Elsevier

Catalysis Today

Volume 306, 15 May 2018, Pages 251-259
Catalysis Today

Photocatalytic activity of wool fabrics deposited at low temperature with ZnO or TiO2 nanoparticles: Methylene blue degradation as a test reaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.02.044Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Wool (from industry or home made) is a less studied textile.

  • ZnO or TiO2 (nano)particles were deposited either by sputtering or by a chemical technique.

  • Oxide particles act as photocatalysts, in MB decolorization, by UV and vis irradiation.

  • The data of photocatalytic decolorization follows up apparent first order kinetics.

  • The presented results point to a fundamental research with potential applications.

Abstract

Different amounts of TiO2 and ZnO particles were deposited upon wool fabrics, which are among the less studied textiles. The materials were get from industry or were home made. Model samples for these oxide deposition and properties were also considered. Either sputtering or chemical sol-gel/electro less technique was respectively applied. The coated samples were then characterized structurally and morphologically, by XRD, SEM and XPS and were checked for photocatalytic properties. Both UV and vis light beams were used for irradiation. The photocatalytic experiments were performed by photodegradation of methylene blue in the PCC2 checker apparatus. The fabrics were firstly impregnated with the dye solution and then dried: self cleaning of the wool fabric samples took in fact place. Reflectance data in the visible spectral range of highest absorption band served for direct analysis of MB degradation. The photocatalytic properties of the coated fabrics increased much in comparison with the raw materials. The photocatalytic decolorization of methylene blue follows up a simple apparently first order kinetic equation in many studied cases. Thus it was demonstrated that MB decolorization can serve as a test reaction at least for self cleaning of fabrics.

Introduction

Zinc oxide (ZnO) is a known semiconductor, which was frequently used either as bulk or as thin layer due to its remarkable properties like high electron mobility, wide band gap, and strong luminescence at room temperature. Many applications were developed last years not only as solar cells and different sensors, in opto-electronics or for transparent conducting films but also as photocatalyst [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is another semiconductor widely recognized from a basic research point of view and due to its technological applications, based on its UV blocking, antibacterial or/and photocatalytic [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] properties. The general mechanism of photocatalysis should include the excitation with photons of energy higher than the band gap and the generation of the exciton pair with holes in the valence band and electrons in the conduction band. These charge carriers may either recombine, dissipating the energy as heat, or undergo an interfacial charge transfer process [3], [14]. Attempts were done to improve each of the steps in (heterogeneous) photocatalysis by tailoring the semiconductor and the reaction conditions. Moreover, its terminology, relative photonic efficiencies and quantum yields were discussed [15], [16], [17].

ZnO was settled upon various supports, including different textiles made from natural or synthetic fibers like cotton [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], polyester (e.g. [29], [30]), silk [31] or wool [32], [33]. Coating the fibers by TiO2 particles was also performed by many techniques: thus, synthetic fibers, e.g. polyester ones, were covered with TiO2 at temperature lower than the natural fibers [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]. Photocatalysis onto TiO2 deposited fabrics was discussed in several works, for example [14], [41], [42], [43].

The photocatalytic performances of different semiconductor catalysts including ZnO and TiO2 [44], [45], [46], [47] were tested by decolorization of different dyes, one of them being methylene blue (MB). Being water soluble, MB can be easily applied directly to different (textile) stuffs: wool [48], cotton [48], [49], polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [50], silica gel [51], metal oxides [52] etc. Due to the fact thatthe reversibility of changes after exposure might be stopped or due to the ambiguous reaction mechanism though under ultraviolet irradiation where MB photoabsorption may be disregarded see for example [45], [53], MB was considered less suitable probe molecule [14].

This paper reports on ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles deposition onto the surface of wool fabrics and model samples and on the photocatalytic properties of these particles. On one hand, the oxide deposition improves the textile features and on the other hand they might find different applications [54] as interesting substrates, which are cheap, non-toxic, washable and foldable. Our wool materials have different mesh sizes and fabrication mode. Pretreatments were already performed industrially to bleach them, to arrive up to effective anti-felting, to receive shrink-resistance etc. During the actual works plasma (pre)treatment was performed that is known to have the effect of cystine bond cleavage and forming of the cysteic acid. Two methods were then applied for oxide deposition leading to (nano)particles: electroless technique or sputtering for ZnO and sol-gel or sputtering for TiO2. UV photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue was finally used for evaluation of photocatalytic properties of coated wool fabrics. Photocatalytic kinetics was discussed as well. MB is degraded upon semiconductor oxide catalytic systems made from alike supports, the same deposited semiconductor particles and similar irradiation: we were in the case when MB photocatalytic degradation can serve as test reaction for fabrics. These reaction conditions rather indicate those in which the self cleaning of fabrics is manifested: thus the decolorization of this dye might be recommended to evaluate fabric photocatalytic properties at least at the self cleaning level.

