Elsevier

Crop Protection

Volume 69, March 2015, Pages 70-76
Crop Protection

The effects of insecticide dose and herbivore density on tri-trophic effects of thiamethoxam in a system involving wheat, aphids, and ladybeetles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.12.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Thiamethoxam in wheat plants affected Coleomegilla maculata fitness via aphid prey.

  • Increasing aphid densities reduced the thiamethoxam titer found in wheat.

  • Clothianidin was found in aphids fed wheat treated with thiamethoxam.

Abstract

We assess how herbivore density and insecticide dose affects the tri-trophic interactions among thiamethoxam-treated wheat (Triticum sp.), Rhophalosiphum padi and the predatory Coleomegilla maculata DeGeer. In the first experiment 2nd and 4th instar C. maculata were fed aphids reared for 24 h on wheat plants treated with sub-lethal thiamethoxam soil drenches to assess the effect of insecticidal dose on the predator. In the second experiment a constant, sub-lethal thiamethoxam soil drench was used on wheat plants, but the plants were infested with different densities of aphids. Aphids from each density treatment were then fed to C. maculata 2nd instars. Insecticide levels within wheat and aphid tissues were quantified using a competitive ELISA. In experiment one, 4th instars of C. maculata displayed no negative effects after consuming aphids from treated plants. However, 2nd instars of C. maculata ate more treated aphids than untreated aphids and larval development times varied between the untreated larvae and those receiving the low dose of the insecticide. In experiment two, the 2nd instar C. maculata displayed slower walking speeds after consuming aphids from low aphid density plants. Thiamethoxam within wheat tissue was found at higher levels with increasing dose. This insecticide was also found at higher levels in wheat plants with the lowest aphid density. Clothianidin, a toxic metabolite of thiamethoxam, was found in aphids that had fed on thiamethoxam-treated wheat, but no differences between treatments were observed. The neonicotinoid treatment altered the quality of R. padi as prey for 2nd instar C. maculata, but this depended on the aphid infestation level on the plants. In addition to revealing a potential deleterious effect of thiamethoxam systemic insecticides in wheat, our assays provide insight into the design and interpretation of toxicity assays involving systemic neonicotinoids and herbivores.

Introduction

Since their introduction in 1991, neonicotinoid insecticides have become commonly used in many agricultural settings to control pest insects (Nauen and Denholm, 2005). Neonicotinoids act as agonists to the acetylcholine receptors within the nervous system of an animal, mimicking the action of naturally produced acetylcholine (Jeschke et al., 2013), a neurotransmitter which allows action potentials to move from nerve cell to nerve cell. The overstimulation of nerve cells due to neonicotinoid insecticides can cause paralysis (Girolami et al., 2009) and death (Iwasa et al., 2004) in insects. The popularity of neonicotinoid use has risen in part because of the diverse means by which the chemicals can be applied. This class of insecticides can be applied as granules in the soil (Lanka et al., 2014), foliar sprays (Juraske et al., 2009), soil drenches (Stoner and Eitzer, 2012), tree injections (Cowles et al., 2006) and topically to animals (Dryden et al., 2011). However, the most widespread application method of neonicotinoids has been as seed treatments that protect plants from herbivory (Jeschke et al., 2010).

Although the threat against beneficial insects is reduced by using systemic insecticides compared to broad spectrum insecticidal sprays, there is evidence that systemically treated plants do in fact harm beneficial insects through a number of pathways (Lundgren, 2009). For example, Moser and Obrycki (2009) exposed Asian ladybeetle (Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)) larvae to corn seedlings grown from seed treated with neonicotinoids. The ladybeetle larvae expressed neurotoxic symptoms such as trembling, paralysis and loss of coordination in 72% of cases, presumably the result of the observed and quantified facultative herbivory (Moser and Obrycki, 2009). In another toxicology study, Rogers et al. (2007) confined Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) adults to the flowers of neonicotinoid treated Fagopyrum esculentum and Asclepias curassavica where they consumed the nectar. Survival of C. carnea was significantly reduced in the insecticide treatment after 10 d compared to an untreated control group; the authors concluded that survival was diminished due to the ingestion of nectar containing neonicotinoid insecticide (Rogers et al., 2007).

