Intimate partner violence in prisoners: Toward effective assessment and intervention☆
Introduction
Violence against women has been described by some as having reached epidemic proportions (Alhabib, Nur, & Jones, 2010). While this may be an artifact of how violence is measured, large population based surveys, such as that conducted by Perilla, Lippy, Rosales, and Serrata (2011), suggest that at least one in ten women in the United States will be a victim of intimate partner violence at some point in their life. When these prevalence rates are considered in light of what is known about the harmful effects of victimization (Golding, 1999), the case for implementing a broad range of initiatives that can prevent intimate partner violence becomes compelling. This includes those that target known offenders given that rates of recidivism among this group are particularly high (see Davis, Lurigio, & Herman, 2007), with data suggesting that, on average, victims of intimate partner violence will be re-victimized 20 times per year (Home Office, 2004). It follows that interventions that are even modestly successful in preventing recidivism in known offenders have the potential to have a profound impact on community safety.
Although correctional services are responsible for the management and rehabilitation of some of the highest risk and most dangerous offenders, there have been few published accounts of how correctional administrations have developed policies, services, and programs to reduce the risk of recidivism in domestically violent prisoners. The aim of this paper is to identify and understand some of the challenges that are associated with providing effective intervention in the prison setting. We suggest that the unique nature of intimate partner violence creates difficulties in accurately identifying the need for intervention in prison populations, that there are particular issues associated with assessing risk of re-offending in prisoners, and that relatively little is known about the effectiveness of behavior change programs that are delivered in the prison setting. Our focus in this paper is on intimate partner violence perpetrated by men against women. Although the term broadly refers to “acts of violence that occur between people who have, or have had, an intimate relationship in domestic settings” (Mitchell, 2011, p.1), the majority of serious violence that occurs in the home is committed by men against women. It is nonetheless acknowledged that intimate partner violence can also be perpetrated by women and occur in same sex-relationships (Johnson, 2011, Langhinrichsen-Rohling et al., 2000, Oriel, 2012). Consequently, the arguments presented here likely also apply to female incarcerated offenders.
Section snippets
Use of imprisonment
Recent years have seen the introduction of both legislation and policy around the western world that is thought to have led to an increase in the number of intimate partner violence perpetrators who receive a custodial sentence (Bowen, 2011a). Indeed, since the passing of the 1994 Violence Against Women Act in the United States, rates of prosecution and conviction have increased both in the US and in other jurisdictions (Garner & Maxwell, 2009). It remains the case, however, that those who
Assessing risk of re-offense
Most western correctional settings rely on generic risk–needs assessment tools to determine the need for intervention. These tools are not violence-specific and it is relatively common for prisoners to be assessed as ‘moderate’ or ‘low’ risk of recidivism, even when there are grounds for considerable concern about intimate partner violence (such as when an offender plans to return to live with his victims or makes threats). One of the most widely used structured risk–need assessment tools is
Prison-delivered offending behavior change programs
Even when those at high risk of recidivism are identified, relatively little is known about the features of effective intervention. Pascual-Leone, Bierman, Arnold, and Stasiak (2012) have, for example, noted that although the prison setting offers an important treatment opportunity, few evaluations of prison-delivered programs have been published. Their review identified an early uncontrolled study by Wolfus and Bierman (1996) which reported promising short term effectiveness, although
Recommendations/conclusions
Our conclusion from this review is that unique aspects of intimate partner violence perpetrated by prisoners may well require a broader response than that which is usually provided by correctional services. While serious violent offenders and sexual offenders currently receive specialist assessment and intervention in prison settings, progress developing similar services for perpetrators of intimate partner violence has been much slower. This is, in part, likely to be a result of the incomplete
References (61)
- et al.
Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of intimate partner violence treatment
Clinical Psychology Review
(2004) An overview of partner violence risk assessment and the potential role of female victim risk appraisals
Aggression and Violent Behaviour
(2011)- et al.
Risk markers for family violence in a federally incarcerated population
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
(1992) Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review
Aggression and Violent Behavior
(2011)- et al.
Desistance from intimate partner violence: A critical review
Aggression and Violent Behavior
(2013) - et al.
Intimate partner violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies
Journal of Family Violence
(2010) - et al.
LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory—Revised
(2001) - et al.
Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
(2010) Defining the data challenge for family, domestic and sexual violence
(2013)- et al.
The relationship between treatment, incarceration, and recidivism of battering: A program evaluation of Seattle's coordinated community response to intimate partner violence
Journal of Family Psychology
(1999)
Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide
Law and Human Behavior
The front line: Building programs that recognize families' role in re-entry
The rehabilitation of partner-violent men
Have male offenders changed? Women's experiences of safety and accountability at the end of the program
An evaluation of intimate partner violence intervention with incarcerated offenders
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Victims of crime
Women at the wall: A study of prisoners' wives doing time on the outside
Prosecution and conviction rates for intimate partner violence
Criminal Justice Review
Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis
Journal of Family Violence
The future of batterer programs: Re-assessing evidence based practice
Risk factors for recidivism among spousal assault and spousal homicide offenders
Psychology Crime and Law
The impact of sentencing options on recidivism among intimate partner violence offenders: A case study
American Journal of Criminal Justice
Intimate partner violence and prisoner re-entry: Experiences of African American women and men
Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know
The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders
Risk assessment among incarcerated domestic offenders across follow-up times and case criteria
Criminal Justice and Behavior
An in-depth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The intimate partner violence risk appraisal guide
Law and Human Behavior
A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment
Psychological Assessment
Intimate partner violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey
Home Office Research Study
Cited by (19)
Implementation and Effectiveness of In-Prison Programs for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: Evidence From Spain
2023, Criminal Justice and BehaviorThe Risk of Family Violence After Incarceration: An Integrative Review
2022, Trauma, Violence, and AbuseCharacteristics and Factors Associated With Intimate Partner Violence–Related Homicide Post-Release From Jail or Prison
2021, Journal of Interpersonal ViolenceRisk refraction: Thoughts on the victim-survivor's risk journey through the criminal justice process
2021, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social DemocracyGender, risk assessment and coercive control: Contradictions in terms?
2021, British Journal of CriminologyA Qualitative Study of Intimate Partner Violence From the Perpetrator’s Perspective
2021, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- ☆
Please note that the views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of other agencies, including the Department for Correctional Services, SA.