Section snippets

Textiles samples

Pieces of sheep wool fabrics originated from industry or home-made were our samples. They differ by the chemical nature of the yarns, the size and the 2D texture elements and the pretreatment type (see Table 1). In Table 1 there are also given the images (made at the same magnification by optical microscopy) of the samples allowing to roughly estimate some morphological differences. Other samples made from cotton or deposited glass plates were used as model for comparison.

Textile functionalization

The pieces of the

Results and discussion

The presentation of the obtained results follows up the two main aims of the work: oxide particle deposition and the photocatalytic properties given by these particles. Thus, deposited samples were investigated in order to demonstrate the deposition of the oxides, the formation of new chemical bonds and the appearance of ZnO/TiO2 aggregates. Though some coated layers are amorphous and the oxide presence cannot be revealed by XRD investigations, the PCC2 checker and MB as the dye to be bleached

Conclusions

Wool textile and model glass plate samples were successfully coated with TiO2 and ZnO (nano)particles at rather low temperature using either a sputtering or a chemical sol-gel/electro less technique. The coated samples were structurally and morphologically characterized by XRD, SEM and XPS. Sputtering leads to wurtzite type ZnO crystallites but deposited TiO2 does not appear crystalline.

TiO2 or ZnO powders deposited upon the fabrics acted as photocatalysts under UV light to decolorize methylene

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank the Romanian Authority of the Education Ministry for the financial support under the project ID 281/2011 and are indebted to Dr. N. Preda (NIMP, Magurele, Romania) for the experiments of ZnO electroless deposition upon the samples.

References (83)

  • K.M. Lee et al.

    Water Res.

    (2016)
  • O. Carp et al.

    Prog. Solid State Chem.

    (2004)
  • M. Pelaez et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2012)
  • K. Nakata et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev.

    (2012)
  • H. Park et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev.

    (2013)
  • B. Xu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2008)
  • Z.H. Lim et al.

    Sens. Actuators B

    (2010)
  • E.S. Ates et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2012)
  • Z. Mao et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2009)
  • P.M. Sivakumar et al.

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2010)
  • N. Preda et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2013)
  • M. Ashraf et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2013)
  • W.A. Daoud et al.

    J. Non-Cryst. Solids

    (2005)
  • R. Rahal et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2011)
  • X. Yan et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2006)
  • A. Mills et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (1999)
  • A. Khan et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2014)
  • S. Frunza et al.

    J. Non-Cryst. Solids

    (2003)
  • J.H. Park et al.

    Mater. Lett.

    (2009)
  • A. Bhattacharyya et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2004)
  • M. Forouharshad et al.

    Thermochim. Acta

    (2011)
  • M. Kwoka et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2005)
  • M.J. Height et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2006)
  • F.B. Li et al.

    Chemosphere

    (2002)
  • G. Hurwitz et al.

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2010)
  • Y.J. Jang et al.

    Res. Mater Bull.

    (2006)
  • S.-M. Lama et al.

    Desalin. Water Treat.

    (2012)
  • X. Bai et al.

    Langmuir

    (2013)
  • S.G. Kumar et al.

    RSC Adv.

    (2015)
  • B. Yin et al.

    J. Nanomater.

    (2014)
  • A.L. Linsebigler et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1995)
  • K. Hashimoto et al.

    Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.

    (2005)
  • A. Ajmal et al.

    RSC Adv.

    (2014)
  • J. Schneider et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2014)
  • M. Rochkind et al.

    Molecules

    (2015)
  • N. Serpone et al.

    Pure Appl. Chem.

    (1999)
  • A. Salinaro et al.

    Pure Appl. Chem.

    (1999)
  • S.E. Braslavsky et al.

    Pure Appl. Chem.

    (2011)
  • A. Yadav et al.

    Bull. Mater. Sci.

    (2006)
  • S.S. Ugur et al.

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.

    (2010)
  • S.K. Bajpai et al.

    J. Eng. Fibers Fabr.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text