Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 132, Issue 3, 1 October 2013, Pages 541-546
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

The relationship between age and risky injecting behaviours among a sample of Australian people who inject drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.03.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Limited evidence suggests that younger people who inject drugs (PWID) engage in high-risk injecting behaviours. This study aims to better understand the relationships between age and risky injecting behaviours.

Methods

Data were taken from 11 years of a repeat cross-sectional study of sentinel samples of regular PWID (The Australian Illicit Drug Reporting System, 2001–2011). Multivariable Poisson regression was used to explore the relationship between age and four outcomes of interest: last drug injection occurred in public, receptive needle sharing (past month), experiencing injecting-related problems (e.g. abscess, dirty hit; past month), and non-fatal heroin overdose (past six months).

Results

Data from 6795 first-time study participants were analysed (median age: 33 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 27–40; median duration of injecting: 13 years [IQR: 7–20]). After adjusting for factors including duration of injecting, each five year increase in age was associated with significant reductions in public injecting (adjusted incidence rate ratio [AIRR]: 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–0.92), needle sharing (AIRR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79–0.89) and injecting-related problems (AIRR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95–0.97). Among those who had injected heroin in the six months preceding interview, each five year increase in age was associated with an average 10% reduction in the risk of heroin overdose (AIRR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85–0.96).

Conclusions

Older PWID report significantly lower levels of high-risk injecting practices than younger PWID. Although they make up a small proportion of the current PWID population, younger PWID remain an important group for prevention and harm reduction.

Introduction

There is evidence to suggest that the population of people who inject drugs (PWID) in Australia is ageing; over the past decade significant increases in median age have been detected in repeat cross-sectional studies of Needle and Syringe Program (NSP) clients and community-recruited PWID (Iversen et al., 2011, Stafford and Burns, 2011). This may reflect the ageing general population, including early-onset substance users (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2008, World Health Organisation, 2011), as well as reduced initiation to heroin injecting following a period of reduction in heroin supply in late 2000/early 2001, in what had been heroin-dominated illicit drug markets, particularly in the country's two most populous jurisdictions, New South Wales and Victoria (Topp et al., 2001, Degenhardt et al., 2004, Degenhardt et al., 2005, Day et al., 2006). Although there has been recent attention to ageing PWID in public health research, particularly in relation to hepatitis C virus (HCV) related morbidity (Higgs and Maher, 2010, Gibson et al., 2011), further research is required to understand the injecting behaviours and associated health needs of younger PWID.

Research into the influence of age on patterns of injecting drug use (IDU) and associated risk behaviours has shown that compared with their older counterparts, younger PWID (commonly defined as those below 30 years of age) report injecting drugs at a higher frequency (Miller et al., 2007, Degenhardt et al., 2008), higher levels of sharing of injecting equipment (Fennema et al., 1997, Kral et al., 2000, Miller et al., 2007, Degenhardt et al., 2008) and engaging in high-risk injecting practices, such as ‘backloading’ (a process in which one syringe is used to mix drugs and to give measured shares to other PWID by squirting the drug solution directly into their syringes; Kral et al., 2000). These behaviours have significant implications for the risk of blood-borne virus (BBV) acquisition, and vascular and tissue injuries, as well as prevention practices (Jose et al., 1993, Topp et al., 2008, Pouget et al., 2011). Younger PWID also report limited use of health and drug treatment services (Cronquist et al., 2001, Miller et al., 2007, Day et al., 2011). These studies however have tended to group participants into just two or three age categories (usually ≤25 years or ≤30 years compared with older PWID), thereby not considering the effects of age within these groups. Further, previous studies have not focused on age-related differences in health outcomes such as drug overdose or injecting-related injury.

Although younger PWID may make up a small proportion of the current PWID population, evidence of their high-risk injecting behaviours and poor service utilisation suggest that they are an important target population for harm reduction and drug treatment services. In this paper, we use 11 years of repeat cross-sectional surveys conducted among sentinel samples of regular Australian PWID to generate robust estimates of the associations between age and selected risky injecting behaviours and related health outcomes.

Section snippets

Study methods

Data were obtained from the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS), which has been described in detail elsewhere (Hando et al., 1998). In brief, participants were recruited using convenience sampling through NSPs, treatment agencies, advertisements in street press and peer referral, in the capital cities of all Australian states and territories. Participants were eligible for the study if they: were aged 16 years or older, had injected drugs at least monthly in the six months preceding interview,

Results

The percentage of first-time participants in annual IDRS samples fluctuated over time, from 74% in 2002 to as low as 55% in 2010. In total, 6795 first-time study participants were included in analysis, representing 67% of the overall study population; the number of participants decreased from 951 in 2001 to 491 in 2011 (Supplementary Material, Table 1). Two thirds of participants were male (66%), and the majority spoke English as their main language (96%). The median age of participants was 33

Discussion

The results of this study of almost 7000 regular PWID suggest that age is related to the extent to which PWID engage in high-risk injecting behaviours and that this relationship has remained stable across the past decade.

