Efficacy, complications and clinical outcome of endovascular treatment for intracranial intradural arterial dissections
Introduction
Intracranial arterial dissection is a recognized cause of ischemic stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage [1], [2]. Dissection between the intima and media leads to luminal narrowing or occlusion. Conversely, dissections involving the media and adventitia interface have the potential to rupture into the subarachnoid space [3], [4]. Patients tend to present with either ischemic complications or subarachnoid hemorrhage, but rarely both, and treatment options depend largely on the clinical presentation.
In the setting of cerebral ischemia, anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy have been advocated and have demonstrated efficacy in small case series [3], [5]. Surgical or endovascular intervention is reserved for patients with recurrent ischemic symptoms despite medical therapy, or where medical therapy is contraindicated. In patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage, the rebleeding rate is considerable, ranging between 30% and 70%, and rebleeding usually occurs within 24 h of the initial rupture [6], [7]. In this group of patients, consideration of early treatment by surgery or endovascular procedures is strongly indicated [8], [9].
Approaches to endovascular treatment of intracranial dissections has evolved over time, and currently includes a variety of occlusive (involving sacrifice of the parent artery) and reconstructive (preserving blood flow through the parent artery) techniques, including coil embolization, stent placement, stent or balloon assisted coiling and use of flow diverting stents. A combination of techniques are used, depending on anatomical factors of the dissection, as well as the clinical presentation. For example, endovascular treatment of dissections presenting with ischemia, typically involves angioplasty or stenting.
Current published literature on endovascular treatment of intracranial dissection remains relatively limited. In this study, we sought to describe the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes in our experience with endovascular treatment of intracranial intradural dissections.
Section snippets
Methods
Between January 2003 and December 2011, 23 patients with 23 intracranial intradural dissections underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. These patients were identified from a prospectively recorded database which contained all cases of endovascular treatment performed in this time period. Only dissections which involved intradural arterial segments were included. All patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team including neurointerventionists, neurosurgeons and neurologists,
Results
The age of our patients ranged from 13.1 to 70.6 years, with a mean of 46.6 years and a slight female predominance (male: female ratio, 10:13). A clear history of hypertension was present in 10 (43.5%) of 23 patients, and five (21.7%) patients had fibromuscular dysplasia. A traumatic event at, or preceding presentation was identified in 6 (26.1%) patients (Table 1).
Locations of the dissections are described in Table 2. The large majority of dissections, 22 (95.6%) of 23 dissections, were
Discussion
Intradural arterial dissection is uncommon, and comparably few studies examine the efficacy and clinical follow-up outcomes following endovascular treatment [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Our study presents a relatively large series of endovascularly treated intradural dissections. Our data indicates that endovascular treatment is associated with moderate peri-procedural morbidity, 17.4%. However, considering the diversity of initial patient clinical symptoms
Conclusion
Patients presenting with intracranial dissection and subarachnoid hemorrhage who do not receive intervention are recognized as having poor clinical outcomes. Our experience with endovascular treatment over a 9-year period demonstrates moderate peri-procedural morbidity and mortality rates with endovascular treatment. We achieved good angiographic and midterm clinical outcomes. Preliminary experience suggests that flow-diverting devices offer a valuable alternative strategy when vessel sacrifice
Financial disclosures
None.
Conflict of interest
None.
References (28)
- et al.
Unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissection. Clinical course and serial radiographic imagings
Stroke
(1997) - et al.
Noninvasive monitoring of internal carotid artery dissection
Stroke
(1994) Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries
N Engl J Med
(2001)- et al.
Clinical picture of intracranial non-traumatic dissecting aneurysm
Neuropathology
(2000) - et al.
Spontaneous dissection of cervico-cerebral arteries
Can J Neurol Sci
(1978) - et al.
Rebleeding from intracranial dissecting aneurysm in the vertebral artery
Stroke
(1990) - et al.
Recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage from untreated ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms
Neurosurgery
(1995) - et al.
Endovascular treatment of ruptured dissecting aneurysms aimed at occlusion of the dissected site by using Guglielmi detachable coils
J Neurosurg
(1999) - et al.
Emergent endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms
Neuroradiology
(2005) - et al.
Incidence and risk factors of recurrence after endovascular treatment of intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms
Stroke
(2011)