably assessing risk of re-offense, and in identifying offending behavior programs that meet the specific needs of prisoners have limited the development of services in this area. As a result it is argued that unique and complex victim related issues that arise during incarceration and post-release are not adequately recognized in current correctional assessment and case management systems. Four avenues for future research and service development in this area are identified, with a view to developing the role that correctional services have to play in preventing intimate partner violence.

Introduction

Violence against women has been described by some as having reached epidemic proportions (Alhabib, Nur, & Jones, 2010). While this may be an artifact of how violence is measured, large population based surveys, such as that conducted by Perilla, Lippy, Rosales, and Serrata (2011), suggest that at least one in ten women in the United States will be a victim of intimate partner violence at some point in their life. When these prevalence rates are considered in light of what is known about the harmful effects of victimization (Golding, 1999), the case for implementing a broad range of initiatives that can prevent intimate partner violence becomes compelling. This includes those that target known offenders given that rates of recidivism among this group are particularly high (see Davis, Lurigio, & Herman, 2007), with data suggesting that, on average, victims of intimate partner violence will be re-victimized 20 times per year (Home Office, 2004). It follows that interventions that are even modestly successful in preventing recidivism in known offenders have the potential to have a profound impact on community safety.

Although correctional services are responsible for the management and rehabilitation of some of the highest risk and most dangerous offenders, there have been few published accounts of how correctional administrations have developed policies, services, and programs to reduce the risk of recidivism in domestically violent prisoners. The aim of this paper is to identify and understand some of the challenges that are associated with providing effective intervention in the prison setting. We suggest that the unique nature of intimate partner violence creates difficulties in accurately identifying the need for intervention in prison populations, that there are particular issues associated with assessing risk of re-offending in prisoners, and that relatively little is known about the effectiveness of behavior change programs that are delivered in the prison setting. Our focus in this paper is on intimate partner violence perpetrated by men against women. Although the term broadly refers to “acts of violence that occur between people who have, or have had, an intimate relationship in domestic settings” (Mitchell, 2011, p.1), the majority of serious violence that occurs in the home is committed by men against women. It is nonetheless acknowledged that intimate partner violence can also be perpetrated by women and occur in same sex-relationships (Johnson, 2011, Langhinrichsen-Rohling et al., 2000, Oriel, 2012). Consequently, the arguments presented here likely also apply to female incarcerated offenders.

Section snippets

Use of imprisonment

Recent years have seen the introduction of both legislation and policy around the western world that is thought to have led to an increase in the number of intimate partner violence perpetrators who receive a custodial sentence (Bowen, 2011a). Indeed, since the passing of the 1994 Violence Against Women Act in the United States, rates of prosecution and conviction have increased both in the US and in other jurisdictions (Garner & Maxwell, 2009). It remains the case, however, that those who

Assessing risk of re-offense

Most western correctional settings rely on generic risk–needs assessment tools to determine the need for intervention. These tools are not violence-specific and it is relatively common for prisoners to be assessed as ‘moderate’ or ‘low’ risk of recidivism, even when there are grounds for considerable concern about intimate partner violence (such as when an offender plans to return to live with his victims or makes threats). One of the most widely used structured risk–need assessment tools is

Prison-delivered offending behavior change programs

Even when those at high risk of recidivism are identified, relatively little is known about the features of effective intervention. Pascual-Leone, Bierman, Arnold, and Stasiak (2012) have, for example, noted that although the prison setting offers an important treatment opportunity, few evaluations of prison-delivered programs have been published. Their review identified an early uncontrolled study by Wolfus and Bierman (1996) which reported promising short term effectiveness, although

Recommendations/conclusions

Our conclusion from this review is that unique aspects of intimate partner violence perpetrated by prisoners may well require a broader response than that which is usually provided by correctional services. While serious violent offenders and sexual offenders currently receive specialist assessment and intervention in prison settings, progress developing similar services for perpetrators of intimate partner violence has been much slower. This is, in part, likely to be a result of the incomplete

References (61)

  • H. Belfrage et al.

    Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide

    Law and Human Behavior

    (2012)
  • M. Bobbitt et al.

    The front line: Building programs that recognize families' role in re-entry

    (2004)
  • E. Bowen

    The rehabilitation of partner-violent men

    (2011)
  • D. Chung et al.

    Have male offenders changed? Women's experiences of safety and accountability at the end of the program

  • A.D. Connors et al.

    An evaluation of intimate partner violence intervention with incarcerated offenders

    Journal of Interpersonal Violence

    (2012)
  • R. Davis et al.

    Victims of crime

    (2007)
  • Day, A., & Bowen, E. Offending competency in intimate partner violence. Invited paper for special issue of Aggression...
  • L.T. Fishman

    Women at the wall: A study of prisoners' wives doing time on the outside

    (1990)
  • J.H. Garner et al.

    Prosecution and conviction rates for intimate partner violence

    Criminal Justice Review

    (2009)
  • J.M. Golding

    Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis

    Journal of Family Violence

    (1999)
  • E.W. Gondolf

    The future of batterer programs: Re-assessing evidence based practice

    (2012)
  • M. Grann et al.

    Risk factors for recidivism among spousal assault and spousal homicide offenders

    Psychology Crime and Law

    (2002)
  • M. Gross et al.

    The impact of sentencing options on recidivism among intimate partner violence offenders: A case study

    American Journal of Criminal Justice

    (2000)
  • C.F. Hairston et al.

    Intimate partner violence and prisoner re-entry: Experiences of African American women and men

    (2006)
  • R.K. Hanson et al.

    Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know

  • S.D. Hart et al.

    The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders

  • N.Z. Hilton et al.

    Risk assessment among incarcerated domestic offenders across follow-up times and case criteria

    Criminal Justice and Behavior

    (2010)
  • N.Z. Hilton et al.

    An in-depth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The intimate partner violence risk appraisal guide

    Law and Human Behavior

    (2008)
  • N.Z. Hilton et al.

    A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment

    Psychological Assessment

    (2004)
  • Home Office

    Intimate partner violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey

    Home Office Research Study

    (2004)
  • Please note that the views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of other agencies, including the Department for Correctional Services, SA.

    View full text