Elsevier

Behavioural Brain Research

Volume 282, 1 April 2015, Pages 194-200
Behavioural Brain Research

Research report
Delineation of the working memory profile in female FMR1 premutation carriers: The effect of cognitive load on ocular motor responses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Female PM-carriers were unaffected by increases in cognitive load (error rate).

  • Female PM-carriers took longer to respond than controls.

  • FMR1 mRNA was negatively associated with PM-carrier WMeffect response time.

Abstract

Fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) premutation carriers (PM-carriers) are characterised as having mid-sized expansions of between 55 and 200 CGG repeats in the 5′ untranslated region of the FMR1 gene. While there is evidence of executive dysfunction in PM-carriers, few studies have explicitly explored working memory capabilities in female PM-carriers. 14 female PM-carriers and 13 age- and IQ-matched healthy controls completed an ocular motor n-back working memory paradigm. This task examined working memory ability and the effect of measured increases in cognitive load. Female PM-carriers were found to have attenuated working memory capabilities. Increasing the cognitive load did not elicit the expected reciprocal increase in the task errors for female PM-carriers, as it did in controls. However female PM-carriers took longer to respond than controls, regardless of the cognitive load. Further, FMR1 mRNA levels were found to significantly predict PM-carrier response time. Although preliminary, these findings provide further evidence of executive dysfunction, specifically disruption to working memory processes, which were found to be associated with increases in FMR1 mRNA expression in female PM-carriers. With future validation, ocular motor paradigms such as the n-back paradigm will be critical to the development of behavioural biomarkers for identification of PM-carrier cognitive-affective phenotypes.

Introduction

The CGG trinucleotide expansions of the fragile X mental retardation gene (FMR1) are associated with a wide spectrum of early and late onset conditions. The full mutation (>200 CGG repeats) causes silencing of the FMR1 gene and loss of the FMR1 protein (FMRP), which is essential for normal neurodevelopment [1], [2], resulting in the neurodevelopmental disorder known as fragile X syndrome (FXS). In contrast, the medium sized premutation expansions (PM: 55–200 CGGs), found in approximately 1 in 430 males and 1 in 209 females within the general population [3], causes over-expression of the FMR1 gene. This over-expression results in mRNA “gain-of-function” toxicity accompanied by ubiquitin-positive intracellular inclusion bodies and reduced cell viability in neuronal cells [4], [5]. These molecular changes are the postulated cause of a late onset neurodegenerative disorder known as fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). FXTAS affects approximately 45% of male and 8–17% of female PM-carriers over the age of 50 [6]. Besides the characteristic intention tremor, ataxia, and dementia, FXTAS also results in a range of molecular and structural abnormalities throughout the central nervous system, as well as executive functioning deficits [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].

There is strong evidence for the existence of a dysexecutive profile in asymptomatic PM-carriers (those without FXTAS) [16], [17], [18], [19]. The male asymptomatic PM-carrier phenotype is currently characterised by impairments in executive processing, with specific deficits in tasks reliant upon working memory, inhibitory processing, visuospatial processing and attentional control [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. Significantly, higher CGG repeat levels (>100) have been associated with impaired working memory and response inhibition performance in male PM-carriers [21], [22], [23], [24].

There is also evidence suggests that there is at-least a sub-group of female PM-carriers demonstrating weakness in executive functioning (i.e. attentional and inhibitory control), processing speed, and visuospatial processing [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]. The extent to which working memory is affected in female PM-carriers is not well understood. Research indicates that the female PM-carrier phenotype may be less easily resolved and milder in nature than males, a consequence of the protective effects attributed to the presence of a normal allele (CGG <45 repeats) on the second X chromosome [38]. Hence a sensitive cognitive measure is required to ascertain whether or not female PM-carriers exhibit impaired working memory functionality, and if this is related to genetic or molecular markers.

