Elsevier

Cities

Volume 25, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages 63-72
Cities

The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2008.01.001Get rights and content

This paper explores knowledge city and knowledge-based urban development concepts, discusses the principles of a knowledge city, and portrays its distinguishing characteristics and processes. It analyses Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience by scrutinising its initiatives on culture, science, technology and innovation, and policies in urban, economic and social development. The paper also illustrates how the city administration played a key role in developing Melbourne as a globally recognised, entrepreneurial and competitive city. It concludes with arguing Melbourne as an emerging knowledge city, identifying its key success factors, and providing some insights for policy makers of other cities in designing their knowledge-based urban development.

Introduction

The last decade has witnessed a rapid evolution of the ‘knowledge city’ (KC) concept from early articulations of the ‘technopolis’ and ‘ideapolis’ into the ‘digital, intelligent or smart city’. The evolution of the concept corresponded to developing a path towards more viable, vibrant, and sustainable form of urban development. In turn, a city following the KC concept embarks on a strategic mission to firmly encourage and nurture locally focussed innovation, science and creativity within the context of an expanding knowledge economy and society. In this regard a KC can be seen as an integrated city, which physically and institutionally combines the functions of a science park with civic and residential functions. It offers one of the effective paradigms for the sustainable cities of the future (Yigitcanlar, 2007, Yigitcanlar and Martinez-Fernandez, 2007).

The KC concept has become attractive because it relates to interest among the city administrations in regional development policies, as it emphasises the development and advancement of technologies and socio-economic activities (Oh, 2002). Even though references to KCs can be traced back to about three decades (Ryser, 1994, Knight, 1995) and some ancestral cities have had a strong association with knowledge and wisdom, it was only recently that cities around the world started giving direct attention to knowledge-based urban development (KBUD) (Carrillo, 2004, Ovalle et al., 2004). This latter refocussing of interest of the KC idea not only drew upon the information and knowledge economies but also stressed that vibrant socio-cultural activities associated with conserved rich natural environments, quality built environments, the presence of tolerance and acceptance of multiculturalism, democratic, transparent and visionary governance, and enriched human capital play key roles (Florida, 2005, Baum et al., 2006).

This new concept of KC has caught the attention of international organisations, city administrations, research communities and practitioners during the last few years. Major international organisations such as World Bank, 1998, European Commission, 2000, United Nations, 2001, OECD, 2001 have adopted knowledge management frameworks in their strategic directions regarding global development. This array of strategies indicates the strength of the link that has emerged between knowledge management and urban development (Komninos, 2002, Ergazakis et al., 2006). The significant increase of KBUD strategies for the pursuit of metropolitan competitiveness of region is also evident in an OECD perspective (OECD, 2005) and is reiterated by city administrations as diverse as Barcelona City, 2003, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, 2004 and the Victorian Government (2002a) on behalf of the Melbourne metropolitan area.

From a research perspective it has become apparent that the nature of city development associated with activities in the knowledge sector requires conditions and environments which are different from commodity-based manufacturing (Knight, 1995). This understanding has emerged in a variety of KCs (i.e. Austin, Barcelona, Delft, Sao Paulo, and Stockholm) and has been expressed in KBUD frameworks (e.g. Larsen and Rogers, 1988, Chatzkel, 2004, Garcia, 2004). In these approaches it is apparent that KCs draw heavily upon the existing cultural and industrial foundations within a city as these act as attractors for knowledge workers. This means these systems emerge as key drivers for the city’s development. In this context the question arises as to whether KC development simply requires reshaping a city to act as a knowledge centre, or whether KC development is really part of the innovation and knowledge base associated with the continuing organic growth of the city.

The popularisation of the KC concept has fuelled many localised KBUD strategies and actions within many cities throughout the world, including Melbourne. It is also recognised that Melbourne has a strong economic and cultural foundation from which knowledge and creativity may be generated. Therefore, this paper analyses Melbourne’s KBUD experience to respond to the question asked above by scrutinising its initiatives on culture, science, technology and innovation and policies in urban, economic, and social development.

The structure of the remainder of this paper is as follows. The knowledge city concept section provides an overview of the KC concept by discussing some of the broad elements required in the development of a KC. The elements emphasise both the planned components of a KC and elements that are not planned but develop and emerge over time. The Melbourne experience section analyses Melbourne’s experiences and the implementation of key ingredients in KBUD. It emphasis the key roles state and local administrations have played in developing Melbourne as a globally recognised KC. Additionally, it also emphasises those components that cannot be planned, but are fundamental to Melbourne’s growth. Conclusion section concludes with arguing that Melbourne is an emerging KC. This section also provides some useful recommendations for policy makers of other cities seeking KBUD.

