Masters, marionettes and modulators: intersection of pathogen virulence factors and mammalian death receptor signaling
Graphical abstract
Introduction
TNFR1 is a master regulator of the inflammatory response and plays crucial roles in protecting the host from pathogen invaders including bacteria and viruses. TNFR1 belongs to a subset of receptors, called Death Receptors (DR), in the TNF superfamily. DR are defined by the presence of a, usually homotypic, protein–protein interaction domain called the Death Domain (DD). The DD engages and drives activation of proteins such as caspases and RIPK kinases that have the ability to induce cell death. An emerging theme in the field of host–pathogen responses is that other DR in addition to TNFR1, namely Fas and TRAIL-R, also play a role in protecting the host from pathogens. If bacteria and viruses are to propagate successfully they must therefore manipulate DR signaling and do so in a highly coordinated and specific fashion. In this review, we explain how the protagonists counter one another's moves and describe what we can learn from this evolutionary warfare.
Section snippets
Masters and strategems
TNF is a master regulator of inflammatory signaling and the founding member of the eponymous TNF superfamily. It is widely acknowledged to be a major player in resisting bacterial and viral infection. There are two receptors: TNFR2 (TNFRSF1B) expressed predominantly on subsets of T-cells, neuronal cell types and endothelial cells, and TNFR1 (TNFRSF1A), which is expressed ubiquitously. TNFR1 signaling is a significant part of the total inflammatory response to TNF and TNFR1 knock-out mice are
The manipulators — pathogenic bacteria
The diarrheal pathogen, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), is extracellular, but forms characteristic lesions known as attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions on intestinal epithelial cells. Although remaining extracellular, the pathogen manipulates intracellular host cell processes by injecting virulence effector proteins into the infected cell using a bacterial type III secretion system. Several of these effectors have been implicated in the inhibition of inflammatory signaling. For
TRAIL and pathogens
The idea that TNF might be used to treat tumors has an elegant link to the bacterial response. It was shown by William Coley in 1894 that mixtures of killed bacteria injected into a patient could drive the destruction of certain tumors and this finding led directly to the discovery of the Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) induced by LPS from the bacteria [27, 28]. Unfortunately, except in very special cases, TNF is useless as an anti-cancer drug because it induces life-threatening inflammation at
Fas and pathogens
Fas (TNFRSF12) has long been considered to be the archetypal DR. Its most notable role is in regulating T-lymphocyte numbers and Fas or FasL (TNFSF6) deficient mice and people ultimately succumb to an auto-immune lymphoproliferative disease [32]. Fas, like TNFR1, has the ability to promote cell proliferation and inflammation, probably principally depending upon whether FasL is membrane bound or soluble [33•]. Relevant to this review, FasL is also induced in response to infection and in a very
What have we learned?
Successful pathogens are great teachers. They highlight the key immune pathways required to limit their growth and give illustrative examples of how this can be achieved. One way that this knowledge can be applied is by using pathogen style approaches to block destructive inflammation. Decoy receptor and other anti-TNF reagents are very, albeit not completely, successful in the clinic in treating auto-inflammatory conditions but if we follow the pathogen lead maybe efficacy can be increased by
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the students, post-docs and other researchers in our respective labs that have helped us in developing the ideas expressed in this review. JS is funded by NHMRC grants 541901, 1025594 and 1046986. EH is funded by NHMRC grants 606788, 1044061 and an ARC Future Fellowship.
References (38)
- et al.
Disruption of TNF-α/TNFR1 function in resident skin cells impairs host immune response against cutaneous vaccinia virus infection
J Invest Dermatol
(2012) Viruses and the TNF-related cytokines, an evolving battle
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev
(2003)- et al.
Inactivation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha by proteinases (gingipains) from the periodontal pathogen, Porphyromonas gingivalis
Implications of immune evasion. J Biol Chem.
(1998) - et al.
Inactivation of membrane tumor necrosis factor alpha by gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis
Infect Immun
(2005) - et al.
Shigella flexneri T3SS effector IpaH4.5 modulates the host inflammatory response via interaction with NF-κB p65 protein
Cell Microbiol
(2013) - et al.
TRAIL: not just for tumors anymore?
J Exp Med
(2012) - et al.
Toxoplasma gondii inhibits Fas/CD95-triggered cell death by inducing aberrant processing and degradation of caspase 8
Cell Microbiol
(2007) - et al.
Bacterial virulence proteins as tools to rewire kinase pathways in yeast and immune cells
Nature
(2012) - et al.
Critical role for tumor necrosis factor alpha in controlling the number of lumenal pathogenic bacteria and immunopathology in infectious colitis
Infect Immun
(2001) - et al.
Increased mortality and dysregulated cytokine production in tumor necrosis factor receptor 1-deficient mice following systemic Klebsiella pneumoniae infection
Infect Immun
(2003)