Elsevier

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volume 98, 1 July 2018, Pages 159-167
Computers in Biology and Medicine

Hypersampling of pseudo-periodic signals by analytic phase projection

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A method to up-sample experimental time series of pseudo-periodic signals.

  • Results in estimation of the pseudo-periodic template underlying the signal.

  • Based on the analytic phase of a monocomponent reference signal.

  • The effective time resolution can be several orders of magnitude larger than the original resolution.

  • Application to time series of MRI images of the human brain shows cerebral pulse waves.

Abstract

A method to upsample insufficiently sampled experimental time series of pseudo-periodic signals is proposed. The result is an estimate of the pseudo-periodic cycle underlying the signal. This “hypersampling” requires a sufficiently sampled reference signal that defines the pseudo-periodic dynamics. The time series and reference signal are combined by projecting the time series values to the analytic phase of the reference signal. The resulting estimate of the pseudo-periodic cycle has a considerably higher effective sampling rate than the time series. The procedure is applied to time series of MRI images of the human brain. As a result, the effective sampling rate could be increased by three orders of magnitude. This allows for capturing the waveforms of the very fast cerebral pulse waves traversing the brain. Hypersampling is numerically compared to the more commonly used retrospective gating. An outlook regarding EEG and optical recordings of brain activity as the reference signal is provided.

Introduction

Many signals in the biological and biomedical sciences are of a pseudo-periodic nature with irregularly spaced, stretched, or otherwise distorted variations of a repeating cycle. An example for a pseudo-periodic cycle is the characteristic QRS complex observed in electric recordings of the heart [1]. Another example are patterns of electrical activity of the brain observed in electroencephalographic (EEG) surface recordings [2]. Those signals usually can be measured with a sufficient sampling rate to resolve their underlying pseudo-periodic cycles (QRS-complex, EEG waveform, respectively). However, often it is not possible to measure the effects of the pseudo-periodic dynamics in parts of the body that cannot be accessed so easily, for example deep within the brain. The method of choice to obtain signals from anywhere in the brain is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Dynamic or functional MRI of the brain is typically sampled at an insufficient rate to resolve the cardiac cycle or EEG patterns [3]. In order to investigate the pseudo-periodic signal in a particular location within the brain, one solution is to upsample the MRI signal at that point with an effective sampling time that is much smaller than the average cardiac cycle or EEG waveform period. The cardiac or EEG recordings then can serve as a reference used to define the pseudo-periodicity of the dynamics of interest.

Here, an efficient upsampling procedure, called hypersampling, is described. Hypersampling consists of an upsampling of the undersampled time series by using the method of analytic phase projection (APP). Hypersampling can be seen as a generalization of retrospective gating [4,5]. Whereas in retrospective gating a recurring template is identified from the reference signal, in hypersampling the continuous phase underlying the pseudo-periodic reference signal is identified from the reference signal. This phase estimate is then used for APP.

The organization of this manuscript is as follows: First, hypersampling by APP is described in Section 2. Hypersampling is demonstrated on simulations in Section 3. In Section 4, these concepts are applied to an MRI of the brain in order to visualize the very fast pulse waves traversing the brain, which normally cannot be resolved with MRI. A discussion including a comparison with retrospective gating and possible further applications to other hybrid systems with fast and slow time scales concludes the manuscript. An appendix provides code for hypersampling via APP, and the supplementary data a video of the pulse waves observed in the human brain.

The following is the supplementary data related to this article:

.

Section snippets

Overview

Hypersampling by analytic phase projection (APP) is summarized in Fig. 1.

Two signals are acquired from the system under study: An undersampled pseudo-periodic time series x(t) and a sufficiently sampled pseudo-periodic reference signal y(t). The reference signal and the time series are acquired during the same time interval and are assumed to have the same pseudo-periodicity. Then, a monocomponent signal yM(t) is obtained by low-pass filtering the reference signal y(t) (box “Monocomponent

Simulation

A signal is being simulated as a nonlinearly transformed chirp signal with linearly increasing frequency from the beginning to the end of the signal time series in order to simulate pseudo-periodic data. Added to the data is 10% white noise. The Appendix contains a Matlab script defining the used signals and the analysis in detail. Fig. 2, row A, contains the given signal. The sampling time of the signal is 2 s. (Artificial physical units are introduced here in order to facilitate comparison

Application: Cerebral pulse waves

As an example, hypersampling via APP is applied to pulse waves in the human brain. Studying the properties of cerebral pressure waves and their possible effects on human health is a very active area of research [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]]. Here, a functional MRI scan from a publicly available data base [22] is used to demonstrate that hypersampling can resolve pulse waveforms in the brain.