Working memory is a limited-capacity system which enables the temporary storage, manipulation, and retrieval of information for use in complex cognitive tasks [39]. It is a process which relies upon widespread cortical and subcortical involvement [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], with the precise network activated dependent on the type of information involved [45]. Specifically, when visuospatial working memory circuitry is overwhelmed (or near capacity due to increases in cognitive load), neural activation is found to be highest in the frontal eye fields and along the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) [46]. Both of these are key ocular motor regions, and central to the support of visual attention [47], [48].

Ocular motor (saccadic) paradigms have been used extensively to assess cognitive (dys)function in a range of disorders; for example multiple sclerosis [49], Parkinson's [50], and Huntington's [51]. Indeed, we have previously utilised ocular motor paradigms, demonstrating reduced capacity to inhibit reflexive eye movements (inhibitory errors) in asymptomatic female PM-carriers, compared to healthy controls [33]. Not only did these female PM-carriers perform more inhibitory errors, they also showed greater difficulty responding to and learning motor/hand sequences compared to controls.

The extensive and well defined ocular motor network encompasses cortical (i.e. parietal and prefrontal regions), subcortical and cerebellar structures [52]. Further, the frontal-parietal connections required for cognitively driven saccades are also key networks required for visuospatial working memory tasks [53]. A range of saccadic paradigms have been developed to investigate working memory. An elegant example of one is the task devised by Jeter [54], which is based on the classic n-back task. The task involves the presentation of a continuous sequence of visual stimuli, and requires participants to identify the location of the stimulus presented ‘n’ locations—back in the sequence. The greater the ‘n’ value, the higher the cognitive load. Jeter, Patel and Sereno [54] have used their ocular motor n-back task to characterise developmental changes in working memory ability, as well as the effects of increasing cognitive load, in neurologically healthy individuals.

This study aimed to further delineate the female PM-carrier cognitive profile by characterising working memory performance under differing and increasing cognitive loads. Given the emerging similarities between the male and female PM-carrier cognitive phenotypes, we anticipated impaired working memory performance in female PM-carriers, with working memory performance being inversely correlated with increases in FMR1 mRNA levels and CGG expansions. This would provide the first evidence for a role of RNA toxicity as a predictor of impaired working memory performance in female PM-carriers.

Section snippets

Participants

All participants were aged between 18 and 55 years of age at the time of recruitment, were English speaking, had no history of serious head injury, had normal or corrected vision, and had around average IQ (as assessed using the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence). The cohort included 14 female PM-carriers (61–102 CGG repeats; mean = 79.36 repeats, standard deviation (SD) = 11.705) who had previously participated in our earlier studies [29], [30], [33], [37], [55] and a comparison group of

Results

The two groups were well matched for age (control: mean = 41.2, SD = 12.6, range 33.00; PM-carrier: mean = 41.9, SD = 7.26, range = 27.00; p = 0.859). There was no significant difference in full scale IQ scores for these two groups (control: mean = 115.4, SD = 12.9, range = 44.00; PM-carrier: mean = 112.9, SD = 9.23, range = 27.00; p = 0.671), with all participants demonstrating IQ's within the normal/average population range.

Discussion

FMR1 CGG expansions are associated with subtle to severe cognitive dysfunction. This study revealed female PM-carriers to have attenuated working memory processes, characterised by prolonged RT and significantly, little effect of increasing cognitive load on error rate. Furthermore, FMR1 mRNA levels in PM-carrier females were significantly correlated with differences in RT as a function of cognitive load for correctly executed responses, suggesting a molecular basis for these alterations. These

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Funding

Supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery grant (DP110103346) to KC and JF. Further, D.E.G. was supported by NHMRC project grant [No. 104299 to D.E.G.], the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program and in part by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Genetics Theme funding.

Acknowledgments

We express our thanks to the Fragile X Association of Australia and Fragile X Alliance for their support in recruitment. We also thank Jonathan Whitty from Healthscope Pathology and Erin Turbitt from the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute for their assistance on the molecular procedures. Finally, we are indebted to all the families who participated in this research.

References (75)

  • C. Semenza et al.

