Research Paper
The importance of boundary conditions on the modelling of energy retaining walls

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103399Get rights and content

Abstract

Shallow geothermal technologies have proven to efficiently provide renewable energy for space heating and cooling. Recently, significant attention has been given to utilising sub-surface structures, primarily designed for stability, to also exchange heat with the ground, converting them into energy geo-structures. This research includes investigations into the feasibility of applying this technology to retaining walls, focusing on the usually neglected interaction between the energy retaining wall and the air inside the underground space it contains (e.g., a building basement, a metro station). Even though soldier pile walls are adopted for the study, the results are applicable for any retaining wall type. Two commonly adopted boundary conditions on the surfaces of the underground structure (thermal insulation and a defined temperature) are used as well as the computationally expensive approach of fully modelling the air inside the underground space. The results show that if these boundaries are not carefully considered, a significant amount of heat can flow into/out of the underground space (up to about 75% in this study). Importantly, adopting inappropriate boundary conditions for these surfaces can result in erroneous and misleading results, a potentially under-designed heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) system and subsequently thermal discomfort within these spaces.

Section snippets

Shallow geothermal energy systems and energy retaining walls

Managing energy resources, reducing energy consumption and moving towards cleaner sources of energy are amongst the key challenges of the 21st century. Shallow geothermal technologies can help our progress towards these goals by providing clean renewable thermal energy for heating and cooling. Shallow geothermal or ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems consist of two circuits, connected via a GSHP, one transferring heat from and to the ground (primary circuit) and the other one transferring

Methodology

Finite element modelling is utilised to simulate the operation of geothermal systems within a typical underground structure in Melbourne, Australia, to investigate the heat transfer process between the ground, the energy wall and the air inside the underground structure. Typical geometry and conditions for a high-rise building incorporating energy soldier pile walls as part of a basement is adopted as a case study, noting that the analyses undertaken are of a generic nature and are applicable

System performance results for the different boundary conditions

This section presents the results from the modelling following the methodology outlined in Section 2 and analyses how different factors affect the performance of the energy structures and the heat transfer process. Each of the three conditions outlined in Section 2.4 are considered for both thermal load distributions presented in Section 2.3. All simulations were computed over 25 years of operation, to ensure adequate time for a realistic assessment of the system’s performance. To gain a

Heat transfer through the wall surfaces

In order to have a deeper understanding of the reasoning behind the results discussed in Section 3, this section investigates the effect of the heat transfer to/from the inside of the underground building space. One approach to investigating this is to examine the temperatures of the air inside the underground space. These air temperatures are shown in Fig. 12, for all three cases of approach (c) which models the air. For Vair=0m/s the temperature of the air is computed at the midpoint of the

Conclusion and remarks on appropriate boundary conditions

This study has presented a detailed long-term numerical investigation on soldier pile energy retaining walls, focusing on the applicability of different boundary conditions at the wall/slab surfaces and the heat transfer through those surfaces. A validated methodology to numerically model soldier pile energy walls has been presented and utilised to show that this boundary condition selection is crucial to having a representative model and useful results. In making this selection, a number of

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Nikolas Makasis: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Guillermo A. Narsilio: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Asal Bidarmaghz: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Ian W. Johnston: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Yu Zhong: Investigation, Data curation, Validation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

Funding from the Australian Research Council (ARC) FT140100227, The University of Melbourne, the Melbourne Metro Rail Authority and the Victorian Government is much appreciated.

References (61)

  • S. Dong et al.

    Thermo-mechanical behavior of energy diaphragm wall: Physical and numerical modelling

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2019)
  • M. Sun et al.

    Heat transfer model and design method for geothermal heat exchange tubes in diaphragm walls

    Energy Build

    (2013)
  • S. Kürten et al.

    Design of plane energy geostructures based on laboratory tests and numerical modelling

    Energy Build

    (2015)
  • N. Makasis et al.

    A robust prediction model approach to energy geo-structure design

    Comput Geotech

    (2018)
  • D. Sterpi et al.

    Assessment of thermal behaviour of thermo-active diaphragm walls based on monitoring data

    J Rock Mech Geotech Eng

    (2018)
  • P. Bourne-Webb et al.

    Analysis and design methods for energy geostructures

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2016)
  • P.J. Bourne-Webb et al.

    Thermal and mechanical aspects of the response of embedded retaining walls used as shallow geothermal heat exchangers

    Energy Build

    (2016)
  • A. Bidarmaghz et al.

    Thermal interaction between tunnel ground heat exchangers and borehole heat exchangers

    Geomech Energy Environ

    (2017)
  • A. Bidarmaghz et al.

    Heat exchange mechanisms in energy tunnel systems

    Geomech Energy Environ

    (2018)
  • C. Xia et al.

    Experimental study on geothermal heat exchangers buried in diaphragm walls

    Energy Build

    (2012)
  • M. Peltier et al.

    Numerical investigation of the convection heat transfer driven by airflows in underground tunnels

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2019)
  • H. Brandl

    Energy foundations and other thermo-active ground structures

    Géotechnique

    (2006)
  • M. Preene et al.

    Ground energy systems: from analysis to geotechnical design

    Géotechnique

    (2009)
  • I.W. Johnston et al.

    Emerging geothermal energy technologies

    KSCE J Civ Eng

    (2011)
  • Narsilio GA, Johnston IW, Bidarmaghz A, Colls S, Mikhaylova O, Kivi A, et al. Geothermal energy: Introducing an...
  • A. Bidarmaghz

    3D Numerical Modelling of Vertical Ground Heat Exchangers

    (2014)
  • Iosif-stylianou I, Christodoulides P, Aresti L, Tassou S, Florides G. Borehole ground heat exchangers and the flow of...
  • Q. Lu et al.

    Cost Effectiveness of Energy Piles in Residential Dwellings in Australia

    Curr Trends Civil Struct Eng - CTCSE

    (2019)
  • Q. Lu et al.

    Cost effectiveness of energy piles in residential dwellings in Australia

    Curr Trends Civ Struct Eng

    (2019)
  • Aditya GR, Mikhaylova O, Narsilio GA, Johnston IW. Financial assessment of ground source heat pump systems against...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text