Elsevier

Bone

Volume 84, March 2016, Pages 204-212
Bone

Review
DNA methylation and the social gradient of osteoporotic fracture: A conceptual model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.12.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Social disadvantage increases stress across lifespan and influences inflammation

  • Heightened inflammatory state increases osteoporotic fracture risk

  • Clinical utility of model may include addressing causative environmental pathways

  • Epigenetic evidence-base may strengthen the importance of lifestyle modification

Abstract

Introduction

Although there is a documented social gradient for osteoporosis, the underlying mechanism(s) for that gradient remain unknown. We propose a conceptual model based upon the allostatic load theory, to suggest how DNA methylation (DNAm) might underpin the social gradient in osteoporosis and fracture. We hypothesise that social disadvantage is associated with priming of inflammatory pathways mediated by epigenetic modification that leads to an enhanced state of inflammatory reactivity and oxidative stress, and thus places socially disadvantaged individuals at greater risk of osteoporotic fracture.

Methods/Results

Based on a review of the literature, we present a conceptual model in which social disadvantage increases stress throughout the lifespan, and engenders a proinflammatory epigenetic signature, leading to a heightened inflammatory state that increases risk for osteoporotic fracture in disadvantaged groups that are chronically stressed.

Conclusions

Our model proposes that, in addition to the direct biological effects exerted on bone by factors such as physical activity and nutrition, the recognised socially patterned risk factors for osteoporosis also act via epigenetic-mediated dysregulation of inflammation. DNAm is a dynamic modulator of gene expression with considerable relevance to the field of osteoporosis. Elucidating the extent to which this epigenetic mechanism transduces the psycho-social environment to increase the risk of osteoporotic fracture may yield novel entry points for intervention that can be used to reduce individual and population-wide risks for osteoporotic fracture. Specifically, an epigenetic evidence-base may strengthen the importance of lifestyle modification and stress reduction programs, and help to reduce health inequities across social groups.

Mini abstract

Our conceptual model proposes how DNA methylation might underpin the social gradient in osteoporotic fracture. We suggest that social disadvantage is associated with priming of inflammatory signalling pathways, which is mediated by epigenetic modifications, leading to a chronically heightened inflammatory state that places disadvantaged individuals at greater risk of osteoporosis.

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disease that is characterised by microarchitectural deterioration of the bone matrix and depletion of bone mineral density (BMD), with a subsequent increase in risk for fragility fracture [1]. Following a hip fracture, there are many financial, personal and psychosocial outcomes: one in five individuals die within the first year, while 60% of individuals who survive a hip fracture still require assistance to walk one year later, and 33% are totally dependent or are admitted to a nursing home [2], [3]. Osteoporotic fractures accounted for more Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) lost than cancers, with the exception of lung cancer [4]. To advance understanding of the aetiology and pathogenesis of osteoporosis, there are now large-scale efforts to identify genes associated with fracture risk via genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of BMD [5], [6], [7], [8]. The maintenance of BMD is not static, rather osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation processes are highly organized and driven by modifications in gene expression patterns throughout the life course [9]. Indeed, it is argued that the risk of developing osteoporosis occurs over the life course, with potential mechanisms involving epigenetic processes [10]. Epigenetics is the study of alterations in gene expression potential that are not caused by changes in DNA sequence [11]. These processes include DNA methylation (DNAm), histone modification and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) activity [12], with much interest recently directed toward the modulation of epigenetic pathways via DNAm [9]. A seminal review by Delgado-Calle et al [9] argued that DNAm plays a role in the onset and progression of musculoskeletal disorders including osteoporosis; a role similarly reported in other non-communicable diseases such as obesity [13], cancer [14], cardiovascular [15] and metabolic diseases [12], [13]. Furthermore, recent data have suggested that patients with fractures have differentially methylated genes that are related to skeletal development [16]. A role for DNAm in osteoporosis onset is biologically plausible; DNAm not only influences gene expression, but also plays a role in establishing a bone cell phenotype. Furthermore, DNAm is involved in the regulation of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells [17], and epigenetic mechanisms (one of which is DNAm) are important for osteoclast differentiation [18].