Each five year increase in age was associated with significantly lower levels of high-risk injecting behaviours: an average 10% reduction in the likelihood of public injecting, and an average 16% reduction in the likelihood of receptive needle sharing. These associations

Role of funding source

The Illicit Drug Reporting System is funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, and is coordinated by the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre at the University of New South Wales. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution to this work of the Victorian Operational Infrastructure Support Program. DH is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award, and receives additional funding through the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC)

Contributors

DH and PD developed the project concept and analysis plan; DH conducted analysis and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All other authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

No conflict declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the study participants and the numerous researchers across Australia who assisted with study coordination and data collection. Thanks to Maelenn Gouillou, Tim Spelman and Paul Agius for assistance with statistical analysis.

References (48)

  • A.M. Salmon et al.

    Injecting-related injury and disease among clients of a supervised injecting facility

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2009)
  • S.G. Sherman et al.

    Prevalence and correlates of opiate overdose among young injection drug users in a large U.S. city

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2007)
  • L.P. Spear

    The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2000)
  • L. Topp et al.

    Prevalence and predictors of injecting-related injury and disease among clients of Australia's needle and syringe programs

    Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health

    (2008)
  • C. Treloar et al.

    Information exchange among injecting drug users: a role for an expanded peer education workforce

    Int. J. Drug Policy

    (2005)
  • A.J. Barros et al.

    Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio

    BMC Med. Res. Methodol.

    (2003)
  • P.O. Coffin et al.

    Identifying injection drug users at risk of nonfatal overdose

    Acad. Emerg. Med.

    (2007)
  • Commonwealth of Australia: Department of Health and Aged Care

    National Heroin Overdose Strategy

    (2001)
  • Commonwealth of Australia: Department of Health and Ageing

    National Drug Strategy 2010–2015: A Framework for Action on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs

    (2011)
  • C. Day et al.

    Changes in the initiation of heroin use after a reduction in heroin supply

    Drug Alcohol Rev.

    (2006)
  • C.A. Day et al.

    Development of a nurse-led primary healthcare service for injecting drug users in inner-city Sydney

    Aust. J. Prim. Health

    (2011)
  • D. Degenhardt et al.

    The Causes, Course and Consequences of the Heroin Shortage in Australia: National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund Monograph No. 3

    (2004)
  • L. Degenhardt et al.

    Effects of a sustained heroin shortage in three Australian States

    Addiction

    (2005)
  • L. Degenhardt et al.

    Drug use and risk among regular injecting drug users in Australia: does age make a difference?

    Drug Alcohol Rev.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Association between mental health service utilisation and sharing of injection material among people who inject drugs in Montreal, Canada

      2019, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Questionnaires compiled information on socio-demographic characteristics, past and current drug use, detailed information on injection drug use and related behaviors (i.e. receptive sharing of injection material), physical and mental health status, sexual behaviors, as well as information on visits to a wide variety of health services (i.e. general practitioner, psychiatrist, psychologist, social worker, street/outreach worker, nurse, other). Knowing that sharing of syringes and related paraphernalia is strongly associated with HCV seroconversion (Hagan et al., 2001; Hahn et al., 2002; Institut national de santé publique du Québec, 2016; Roy et al., 2007), our primary outcome was a measure of receptive sharing of injection material, which was dichotomized as yes vs. no to be consistent with previous studies (Gu et al., 2011; Hagan et al., 2010; Horyniak et al., 2013; Levesque et al., 2014; Spelman et al., 2015). At each visit, participants were asked if they had used injection material previously used by someone else during the past three months, by direct or indirect contact with blood.

    • The association between experiencing discrimination and physical and mental health among PWID

      2019, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since PWID are a hidden population, random population sampling is not feasible, therefore, alternative sampling procedures have been used to recruit the IDRS sample (Thompson & Collins, 2002). The IDRS sampling process is non-randomised, health service based supplemented by peer referral (Horyniak et al., 2013). Eligible participants were aged seventeen years and over, reported injecting drugs regularly for at least the last six months, and had resided in the city of interview for at least one year prior to interview (Sutherland et al., 2015).

    • Effect of ageing and time since first heroin and cocaine use on mortality from external and natural causes in a Spanish cohort of drug users

      2018, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most studies have not found a decreasing fatal overdose risk with age (Bartu et al., 2004; Bird et al., 2003; Buster et al., 2002; Clausen et al., 2009; Merrall et al., 2012; Odegard et al., 2007; Pierce et al., 2015), but some do (Copeland et al., 2004; Cousins et al., 2011; Larney et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2013). Moreover, most non-fatal overdose studies have found a greater risk in younger than older opioid users (Bergenstrom et al., 2008; Coffin et al., 2007; Horyniak et al., 2013; Kerr et al., 2007; Kinner et al., 2012; Seal et al., 2001; Bretteville-Jensen, Lillehagen, Gjersing, & Andreas, 2015). Regarding time since first heroin use, a fatal overdose study found a higher risk in long-term users (Odegard et al., 2007), while non-fatal overdose studies have generally found higher risk in short-term users (Powis et al., 1999; Stewart, Gossop, & Marsden, 2002; Bazazi et al., 2015; Brugal et al., 2002), although some do not (Darke et al., 2009; Uuskula et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text