Elsevier

Collegian

Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2021, Pages 178-183
Collegian

Managing workplace change: Intergenerational perspectives from Victorian public hospital nurses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2020.06.006Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Background

In response to a growing nursing shortage internationally, alongside an ageing population, strategies to retain older nurses in the workforce are warranted. As a result, it is important to understand nurse experiences and develop strategies to retaining older nurses in the workforce.

Aim

What are the experiences of change management, career intentions, learning and development, and wellbeing across different generations of Victorian public health nurses?

Methods

Using the 2018 People Matter Survey, we conducted a secondary analysis of Victorian nurses who completed the health survey (n = 18,963), the change management module (n = 6,044), and the career intentions module (n = 4,320). Nurses were divided into accepted generational age groupings: Generation Z (born from 1996 onwards), Generation Y (1981 to 1995), Generation X (1961 to 1980) and Baby Boomers (1943 to 1960). Descriptive statistics and analysis of cross-tables of frequencies were applied.

Findings

In total, 3,781 Baby Boomers, 9,022 from Generation X, 4971 from Generation Y and 1,189 from Generation Z responded to the survey. The experience of workplace change had the most adverse impact and increased with age (Gen Z; 34.3%; Gen Y: 49.3 %; Gen X: 53.6% and BB; 56.3%) and most participants felt they had limited control over issues that caused stress.

Discussion

This study highlights that workplace change is common and nurses in Victoria, Australia’ are typically well informed and supported during change processes.

Conclusion

Supporting nurses through organisational change is essential. Further, promoting professional development and career progress, particularly in older nurses, may promote retention in an era of global nursing shortages.

Introduction

In 2015, the total number of nurses and midwives was 360,008, making it the largest single health profession in Australia (AIHW) (Health Workforce Australia, 2014: Australia’s Future Health Workforce – Nurses Detailed; Stevanin, Palese, Bressan, Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, & Kvist, 2018). This figure is consistent internationally with nurses being the largest profession in the UK (n = 639,000) (The Nursing Midwifery Council, 2019), Canada (n = 431,769) (Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2018) and the United States (n = 3.8 million) (Smiley et al., 2018). Projected figures highlight that the demand for Australian nurses will significantly exceed supply and there will be an expected shortfall of approximately 85,000 nurses by 2025, which will increase to 123,000 nurses by 2030 (Health Workforce Australia, 2014: Australia’s Future Health Workforce – Nurses Detailed). The growing need for nurses is consistent with an ageing workforce and fewer people choosing nursing as a profession (Stevanin et al., 2018, Stevanin et al., 2020).

A generation is a cohort that shares birth years and related significant life events (Wilson, Squires, Widger, Cranley, & Tourangeau, 2008) thus leading to unifying commonalities (Lyons & Kuron, 2014). Currently, the international nursing workforce is made up of four commonly-accepted generational groupings: Baby Boomers, born from 1943 to 1960; Generation X, born from 1961 to 1980; Generation Y, born from 1981 to 1995; and Generation Z, born from 1996 onwards (Bell, 2013, Parry and Urwin, 2017, Stevanin et al., 2018). The impact of generational differences among nurses has the potential to impact retention due to the experience of differing values and priorities (Haddad, Annamaraju, & Toney-Butler, 2020) as well as work habits, expectations of management (Boychuk Duchscher & Cowin, 2004) and retention strategies (Coburn & Hall, 2014). In addition, generational differences are reflected in communication, teamwork and technology literacy, which are all central in developing nursing competencies (Bell, 2013). While generational profiles are a guide only, since individual variations exist, they help to understand the current work context. For example, Baby Boomers typically have more experience, value work performance and are loyal. Generation X are independent and effective problem solvers who value a work/life balance with family life. Generation Y are confident, multi-taskers, globally connected and technologically adept. Lastly, Generation Z are independent, outcomes oriented, technologically adept and dependent, using technology to answer questions (Bell, 2013, Kupperschmidt, 2000). Despite these differences, nurses across each generation share a dedication to promoting health and well-being for their patients and families (Price & Reichert, 2017), with job satisfaction being a strong predictor for nurse retention (Murrells, Robinson, & Griffiths, 2008). As a result, there is a need to create work environments that maximise job satisfaction and facilitate the retention of older nurses while also recruiting younger ones (Wilson et al., 2008).