Besides direct mortality of beneficial insects resulting from the use of systemic neonicotinoids, sub-lethal concentrations of insecticide within plants can act as one of a suite of stressors that result in diminished fitness of non-target species. Consequences of ingesting sub-lethal concentrations of insecticides can include reduced fecundity (Shi et al., 2011), lowered mobility (Scholer and Krischik, 2014), loss of orientation abilities (Fischer et al., 2014), limited overwintering survivability (Grewal et al., 2001) and reduced foraging capacity (Schneider et al., 2012). The sub-lethal effects of neonicotinoids can potentially reduce the efficiency of predator and parasitoid communities, threatening biotic resistance to pest proliferation (Seagraves and Lundgren, 2012).

Predation on crop pests by predators and parasitoids provides not only environmental benefits, but also has tangible economic value to land owners, and is an important component of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) (Zhang and Swinton, 2009). Plant incorporated systemic insecticides may affect non-target predators through various trophic pathways, primarily considered bi-trophic (Lundgren, 2009), or tri-trophic (prey-mediated) effects (Birch et al., 1999). Beneficial insects are exposed to systemic insecticides through omnivory on non-prey foods such as vegetative plant tissue (Moser and Obrycki, 2009), pollen (Cresswell, 2011, Dively and Kamel, 2012), guttation fluid (Girolami et al., 2009), floral (Krischik et al., 2007) or extra-floral nectar (Stapel et al., 2000). Predators can also be adversely affected by an insecticide if their herbivorous prey contains the toxin or the quality of the prey is lessened by ingesting insecticide-containing plant tissues (Dutton et al., 2002). Documenting the trophic relationships between systemically treated-plants, pests and beneficial insects is important for understanding the compatibility of systemic insecticides within IPM systems.

Wheat is a crop of significant importance worldwide; 18.5 million ha of wheat was harvested in the United States in 2013 alone (NASS, 2014). Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (bird cherry-oat aphid, Hemiptera: Aphididae) is a common pest of wheat in the U.S. and worldwide, causing significant damage resulting from feeding and transmitting viruses (Jiménez-Martínez et al., 2004). Neonicotinoid seed treatments are highly water soluble (Maienfisch et al., 2001) and are readily transported through both xylem and phloem, making this class of insecticides and method of application well adapted for the control of phloem feeding insects, like aphids (Magalhaes et al., 2009), in a variety of crops including wheat (Gray et al., 1996).

Members of the Coccinellidae family have historically been used frequently and effectively as a useful tool in biological control programs to limit pest arthropod herbivory (Biddinger et al., 2009, Weber and Lundgren, 2009), especially from aphids (Obrycki et al., 2009). One species of Coccinellidae, Coleomegilla maculata DeGeer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), is a predator of R. padi in wheat (Elliott et al., 1999) and in other crops including corn (Lundgren and Wiedenmann, 2005), thus C. maculata could potentially be affected tri-trophically by aphids feeding on systemically treated wheat. Sublethal levels of neonicotinoid insecticides can be found in crops either as the seed treatment dissipates over the season (McCornack and Ragsdale, 2006, Seagraves and Lundgren, 2012), or through uptake of residual insecticides found in the soil from previous insecticide applications. Here we examine the tri-trophic interactions among wheat plants containing sublethal doses of thiamethoxam, aphids, and the predatory C. maculata. Specifically, we examined how insecticide dose in the wheat plants and aphid densities on the wheat plants interact to affect C. maculata larvae.

Section snippets

Insects and plants

A C. maculata DeGeer colony was established from individuals collected from a corn field near Brookings, SD, USA (44.3114° N, 96.7981° W), and was raised for three generations (approximately 15 mo) in the laboratory. The colony was maintained on a semi-artificial diet (Lundgren's Super C. mac Diet, (Lundgren et al., 2011)) and honey. The beetles were raised at 26.5 °C with 16:8 h (L:D; light: dark) photoperiod. The R. padi colony was established from individuals collected in Hays, Kansas.

