Elsevier

Construction and Building Materials

Volume 200, 10 March 2019, Pages 146-158
Construction and Building Materials

Tensile behaviour of double headed anchored blind bolt in concrete filled square hollow section under cyclic loading

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.089Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The addition of extra head to the Headed Anchored Blind Bolts (HABBs) improved the behaviour of the blind bolt.

  • Cyclic deterioration of stiffness of Double Headed Anchored Blind Bolts (DHABB) under cyclic load was not significant.

  • The tensile behaviour of DHABBs in concrete with fibre reinforced was not consistent from one test to other.

Abstract

This paper presents the tensile behaviour of individual Double Headed Anchored Blind Bolts (DHABBs) which are anchored within Concrete Filled Square Hollow Section (CFSHS) tubes. The DHABB consists of a conventional Headed Anchored Blind Bolt (HABB) with one additional middle head, between the existing end head in the embedded region and head next to the tube wall. A series of experiments were conducted on the pull-out of single DHABBs under monotonic and cyclic loading using different tube sizes, bolt sizes and concrete types. Detailed results from the experimental work are presented in this paper. A comprehensive three dimensional finite element model was developed and the results were compared with full scale pull-out test results. A good agreement was obtained between the FE and experimental results.

Introduction

Concrete filled steel tubes (CFST) are popular as the structural columns in many countries around the world. They have a large load bearing capacity, favourable ductility and look aesthetically beautiful. However, in many countries, including Australia, CFSTs are not very popular because of the perceived difficulties in connecting beams to the columns. In such places, welding (which is the most common method of achieving the moment resisting connection between beam and CFST) is not preferred at site due to cost and quality issues. Due to the lack of access to the inner side of the column, it is not possible to install ordinary structural bolts.

In the last few decades, research has been conducted to investigate alternative solutions to welded connections, including that on blind bolts, i.e. ones that can be installed from the outside of the tube. In this research, modified Ajax Oneside blind bolts have been used. The Ajax Oneside was originally developed by Ajax Engineered Fasteners [1] and later modified by Goldsworthy & Gardner [2], Yao et al. [3] and Pokharel et al. [4], and the modified bolt is called a double headed anchored blind bolt (DHABB). The modification involves an extension of the bolt beyond the head of the Ajax Oneside that bears on the inside wall of the tube; anchorage into the infill concrete is achieved by providing two heads along this extension (one at the end of the extension and another between the end head and the head next to the tube wall). The extension was embedded into the concrete to increase the stiffness of the connection and also to limit the local deformation of the tube wall.

The ultimate aim of the research is to develop a moment resisting connection for low to moderate seismic regions using DHABBs. The concrete filled square hollow section (CFSHS) has been selected as the column rather than a concrete-filled circular hollow section (CFCHS) as it is relatively easier to connect to the beam because of its simpler geometry, and it has stiffness that is comparable with that of the CFCHSs.

The tensile behaviour of headed anchored blind bolts (HABB) has been investigated recently by Agheshlui et al. [5] and Oktavianus et al. [6] for single blind bolts and by Agheshlui et al. [7] and Pokharel et al. [8] for group behaviour. In those researches, monotonic load regimes were used in investigating the behaviour of the blind bolts. The tensile behaviour of blind bolts under cyclic loading has not been investigated so far. The tensile behaviour of cogged anchored blind bolts has been investigated in references [3], [9]. A similar concept in which a blind bolt has been extended and anchored into the infill concrete has been used by some other researchers using Hollo-bolts [10].

During pull-out of anchored blind bolts, the load from the bolt is transferred to the concrete in two ways; one is through the tangential/frictional force between the threaded rod and surrounding concrete, i.e. bond, and the other is from bearing of the embedded head onto the concrete. The frictional component was found to be very small compared with the bearing component [11]. When the load is first applied, the tensile load from the blind bolt will be transferred to the surrounding concrete due to the bond between the concrete and the blind bolt. The bond will be lost at a low load and then the bearing action will be the main load transfer mechanism. If the applied load is sufficiently high to cause failure, the failure mechanism is expected to be due to either steel failure (of the blind bolt itself) or concrete failure. The concrete related failure is very complex and is affected by several factors. The concrete related failure modes have been studied by several researchers [12], [13], [14]. However, in this study, the load on the blind bolts is limited to 60% of their nominal capacities and thus the concrete related failure is less likely.

