Elsevier

Current Opinion in Virology

Volume 19, August 2016, Pages 23-29
Current Opinion in Virology

Impacts of poultry vaccination on viruses of wild bird

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2016.06.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Transmission of viruses from farmed poultry to wild birds is not highly studied.

  • Attenuated poultry vaccines can be transmitted from poultry to wild birds.

  • Virulent poultry viruses may evolve under vaccine pressure and spread to wild birds.

  • Poultry vaccines can contain viral contaminants that may spread to wild birds.

  • Recombination could increase the risk of vectored vaccines spreading to wild birds.

Spillover of viruses from farmed poultry into wild birds is a relatively new area of study at the livestock–wildlife interface. These transmission events can threaten the health of wild birds. There is growing evidence of transmission of vaccine viruses from poultry to wild birds, including attenuated vaccine strains of Newcastle disease virus and infectious bronchitis virus, and also spread of virulent viruses that may have evolved under the pressure of vaccine use, such as Marek's disease virus. Viral contaminants of poultry vaccines, including reticuloendotheliosis virus, may also be transmitted to wild birds and result in disease. New, vectored vaccines are less likely to directly spread to wild birds but this risk may rise as a result of recombination.

Introduction

Global poultry production is increasing rapidly, with chicken meat forecast to become the largest meat sector worldwide from 2020 [1]. The potential for viruses in wild birds, which are often considered reservoirs of infection, to ‘spillover’ into poultry and cause disease has long been recognised. Thus biosecurity programmes in poultry operations have been developed to help prevent the direct or indirect transmission of pathogens from wild birds to poultry [2]. Virus transmission in the other direction (from poultry into wild birds) lacks the immediate economic consequences that viral incursions into commercial poultry can have and has not been as thoroughly considered. Consequently, fewer biosecurity measures are in place to prevent such transmission events. This is despite the massive scale of modern commercial poultry production which can enable large-scale contamination of the environment with infectious material through practices such as disposal or re-use of poultry litter [3] or through airborne dispersal of infectious agents from infected flocks [4]. Furthermore, an increased interest in free-range poultry production allows increased direct contact between wild birds and farmed poultry [2].

A developing awareness of the concept of ‘one health’, which recognises connections between animal, environmental and human health, including at the livestock-wildlife interface [5, 6] has served to highlight the risks that poultry viruses may pose to the environment and to wild birds. The potential for spillover exists when the natural host range of a virus includes a domestic poultry species and a wild bird species. As viruses in wild birds are much less studied than those in poultry, the natural host ranges of many avian viruses are not well understood. Similarly, the degree of host susceptibility to disease caused by different viruses is often not known. However, some poultry viruses are known to have broad host ranges (e.g. avian paramyxovirus-1, also called Newcastle disease virus, NDV) and are thus a potential risk to a wide range of wild bird species [7]. Other poultry viruses have narrow host ranges (e.g. some avian herpesviruses). These may only be a risk to small number of wild bird species that are closely related to farmed poultry species, such as other Galliform or Anseriform birds [8, 9]. Without appropriate surveillance programmes in wild bird populations, spillover events from poultry into wild birds are unlikely to be detected.

Vaccines, along with biosecurity programmes, are critical to the control of viral diseases in poultry. Table 1 summarises vaccines used for this purpose and also lists the genus and family names of each virus. These vaccines typically reduce clinical signs of disease but do not prevent virus infection [2]. Vaccination can have a profound influence on virus populations within commercial poultry flocks, and, by extension, viruses that may spillover into wild bird populations. Poultry vaccines may have an impact on wild bird viruses through the transmission of attenuated vaccines from poultry to wild birds; the transmission of virulent viruses that have evolved in response to the use of poultry vaccines; or through undetected viral contaminants within commercial vaccines being transmitted to wild birds. New, vectored poultry vaccines also have the potential to have an impact on wild bird viruses. These vaccines use a virus vector to express heterologous (foreign) proteins from other poultry pathogens. These four mechanisms through which poultry vaccines may affect wild bird viruses (Figure 1) will be explored in further detail below, with a focus on recent contributions to this field and consideration of the potential risks to wild birds.

Section snippets

Attenuated vaccine viruses transmitted from poultry to wild birds

Spillover of vaccine viruses from poultry into wild birds can only occur with live vaccines. Attenuated vaccines are commonly used in poultry (Table 1) as they are relatively inexpensive to produce and administer, particularly when they facilitate mass administration by drinking water, aerosol or spray. These vaccines also often induce more effective immunity than inactivated vaccines [2]. Prior to their registration, the safety characteristics of attenuated poultry vaccines are examined

The influence of vaccines on the evolution of poultry viruses

Vaccines can influence the evolution of viruses within poultry flocks. Selection for viruses that ‘escape’ vaccine-induced immunity can occur when there is incomplete cross-protection between viral serotypes or antigenic types. This has been reported for a number of poultry viruses, particularly avian influenza virus (AIV) [16•, 17], but also other viruses, including IBV [15] and NDV [18]. The viruses that persist in poultry despite (or due to) the use of vaccines can then be transmitted to

Viral contaminants of poultry vaccines

Contamination of attenuated vaccines with viruses used to generate inactivated viruses in the same facility, or with viruses circulating in flocks used for production of embryonated eggs for vaccine production, has the potential to contribute to dissemination of virulent viruses into wild birds through poultry vaccines. In addition, inadequate inactivation of virulent viruses used to produce inactivated vaccines may also result in dissemination of viruses that pose a risk to wild birds.