Section snippets

The knowledge city concept

KCs play a fundamental role in knowledge creation, economic growth and development. Edvinsson (2003) describes KC as a city that was purposefully designed to encourage the nurturing of knowledge. The notion of KC is interchangeable to a certain degree with similar evolving concepts such as ‘knowledge-based clusters’ (Arbonies and Moso, 2002), ‘ideopolis’ (Garcia, 2004) or ‘technopolis’ (Smilor et al., 1988). KC is also seen as an umbrella metaphor for geographical entities, which focus on

The Melbourne experience

Australia is one of the world’s fastest growing knowledge economies. In terms of size between 2004 and 2007 the Australian economy moved from 13th to 10th place in the global national economy ranking, and in terms of ‘ease of business’ and ‘starting a business’ its current rankings are 7th and 1st, respectively (Doing Business, 2007). In 2006, Australia ranked 15th in the ‘Global Networked Readiness Index’, a benchmarking tool to determine national progress in the impact of ICT on the world

Conclusions

‘The Most Admired Knowledge City Awards’ acknowledged Melbourne among the emerging KCs around the world that are successfully engaged in formal and systematic KBUD processes under the flag of KC (World Capital Institute, 2007). Melbourne’s KBUD accomplishment was mentioned for reasons particularly referring to its strength in “depend[ing] more on the assertive actions from its local leadership, and the kind of local resource management to achieve in shorter periods of time” (World Capital

References (75)

  • H. Frederick et al.

    New Zealand and its competitors in the knowledge economy

    Telematics and Informatics

    (1999)
  • D. Oh

    Technology-based regional development policy: case study of Taedok science town

    Habitat International

    (2002)
  • ABS (2007) Australian Bureau of Statistics 1996, 2001 and 2006 Census statistics. <www.censusdata.abs.gov.au> [accessed...
  • A. Arbonies et al.

    Basque country: the knowledge cluster

    Journal of Knowledge Management

    (2002)
  • Barcelona City
    (2003)
  • Baum, S, Yigitcanlar, T, Horton, S, Velibeyoglu, K and Gleeson, B (2006) The Role of Community and Lifestyle in the...
  • D. Black et al.

    A theory of urban growth

    Journal of Political Economy

    (1998)
  • M. Boddy

    Technology, innovation and regional economic development in the State of Victoria

    Environment and Planning C

    (2000)
  • P. Brain

    The factors and outcomes driving metropolitan development over the next quarter century

    (1999)
  • Brumby, J (2005) Speech at the 4th Australian Innovation Festival Launch. 29 April,...
  • Business Victoria (2007) Business Victoria. <www.business.vic.gov.au> [retrieved 3 October...
  • F. Carrillo

    Capital cities: a taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities

    Journal of Knowledge Management

    (2004)
  • J. Chatzkel

    Greater Phoenix as a knowledge capital

    Journal of Knowledge Management

    (2004)
  • P. Cheng et al.

    Knowledge repositories in knowledge cities

    Journal of Knowledge Management

    (2004)
  • DIIRD (2007) Victoria’s Knowledge Workers. Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development....
  • Department of Planning and Development (1994) Melbourne Metropolitan Strategy. Victorian Government,...
  • DSE (2003) Urban Development Program. Department of Sustainability and Environment Report 2003,...
  • J. Dodson et al.

    The economic revolution in Melbourne’s West

    Urban Policy and Research

    (2004)
  • Doing Business (2007) Economy Rankings 2007. <www.doingbusiness.org> [retrieved 2 October...
  • Dublin Chamber of Commerce (2004) Imagine Dublin 2020: Our Vision for the Future of the City....
  • S. Dutta et al.

    The Global Information Technology Report 2006–2007. Connecting to the Networked Economy

    (2007)
  • R. Dvir et al.

    Innovative engines for knowledge cities: an innovation ecology perspective

    Journal of Knowledge Management

    (2004)
  • Edvinsson, L (2003) Introduction to Issues in Knowledge Management. Oxfordshire, Henley Knowledge Management...
  • K. Ergazakis et al.

    Knowledge cities: the answer to the needs of knowledge-based development

    Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems

    (2006)
  • European Commission (2000) Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-based Economy. Office for Official Publications of the...
  • R. Florida

    The Rise of the Creative Class and How it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life

    (2002)
  • R. Florida

    The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent

    (2005)
  • C. Galbraith et al.

    Location decisions by high technology firms

    Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

    (1988)
  • B. Garcia

    Developing futures: a knowledge-based capital for Manchester

    Journal of Knowledge Management

    (2004)
  • S. Garrett-Jones

    Knowledge and cooperation for regional development

    Prometheus

    (2007)
  • E. Glaeser

    The new economics of urban and regional growth

  • A. Gospodinia
    (2005)
  • Griffiths, M (2002) Australian e-democracy? Innovative e-Government for Victoria,...
  • R. Knight

    Knowledge-based development: policy and planning implications for cities

    Urban Studies

    (1995)
  • N. Komninos

    Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces

    (2002)
  • K. Larsen

    Learning cities: the new recipe in regional development

    The OECD Observer

    (1999)
  • K. Larsen et al.

    Silicon Valley: The Rise and Falling off of Entrepreneurial Fever, Creating the Technopolis

    (1988)
  • Cited by (218)

    • The concept of more Humane and Sustainable Smart Cities

      2021, Humane and Sustainable Smart Cities: A Personal Roadmap to Transform Your City after the Pandemic
    • Innovation District Planning: Concept, Framework, Practice

      2024, Innovation District Planning: Concept, Framework, Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +61 3 8344 7474.

    2

    Tel.: +61 7 3244 7277.

    View full text