Elsevier

Carbohydrate Research

Volume 415, 13 October 2015, Pages 31-38
Carbohydrate Research

Identification, biochemical characterization, and in-vivo expression of the intracellular invertase BfrA from the pathogenic parasite Leishmania major

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2015.07.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A sucrose-metabolizing invertase from the protozoan pathogen Leishmania major was identified.

  • RT-PCR experiments demonstrated that this enzyme was expressed in other Leishmania species.

  • The expression is dependent on the parasite life stage (overexpressed in promastigotes).

  • The cloned and expressed recombinant enzyme has a low affinity for sucrose yet comparable to other invertases.

  • These results, coupled to molecular modeling and sequence analysis, suggest that this invertase is an intracellular enzyme.

Abstract

The parasitic life cycle of Leishmania includes an extracellular promastigote stage that occurs in the gut of the insect vector. During that period, the sucrose metabolism and more specifically the first glycosidase of this pathway are essential for growth and survival of the parasite. We investigated the expression of the invertase BfrA in the promastigote and amastigote stages of three parasite species representative of the three various clinical forms and of various geographical areas, namely Leishmania major, L. donovani and L. braziliensis. Thereafter, we cloned, overexpressed and biochemically characterized this invertase BfrA from L. major, heterologously expressed in both Escherichia coli and L. tarentolae. For all species, expression levels of BfrA mRNA were correlated to the time of the culture and the parasitic stage (promastigotes > amastigotes). BfrA exhibited no activity when expressed as a glycoprotein in L. tarentolae but proved to be an invertase when not glycosylated, yet owing low sequence homology with other invertases from the same family. Our data suggest that BfrA is an original invertase that is located inside the parasite. It is expressed in both parasitic stages, though to a higher extent in promastigotes. This work provides new insight into the parasite sucrose metabolism.

Introduction

Leishmaniasis belongs to the group of neglected tropical diseases, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), which includes diseases that are endemic in developing countries.1 The main foci of leishmaniasis are India, Africa, South America, Mediterranean basin and Middle East.2, 3 The microorganism responsible for this widespread zoonosis is a kinetoplastid protozoan parasite of the Leishmania genus, transmitted through inoculation by female sandflies. About twenty Leishmania species can infect humans, and are not only responsible for various clinical forms (cutaneous leishmaniasis, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis or visceral leishmaniasis) and outcomes, depending mainly on the Leishmania species, but also on the immune background of the patient. Whereas cutaneous leishmaniasis is usually a self-healing disease, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis is a more severe non-healing disease, and visceral leishmaniasis is usually fatal in the absence of treatment.4

The stages of the parasite life cycle are correlated to the infection stages in the hosts.5, 6, 7 In the vector salivary glands, the parasites are found as extracellular promastigotes. After inoculation by the insect bite, parasites are phagocytosed by mammalian macrophages and differentiate to their amastigote intracellular stage. The adaptation of Leishmania to two different environments is thus highly critical for its survival and growth. In sandflies, the parasite load was shown to be correlated with the feeding with plants containing high levels of sucrose,8, 9, 10, 11 which indicates a critical role for the enzymes involved in sucrose transport and metabolism for Leishmania survival and growth in insect gut. Several pathways have been described for sucrose metabolism,12 involving either an extracellular13, 14 or an intracellular15 invertase. Recently, a report from Lyda et al.16 identified and characterized a secreted invertase from the leishmania species donovani and mexicana, highlighting the potentiality of these enzymes as a therapeutic target to disrupt the parasite metabolism.

Invertases (EC 3.2.1.26), or β-fructofuranosidases, are glycosides hydrolases (GHs) that catalyze the hydrolysis of sucrose into fructose and glucose (Fig. 1) by the recognition of β-d-fructose in the enzyme active site. Invertases belong to the CAZy family GH32 that contains invertases, fructan hydrolases, fructosyltransferases and sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolases.17 Several X-ray structures of GH32 family from different organisms have been reported in the literature, including bacteria,18, 19, 20, 21 fungi,22, 23 yeast24, 25, 26 and plants.27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 Five putative genes encoding invertases have been identified in Leishmania genomes,35, 36, 37, 38 but only one protein was cloned and enzymatically characterized as an extracellular invertase.16 Unlike Leishmania, no invertase is present in human genome, but another GH is responsible for sucrose hydrolysis, i.e. sucrase or α-d-glucosidase, which interacts with the α-d-glucosyl moiety of sucrose (Fig. 1).

