20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research
Introduction
2012 marks 20 years since the first publication of the balanced scorecard article by Robert Kaplan and David Norton in the January–February issue of Harvard Business Review. After a year's research activity inside 12 companies, Kaplan and Norton (1992) disseminated their findings through a performance measurement framework which they developed and called the Balanced Scorecard. Kaplan and Norton's original version of the balanced scorecard expanded on mere financial performance measures and incorporated operational performance measures categorised by three perspectives: customer satisfaction, internal business processes, and innovation and learning. Following that article, and examining more than 300 organisations, Kaplan and Norton produced a series of articles (Kaplan, 2009, Kaplan and Norton, 1993, Kaplan and Norton, 1996a, Kaplan and Norton, 1996b, Kaplan and Norton, 2000, Kaplan and Norton, 2001a, Kaplan and Norton, 2001b, Kaplan and Norton, 2004a, Kaplan and Norton, 2006a, Kaplan and Norton, 2008a) and several books (Kaplan and Norton, 1996c, Kaplan and Norton, 2001c, Kaplan and Norton, 2004b, Kaplan and Norton, 2006b, Kaplan and Norton, 2008b) to advance the knowledge base of the balanced scorecard. About 15 years ago, in a review essay, Atkinson, Balakrishnan, Booth, Cote, Grout, Mali, Roberts, Ulan, & Wu noted that “the balanced scorecard is among the most significant developments in management accounting and thus, deserves intense research attention” (1997, p. 94). In its 20 years of existence the balanced scorecard has generated enormous interest in academic and industrial communities (Barnabe and Busco, 2012, Kraus and Lind, 2010, Malina et al., 2007, Norreklit et al., 2012, Salterio, 2012).
The 20th anniversary of the balanced scorecard provides the opportunity to explore the status of related research from 1992 to 2011. Several notable prior reviews1 of the management accounting research (e.g., Chenhall, 2003, Chenhall, 2009, Chenhall and Smith, 2011, Hesford et al., 2009, Langfield-Smith, 2008, Merchant and Otley, 2007, Selto and Widener, 2004, Shields, 1997, Wagenhofer, 2006) have provided useful insights into the role of management accounting and performance measurement systems in organisations, yet these reviews have not taken the balanced scorecard as their primary focus. My aim here is to expand upon these previous reviews and to contribute to the performance management research literature in the following way. First, I tabulate, review, and synthesise studies related to the balanced scorecard published in accounting, business and management journals. Using this summative account of published research, I discuss how prior balanced scorecard studies have contributed to the field. Next, I identify gaps in published research, which suggest some opportunities for future research. In the final section, I offer my conclusion. My review in this article will provide future balanced scorecard researchers with much food for thought, leading to a “new” knowledge base for the balanced scorecard research field.
Section snippets
Review approach
In this review, I used 25 highly ranked2
Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard
In the late 1980s, many scholars expressed concern about traditional performance measures that focused solely on financial metrics (Johnson and Kaplan, 1987, Kaplan and Norton, 1992, Lynch and Cross, 1991). Scholars prior to Kaplan and Norton (e.g., Berliner and Brimson, 1988, Bromwich and Bhimani, 1989, Johnson, 1988, McNair et al., 1990) criticised such measures for encouraging managers to focus on short-term financial results while sacrificing long-term prospects. These and other scholars
Balanced scorecard studies published in accounting journals
Here, I examine the 114 articles published in 25 accounting journals that deal with the balanced scorecard.
Balanced scorecard studies published in business and management journals
Business and management research has also established a strong tradition in researching balanced scorecard practices in various settings. As with the accounting studies, in this section I present a review of balanced scorecard articles published by business and management journals.
Knowledge gained from existing studies on the balanced scorecard
This section identifies and discusses several themes emerged from this review. Appendix C, Appendix D summarise the key issues addressed in some notable articles published in leading journals. These articles were selected on the basis of their citation in the literature (this list is merely illustrative, not exhaustive).
The debate, knowledge gaps and recommendations for further studies
Despite its usefulness, the balanced scorecard has also received considerable criticism. For example, Butler, Letza, and Neale (1997) considered its concept to be too general, pointing out that it might not fit in an organisation's culture and could ignore corporate missions. In a similar vein, Laitinen (2003) found the selection of the four basic dimensions and their interrelationships problematic, because the measures in practical applications appeared to connect loosely to each other and
Final remarks
The aim of this article has been to explore the status of research on the balanced scorecard with a view to identify gaps and to sketch ideas for future research. Reviewing 114 articles published in 25 accounting journals and 67 articles in business and management journals over a 20-year period, this article provides an overview of the balanced scorecard implementation and usage, theoretical orientations, and methods of investigation and analysis.
