Elsevier

Children and Youth Services Review

Volume 56, September 2015, Pages 139-148
Children and Youth Services Review

Juvenile justice, mental health, and the transition to adulthood: A review of service system involvement and unmet needs in the U.S.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We summarized the developmental and service needs of justice-involved transition age youth with mental health problems.

  • Transition age youth are a unique subgroup within the juvenile justice system.

  • There are high rates of mental health problems among this group.

  • We highlighted areas in need of further research.

  • We provided nine specific policy and practice recommendations for this group.

Abstract

Although adolescents are the primary focus of juvenile justice, a significant number of young people involved with this system are considered transition age youth (i.e., 16–25 years of age). The aims of this review are to summarize the specific needs of transition age youth with mental health conditions involved with the juvenile justice system, identify the multiple service systems relevant to this group, and offer recommendations for policies and practice. A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify and synthesize the literature. Findings highlight the paucity of research specific to transition age youth. Thus, we also summarized relevant research on justice-involved adolescents, with a focus evaluating its potential relevance in the context of the unique milestones of the transition age, including finishing one's education, setting and working towards vocational goals, and transitioning from one's family of origin to more independent living situations. Existing programs and initiatives relevant to transition age youth with mental health conditions are highlighted, and nine specific recommendations for policy and practice are offered.

Introduction

Each year, more than 2 million children, adolescents, and young adults formally come into contact with the juvenile justice system in the U.S. (Puzzanchera, 2009). The majority of these youth (65–70%) have at least one diagnosable mental health problem, and 20–25% have serious emotional problems (Shufelt and Cocozza, 2006, Teplin et al., 2002, Wasserman et al., 2002). The current system for rehabilitation often fails to address or even presents barriers to meeting the multiple needs of such young people. Transition age youth are a particularly vulnerable subgroup in the juvenile justice system, as this age group has the highest rates of mental health problems (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2012) and also face multiple transitions in life roles during this developmental period. This paper provides an overview of service system issues for mental health practitioners, juvenile justice professionals, policymakers, and allied professionals whose work brings them in contact with transition age youth with mental health needs in the juvenile justice system.

Though the predominant focus of the juvenile justice system is on adolescents, a significant number of justice-involved youth fall into the developmental period known as the transition age, which refers to youth ages 16 through 25 years (Davis & Vander Stoep, 1997). The number of transition age youth served by the juvenile justice system varies by state for two reasons. First, there is variability across states in the upper age of jurisdiction in the juvenile court—the age at which an individual who breaks the law would be processed in the juvenile versus adult court system. Fig. 1 shows that the majority of states consider crimes committed through age 17 as juvenile offenses. Only a few states have an upper age of 16, and two currently have a limit of 15. Second, there is variability in the age at which youth are transferred from the juvenile to adult justice systems. Fig. 2 shows that only a few state juvenile justice systems end their involvement with youth at age 18. It is more common for justice-involved youth to remain under juvenile jurisdiction through age 20, with some states allowing extension to age 24.

Given the large number of transition age youth involved with the juvenile justice, it is important for this system to be well-informed about the significant changes in educational, vocational, and relational roles, including reduced family influence and changing social networks, inherent to this age group (Arnett, 2000). This developmental period poses challenges for even the most well-adjusted youth as they make long-term decisions about careers and move from their family of origin to more independent living situations (IOM (Institute of Medicine) and National Research Council (NRC) [NRC], 2014). Normative transitions include completing school or vocational training, obtaining and maintaining gainful employment, developing a social network, and becoming a productive citizen. Success is determined by a complex interplay between youth, their families and neighborhoods, and available opportunities.

Section snippets

Search strategy

Several strategies were employed to reviewing the relevant literature, integrate findings, and identify areas for continued study. First, published papers were located through database searches of PsychINFO and PubMed for keywords, titles, abstracts, and text containing the words: a) “emerging adult,” or “transition age youth,” or “transitional youth” or “transitioning youth” or “young adult” or “adolescent” cross referenced with b) “mental health,” or “mental illness” or “mental disorder” and

Mental health problems and other pitfalls of the transition age

The importance of this developmental period lies not only in key milestones but also in the risk for impediments. Rates of mental health problems peak during the transition age, and the majority of mental health disorders have onset by the early 20s (Kessler et al., 2005, Kim-Cohen et al., 2003, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2012). Past-year prevalence rates for mental health problems, excluding substance use disorders, are 29–40% between ages 18 and 25 (Newman et

