Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
eHealth Technologies for Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Viral Hepatitis: A Systematic Review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.011Get rights and content

Background & Aims

Chronic viral hepatitis is a leading cause of worldwide liver-related morbidity and mortality, despite the availability of effective treatments that reduce or prevent complications in most patients. Electronic-health (eHealth) technologies have potential to intervene along the whole cascade of care. We aimed to summarize available literature on eHealth interventions with respect to conventional screening, diagnostic and treatment outcomes in chronic hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV).

Methods

We systematically reviewed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and international conference abstracts, including studies published from 2009 – 2020. Overall 80 studies were included, covering electronic medical record (EMR) interventions (n=39), telemedicine (n=20), mHealth (n=5), devices (n=4), clinical decision support (n=3), web-based (n=5), social media (n=1) and electronic communication (n=3).

Results

Compared to standard care, EMR alerts increase screening rates in eligible populations including birth cohort screening in HCV, universal HCV screening in Emergency Departments, ethnic groups with high HBV prevalence, and HBV screening prior to immunosuppression. Direct messaging alerts to providers and automated testing may have a greater effect. No significant difference was found in sustained virological response outcomes between telemedicine and face-to-face management for community, rural and prison cohorts in HCV in the direct acting antiviral era of treatment, with higher patient satisfaction in telemedicine groups.

Conclusions

EMR alerts significantly increase screening rates in eligible cohorts in both chronic HBV and HCV. Telemedicine is equally efficacious to face-to-face care in HCV treatment. Other eHealth technologies show promise; however rigorous studies are lacking.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

We performed a systematic review of the literature in July 2020 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (Supplementary Table 1). This systematic review was prospectively registered on the NIHR Prospero database (registration number: CRD42018084582).

Study Selection

A total of 1979 studies were identified. After removal of duplicate entries, title and abstract review, 140 studies were retained for full-text review. Supplementary Figure 1 outlines the PRISMA flow diagram outlining search and identification outcomes. After full-text review, 80 studies were included in the final analysis (Supplementary Material). The first identified study was in 2009, with an increase in published eHealth interventions for viral hepatitis year on year from 2012 onwards.

Impact of eHealth Interventions

A rapid growth in eHealth research in viral hepatitis has provided strong evidence that EMR alerts improve screening rates in HBV and HCV and for the use of telemedicine in the treatment of HCV in both community and prison settings. Directly messaging providers and automated electronic ordering based on high risk patient factors appear to further enhance the yield in EMR-based interventions, and telementoring may increase treatment initiation rates in the community for HCV. Web-based, mHealth,

Conclusions

Electronic medical record alerts significantly improve screening rates in both hepatitis B and C, and the addition of automated testing in high risk cohorts may further enhance this. Telemedicine for community and prison-based hepatitis C management yields equivalent clinical outcomes to face-to-face specialist management in hepatitis C and may result in higher patient satisfaction. The addition of telementoring increases community-based treatment initiation in HCV and improves clinician

CRediT Authorship Contributions

James Haridy, MBBS, MPH, B Physio, CHIA, FRACP (Conceptualization: Lead; Data curation: Lead; Formal analysis: Lead; Methodology: Lead; Project administration: Lead; Writing – original draft: Lead; Writing – review & editing: Lead)

Guru Iyngkaran (Conceptualization: Supporting; Formal analysis: Supporting; Writing – review & editing: Supporting)

Amanda Nicoll (Conceptualization: Supporting; Writing – original draft: Supporting; Writing – review & editing: Supporting)

Geoff Hebbard (Writing –

References (48)

  • D.K. Owens et al.

    Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adolescents and adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement

    JAMA

    (2020)
  • N. Abughali et al.

    Interventions using electronic medical records improve follow up of infants born to hepatitis C virus infected mothers

    Pediatric Infect Dis J

    (2014)
  • D.N. Fitch et al.

    Use of electronic health record clinical decision support tool for HCV birth cohort screening

    J Viral Hepat

    (2017)
  • E. Chak et al.

    Electronic medical alerts increase screening for chronic hepatitis B: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2018)
  • L. Hsu et al.

    Electronic messages increase hepatitis B screening in at-risk Asian American patients: a randomized, controlled trial

    Dig Dis Sci

    (2013)
  • H. Jones et al.

    Electronic reminders increase hepatitis C screening, referral, treatment and cure

    J Viral Hepat

    (2019)
  • V. Shahnazarian et al.

    Hepatitis C: improving the quality of screening in a community hospital by implementing an electronic medical record intervention

    BMJ Qual Improv Rep

    (2015)
  • M.C. Jonas et al.

    Streamlining screening to treatment: the hepatitis C cascade of care at Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2016)
  • A. de la Torre et al.

    Electronic health record year and country of birth testing and patient navigation to increase diagnosis of chronic viral hepatitis

    J Viral Hepat

    (2019)
  • J.J. Feld et al.

    An electronic prompt prior to myelosuppressive therapy to improve hepatitis B virus screening

    J Clin Oncol

    (2014)
  • H. Fujii et al.

    Putting "sticky notes" on the electronic medical record to promote intra-hospital referral of hepatitis B and C virus-positive patients to hepatology specialists: an exploratory study

    BMC Infectious Diseases

    (2016)
  • M. Castrejon et al.

    Implementation of a large system-wide hepatitis C virus screening and linkage to care program for baby boomers

    Open Forum Infect Dis

    (2017)
  • S. Arora et al.

    Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers

    N Engl J Med

    (2011)
  • M. Neuhaus et al.

    Telementoring for hepatitis C treatment in correctional facilities

    J Telemed Telecare

    (2018)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Interventions to enhance testing, linkage to care, and treatment initiation for hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Medical chart reminders significantly improved the uptake of HCV antibody testing, the uptake of HCV RNA testing, and linkage to HCV care in at least two studies and significantly improved treatment uptake in a single study. This finding is consistent with the effect of medical reminders on improving screening for HIV, hepatitis B virus, colorectal cancer, and diabetes.130–134 These reminders remove provider-level barriers caused by acts of omission that can occur from an overload of information for clinicians, competing medical priorities, or an outdated knowledge of testing guidelines.135–137

    • Patient-centered HCV care via telemedicine for individuals on medication for opioid use disorder: Telemedicine for Evaluation, Adherence and Medication for Hepatitis C (TEAM-C)

      2022, Contemporary Clinical Trials
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, OASAS has research-related data, such as baseline demographic data used for the randomization schema. Several systematic reviews have identified the need for rigorous trials of telemedicine both for HCV and broadly [1,2]. Evidence-based telemedicine trials targeted to vulnerable populations are especially needed.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: JH has received speaker fees from Merck-Sharpe-Dohme and Bristol-Myer Squibbs unrelated to this study. GI and ET are shareholders in Gessit Pty Ltd and have received research grants from Merck-Sharpe-Dohme, Bristol-Myer-Squibbs, and AbbVie unrelated to this study. AJN has received speaker fees and research support from MSD, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, and AbbVie unrelated to this study. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.

    Funding JH is supported on an Australian Government Research Training Scholarship.

    View full text