From a positive stance, many quantitative
Acknowledgements
An earlier version of this paper was presented as a keynote speech at the 2011 New Zealand Management Accounting Conference (Wellington, New Zealand, 17–18 November). I am grateful to Paul Andon, Jan Bell, David Brown, Robert Chenhall, Mandy Cheng, Clinton Free, Kerry Humphreys, Steven Salterio, Mike Shields, Ken Trotman, and research seminar participants at La Trobe University (Melbourne, Australia), University of New South Wales (Sydney, Australia), University of Technology Sydney
References (150)
Applying the BSC concept: an experience report
Long Range Planning
(2001)- et al.
Antecedents to management accounting change: a structural equation approach
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(2003) - et al.
Performance effects of using the BSC: a note on the Dutch experience
Long Range Planning
(2004) Accounting, ambiguity, and the new institutionalism
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1995)Reflections on a contingent view of accounting
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1997)Management control system design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(2003)- et al.
Multiple perspectives of performance measures
European Management Journal
(2007) - et al.
Management accounting change in a bank
Management Accounting Research
(1995) - et al.
The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: a historically informed field study
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1988) - et al.
Implementing corporate strategy: from tableaux de bord to balanced scorecards
European Management Journal
(1998)
Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research: a critical review
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Total quality management and the balanced scorecard approach: a critical analysis of their potential relationships and directions for research
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Linking environmental uncertainty to non-financial performance measures and performance: a research note
The British Accounting Review
Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard
Exploring management accounting change: the case of balanced scorecard implementation
Management Accounting Research
The impact of the corporate balanced scorecard on corporate control – a research note
Management Accounting Research
Future-based management accounting: a new approach with survey evidence
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
The meaning of balanced scorecards in the health care organization
Financial Accountability & Management
Relevance assumed: a case study of the balanced scorecard development using system dynamics
Journal of Operational Research Society
Organizations as rhetoric: knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity
Journal of Management Studies
The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research
Judgment and Decision Making
New directions in management accounting research
Journal of Management Accounting Research
The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy
The Accounting Review
The causal relationships between performance drivers and outcomes: reinforcing balanced scorecards' implementation through system dynamics models
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Cost management for today's advanced manufacturing—The CAM-I conceptual design
Enhancing strategy design and planning in public utilities through dynamics BSCs: insights from a project in a city water company
System Dynamics Review
Psychology theory in management accounting research
An approach to organizing a management accounting curriculum
Issues in Accounting Education
Economics in management accounting
Management accounting: Evolution not revolution
On the adoption of management accounting practices: The balanced scorecard as a rhetorical machine
Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy
Long Range Planning
The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle
Actor-network-theory – the market test
Financial versus non-financial information: the impact of information organization and presentation in a Balanced Scorecard
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Measures vs. action: the BSC in Swedish Law enforcement
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
Performance measurement and adoption of balanced scorecard: a survey of municipal governments in the USA and Canada
The International Journal of Public Sector Management
The differential improvement effects of the strategy map and scorecard perspectives on managers' strategic judgments
The Accounting Review
Developing integrative performance management systems
Theorising and testing in contingency research on management control systems
A review of management accounting research: 1980–2009
Accounting and Finance
Transforming an organization: using models to foster a strategic conversation
California Management Review
Budgeting research: three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration
Journal of Management Accounting Research
Adoption rationales of new management practices
Journal of Business Research
The balanced scorecard: subjects, concepts and objects – a commentary
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Strategic alignment and middle-level managers' motivation in a balanced scorecard setting
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
The making and remaking of organization context duality and the institutionalization process
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Relative weighting of common and unique balanced scorecard measures by knowledgeable decision makers
Behavioral Research in Accounting
Interest and agency in institutional theory
Cited by (266)
A comprehensive bibliometric study of the balanced scorecard
2023, Evaluation and Program PlanningEmbedding attributes towards the supply chain performance measurement
2023, Cleaner Logistics and Supply ChainGaps in strategic problem-solving methods: A systematic literature review
2024, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision AnalysisThe current role of management accounting: paradigm shift and future challenges
2024, Journal of Accounting and Organizational ChangeBarriers, drivers, and application of decision-making strategies and tools
2024, Rethinking Decision-Making Strategies and Tools: Emerging Research and Opportunities