Elsevier

Chemosphere

Volume 293, April 2022, 133548
Chemosphere

Multifunctional hybrid membranes for photocatalytic and adsorptive removal of water contaminants of emerging concern

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133548Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Synthesis of Au–TiO2 nanocomposites with ability to absorb visible radiation.

  • Production of porous multifunctional Au–TiO2/Yttrium/PVDF-HFP membranes.

  • Photocatalytic and adsorptive efficiency tested in norfloxacin and arsenic removal.

  • Multifunctional tests performed for simultaneous photocatalysis and adsorption.

Abstract

This work focuses on the combination of multifunctional photocatalytic and adsorbent materials in a unique polymeric membrane. For this purpose, Au/TiO2 and Y2(CO3)3 nanoparticles were immobilised onto a poly (vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene), (PVDF-HFP) membrane, and the physical-chemical characterisation of these materials was performed, as well as pollutant removal efficiency. An efficient TiO2 functionalisation with gold nanoparticles was achieved, endowing these particles with the capability to absorb visible radiation absorption. A favourable porous structure was obtained for the membranes, with an average pore size of 4 μm, and the nanoparticles immobilisation did not alter the chemical properties of the polymeric membrane. The produced hybrid materials, including both the Au/TiO2 and Y2(CO3)3 nanoparticles, presented an efficiency of 57% in the degradation of norfloxacin (5 mg/L) under ultraviolet radiation for 120 min, 80% under visible radiation for 300 min, and 58% in arsenic adsorption for 240 min. These membranes represent a new multifunctional platform for removing several pollutants, which may allow their incorporation in more efficient and less energy-consuming water treatment processes favouring its application, even in low energy resources countries.

Introduction

Human health and well-being strongly depend on the water quality available for consumption (Organisation, 2017). Deterioration of water quality has become one of the most worrying and urgent problems since about 1.6 million people die annually from illness related to unsafe water consumption, responsible for the deaths of at least 3900 children a day in developing countries (Shannon et al., 2008).

Among the causing agents are the so-called contaminants of emerging concern (CEC), released daily into wastewaters in an unmonitored form (Schwarzenbach et al., 2006). Emerging contaminants involve pharmaceuticals (Quesada et al., 2019), personal care products (Ebele et al., 2017), agrochemicals (Evans et al., 2019), industrial products (Deblonde et al., 2011), and many others. Antibiotics are abundantly used in modern medicine to fight bacterial infections and are excreted in an unmetabolised way in 95% of the cases, ending in wastewater (Elmund et al., 1971). Due to rising antibiotics consumption, a gradual increase of bacterial resistance is predicted until 2050, which would cause 10 million deaths per year, reducing the world domestic product by approximately 100 trillion dollars (O'Neill, 2018).

Among CEC, Norfloxacin (NOR) is an antibiotic from the fluoroquinolone group that challenges conventional water treatment systems due to its complexity and chemical stability (de Souza et al., 2018). Its inefficient removal from effluents represents a risk for human health and the environment since this antibiotic can be toxic to plants and aquatic organisms (Shah et al., 2018) and responsible for bacterial genotoxicity (Chen and Chu, 2016).

Further, inorganic pollutants such as heavy metals can be found in abundance in various natural systems due to their excessive use in anthropogenic activities and provenance from natural sources (Siegel, 2002). Among the most dangerous heavy metals for the environment and human health, arsenic is one of the ten pollutants of most significant concern for public health, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) (Organisation, 2018). Arsenic exposure is related to several diseases, including respiratory, neurologic, and mutagenic diseases, bladder, viscus, and kidney cancers, and even death (Qiu et al., 2020). It was estimated that arsenic-contaminated water consumption causes more than 150 million deaths in more than 70 countries (Luan et al., 2019). Due to these severe effects, the WHO has defined 10 μg/L as the maximum concentration level (MCL) for arsenic in drinking water (Qiu et al., 2020).

