Short communication
Sigma-1 antagonism inhibits binge ethanol drinking at adolescence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108214Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We assessed effects of the S1-R antagonists S1RA or BD-1063 on ethanol drinking.

  • S1RA blocked ethanol binge drinking in male and female adolescent Wistar rats.

  • BD-1063 blocked ethanol binge drinking in male and female adolescent Wistar rats.

  • S1RA reduced free-choice ethanol drinking long after its clearance.

  • S1-R antagonists are promising targets for the development of new medications.

Abstract

Background

Ethanol use during adolescence is a significant health problem, yet the pharmacological treatments to reduce adolescent binge drinking are scarce. The present study assessed, in male and female adolescent Wistar rats, if the sigma-1 receptor (S1-R) antagonists S1RA or BD-1063 disrupted ethanol drinking.

Methods

Three times a week, for two weeks, the rats received the S1-R antagonists. Thirty min later they were exposed, for 2 h, to a bottle of 8% or 10 % v/v ethanol. A 24 h, two-bottle, ethanol intake test was conducted after termination of these procedures. A subset of these rats was tested for recognition memory via the novel object recognition test.

Results

The rats given 64 mg/kg S1RA drank, in each binge session, significantly less than vehicle counterparts. Male rats given 4 or 16 mg/kg S1RA drank significantly less than those given 0 mg/kg in session 3 or in session 1 and 2, respectively; whereas female rats given 4 or 16 mg/kg drank significantly less than females given 0 mg/kg in session 2–5 or in sessions 2–6, respectively. Administration of 32 mg/kg, but not of 2 or 8 mg/kg, BD-1063 suppressed, across sessions, ethanol drinking. S1-R antagonism reduced absolute ethanol drinking at the two-bottle choice post-test. Recognition memory was not affected by the ethanol exposure.

Conclusions

The results indicate that S1-R antagonists may be promising targets to prevent increases in ethanol intake at adolescence. The persistent effect of S1-R antagonism in free-choice drinking suggests that modulation of the S1-R is altering plastic effects associated with ethanol exposure.

Introduction

Recent studies have warned on the high prevalence of teenage drinking, the closing of the sex gap in ethanol consumption (Thibaut, 2018), and the rising occurrence of adolescent binge drinking (Pilatti et al., 2017; Spear, 2018). The latter is associated with immediate (Wicki et al., 2018) or long-term negative consequences, including greater likelihood of exhibiting an alcohol use disorder (AUD) (Rial Boubeta et al., 2018).

Sigma receptors, of which two subtypes (sigma-1 and sigma-2) have been described, were first proposed as new opioid receptors, and they were also confused with PCP/NMDA receptors (Maurice and Su, 2009). The endogenous ligand of sigma receptors is still unknown, although some neurosteroids have been suggested as likely candidates (Hayashi and Su, 2005). The sigma-1 receptor (S1-R) is an intracellular chaperone with an aminoacidic sequence well conserved across species (Alon et al., 2017; Maurice and Su, 2009); and is concentrated in brain areas related to motivation, learning and sensorimotor processes, including hippocampus, olfactory bulb, and substantia nigra (Cobos et al., 2008). The S1-R ligands have long been expected to mitigate neurodegenerative and mood disorders, chronic pain or drug abuse, among other diseases (Merlos et al., 2017; Romero and Portillo-Salido, 2019). Systemic or intracerebroventricular administration of a S1-R agonist (Bhutada et al., 2012; Maurice et al., 2003) enhances preference for a place associated with the effects of ethanol (Quadir et al., 2019). Moreover, S1-R agonism via DTG exacerbated operant responding for ethanol (Sabino et al., 2011; Valenza et al., 2020), an effect disrupted by BD-1063 (Sabino et al., 2011). On the other hand, it has been also shown that antagonism of S1-R, via administration of BD-1063/1047 or NE-100, dose-dependently inhibited ethanol-induced behavioral activation in an open field (Maurice et al., 2003) or ethanol self-administration (Blasio et al., 2015; Sabino et al., 2009b). Altogether, these studies suggest that antagonism of S1-R reduces ethanol seeking and intake, and hence is a promising strategy for the development of medications to treat risky drinking.

The density of S1-R levels is affected by the hormonal changes that take place at adolescence (Moradpour et al., 2016). This suggests that the effects of S1-R agonists can be age-specific. The modulatory effect of the S1-R system on ethanol intake during adolescence remains uncharted and, despite the suggestion for adequate sex representation (Hilderbrand and Lasek, 2018), all of the studies on the role of S1-R in ethanol consumption have employed males (Quadir et al., 2019). This is particularly troubling, as female rats (Varlinskaya et al., 2015; Vetter-O’Hagen et al., 2011) and mice (Lopez et al., 2011; Szumlinski et al., 2019) consistently exhibit greater ethanol intake and preference than males [for a comprehensive review, see (Roth et al., 2004)], and women tend to progress more rapidly from alcohol initiation or first drunkenness to problematic drinking (Brady and Randall, 1999; Erol and Karpyak, 2015). The present study assessed the role of the S1-R system on binge-like ethanol drinking in adolescent Wistar rats, both male and female. We evaluated if pretreatment with the S1-R antagonists S1RA or BD-1063 disrupted drinking in a procedure that induces levels of drinking akin to those found during a binge drinking episode (Salguero et al., 2020). It was possible that the binge exposure altered recognition memory (Marco et al., 2017), and that BD-1063 protected from this effect. This was assessed in Experiment 2, via the novel object recognition (NOR) test.