The importance of Leishmania invertases in the survival and growth of the parasite in the insect vector, as well as their absence in humans, make them potential target for the design of anti-Leishmania active compounds.16 Analyzing their enzymatic behavior, as well as their expression level during the parasite life cycle, is thus necessary to better understand their biological role. Herein, we describe the cloning, purification and biochemical characterization of the first intracellular Leishmania invertase, named BfrA. Noteworthy, this particular enzyme is only highly expressed in the promastigote stage of the parasite, thus is probably essential for the parasite sucrose metabolism in the insect vector.

Section snippets

Sequence analysis and primers design

L. major, L. infantum, L. donovani, L. mexicana, and L. braziliensis genomes were retrieved from GeneBank database. BlastP39 was used to identify invertases in these genomes, using CAZy database (www.cazy.org).40 GH32 protein sequences were retrieved from UniProt database. Clustal Omega EMBL server was used for multiple alignments,41, 42 and Phylogeny server was used for phylogenetic tree generation.43 Specific primers were designed for RT-qPCR using CLC Workbench® software (Qiagen).

Promastigote parasite cultures

Leishmania

Sequence alignment of Leishmania invertases

In order to identify the homologies between Leishmania putative invertases and other GH32 enzymes, a sequence alignment was performed. The peptidic sequences of all characterized GH32 enzymes in CaZY database were retrieved and aligned together with the sequences of GH32 enzymes found in L. major, L. infantum, L. mexicana, L. donovani, and L. braziliensis. Six genes coding for GH32 enzymes were identified in several chromosomes: two on chromosome 4, two on chromosome 23, one on chromosome 27,

Conclusion

In this work, we provide the description of an invertase of the GH32 family in the Leishmania genus, the first enzyme of the sucrose metabolism and bring new insight into the parasitic metabolic pathways. Despite owing common biochemical characteristics for this family, its poor sequence homology with other GH32 invertases is of high interest in view of medical chemistry development. Our data also suggest that the glycosylated form of BfrA is inactive and that its location is most likely

Acknowledgments

We thank Christelle Manuel for technical assistance.

References (79)

  • J. Alexander et al.
  • D.L. Sacks

    Exp Parasitol

    (1989)
  • Y. Schlein

    Parasitol Today

    (1986)
  • N.F. Gontijo et al.

    Exp Parasitol

    (1996)
  • A. Singh et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (2011)
  • F. Alberto et al.

    J Biol Chem

    (2004)
  • J. Park et al.

    J Biol Chem

    (2012)
  • R.a.P. Nagem et al.

    J Mol Biol

    (2004)
  • J. Pouyez et al.

    Biochimie

    (2012)
  • M. Álvaro-Benito et al.

    J Biol Chem

    (2010)
  • M. Álvaro-Benito et al.

    J Biol Chem

    (2012)
  • M.A. Sainz-Polo et al.

    J Biol Chem

    (2013)
  • S.F. Altschul et al.

    J Mol Biol

    (1990)
  • R. Breitling et al.

    Protein Expres. Purif

    (2002)
  • P. Bernfeld

    Methods in enzymology

    (1955)
  • A. Sali et al.

    J Mol Biol

    (1993)
  • B.M. Chassy et al.

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1979)
  • J. Thompson et al.

    J Biol Chem

    (1991)
  • J. Thompson et al.

    J Biol Chem

    (2001)
  • A. Saxena et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (2007)
  • E.J. Vandamme et al.

    Adv Appl Microbiol

    (1983)
  • D. Butler

    Nature

    (2007)
  • J. Alvar et al.

    PLoS ONE

    (2012)
  • J. Van Griensven et al.

    PLoS NeglTrop Dis

    (2014)
  • H. Hussain et al.

    Chem Rev

    (2014)
  • D. Zilberstein et al.

    Annu Rev Microbiol

    (1994)
  • R.S. Bray

    J Protozool

    (1983)
  • Y. Schlein et al.

    Med Vet Entomol

    (1999)
  • Y. Schlein et al.

    Nature

    (2001)
  • A.N. Chatterjee et al.

    Nature

    (1960)
  • J.J. Blum et al.

    J Eukaryot Microbiol

    (1994)
  • T.A. Lyda et al.

    Mol Cell Biochem

    (2015)
  • B.L. Cantarel et al.

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2009)
  • F. Alberto et al.

    Biochem J

    (2006)
  • A. Bujacz et al.

    FEBS J

    (2011)
  • M. Hothorn et al.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2010)
  • M. Hothorn et al.

    Plant Cell

    (2004)
  • W. Lammens et al.

    J Exp Bot

    (2009)
  • W. Lammens et al.

    Plant J

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These authors participated equally to the work.

    View full text