Transition age youth in the juvenile justice system

Transition age youth in the juvenile justice system are “the perfect storm” of the potential perils of this developmental period. First, mental health problems are common. The most common mental health disorders among youth in the juvenile justice system are disruptive behavior disorders (e.g., conduct disorder), anxiety disorders (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder), and mood disorders (e.g., major depression) (Skowyra & Cocozza, 2007). Further, many youth with mental health diagnoses have a

Critical issues facing justice-involved transition age youth with mental health problems

Involvement with multiple systems is the rule rather than the exception for youth in the juvenile justice system, particularly those with mental health problems. For example, at least one in five youth involved in community-based mental health systems also has juvenile justice involvement (Cauffman et al., 2005, Rosenblatt et al., 2000, Vander Stoep et al., 1997). Table 1 provides an overview of the service systems with which justice-involved youth typically interact, as well as key issues

Issues specific to detained and incarcerated transition age youth and reentry

Among youth processed and adjudicated delinquent by the juvenile justice system in 2009, 27% were placed in residential settings, 60% were placed on probation, and 13% received other sanctions (Knoll & Sickmund, 2012). Thus, incarcerated youth make up a significant minority (27%) of the juvenile justice population. Many of the estimated 200,000 juveniles and young adults ages 24 and under returning from incarceration each year will face reentry during their transition to adulthood (Mears &

Evidence-based and promising practices and policies

There is little information on evidence-based practices and policies specifically for justice-involved transition age youth with mental health problems (Hoffman et al., 2009, IOM (Institute of Medicine) and National Research Council (NRC), 2014). Most of what is known is extrapolated from studies with adult or adolescent justice-involved populations. A variety of treatments have been well validated to target delinquency among justice-involved adolescents (e.g., Multisystemic Therapy,

Domain-specific services

There are also some effective programs developed within specific domains relevant to justice-involved transition age youth. None of these interventions alone are likely to be sufficient to ensure a successful transition to adulthood for justice-involved youth, and coordination and individualization of such services are needed to ensure effectiveness. However, they represent potential building blocks of successful programs for this age group.

Policy and practice recommendations

The current policies and programs are not sufficient in addressing the needs of justice-involved transition age youth with mental health problems. The following policy recommendations are consistent with those put forth for transition age youth with serious mental health conditions (Davis et al., 2009). An overarching recommendation is that federal policies, including IDEA and the Chafee Act, are fully implemented in the juvenile justice system (see Gagnon and Richards, 2008, Koyanagi and

Conclusion

Youth with both juvenile justice involvement and mental health problems are a vulnerable group, particularly during the transition to adulthood. The multiple problems faced by such youth present barriers to meeting normative developmental milestones of this age, including vocational and educational success, development of stable relationships, and maturation into productive adults. The current policies and practices in the juvenile justice system are not well suited to meet the multiple needs

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by funding from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, through American Institutes for Research, which was funded by contract no. 280-03-4200), the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (Grant K23DA034879) and by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education (Grant H133B090018). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily

References (114)

  • C.S. Schwalbe et al.

    A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (2012)
  • J.A. Anderson et al.

    The Dawn Project: A model for responding to the needs of children with emotional and behavioral challenges and their families

    Community Mental Health Journal

    (2003)
  • T.D. Armstrong et al.

    Community studies on adolescent substance use, abuse, or dependence and psychiatric comorbidity

    Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology

    (2002)
  • J.J. Arnett

    Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties

    The American Psychologist

    (2000)
  • B. Bloom et al.

    Moving towards justice for female juvenile offenders in the new millennium: Modeling gender-specific policies and programs

    Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

    (2002)
  • N.W. Boris et al.

    The process and promise of mental health augmentation of nurse home-visiting programs: Data from the Louisiana Nurse-Family Partnership

    Infant Mental Health Journal

    (2006)
  • J. Bradley et al.

    Identification and management of chronic medical problems in juveniles

    Corrections Today

    (2003)
  • A.A. Braga et al.

    Controlling violent offenders released to the community: An evaluation of the Boston reentry initiative

    Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency

    (2009)
  • E.J. Bruns et al.

    Effectiveness of wraparound versus case management for children and adolescents: Results of a randomized study

    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

    (2015)
  • E.J. Bruns et al.

    Ten principles of the wraparound process

    (2004)
  • M. Bullis et al.

    Life on the “outs”: Examination of the facility-to-community transition of incarcerated youth

    Exceptional Children

    (2002)
  • V. Capoccia et al.

    Sustaining enrollment in health insurance for vulnerable populations: Lessons from Massachusetts

    Psychiatric Services

    (2013)
  • M.M. Carney et al.

    Reducing juvenile recidivism: Evaluating the wraparound services model

    Research on Social Work Practice

    (2003)
  • E. Cauffman et al.