There is emerging interest in the role that social factors may play in influencing DNAm. For instance, in a study of 92 Canadian adults (aged 24-45 years; 62% female) socioeconomic position (SEP) during early life, defined as parental occupation (manual vs. non-manual), showed associations with DNAm in later life [19]. Similar associations were observed in a larger study of 239 adults (aged 35-64 years; 51% female) from the United Kingdom (UK), where SEP during adulthood was defined as residing in an affluent vs. deprived area [20]. In a study of 89 women (aged 38-46 years) from the United States of America (USA) low income at birth, being raised in a single parent family, and lower adult educational attainment were all associated with higher DNAm profiles in adulthood [21]. Those observations are supported by evidence from a rhesus macaque model, which showed that dominance-rank, an indicator of social hierarchy and thus a proxy for SEP, was associated with differences in levels of chronic stress and the subsequent modulation of physiological responses and DNAm profiles [22]. The available studies indicate plasticity in molecular responses in stress response pathways might be related to the influence of SEP on the epigenetic pathway/s. However, conflicting data also exist: a study of 85 women from the USA found no association between SEP (an aggregate measure derived from maternal and paternal education, occupation and income at birth and at 7 years of age), and DNAm [23]. Nevertheless, an association between the allostatic load (the cumulative dysregulation of biological systems [24]) and SEP has been reported in some [25], although not all [26], reviews.

The public health importance of the social gradient of osteoporosis is underscored by increased attention in recent years [27], [28], [29], [30]. Yet, the underlying mechanism for that gradient remains uncertain. The epigenetic signature is influenced by a multitude of environmental factors across the lifespan, and the epigenome appears to function as a vital conduit that transduces exposures into phenotypic expression and disease risk [15], [31]. We suggest that understanding this mechanism with respect to specific social determinants may identify various entry points for interventions in order to reduce the prevalence of osteoporosis and, consequently, reduce the social gradient of osteoporotic fracture [27]. This paper proposes a conceptual model, based on the challenge posed by social disadvantage to achieving allostasis (the maintenance of stability, or homeostasis, through change [24]), and the ‘three-hit theory’ of the allostatic load model as identified by McEwen et al [32], and later expanded upon by Daskalakis et al [33], whereby genetic predisposition provides the first ‘hit’ to allostasis, the early life environment provides the second, and later life environment provides the third. Our proposed model posits why socially disadvantaged individuals may be at greater predisposition for increased risk of osteoporotic fracture compared to their more advantaged counterparts, and explores the modulation across the life course of the epigenetic signature. We argue that epigenetic mechanisms such as DNAm are highly influenced by SEP, and that social determinants are dynamic modulators of gene expression with relevance to the field of osteoporosis.

Section snippets

In utero

In addition to non-modifiable genetic predisposition (including sex and ethnicity [34]; see Fig. 1, Box 1), mechanisms have been proposed to explain epigenetic influences that occur in utero and which impact adult bone health later in life.

Recent research has demonstrated that foetal under-nutrition, indicated by low birth weight, is associated not only with adverse childhood outcomes such as stunting and reduced cognitive function, but also with increased morbidity in adult life from

Conclusion

Taking the emerging evidence-base in context, cumulative stressors, responses to stressors, a heightened inflammatory state and subsequent increase in osteoporotic fracture risk are all influenced by SEP. Whilst factors such as physical activity and nutrition exert direct biological effects on bone, and are associated with DNAm status, the recognised social gradient of risk factors for osteoporosis also act via epigenetic-mediated dysregulation of inflammation. More specifically, relationships

Conflict of interest

Sharon Brennan-Olsen, Richard Page, Michael Berk, José Riancho, William Leslie, Scott Wilson, Karen Saban, Linda Janusek, Julie Pasco, Jason Hodge, Shae Quirk, Natalie Hyde, Sarah Hosking, and Lana Williams declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements/Funding

SLB-O is supported by an Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Fellowship (2015-16). JAR is supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI12/615). LJW is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC of Australia) Career Development Fellowship (2015-18). NKH is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award, Deakin University (2013-16). MB is supported by a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship (1059660). SEQ is supported by a NHMRC Public Health and Health Services Research

References (109)

  • S.L. Brennan et al.

    Socioeconomic status and risk factors for obesity and metabolic disorders in a population-based sample of adult females

    Prev. Med.

    (2009)
  • K.J.P.M. MacKelvie et al.

    Bone mass and structure are enhanced following a 2-year randomised controlled trial of exercise in prepubertal boys

    Bone

    (2004)
  • O.E.M. Mendonca-Furtado et al.

    Does heirarchy stability influence testosterone and cortisol levels of bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus Iibidinosus) adult males? A comparison between two wild groups

    Behav. Process.

    (2014)
  • K.T. Steeve et al.