New generation (vectored) vaccines

A recent dramatic expansion in the use of viral vectored poultry vaccines may have impacts on viruses in wild birds. Most vectored poultry vaccines use double-stranded DNA viruses as vectors. Herpesvirus of turkey (HVT) and FPV are used commercially as vaccine vectors to express genes from other poultry pathogens, including AIV, IBDV, NDV and infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) (Table 1). Fowl adenovirus (FAdV) and a number of avian herpesviruses (ILTV, MDV-1 and duck enteritis virus)

Conclusion

Vaccines are crucial for achieving high standards of animal production, health and welfare in farmed poultry, but many of the impacts of poultry vaccines on wild bird viruses are incompletely characterised. This is not unexpected given the difficulties involved in studying viruses in wild birds and the historical focus on wild birds as a potential source of infection for farmed poultry. As the scale of poultry production grows it will become increasingly important to better characterise these

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

Joanne Devlin is supported by a Future Fellowship from the Australian Research Council (FT140101287).

References (48)

  • S.W. Lee et al.

    Growth kinetics and transmission potential of existing and emerging field strains of infectious laryngotracheitis virus

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • S.W. Lee et al.

    Attenuated vaccines can recombine to form virulent field viruses

    Science

    (2012)
  • P.K. Vaz et al.

    Evidence of widespread natural recombination among field isolates of equine herpesvirus 4 but not among field isolates of equine herpesvirus 1

    J Gen Virol

    (2016)
  • OECD/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2015

    (2015)
  • S.R. Collet

    Principles of disease prevention, diagnosis and control introduction

  • C. Gortazar et al.

    The wild side of disease control at the wildlife-livestock-human interface: a review

    Front Vet Sci

    (2014)
  • P.J. Miller et al.

    Newcastle disease

  • S.A. Metwally

    Duck virus enteritis (duck plaque)

  • K.A. Schat et al.

    Marek's disease

  • Principles of Veterinary Vaccine Production (Chapter, 1.1.6)., In OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for...
  • S. Cardenas Garcia et al.

    Molecular epidemiology of Newcastle disease in Mexico and the potential spillover of viruses from poultry into wild bird species

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (2013)
  • C.J. Snoeck et al.

    Characterization of newcastle disease viruses in wild and domestic birds in Luxembourg from 2006 to 2008

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (2013)
  • L.A. Hughes et al.

    Genetically diverse coronaviruses in wild bird populations of northern England

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2009)
  • Y.L. Chong et al.

    The effect of vaccination on the evolution and population dynamics of avian paramyxovirus-1

    PLoS Pathog

    (2010)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Validation of specific quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay panel for Infectious Bronchitis using synthetic DNA standards and clinical specimens

      2020, Journal of Virological Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, constant worldwide surveillance and identification of IBV types is fundamentally important. Vaccines play a critical role in the control of IBV in poultry (Devlin et al., 2016), and vaccination against multiple IBV serotypes in commercial poultry operations is routinely practiced. Currently, more than 50 antigenic and genetic types of this virus have been officially reported and, among them, the Arkansas (Ark), Massachusetts (Mass), Delaware (DE) and Georgia 98 (GA98) types are frequently isolated in the field, and are also the commonly used vaccine types in the United States (Jackwood et al., 2005; Jackwood, 2012).

    • Management of pathogens in poultry

      2019, Animal Agriculture: Sustainability, Challenges and Innovations
    • Comparative evolutionary and phylogenomic analysis of Avian avulaviruses 1–20

      2018, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the biological significance of these sites is still unknown and needs to be explored in future. Multiple vaccination regimens coupled with mass employment of live avulavirus 1 vaccine (e.g., LaSota) increases the probability of its spill-over (Devlin et al., 2016; Rohaim et al., 2017). Such spill-over may enhance additional events such as reversion of virulence and recombination with wild-type strain.

    • Reverse spillover of avian viral vaccine strains from domesticated poultry to wild birds

      2017, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Wild birds have been proposed to play crucial roles in the spillover and in potentiating the virulence of avian viruses [2]. However, intensive vaccines application, contamination of the environment with infectious material through disposal or re-use of poultry litter and due to close contacts between wild birds and commercial poultry may lead to reversal of spillover (reverse spillover) from farmed poultry to wild birds [3]. Likewise, the transmission of virulent (e.g. escape mutant) viruses that have evolved either in response to vaccine pressure or through undetected viral contaminants within commercial vaccines are being transmitted to wild birds [2].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text