    Predicting first time involvement in the juvenile justice system among emotionally disturbed youth receiving mental health services

    Psychological Services

    (2005)
  • P. Chamberlain

    Treating chronic juvenile offenders: Advances made through the Oregon multidimensional foster care model

    (2003)
  • P. Chamberlain et al.

    Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for girls in the juvenile justice system: Two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2007)
  • D.A. Chapin et al.

    Juvenile diversion

  • L. Chassin et al.

    Trajectories of alcohol and drug use and dependence from adolescence to adulthood: The effects of familial alcoholism and personality

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (2004)
  • H.L. Chung et al.

    The transition to adulthood for adolescents in the juvenile justice system: A developmental perspective

  • H.L. Chung et al.

    An empirical portrait of community reentry among serious juvenile offenders in two metropolitan cities

    Criminal Justice and Behavior

    (2007)
  • H.B. Clark et al.

    Transition into community roles for young people with emotional behavioral difficulties: Collaborative systems and program outcomes

  • J.J. Cocozza et al.

    Youth with mental disorders: Issues and emerging responses

    Juvenile Justice

    (2000)
  • W.E. Copeland et al.

    Childhood psychiatric disorders and young adult crime: A prospective, population-based study

    The American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • W.E. Copeland et al.

    Untreated psychiatric cases increase during the transition to adulthood

    Psychiatric Services

    (2015)
  • C.C. Cottle et al.

    The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis

    Criminal Justice and Behavior

    (2001)
  • M. Davis et al.

    The service system obstacle course for transition-age youth and young adults

  • M. Davis et al.

    The great divide: How mental health policy fails young adults

    Research in Community and Mental Health

    (2006)
  • M. Davis et al.

    Reducing recidivism and symptoms in emerging adults with serious mental health conditions and justice system involvement

    The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

    (2014)
  • M. Davis et al.

    The transition to adulthood for youth who have serious emotional disturbance: Developmental transition and young adult outcomes

    The Journal of Mental Health Administration

    (1997)
  • M.S. Davison et al.

    Transitioning foster care youth and their risk for homelessness: Policy, program, and budgeting shortcomings

    Human Welfare

    (2014)
  • G. de Girolamo et al.

    Age of onset of mental disorders and use of mental health services: Needs, opportunities and obstacles

    Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

    (2012)
  • T.J. Dishion et al.

    When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior

    The American Psychologist

    (1999)
  • P. Dvorak

    D.C., a public-housing waiting list with no end

    The Washington post

    (2013, April 11)
  • M. Ellison et al.

    Adapting supported employment for emerging adults with serious mental health conditions

    Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

    (2015)
  • D.P. Farrington et al.

    Young adult offenders: The need for more effective legislative options and justice processing

    American Society of Criminology

    (2012)
  • R.M. Foley

    Academic characteristics of incarcerated youth and correctional educational programs: A literature review

    Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

    (2001)
  • E.M. Foster et al.

    The transition to adulthood for youth leaving public systems: Challenges to policies and research

  • J.C. Gagnon et al.

    Making the right turn: A guide about improving transition outcomes of youth involved in the juvenile corrections system

    (2008)
  • S. Geenen et al.

    Better futures: A randomized field test of a model for supporting young people in foster care with mental health challenges to participate in higher education

    The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

    (2015)
  • S.J. Geenen et al.

    Transition planning for foster youth

    The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education

    (2006)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Inequities in Mental Health Services: A 16-Year Longitudinal Study of Youth in the Justice System

      2024, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • Justice-Involved Youth: Support for Community and Family Interventions

      2024, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
    • A qualitative study exploring community pharmacists’ perspectives of child and adolescent mental healthcare

      2021, Scientific African
      Citation Excerpt :

      Preventing and managing these problems early might have key, long-reaching effects. Yet child and adolescent mental health (CAMH) concerns are generally neglected, with a major gap in resource mobilization for addressing their unmet needs particularly in LMICs, where almost 75% of people with mental illness are unable to reach apt care [7,11]. This may be due to low government budget allocations of just about 2% to mental healthcare [12].

    • Threat or thrill? the neural mechanisms underlying the development of anxiety and risk taking in adolescence

      2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Understanding different behavioral profiles of adolescent anxiety is especially important given the implications of risk taking and mental health for the juvenile justice system. Symptoms of anxiety and depression are common in juvenile offenders (Cauffman, 2004) and may influence offending behaviors in justice-involved youth (Copeland et al., 2007; Hoeve et al., 2013); however, mental health needs in this population are often left unmet (Zajac et al., 2015). Taken together, these results underscore the importance of considering risk-relevant traits such as impulse control and reward sensitivity (in addition to threat sensitivity) in studies of adolescent anxiety.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text