An additional challenge towards facilitating retention of nurses, is the impact of continual workplace changes in health care due to factors such as: an ageing population, changing disease patterns, advances in technology and other political and policy initiatives (Moloney, Boxall, Parsons, & Cheung, 2018; Nilsen, Schildmeijer, Ericsson, Seing, & Birken, 2019). Workplace change is often characterised by restructures and mergers due to fiscal pressures, technological and clinical practice changes alongside the increased demand for efficiency with fewer resources (Al-Abri, 2007; Moloney, Gorman, Parsons, & Cheung, 2018). Growing evidence highlights a negative association between organisational change (Kuokkanen, Suominen, Härkönen, Kukkurainen, & Doran, 2009) and increased staff stress levels (Lavoie-Tremblay et al., 2010), and lower job satisfaction (Moloney, Boxall et al., 2018; Willem, Buelens, & De Jonghe, 2007). A growing number of studies exploring how nurses respond to organisational change highlight the need for better organisational support (Abou Hashish, 2017, Ross, 2016), supervisor support (Galletta, Portoghese, Coppola, Finco, & Campagna, 2016; Gillet et al., 2018), effective nurse leadership (Mudallal, Othman, & Al Hassan, 2017), team commitment and working group cohesion (Galletta et al., 2016; Lasalvia et al., 2009; Zhu, Wholey, Cain, & Natafgi, 2017).

As international bodies and government policies seek to address nursing shortages, any strategies should be informed by evidence. The People Matter Survey is the public sector annual employee opinion survey, which is coordinated independently across Australian States and Territories. In the state of Victoria, the survey is distributed by the Victorian Public Service Commission and captures the experiences of approximately 300,000 public employees across over 184 organisations. This study presents results on a sub-study exploring the results of optional survey modules towards the experience of change management, career intentions, learning and development, and wellbeing in Victorian public hospital nurses who participated in this state-wide survey. We hypothesised that adverse experiences would highlight areas to intervene to promote staff retention.

Section snippets

Methods

Results from the People Matter Survey captures the opinions and experiences of all eligible Victorian public employees (public health sector employees, public servants, and police), approximately 93,300 public health employees from 184 organisation across the Victorian public service workforce, including metropolitan and regional settings. Our study involved a secondary data analysis of the data collected from 18,963 Victorian public hospital nurses (including registered nurses, enrolled nurse

Data generation

Data from the People Matter Survey was collected by the Victorian Public Service Commission. The core survey measures employee engagement, satisfaction, and factors based on the public sector values and employment principles, such as respect, leadership and integrity. It also provides a mechanism to monitor bullying and harassment. A broad suite of demographic questions are asked to understand the employment experience of groups within the workforce, for example, in relation to inclusion and

Data analysis

The People Matter Survey data can be used to identify workforce issues and at-risk groups. For the purpose of this study, we examined nursing responses to questions in the optional modules exploring change management, career intentions, learning and development, and wellbeing. Following, ethical approval, all data from registered nurses and midwives who responded to the survey were provided by the data custodian, the Victorian Public Service Commission for analysis. Data had already been

Results

To put the People Matter survey results in context, according to the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia, the state of Victoria employs the most midwives (n = 1,495, 25.5%), and the second largest number of registered nurses (n = 77,247, 25%) in Australia(Nursing & Midwifery Board, 2019). There was a 37% response rate to People Matter survey of public health care employees (n = 114,327). There were 21.4% male respondents and 78.5% female respondents. In total, 18,963 nurses, 16.6% of all