Section snippets

Experimental design and subjects

We employed 169 adolescent Wistar rats [80 (40 male) in Experiment 1, 89 (39 male) in Experiment 2], derived from 18 litters reared at the Instituto de Investigación Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra (INIMEC-CONICET-UNC; Córdoba, Argentina). Several studies have described postnatal days (PDs) 27–28 to 42 as corresponding to early/mid-adolescence in humans, and the PD 46–59 period as late adolescence (Burke and Miczek, 2014; Karanikas et al., 2013; Spear, 2000). We conducted the ethanol drinking

Experiment 1

Males and females showed similar ethanol intake (g/kg or %) or overall fluid intake at the habituation session (p > 0.05; see Table 1). The ANOVA for g/kg ingested during the binge sessions (Fig. 1) yielded significant main effects of Dose (F3,70 = 34.08, p < .001, η²p = .59), Day of Assessment (F5,350 = 58.17, p < .001, η²p = .45) and Sex (F1,70 = 28.2, p < .001, η²p = .29), and significant two-way interactions between Day of Assessment and Sex (F5,350 = 4.59, p < .001, η²p = .06), and between

Discussion

The heightened vulnerability of adolescents to AUD is a significant concern. Thus, it is important to understand its neurobiological underpinnings and develop preventive and treatment strategies (Waller et al., 2019). There are only a few pharmacological treatments approved to maintain abstinence, reduce drinking, or prevent reinstatement; and these have been rarely studied in models of adolescent alcohol drinking (Sable et al., 2006). The present study found that antagonism of S1-R may prevent

Role of funding source

This work was supported by PICT 2015-0325 of Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (FONCyT), to RMP; by the Junta de Andalucía (grant CTS 109), and by funding from Esteve Pharmaceuticals and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). This research was done in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral thesis of LR-L, who was supported by a predoctoral grant from the Programa de Movilidad Internacional para Estudiantes de Doctorado 2019/20 of the University of

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Leandro Ruiz-Leyva: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Data curation, Project administration, Investigation, Resources. Agustín Salguero: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Data curation, Project administration, Investigation, Resources. Ignacio Morón: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Funding acquisition. Enrique Portillo-Salido: Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Resources. Cruz Miguel Cendán:

Declaration of Competing of Interest

We declare having no competing interest nor conflict of interest related to our MS or its results. EPS is an employee of the international pharmaceutical company ESTEVE. The latter company, however, had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data nor in the writing of the report.

References (42)

  • K.K. Szumlinski et al.

    DID it or DIDn’t it? Exploration of a failure to replicate binge-like alcohol-drinking in C57BL/6J mice

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (2019)
  • H. Ujike et al.

    Sigma Receptor antagonists block the development of sensitization to cocaine

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1996)
  • M. Valenza et al.

    Sigma receptor-induced heavy drinking in rats: modulation by the opioid receptor system

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (2020)
  • E.I. Varlinskaya et al.

    Social consequences of ethanol: impact of age, stress, and prior history of ethanol exposure

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2015)
  • C.S. Vetter-O’Hagen et al.

    Evidence for suppressant effects of testosterone on sex-typical ethanol intake in male Sprague-Dawley rats

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2011)
  • A. Wille-Bille et al.

    Restraint stress enhances alcohol intake in adolescent female rats but reduces alcohol intake in adolescent male and adult female rats

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2017)
  • A. Alon et al.

    Structural perspectives on sigma-1 receptor function

    Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.

    (2017)
  • P.S. Bhutada et al.

    Influence of sigma-1 receptor modulators on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in the extinction-reinstatement model

    Behav. Pharmacol.

    (2012)
  • A.R. Burke et al.

    Stress in adolescence and drugs of abuse in rodent models: role of dopamine, CRF, and HPA axis

    Psychopharmacology

    (2014)
  • S.M. Cheer et al.

    Spotlight on fluvoxamine in anxiety disorders in children and adolescents

    CNS Drugs

    (2002)
  • E.J. Cobos et al.

    Pharmacology and therapeutic potential of sigma(1) receptor ligands

    Curr. Neuropharmacol.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Administration of the sigma-1 receptor agonist PRE-084 at emerging adulthood, but not at early adolescence, attenuated ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in female rats

      2022, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Agonism of S1-R potentiates the reinforcing effects of cocaine [14]. S1-R antagonism, via the administration of BD-1047 or BD-1063, blocks ethanol induced-motor activity [15], operant or home-cage ethanol self-administration [16–19], and ethanol-induced CPP [20]. The activation of S1-R by the selective sigma ligands PRE-084 or DTG, in turn, did not alter ethanol-induced motor activity, yet it dose-dependently augmented [15] the expression of ethanol-induced CPP.

    • Characterization of a differential reinforcement of low rates of responding task in non-deprived male and female rats: Role of Sigma-1 receptors

      2021, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      BD-1063 more potently reduced impulsive behavior in females than in males. These results are consistent with previous finding showing that Sig-1R antagonism exerts greater effects in females compared to males when reducing ethanol binge drinking (Ruiz-Leyva et al., 2020) or the number of earned food responses in a food deprivation status (Tapia et al., 2019). Although this series of studies was not designed to determine the molecular mechanism underlying the increased basal impulsive action and responsiveness to BD-1063 in females compared to males, we speculate that such differences may be due to differential expression of the Sig-1R protein in the striatum, a brain area involved in decision making and impulsivity (Eagle and Baunez, 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text