Various studies on removing pollutants through conventional water treatment techniques reveal their inefficiency in removing the pollutants mentioned above, even responsible for forming several harmful by-products (Quintana et al., 2010). Biological processes (Joss et al., 2006), sand filtration (Stackelberg et al., 2007), coagulation/flocculation (Vieno et al., 2007), sedimentation (Arikan, 2008), and chlorine disinfection (Acero et al., 2010) are some of these techniques. The need for further efficient solutions leads to innovative approaches, including photocatalysis, adsorption and membrane-based technologies (Homem and Santos, 2011).

Photocatalysis has been distinguished by its high degradation efficiencies, non-selectivity, photochemical stability and low implementation costs (Prihod'ko and Soboleva, 2013). Due to its properties, photocatalysis is nowadays the most used technique for the degradation of a wide range of contaminants of emerging concern, including pharmaceuticals (Anucha et al., 2021), organic dyes (Zhao et al., 2022), pesticides (Bose et al., 2021), and personal health care products (Venkatesan Savunthari et al., 2021). To an efficient photocatalytic process, only a radiation source and a photocatalyst are necessary. The search for efficient and cost-effective photocatalysts resulted in a wide range of materials: titanium dioxide (TiO2) (Mousa et al., 2021), zinc oxide (ZnO) (Leng et al., 2021), tungsten trioxide (WO3) (Mehta et al., 2021), cadmium sulfide (CdS) and graphitic carbon nitrides (g-C3N4) (Mehta et al., 2021), amongst others. TiO2 is the most used photocatalyst due to its high photocatalytic activity, chemical stability, reduced toxicity and relatively low cost (Zhao et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2018). TiO2-based photocatalysts have been widely used for photocatalysis in the removal of bisphenol A (Gao et al., 2010), pesticides (Kadam et al., 2014), pharmaceuticals (Anucha et al., 2021; Aoudjit et al., 2021), including antibiotics (Zhao et al., 2020), and particularly norfloxacin (Katzenberg et al., 2020), presenting efficiencies always close to 100% under UV radiation. Disadvantages such as low photocatalytic activity under visible radiation can be overcome with TiO2 doping (Nguyen et al., 2018; Garzon-Roman et al., 2019), functionalisation with noble metals (Martins et al., 2020b; Salazar et al., 2020a), and the development of hybrid materials (Cheng et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2019).

The arsenic species removal from natural and drinking water is an environmental remediation issue of high importance, being oxidation (Leupin and Hug, 2005), co-precipitation (Wang et al., 2011), ion exchange (He et al., 2012), membrane filtration (Sabbatini et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2013) and adsorption (Mohan and Pittman, 2007; Zhao et al., 2019) the most commonly used methods. Among them, adsorption arises as an exciting alternative for the remediation of these contaminants due to its high efficiencies, straightforward operation, cost-effectiveness, and lack of sludge production. Its application towards heavy metals (Ren et al., 2021) such as arsenic (Xu et al., 2022), chromium (Ntuli et al., 2021) or lead (Hong et al., 2022) has been the focus of intense research in the scope of inorganic contaminants. Concerning arsenic remediation, adsorption using several materials has been reported (Gupta et al., 2021). Special attention has been devoted to adsorbents synthesised through rare metals such as zirconium, lanthanum and cerium, which have been successful in arsenic removal (Mohan and Pittman, 2007). Among these rare metals, yttrium (Y) has shown great potential in the adsorption of arsenic in suspension (Yu et al., 2019), as demonstrated by the use of different Y-based materials for arsenic removal, for instance, Y/PVA (Yu et al., 2018b), Fe–Y binary oxide (Huang et al., 2020), and Co3O4/Y2O3 (Pei et al., 2021), achieving adsorption efficiencies higher than 90% under specific experimental conditions.