This paper presents the tensile behaviour of the modified blind bolt (DHABB) under cyclic loading. The DHABBs are anchored within the concrete filled square hollow sections (CFSHS). Firstly, details are given about the experimental program in which pull-out tests were conducted; the results of these tests are also presented. Then the finite element (FE) analysis of those pull-out tests is presented. Finally, the FE results are compared with the experimental results, and effectiveness of the modification of HABB to DHABB in improving the stiffness and strength of the connection is assessed. The cyclic deterioration caused by the cyclic loading is also investigated in this study.

Section snippets

Experimental program

A series of pull-out tests was conducted to investigate the behaviour of double headed anchored blind bolts (DHABBs) in concrete filled square hollow section (CFSHS) columns. The modification involving transforming headed anchored blind bolts (HABBs) to double headed anchored blind bolts (DHABBs) is presented in reference [4]. Fig. 1 shows the original HABB and the modified blind bolt (DHABB) with one additional head between the existing heads in the embedded region. This head will be called

Test results

Fig. 9 shows the pull-out load vs displacement curve for different specimens. The displacement in each figure is the actual pull-out displacement of DHABB at the outer face of the steel tube. The LDTs were removed when the load was close to the failure load to prevent damage to the LDTs, and hence the load vs. displacement curve is cut off prior to the failure condition being reached.

Fig. 10 shows a comparison of the backbone and full cyclic curves of force vs. pull-out displacement for the

Discussion

The summary of test results is presented in Table 2 which shows the ultimate strength, secant stiffness at 60% of the nominal capacity of bolts and residual displacement at the end of the 5th cycle at 60% of nominal capacity. Each of those values are the average of two tests. The test has different tube sections (SHS 400 × 400 × 10 and SHS 400 × 400 × 12.5), bolt sizes (M20 and M24), concrete (N50 and S50) and loading (monotonic and cyclic).

FE models

A FE package ABAQUS/Explicit [21] was used for modelling the pull-out tests. Taking advantage of symmetric conditions along the transverse direction of the concrete filled hollow section (CFSHS), a half of each test specimen was modelled. The FE model used to simulate the pull-out of M24 DHABBs from a CFSHS 400 × 400 × 10 (C-24-10) is shown in Fig. 21.

Eight-noded brick elements with reduced integration (C3D8R) were used to model all the components. Surface to surface contact was used between

Conclusions

The experimental and numerical behaviour of double headed anchored blind bolts was investigated in this paper. From the experimental result, it was verified that the addition of a middle head to the HABB improved the behaviour of the blind bolt. The behaviour of the DHABB was found to be dependent on the bolt sizes and SHS section sizes. The larger bolt was found to have a higher strength and stiffness as expected.

The deterioration of stiffness in a DHABB under cyclic loads was very small up to

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by Australian Research Council (ARC) and collaborating organisations Orrcon Steel and AJAX Engineered Fasteners through Linkage grant LP110200511.

References (26)

  • Y. Oktavianus et al.

    Pull-out behaviour of blind bolts from concrete-filled tubes

    Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Struct. Build.

    (2015)
  • H. Agheshlui et al.

    Tensile behavior of groups of anchored blind bolts within concrete-filled steel square hollow sections

    J. Struct. Eng.

    (2015)
  • T. Pokharel et al.

    Numerical and experimental behaviour of moment resisting connections using blind bolts within cfshs columns

  • Cited by (15)

    • Review on blind bolted connections to concrete-filled steel tubes

      2023, Thin-Walled Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      An optimal embedment length was also suggested in the study to achieve the highest stiffness. Cyclic performance of the double-headed Ajax bolt connected to square CFSTs was studied in Pokharel et al. [40] by pullout test similar as Oktavianus et al. [20] (Fig. 3(a)). The steel tube size was 400 × 12.5 mm and 400 × 10 mm, and the bolt was located at the 1/4 location of the tube face wall.

    • Cyclic behavior of T-stub connection to hollow section steel column using TSOBs

      2021, Journal of Constructional Steel Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hence, the method of field welding to connect the Hollow Section Steel Column (HSSC) and the open section beam is adopted in many constructions. Field welding is susceptible to the weather and can introduce residual stresses into structures [4]. To overcome the difficulty of connecting the HSSC to the open section beam, the one-side bolts capable of connecting the HSSC members are proposed constantly.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text