    Genetics and mathematics: FMR1 premutation female carriers

    Neuropsychologia

    (2012)
  • A.L. Shelton et al.

    Exploring inhibitory deficits in female premutation carriers of fragile X syndrome: through eye movements

    Brain Cogn

    (2014)
  • S. Kéri et al.

    Visual pathway deficit in female fragile X premutation carriers: a potential endophenotype

    Brain Cogn

    (2009)
  • S. Kéri et al.

    The perception of biological and mechanical motion in female fragile X premutation carriers

    Brain Cogn

    (2010)
  • R.A. Charlton et al.

    White matter pathways associated with working memory in normal aging

    Cortex

    (2010)
  • N. Osaka et al.

    The neural basis of executive function in working memory: an fMRI study based on individual differences

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • D.E.J. Linden et al.

    Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory: dissociation of fMRI load effects in a fronto-parietal network

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • J. Fielding et al.

    No sequence dependent modulation of the Simon effect in Parkinson's disease

    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res

    (2005)
  • S. Metcalfe et al.

    A model for offering carrier screening for fragile X syndrome to nonpregnant women: results from a pilot study

    Genet Med

    (2008)
  • D. Loesch et al.

    Evidence for the toxicity of bidirectional transcripts and mitochondrial dysfunction in blood associated with small CGG expansions in the FMR1 gene in patients with parkinsonism

    Genet Med

    (2011)
  • T.J. Silk et al.

    Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • R. Vandenberghe et al.

    Spatial attention deficits in humans: the critical role of superior compared to inferior parietal lesions

    Neuropsychologia

    (2012)
  • S.-Y. Kim et al.

    Altered neural activity of magnitude estimation processing in adults with the fragile x premutation

    J Psychiatr Res

    (2013)
  • S.-Y. Kim et al.

    Altered neural activity in the ‘when’ pathway during temporal processing in fragile X premutation carriers

    Behav Brain Res

    (2014)
  • J.Y. Wang et al.

    Influence of the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) gene on the brain and working memory in men with normal FMR1 alleles

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • R. Hashimoto et al.

    An fMRI study of the prefrontal activity during the performance of a working memory task in premutation carriers of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene with and without fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS)

    J Psychiatr Res

    (2011)
  • S. Jacquemont et al.

    Fragile X premutation tremor/ataxia syndrome: molecular, clinical, and neuroimaging correlates

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2003)
  • F. Tassone et al.

    Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in carrier males: a new mechanism of involvement in the fragile-X syndrome

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2000)
  • R. Willemsen et al.

    CGG repeat in the FMR1 gene: size matters

    Clin Genet

    (2011)
  • R. Willemsen et al.

    The fragile X syndrome: from molecular genetics to neurobiology

    Mental Retardation Dev Disabil Res Rev

    (2004)
  • F. Tassone et al.

    FMR1 CGG allele size and prevalence ascertained through newborn screening in the United States

    Genome Med

    (2012)
  • D.G. Arocena et al.

    Induction of inclusion formation and disruption of lamin A/C structure by premutation CGG-repeat RNA in human cultured neural cells

    Hum Mol Genet

    (2005)
  • R. Willemsen et al.

    The FMR1 CGG repeat mouse displays ubiquitin-positive intranuclear neuronal inclusions; implications for the cerebellar tremor/ataxia syndrome

    Hum Mol Genet

    (2003)
  • L. Rodriguez-Revenga et al.

    Penetrance of FMR1 premutation associated pathologies in fragile x syndrome families

    Eur J Hum Genet

    (2009)
  • J.S. Adams et al.

    Volumetric brain changes in females with fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS)

    Neurology

    (2007)
  • J.A. Brunberg et al.

    Fragile X premutation carriers: characteristic MR imaging finding of adult male patients with progressive cerebellar and cognitive dysfunction

    Am J Neuroradiol

    (2002)
  • S. Cohen et al.

    Molecular and imaging correlates of the fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome

    Neurology

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text