The MRI data consists of image volumes covering parts of

Comparison with retrospective gating

The proposed method is generalizing well-known retrospective gating approaches. In most retrospective gating approaches, templates of the reference signal (for example, the R peak of the cardiac cycle) are used to define gating points. A pseudo-period, or cycle, is then defined by the interval from one template of the reference signal to the next, for example, RR intervals [4,5]. Signal sampling times are then linearly projected on cycle times. The analytic phase projection method differs in

Conclusion

An algorithm to upsample an insufficiently sampled pseudo-periodic signal with the help of a reference signal, “hypersampling” has been presented. Hypersampling is based on a projection of the signal time series to the analytic phase of the reference signal. It generalizes the widely used retrospective gating approach. Hypersampling has been validated in numerical simulations of pseudo-periodic signals, and it has been discussed that in the case of nonlinear phase evolution, hypersampling can

Acknowledgments and disclosure

The author would like to thank M. Hanke, A. Brechmann, and J. Stadler for help in using their database (M. Hanke Scientific Data 1, 140003, 2014). The author is partially funded by NIH grant # 5 R21 EY027568 02. The study sponsor was not involved in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This research uses an algorithm described in a patent application by the Center

Henning U. Voss studied physics in Hamburg and Potsdam, Germany. He received the diploma and a Ph.D. in physics both from Potsdam University in 1994 and 1998, respectively. Since 2009 he has been Associate Professor of Physics in Radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City. From 2000 to 2003 he was Assistant Professor at Freiburg University, Germany. From 2003 to 2009 he was Assistant Professor of Physics in Radiology at his present institution. His research interests are imaging

References (40)

  • S.L. Marple

    Computing the discrete-time “analytic” signal via FFT

    IEEE Trans. Signal Process.

    (1999)
  • L.H.G. Henskens et al.

    Increased aortic pulse wave velocity is associated with silent cerebral small-vessel disease in hypertensive patients

    Hypertension

    (2008)
  • M.E. Wagshul et al.

    The pulsating brain: a review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility

    Fluids Barriers CNS

    (2011)
  • S.W. Rabkin

    Arterial stiffness: detection and consequences in cognitive impairment and dementia of the elderly

    J. Alzheim. Dis.

    (2012)
  • T. Tarumi et al.

    Cerebral hemodynamics in normal aging: central artery stiffness, wave reflection, and pressure pulsatility

    J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol.

    (2014)
  • Y.J. Tong et al.

    Short repetition time multiband echo-planar imaging with simultaneous pulse recording allows dynamic imaging of the cardiac pulsation signal

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2014)
  • A.L. Wentland et al.

    Review of MRI-based measurements of pulse wave velocity: a biomarker of arterial stiffness

    Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther.

    (2014)
  • H.U. Voss et al.

    Mapping cerebrovascular dynamics with magnetic resonance advection imaging (MRAI): modeling challenges and estimation bias

  • E.A.H. Warnert et al.

    Noninvasive assessment of arterial compliance of human cerebral arteries with short inversion time arterial spin labeling

    J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol.

    (2015)
  • M. Bianciardi et al.

    The pulsatility volume index: an indicator of cerebrovascular compliance based on fast magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac and respiratory pulsatility

    Philos. T. R. Soc. A

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    Henning U. Voss studied physics in Hamburg and Potsdam, Germany. He received the diploma and a Ph.D. in physics both from Potsdam University in 1994 and 1998, respectively. Since 2009 he has been Associate Professor of Physics in Radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City. From 2000 to 2003 he was Assistant Professor at Freiburg University, Germany. From 2003 to 2009 he was Assistant Professor of Physics in Radiology at his present institution. His research interests are imaging techniques, modeling dynamical systems, and applications of these fields to biomedical research.

    View full text