A framework for incorporating social processes in hydrological models

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.011Get rights and content

Earth's surface has undergone dramatic changes due to the intensification of human activities. In turn, humans modify their behavior in response to environmental change. Conventional hydrological models do not represent such coupled human–water systems. This paper proposes a socio-hydrological water balance framework for analyzing the behavior of the sociohydrologic system in terms of water allocation between social system and ecological system. This proposed socio-hydrological framework will help develop a quantitative understanding of co-evolutionary processes in river basins from a social and ecological systems perspective.

Introduction

Hydrology studies the earth's water, its distribution and circulation, chemical and physical properties, and interaction with the environment [1]. Hydrological models are simplified representations of the hydrologic cycle that typically extend from perceptual to numerical representations of runoff and other hydrologic processes as a function of various parameters and inputs. Hydrologic models represent our understanding of hydrological processes and provide a basis to predict changes in basin behavior, making them an important tool for water resource management [2].

In the Anthropocene (the last 200 years), the global population has rapidly increased and human activities have altered water cycles to an unprecedented extent, for example through expansion of global irrigated areas for food production, and construction of tens of thousands of dams and reservoirs to boost water supply, to provide flood control, and to serve as a source of energy [3••, 4, 5, 6]. Water in many river basins has been increasingly transferred from the ecological system to the social system, which has led to worsening ecological degradation. It is increasingly recognized that the biophysical focus of most hydrological models is no longer adequate. This is because multiple environmental subsystems have changed substantially during the Anthropocene as a direct or indirect result of human activity [7], and are expected to continue along a path of rapid change into the future [7, 8]. Important changes include water abstraction, climatic change, land use and land cover change, and biogeochemical changes. Moreover, human activity is also likely to induce further changes over a range of physical, ecological and social processes as societies respond to environmental degradation [4, 5, 6]. Due to these dynamic changes in human and hydrological systems, the capacity of existing hydrological models in supporting sustainable water resources management is being seriously questioned.

It is increasingly agreed that humans and their actions should be considered as part and parcel of water cycle dynamics and should be included in hydrological models. In essence, the hydrological changes and social changes in a river basin are co-evolutionary processes [9, 10••]. Socio-hydrology is an emerging discipline aiming to understand and predict the dynamics and co-evolution of coupled human–water systems that is attracting much scholarly attention [11•, 12••, 13]. There is a large diversity of emerging socio-hydrological models, in part, because they derive relationships and identify governing processes individually for each case study [14, 15, 16]. At present, there is no mechanistic understanding of how social drivers and social responses interact with the hydrological components of a co-evolving human–water system [4, 17••, 18]. This paper aims to contribute to this understanding by providing a generic framework for representing the important components of the socio-hydrologic system and quantifying their interactions. Before doing so we briefly discuss the status quo of hydrological modeling as background.

Section snippets

Hydrological models

A variety of hydrological models have been developed across the world to simulate site-specific hydrologic phenomena and hydrologic cycles. They are used to develop understanding of the partitioning of precipitation into evapotranspiration and surface runoff at a river basin for planning and management of water resources to meet human demands, and increasingly to identify hydrologic system changes. Each model has its own unique characteristics, but precipitation data and drainage area are two

Recent studies in incorporating social processes in hydrological models

It is recognized that human beings influence hydrological systems, and the changes of hydrological systems in turn influence water use behavior of human beings. Land use change is a notable example of human's adaption to the hydrological system, and the interaction between them co-evolves [38]. Therefore, making hydrologic predictions on long timescales is not only a matter of developing modeling approaches that are robust to non-stationarity in the forcing variables, but also requires

The socio-hydrologic water balance model

Incorporating human response (including government and individual behavioral responses) to hydrologic extremes (droughts and floods) in hydrological models is the core task for developing socio-hydrological models. As summarized above, there are many classifications for hydrological models, but, however simple or complex, they all simulate the hydrological cycles of river basins. In this section, a socio-hydrological model is proposed in which the simplest hydrological model, partitioning

The socio-hydrologic water balance model with water allocation decision-making feedback system

The socio-hydrological water balance framework proposed above provides a basis for analyzing co-evolutionary processes between the social system and ecological system that reflects the impact of water allocation decision-making on these two systems. However, it still does not help characterise how changing social factors and processes influence human water resource management decision-making in a river basin, or the impact of socio-ecological system outcomes on water allocation. A conceptual

Challenges in applications of this proposed framework

The proposed framework (DHWC) developed a generic and systemic framework representing social processes influencing and responding to hydrological processes. It represented social processes with three interactive variables: societal value change, technological progress and governance reform. These three variables consider willingness to (re)allocate water, capacity to (re)allocate water and potential institutional change enabling (re)allocation of water. The last of these could be through formal

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No: 41601036, 41571031), ‘Light of West China’ Program of CAS, the Australian Research Council (Project No: FT130100274), and the National Key Research and Development Program (Project No: 2017YFC0404305, 2016YFSF0302481). We thank Yan Zhao from the School of Earth and Environmental Science, the University of Queensland and Hang Zhang from the School of Environment and Civil Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology

References (70)

  • Y. Elshafei et al.

    A model of the socio-hydrologic dynamics in a semiarid catchment: isolating feedbacks in the coupled human-hydrology system

    Water Resour Res

    (2015)
  • A. Viglione et al.

    Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk – roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust

    J Hydrol

    (2014)
  • W. Wu

    The evolutionaly history of irrigated agricultural technology in the Heihe River Basin

  • R.K. Linsley et al.

    Hydrology for Engineers

    (1982)
  • Y. Wada et al.

    Modeling global water use for the 21st century: the Water Futures and Solutions (WFaS) initiative and its approaches

    Geosci Model Dev

    (2016)
  • Y. Wada et al.

    Human–water interface in hydrological modelling: current status and future directions

    Hydrol Earth Syst Sci

    (2017)
  • S. Siebert et al.

    A global data set of the extent of irrigated land from 1900 to 2005

    Hydrol Earth Syst Sci

    (2015)
  • A. Montanari et al.

    “Panta Rhei—everything flows”: change in hydrology and society—the IAHS scientific decade 2013–2022

    Hydrol Sci J

    (2013)
  • S. Thompson et al.

    Developing predictive insight into changing water systems: use-inspired hydrologic science for the Anthropocene

    Hydrol Earth Syst Sci

    (2013)
  • M. Sivapalan et al.

    Downward approach to hydrological prediction

    Hydrol Process

    (2003)
  • M. Sivapalan

    Debates—Perspectives on sociohydrology: changing water systems and the “tyranny of small problems”—sociohydrology

    Water Resour Res

    (2015)
  • M. Sivapalan et al.

    Socio-hydrology: a new science of people and water

    Hydrol Processes

    (2012)
  • T.J. Troy et al.

    Debates—Perspectives on sociohydrology: sociohydrologic modeling—tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation

    Water Resour Res

    (2015)
  • Z. Lu et al.

    Progress on sociohydrology

    Adv Water Sci

    (2016)
  • A. Montanari

    Debates—Perspectives on sociohydrology: introduction

    Water Resour Res

    (2015)
  • N.J. Mount et al.

    Data-driven modelling approaches for socio-hydrology: opportunities and challenges within the Panta Rhei Science Plan

    Hydrol Sci J

    (2016)
  • A. Ciullo et al.

    Socio-hydrological modelling of flood-risk dynamics: comparing the resilience of green and technological systems

    Hydrol Sci J

    (2017)
  • G. Di Baldassarre et al.

    Towards understanding the dynamic behaviour of floodplains as human–water systems

    Hydrol Earth Syst Sci

    (2013)
  • Y. Wei et al.

    Socio-hydrology: theory, method and practice

    (2017)
  • M.R. Sanderson et al.

    Bringing the “social” into socio-hydrology: conservation policy support in the Central Great Plains of Kansas, USA

    Water Resour Res

    (2017)
  • A. Porporato et al.

    Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress: III. Vegetation water stress

    Adv Water Resour

    (2001)
  • H. Wheater et al.

    Hydrological Modelling in Arid and Semi-arid Areas

    (2007)
  • K. Abbaspour et al.

    A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model

    J Hydrol

    (2015)
  • W. Rippl

    The capacity of storage reservoirs for water supply

    Van Nostrand's Eng Mag (1879–1886)

    (1883)
  • J.G. Arnold et al.

    Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part I: Model Development

    (1998)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Novel hybrid coupling of ecohydrology and socioeconomy at river basin scale: A watershed system model for the Heihe River basin

      2021, Environmental Modelling and Software
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, numerical models, typically designed for specific purposes or domains, can rarely be applied to an entire watershed that has distinct natural and human characteristics over different sections. The deficiencies of the existing models, together with the increasing influence of human activities in the Anthropocene era, urgently call for the development of watershed system models to produce a holistic simulation of the water-land-air-plant-human nexus at the watershed scale (Sivapalan et al., 2014; Cheng and Li, 2015; Inam et al., 2017; Kuil et al., 2018; Lu et al., 2018; Li and Xie, 2019). Watershed system models are essential if we are to better understand complex watershed systems and support integrated river basin management (Cai et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018b).

    • Managing supply and demand of ecosystem services in dryland catchments

      2021, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
      Citation Excerpt :

      The change in use and management of land and water resources links the ecological system and social system, and leads to (mis-) matches between ESS and ESD. It is driven by a societal system consisting of societal value (societal willingness to change, i.e. change in stakeholders’ preference), technological progress (societal ability to change), and institutional change (government’s regulation of the change through policy) [30••]. This societal system is considered as the generic drivers for the human decision-making processes.

    • Agent-based socio-hydrological modeling for restoration of Urmia Lake: Application of theory of planned behavior

      2019, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Contrarily, the bottom-up approaches focus on the underlying linkages of the sub-systems, which form larger complex systems. Thus, bottom-up approaches could deliver more accurate results in investigations of socio-hydrological processes, especially when sub-systems include complex dynamic elements such as humans (Troy et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2018). One of the most known bottom-up approaches which have been used in many branches of science is agent-based modeling (ABM).

    • Spatial explicit management for the water sustainability of coupled human and natural systems

      2019, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to the basic support for human-natural sustainability, water research in CHANS has attracted broad research interest in various concepts such as human-water systems and socio-hydrological systems (Feng et al., 2018; Blair and Buytaert, 2015; Srinivasan et al., 2012). Instead of using normal hydrological models, research linking water with CHANS should consider the dynamic interactions and coevolution of social-hydrological systems (Lu et al., 2018). However, most current research only marginally considers social processes in simulating coupled human-water systems and fails to provide an explicit description of the interactions between human and water systems (Troy et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text