Discussion

This study highlights generational differences towards how Victorian public hospital nurses experienced change management, career intentions, learning and development, and wellbeing. There was general consistency among the generations towards agreeing that they felt supported when it comes to change management, career intentions, learning and development, and wellbeing. This is a key finding since change in work practices have the potential to threaten confidence and competence or our

Conclusion

With a large cohort of nurses approaching retirement, it is important to ensure that their work environments are positive, and promote job satisfaction and commitment to the profession through continuing education. Our results identified generational difference and highlighted modifiable workplace factors that can promote retention and lessen the nursing workforce shortage.

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding

The Melbourne Ageing Research Collaboration supported this project.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health Human Ethics Advisory Group (1851822.1), 2017.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

JW completed data analysis with support from GH. JW drafted the manuscript for publication and BB, GH contributed to the content and revision of the manuscript. JW managed revisions, literature and checking of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants.

References (45)

  • I.A. Pool et al.

    Strategies for continuing professional development among younger, middle-aged, and older nurses: A biographical approach

    International Journal of Nursing Studies

    (2015)
  • R.A. Smiley et al.

    The 2017 national nursing workforce survey

    Journal of Nursing Regulation

    (2018)
  • A. Willem et al.

    Impact of organizational structure on nurses’ job satisfaction: A questionnaire survey

    International Journal of Nursing Studies

    (2007)
  • E.A. Abou Hashish

    Relationship between ethical work climate and nurses’ perception of organizational support, commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intent

    Nursing Ethics

    (2017)
  • A. Agresti
    (2003)
  • R. Al-Abri

    Managing change in healthcare

    Oman Medical Journal

    (2007)
  • F. Armmer

    An inductive discussion of the interrelationships between nursing shortage, horizontal violence, generational diversity, and healthy work environments

    Administrative Sciences

    (2017)
  • M. Armstrong-Stassen et al.

    Professional development, target-specific satisfaction, and older nurse retention

    Career Development International

    (2013)
  • J.A. Bell

    Five generations in the nursing workforce: Implications for nursing professional development

    Journal for Nurses in Professional Development

    (2013)
  • J.E. Boychuk Duchscher et al.

    Multigenerational nurses in the workplace

    JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

    (2004)
  • L. Bryant-Hampton et al.

    Recognition: a key retention strategy for the mature nurse

    JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

    (2010)
  • Canadian Institute for Health Information

    Nursing in Canada, 2018

    (2018)
  • A.S. Coburn et al.

    Generational differences in nurses’ characteristics, job satisfaction, quality of work life, and psychological empowerment

    Journal of Hospital Administration

    (2014)
  • R. Erickson et al.

    Why emotions matter: age, agitation, and burnout among registered nurses

    Online Journal of Issues in Nursing

    (2007)
  • C.A. Fackler

    Retaining older hospital nurses: experienced hospital nurses’ perceptions of new roles

    Journal of Nursing Management

    (2019)
  • E. Fiabane et al.

    Work engagement and occupational stress in nurses and other healthcare workers: the role of organisational and personal factors

    Journal of Clinical Nursing

    (2013)
  • M. Galletta et al.

    Nurses well‐being in intensive care units: study of factors promoting team commitment

    Nursing in Critical Care

    (2016)
  • N. Gillet et al.

    The effects of work factors on nurses’ job satisfaction, quality of care and turnover intentions in oncology

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2018)
  • L.M. Haddad et al.

    Nursing shortage

    (2020)
  • B. Happell et al.

    Nurses and stress: recognizing causes and seeking solutions

    Journal of Nursing Management

    (2013)
  • Health Workforce Australia

    Australia’s Future Health Workforce – Nurses Detailed

    (2014)
  • C.M. Joyce et al.

    The “Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL)” longitudinal survey-protocol and baseline data for a prospective cohort study of Australian doctors’ workforce participation

    BMC Health Services Research

    (2010)
  • View full text