Cell Reports
Volume 20, Issue 8, 22 August 2017, Pages 1964-1977
Journal home page for Cell Reports

Resource
Peptide-Based Scaffolds Support Human Cortical Progenitor Graft Integration to Reduce Atrophy and Promote Functional Repair in a Model of Stroke

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.069Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Peptide scaffolds structurally and functionally support neural grafts in a stroke model

  • Scaffolds promote human stem cell graft differentiation and integration

  • Cell + scaffold implants reduce host tissue atrophy

  • Cell + scaffold implants promote prolonged recovery of motor function

Summary

Stem cell transplants offer significant hope for brain repair following ischemic damage. Pre-clinical work suggests that therapeutic mechanisms may be multi-faceted, incorporating bone-fide circuit reconstruction by transplanted neurons, but also protection/regeneration of host circuitry. Here, we engineered hydrogel scaffolds to form “bio-bridges” within the necrotic lesion cavity, providing physical and trophic support to transplanted human embryonic stem cell-derived cortical progenitors, as well as residual host neurons. Scaffolds were fabricated by the self-assembly of peptides for a laminin-derived epitope (IKVAV), thereby mimicking the brain’s major extracellular protein. Following focal ischemia in rats, scaffold-supported cell transplants induced progressive motor improvements over 9 months, compared to cell- or scaffold-only implants. These grafts were larger, exhibited greater neuronal differentiation, and showed enhanced electrophysiological properties reflective of mature, integrated neurons. Varying graft timing post-injury enabled us to attribute repair to both neuroprotection and circuit replacement. These findings highlight strategies to improve the efficiency of stem cell grafts for brain repair.

Keywords

neural transplantation
human embryonic stem cells
stroke
hydrogel
self-assembling peptides
cortex
integration

Cited by (0)

4

These authors contributed equally

5

Senior author

6

Lead Contact