The combination of photocatalytic and adsorption processes may be achieved by immobilising a photocatalyst and an adsorbent material into a unique matrix such as a polymeric membrane, addressing the removal of CECs and heavy metals simultaneously (Du et al., 2019) or to improve the removal of a specific compound by the combined adsorption/degradation process (Song et al., 2021). The production of polymer-based multifunctional materials for adsorptive and photocatalytic effects on the photoreduction and adsorption of heavy metals (Mulungulungu et al., 2021), as well as adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds (Pascariu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). Alternatively, the application of multifunctional materials for simultaneous organic and inorganic contaminants remediation is still poorly reported (Doagoo et al., 2021). The combination of adsorption, photocatalysis, and membrane filtration is often used to remove inorganic and organic species of a specific heavy metal, such as simultaneous removing As(V) and p- Arsanilic acid (Liu et al., 2020). In the last decades, the use of polymeric substrates such as polyester (Yu et al., 2019), polyamide (Cossich et al., 2015), cellulose (Ortelli et al., 2014), chitosan (Jbeli et al., 2018), and polyvinylidene fluoride, to immobilise active nanoparticles as arisen as a strong possibility.

PVDF and its copolymers are widely used to develop membranes due to their mechanical, chemical, and thermal stability (Liu et al., 2011). PVDF-HFP is a PVDF copolymer, and alongside other PVDF copolymers, it has been used in water remediation for the removal of heavy metals (Salazar et al., 2016), organic matter (Zioui et al., 2019), organic compounds (Zioui et al., 2019), and desalination (Zuo et al., 2013) among others.

This work used the PVDF-HFP as a porous substrate to immobilise photocatalytic and adsorptive nanoparticles that endow this membrane with multifunctional properties. This hybrid material will address the removal of norfloxacin and arsenic contaminants simultaneously.

Section snippets

Materials

Commercial titanium dioxide nanoparticles (P25 TiO2, with 21 nm of particle size and 35–65 m2/g of surface area) were supplied by Evonik (Quimidroga, Spain). Yttrium carbonate (Y2(CO3)3) nanoparticles (particle size: 100–120 nm; surface area: 12–18 m2/g) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Sigma-Aldrich also provided gold (III) chloride trihydrate solution (HAuCl4·3H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and sodium arsenate dibasic heptahydrate (HAsNa2O4). PVDF-HFP was supplied by Arkema and N,

Nanoparticle's characterisation

The Au/TiO2 and Y2(CO3)3 particles morphology and microstructure were accessed using TEM and XRD techniques. Fig. 2 (a) shows the nanorod shape for Y2(CO3)3 nanoparticles, with a size of 50–200 nm. Fig. 2 (b) identifies a homogeneous dispersion of Au nanoparticles (clearer points in the image) on TiO2 nanoparticles. Au nanoparticles present an almost spherical shape, confirming a good crystallisation process. TiO2 nanoparticles show an average size of around 10 nm, and Au nanoparticles size

Conclusions

Admittedly, water bodies are increasingly contaminated with persistent contaminants, requiring urgent combinatorial technologies to remove them. To face this problem, visible photocatalysis and adsorption, together with membrane technology, offer a solution to remove organic and inorganic contaminants with a single robust and multifunctional material.

Herein, TiO2 nanoparticles were successfully functionalised with gold nanoparticles of ≈1.5 nm, envisaging visible radiation absorption. The Au/TiO

Credit author statement

Conceptualization: S. Lanceros-Mendez and P. M. Martins; Data curation: P. M. Martins; Bruno Santos, H. Salazar; Formal analysis: P. M. Martins, S. Lanceros-Mendez; Funding acquisition: S. Lanceros-Mendez; Investigation: Bruno Santos, H. Salazar, Sónia A.C. Carabineiro; Methodology: P. M. Martins, H. Salazar, Sónia A.C. Carabineiro; Project administration: S. Lanceros-Mendez Resources: S. Lanceros-Mendez, Carlos J. Tavares, G. Botelho, Sónia A.C. Carabineiro; Software: H. Salazar, Bruno Santos;

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia - FCT) in the framework of the strategic project UID/QUI/0686/2020 and UID/FIS/04650/2020 by FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020-Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) with the reference project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006941, project PTDC/CTM-ENE/5387/2014, 2020–2023 multiannual funding to Centro de Química Estrutural (project UIDB/00100/2020) and

References (104)

  • D.M. Correia et al.