    IL-6, RANKL, TNF-alpha/IL-1: interrelations in bone resorption pathophysiology

    Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.

    (2004)
  • T. Wada et al.

    RANK-RANKL signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease

    Trends Mol. Med.

    (2006)
  • T. Weishaar et al.

    Vitamin D status is a biological determinant of health disparities

    J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.

    (2013)
  • WHO

    Prevention and management of osteoporosis: report of a WHO scientific group

  • IOF
  • R. Otmar et al.

    Personal and psychosocial impacts of clinical fracture in men

    J. Men's Health

    (2013)
  • O. Johnell et al.

    An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures

    Osteoporos. Int.

    (2006)
  • K. Estrada et al.

    Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture

    Nat. Genet.

    (2012)
  • U. Styrkarsdottir et al.

    Multiple genetic loci for bone mineral density and fractures

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2008)
  • E.L. Duncan et al.

    Genome-wide association study using extreme truncate selection identifies novel genes affecting bone mineral density and fracture risk

    PLoS Genet.

    (2011)
  • J. Delgado-Calle et al.

    The role of DNA methylation in common skeletal disorders

    Biology

    (2012)
  • Harvey N, Dennison E, Cooper C. Osteoporosis: A lifecourse approach. J. Bone Miner. Res. l2014;29:...
  • C.L. Wood et al.

    Bone mineral density and osteoporosis after preterm birth: The role of early life factors and nutrition

    Int. J. Endocrinol.

    (2013)
  • F.M. Low et al.

    Developmental plasticity and epigenetic mechanisms underpinning metabolic and cardiovascular diseases

    Epigenomics

    (2011)
  • K. Gronback et al.

    Epigenetic changes in cancer

    APMIS

    (2007)
  • K.L. Saban et al.

    Epigenetics and social context: Implications for disparity in cardiovascular disease

    Aging Dis.

    (2014)
  • J. Delgado-Calle et al.

    Genome-wide profiling of bone reveals differentially methylated regions in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis

    Arthritis Rheum.

    (2013)
  • M.I. Kang et al.

    Transitional CpG methylation between promoters and retroelements of tissue-specific genes during human mesenchymal cell differentiation

    J. Cell. Biochem.

    (2007)
  • T. Yasui et al.

    Epigenetic regulation of osteoclast differentiation

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2011)
  • L.L. Lam et al.

    Factors underlying variable DNA methylation in a human community cohort

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2012)
  • D. McGuinness et al.

    Socio-economic status is associated with epigenetic differences in the pSoBid cohort

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (2012)
  • P. Tehranifar et al.

    Early life socioeconomic factors and genomic DNA methylation in mid-life

    Epigenetics

    (2013)
  • J. Tung et al.

    Social environment is associated with gene regulatory variation in the rhesus macaque immune system

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2012)
  • M.B. Terry et al.

    Genomic DNA methylation among women in a multiethnic New York City birth cohort

    Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.

    (2014)
  • P. Sterling et al.

    Allostasis: A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology

  • T.M. Beckie

    A systematic review of allostatic load, health, and health disparities

    Biol. Res. Nurs.

    (2012)
  • J.B. Dowd et al.

    Socio-economic status, cortisol and allostatic load: a review of the literature

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (2009)
  • S.L. Brennan et al.

    The social gradient of fractures at any skeletal site in men and women: data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study Fracture Grid

    Osteoporos. Int.

    (2015)
  • C.M. Oliveira et al.

    The interactions between municipal socioeconomic status and age on hip fracture risk

    Osteoporos. Int.

    (2014)
  • C.J. Crandall et al.

    Socioeconomic status in relation to incident fracture risk in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation

    Osteoporos. Int.

    (2014)
  • D.L. Foley et al.

    Prospects for epigenetic epidemiology

    Am. J. Epidemiol.

    (2009)
  • B.S. McEwan

    Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostatis and allostatic Load

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1998)
  • K. King et al.

    Epigenetic regulation of Newborns' imprinted genes related to gestational growth: patterning by parental race/ethnicity and maternal socioeconomic status

    J. Epidemiol. Community Health

    (2015)
  • P.D. Gluckman et al.

    Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2008)
  • P. Gluckman et al.

    Developmental Origins of Health and Disease

    (2006)
  • S. Entringer

    Impact of stress and stress physiology during pregnancy on child metabolic function and obesity risk

    Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care

    (2013)
  • C. Holroyd et al.

    Epigenetic influences in the development origins of osteoporosis

    Osteoporos. Int.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text