Effect of thiamethoxam dose and aphid density on toxin levels in plant and prey

The concentration of thiamethoxam in the soil drenches were positively correlated with the thiamethoxam concentration found in wheat tissue (Fig. 1A). The level of aphid infestation on wheat plants significantly (P = 0.03) affected how much thiamethoxam was detected within wheat tissue (Fig. 1B). In particular, wheat that had five aphids per plant had significantly more thiamethoxam than treatments that had greater aphid infestations. Thiamethoxam was undetectable in aphids, but clothianidin

Discussion

Our study revealed that herbivore density interacts with systemic neonicotinoid insecticides in ways that may affect higher trophic levels responsible for regulating pest insect populations. Aphids fed wheat treated with sub-lethal doses of thiamethoxam had a measurable adverse, prey-mediated effects on the fitness of young lady beetle larvae, but only when aphids were less crowded on the plants. Aphid density had an effect on the amount of insecticide detectable within the plants as well.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Janet Fergen, Ryan Schmid, Megan Wentzel and Mallory Wentzel for assistance in the laboratory. Helpful advice was given by Frank Byrne in synthesizing an ELISA protocol. Mention of proprietary products does not constitute endorsement by the USDA.

References (50)

  • M.A. Rogers et al.

    Effect of soil application of imidacloprid on survival of adult green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), used for biological control in greenhouse

    Biol. Control

    (2007)
  • J.O. Stapel et al.

    Disruptive sublethal effects of insecticides on biological control: altered foraging ability and life span of a parasitoid after feeding on extrafloral nectar of cotton treated with systemic insecticides

    Biol. Control

    (2000)
  • D.C. Weber et al.

    Assessing the trophic ecology of the Coccinellidae: their roles as predators and as prey

    Biol. Control

    (2009)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Incorporating natural enemies in an economic threshold for dynamically optimal pest management

    Ecol. Model

    (2009)
  • Y. Benzidane et al.

    Effect of thiamethoxam on cockroach locomotor activity is associated with its metabolite clothianidin

    Pest Manag. Sci.

    (2010)
  • A.N.E. Birch et al.

    Tri-trophic interactions involving pest aphids, predatory 2-spot ladybirds and transgenic potatoes expressing snowdrop lectin for aphid resistance

    Mol. Breed. New Strateg. Plant Improv.

    (1999)
  • F.J. Byrne et al.

    Quantification of imidacloprid toxicity to avocado thrips, Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), using a combined bioassay and ELISA approach

    Pest Manag. Sci.

    (2005)
  • R.S. Cowles et al.

    Activity and residues of imidacloprid applied to soil and tree trunks to control hemlock woolly Adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) in forests

    J. Econ. Entomol.

    (2006)
  • J. Cresswell

    A meta-analysis of experiments testing the effects of a neonicotinoid insecticide (imidacloprid) on honey bees

    Ecotoxicology

    (2011)
  • G.P. Dively et al.

    Insecticide residues in pollen and nectar of a cucurbit crop and their potential exposure to pollinators

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (2012)
  • A. Dutton et al.

    Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Chrysoperla carnea

    Ecol. Entomol.

    (2002)
  • N. Elliott et al.

    Influence of within-field and landscape factors on aphid predator populations in wheat

    Landsc. Ecol.

    (1999)
  • J. Fischer et al.

    Neonicotinoids interfere with specific components of navigation in honeybees

    PLos One

    (2014)
  • V. Girolami et al.

    Translocation of neonicotinoid insecticides from coated seeds to seedling guttation drops: a novel way of intoxication for bees

    J. Econ. Entomol.

    (2009)
  • P.S. Grewal et al.

    Neonicotinoid insecticides alter diapause behavior and survival of overwintering white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

    Pest Manag. Sci.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text