    Surface wettability modification of poly(vinylidene fluoride) and copolymer films and membranes by plasma treatment

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • E. Cossich et al.

    Development of electrospun photocatalytic TiO2-polyamide-12 nanocomposites

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2015)
  • D.I. de Souza et al.

    Nanofiltration for the removal of norfloxacin from pharmaceutical effluent

    J. Environ. Chem. Eng.

    (2018)
  • T. Deblonde et al.

    Emerging pollutants in wastewater: a review of the literature

    Int. J. Hyg Environ. Health

    (2011)
  • X. Du et al.

    Enhanced photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and diclofenac sodium degradation under simulated sunlight irradiation over MIL-100(Fe)/g-C3N4 heterojunctions

    Chin. J. Catal.

    (2019)
  • A.J. Ebele et al.

    Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment

    Emerging Contaminants

    (2017)
  • A.E.V. Evans et al.

    Agricultural water pollution: key knowledge gaps and research needs

    Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.

    (2019)
  • E. Evgenidou et al.

    Photocatalytic degradation of a mixture of eight antibiotics using Cu-modified TiO2 photocatalysts: kinetics, mineralisation, antimicrobial activity elimination and disinfection

    J. Environ. Chem. Eng.

    (2021)
  • B. Gao et al.

    Zr-doped TiO2 for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A

    Appl. Catal. Gen.

    (2010)
  • S. Gao et al.

    Effect of different Co contents on the microstructure and tensile strength of Mg-Co-Y alloys

    Mater. Sci. Eng., A

    (2019)
  • Z. He et al.

    Adsorption of arsenate and arsenite from aqueous solutions by cerium-loaded cation exchange resin

    J. Rare Earths

    (2012)
  • J.-M. Herrmann

    Photocatalysis fundamentals revisited to avoid several misconceptions

    Appl. Catal. B Environ.

    (2010)
  • V. Homem et al.

    Degradation and removal methods of antibiotics from aqueous matrices – a review

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2011)
  • J. Hong et al.

    Highly efficient removal of trace lead (II) from wastewater by 1,4-dicarboxybenzene modified Fe/Co metal organic nanosheets

    J. Mater. Sci. Technol.

    (2022)
  • J. Hua

    Synthesis and characterisation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and ZnO decorated zirconia as a potential adsorbent for enhanced arsenic removal from aqueous solution

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (2021)
  • Z. Huang et al.

    Selective removal of high concentration arsenate from aqueous solution by magnetic Fe–Y binary oxide

    Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.

    (2020)
  • A. Jbeli et al.

    Chitosan-Ag-TiO2 films: an effective photocatalyst under visible light

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2018)
  • A. Joss et al.

    Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: proposing a classification scheme

    Water Res.

    (2006)
  • A.N. Kadam et al.

    Preparation of N doped TiO2 via microwave-assisted method and its photocatalytic activity for degradation of Malathion

    Spectrochim. Acta Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.

    (2014)
  • B. Leng et al.

    Highly efficient visible-light photocatalytic degradation and antibacterial activity by GaN:ZnO solid solution nanoparticles

    J. Mater. Sci. Technol.

    (2021)
  • V. Lenoble et al.

    Arsenite oxidation and arsenate determination by the molybdene blue method

    Talanta

    (2003)
  • O.X. Leupin et al.

    Oxidation and removal of arsenic (III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron

    Water Res.

    (2005)
  • B. Liu et al.

    Effective and simultaneous removal of organic/inorganic arsenic using polymer-based hydrated iron oxide adsorbent: capacity evaluation and mechanism

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • B. Liu et al.

    As(III) removal from aqueous solution using α-Fe2O3 impregnated chitosan beads with As(III) as imprinted ions

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • H. Luan et al.

    Efficient removal of As(III) by Cu nanoparticles intercalated in carbon nanotube membranes for drinking water treatment

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2019)
  • D. Mohan et al.

    Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—a critical review

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2007)
  • V.R. Moreira et al.

    Arsenic contamination, effects and remediation techniques: a special look onto membrane separation processes

    Process Saf. Environ. Protect.

    (2021)
  • C.H. Nguyen et al.

    Degradation of methylene blue and methyl orange by palladium-doped TiO2 photocatalysis for water reuse: efficiency and degradation pathways

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • S. Ortelli et al.

    TiO2 based nano-photocatalysis immobilised on cellulose substrates

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem.

    (2014)
  • Z. Qiu et al.

    Efficient oxidation and absorption of As(III) from aqueous solutions for environmental remediation via CuO@MNW membranes

    Separ. Purif. Technol.

    (2020)
  • H.B. Quesada et al.

    Surface water pollution by pharmaceuticals and an alternative of removal by low-cost adsorbents: a review

    Chemosphere

    (2019)
  • J.B. Quintana et al.

    Investigating the chlorination of acidic pharmaceuticals and by-product formation aided by an experimental design methodology

    Water Res.

    (2010)
  • P. Sabbatini et al.

    Fabrication and characterisation of iron oxide ceramic membranes for arsenic removal

    Water Res.

    (2010)
  • H. Salazar et al.

    Photocatalytic and antimicrobial multifunctional nanocomposite membranes for emerging pollutants water treatment applications

    Chemosphere

    (2020)
  • H. Salazar et al.

    Poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene)/bayerite composite membranes for efficient arsenic removal from water

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2016)
  • N.S. Shah et al.

    Solar light driven degradation of norfloxacin using as-synthesised Bi3+ and Fe2+ co-doped ZnO with the addition of HSO5−: toxicities and degradation pathways investigation

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • Y. Song et al.

    Multifunctional self-assembly 3D Ag/g-C3N4/RGO aerogel as highly efficient adsorbent and photocatalyst for R6G removal from wastewater

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2021)
  • R.E. Sousa et al.

    Microstructural variations of poly(vinylidene fluoride co-hexafluoropropylene) and their influence on the thermal, dielectric and piezoelectric properties

    Polym. Test.

    (2014)
  • P.E. Stackelberg et al.

    Efficiency of conventional drinking-water-treatment processes in removal of pharmaceuticals and other organic compounds

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2007)
  • A. Sze et al.

    Zeta-potential measurement using the Smoluchowski equation and the slope of the current–time relationship in electroosmotic flow

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Hybrid TiO<inf>2</inf>:Au nanostars based polymeric membranes for photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin in water samples

      2023, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, suitable methods for incorporating the support materials are highly required (Singh et al., 2013b). Poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and its copolymers, such as poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) or poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) (PVDF-TrFE), have been extensively used as membrane materials due to their excellent chemical, mechanical, thermal, and UV resistance characteristics, related to the stable C–F bonds of the polymer chain (Liu et al., 2011; Martins et al., 2022, 2019; Salazar et al., 2020). Furthermore, they can be produced in different morphologies, such as thin films or porous membranes and fibre mats with controlled porosity and pore size, which can allow high photocatalytic efficiency of the nanoparticles after being supported on the membranes (Martins et al., 2019, 2016; P. M. Martins et al., 2014; Salazar et al., 2020).

    • An updated review on environmental occurrence, scientific assessment and removal of brominated flame retardants by engineered nanomaterials

      2022, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are shreds of evidence for the action of nanomaterials towards adsorption and degradation. The first step is the adsorption due to high surface area, while the degradation process starts in the presence of UV or Sunlight irradiation which is followed by the production of oxidative species (OH, superoxide radicals), which leads to the mineralization of pollutants (Martins et al., 2022). Various studies have been carried out in Sunlight and dark conditions to understand the adsorption and degradation process; in these cases, 30–40% adsorption was reported under dark conditions, while in Sunlight, high adsorption >90% with degradation has been reported (Keshu et al., 2021; Rani et al., 2021a,b,c, 2022).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text