Short-term injection drug use changes following hepatitis C virus (HCV) assessment and treatment among persons who inject drugs with acute HCV infection
Introduction
Among people who inject drugs (PWID), the median global hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence is estimated at 67% and is as high as 90% in certain settings (Nelson et al., 2011). In the United States, the number of HCV-related deaths between 2003–2013 has surpassed 60 other nationally notifiable infectious conditions combined (Ly, Hughes, Jiles, & Holmberg, 2016). It is widely acknowledged that timely engagement in HCV care, involving HCV testing and counselling, and assessment and treatment for those infected is key in reducing HCV-related morbidity and mortality (Grebely et al., 2015, World Health Organization, 2014).
More recently, research has attempted to investigate whether the benefits of HCV care may extend beyond liver-related outcomes (Alavi et al., 2015; Higgs, Wright, & Hellard, 2016; Younossi, Stepanova, Nader, Lam, & Hunt, 2015). Among PWID, there is some evidence to suggest that HCV treatment could have positive impacts on drug use behaviours. PWID engaged in treatment have access to regular monitoring and care, creating opportunities to receive counselling and discuss behaviour change (Aspinall et al., 2014, Bruneau et al., 2014, Spelman et al., 2015). Concurrent access to ancillary health care services and support, including primary care and addiction treatment may also play a role in influencing behaviour changes (Friedmann, Zhang, Hendrickson, Stein, & Gerstein, 2003; Nambiar, Agius, Stoove, Hickman, & Dietze, 2015; Saitz, Horton, Larson, Winter, & Samet, 2005). To date, only one study has specifically examined injection drug use changes in relation to HCV treatment exposure (Alavi et al., 2015). In this study of 124 PWID with acute or early chronic HCV followed for a median of 1.8 years in Australia, no association was found between treatment for HCV infection and past-month injection drug use (Alavi et al., 2015).
For decades, interferon-based therapy has been the standard of care for HCV. In light of the availability of new highly efficacious and well-tolerated therapies for HCV, recently shown to be associated with high cure rates among PWID (Dore et al., 2016), achieving an understanding of the impact of treatment on drug use behaviours in this population is particularly important in order to inform the ongoing debate on which patient groups to prioritize for treatment and related cost-benefit analyses (Scott, McBryde, Thompson, Doyle, & Hellard, 2016).
IMPACT was a longitudinal prospective cohort study in Montreal designed to investigate the effect of antiviral treatment on behaviour change in a community-based sample of current PWID with acute HCV, who were systematically referred for HCV clinical assessment and offered targeted health care services. The primary objective of this study was to compare eligible IMPACT participants who received treatment to those who chose not to engage in HCV care post-diagnosis with respect to their drug use changes over the course of a year. A subset of participating PWID were not eligible for treatment, either because they had spontaneously cleared the infection, or had contra-indications to therapy. As a secondary objective, we examined one-year injection drug use changes among these two groups and compared them with those who did not engage in HCV care.
Section snippets
Study design and participants
Enrolment in IMPACT took place between November 2007 and March 2015 and participants were recruited from two main sources: (i) the St. Luc Cohort, a community-based ongoing prospective cohort study examining determinants of HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission among current PWID (n = 94, 80.3%) and (ii) local community- and hospital-based collaborating clinics, including the addiction medicine clinic at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) (n = 23, 19.7%).
To
Results
The present study included all participants who had completed three study visits. Of 117 enrolled, one was excluded, as he had developed chronic HCV infection by the time that the clinical assessment was made, 16 (13.7%) had yet to return for their second or third follow-up visits and 13 (11.1%) were lost to follow-up, five of whom are known to have died. Eighty-seven participants formed the sample for this study. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline
Discussion
The primary aim of this study was to compare short-term changes in injection drug use among active PWID with acute HCV infection who received antiviral treatment relative to those who chose not to do so. Our results indicate that treatment receipt was associated with a lower likelihood of reporting injection drug use at follow-up, a few months after the end of the treatment course for most, relative to those who chose not to engage in HCV care. These novel findings support a growing evidence
Funding
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP172097] and the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS) [FRQS52905]. AAA is supported through a CIHR PhD scholarship (Frederick Banting and Charles Best Graduate Scholarship) and a Canadian Network on Hepatitis C (CanHepC) PhD trainee scholarship. EF is supported through a CIHR MD/PhD scholarship and a CanHepC PhD trainee scholarship. DJA holds a Clinical researcher career award from FRQS. Funding bodies did not
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Marie-Eve Turcotte, Rachel Bouchard, Élisabeth Deschênes, and other staff members of the St. Luc Cohort study. A special thank you is extended to the cohort participants, without whom this research would not be possible.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References (17)
- et al.
Injecting risk behaviours following treatment for hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs: The Australian trial in acute hepatitis C
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2015) - et al.
Does informing people who inject drugs of their hepatitis C status influence their injecting behaviour? Analysis of the networks II study
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2014) - et al.
Expanding access to prevention, care and treatment for hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2015) - et al.
Cessation of injecting drug use: The effects of health service utilisation, drug use and demographic factors
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2015) - et al.
Global epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: Results of systematic reviews
Lancet
(2011) - et al.
Intensity of drug injection as a determinant of sustained injection cessation among chronic drug users: The interface with social factors and service utilization
Addiction
(2004) - et al.
Sustained drug use changes after hepatitis C screening and counseling among recently infected persons who inject drugs: A longitudinal study
Clinical Infectious Diseases
(2014) - et al.
Elbasvir-grazoprevir to treat hepatitis C virus infection in persons receiving opioid agonist therapy: A randomized trial
Annals of Internal Medicine
(2016)
Cited by (16)
Injecting frequency trajectories and hepatitis C virus acquisition: Findings from a cohort of people who inject drugs in Montréal, Canada
2021, International Journal of Drug PolicyCitation Excerpt :Second, study participants who reported a lifetime history of HCV treatment were overrepresented in trajectory groups featuring an initially low injecting frequency (sporadic, infrequent, increasing). This might suggest a dampening effect of HCV treatment on injecting frequency, potentially explained by repeated counselling throughout the treatment period (Artenie et al., 2017). However, existing evidence on the relationship between HCV treatment and subsequent drug injecting is limited, mixed, and predates availability of direct-acting antiviral treatments (Alavi et al., 2015; Artenie et al., 2017).
Elimination of hepatitis C virus infection among people who use drugs: Ensuring equitable access to prevention, treatment, and care for all
2019, International Journal of Drug PolicyCitation Excerpt :However, further work is needed to address the high costs related to treatment for HCV and opioid dependence to allow these strategies to be more cost-effective and facilitate broader scale-up and implementation. Previous studies have demonstrated that reductions in injecting risk behaviours may occur in the setting of interferon-based treatment (Alavi et al., 2015; Artenie et al., 2017; Artenie et al., 2019; Midgard et al., 2017). In this issue, Caven and colleagues conducted a systematic review of the impact of HCV treatment on drug use risk behaviours among people who inject drugs (Caven, Malaguti, Robinson, Fletcher, & Dillon, 2019).
Impact of Hepatitis C treatment on behavioural change in relation to drug use in people who inject drugs: A systematic review
2019, International Journal of Drug PolicyCitation Excerpt :The most common outcome measure of behaviour change in relation to drug use in the selected studies was past month injecting drug use. Three of the four studies assessing this outcome found treatment significantly reduced the odds of participants reporting past month injecting at follow up (Artenie et al., 2017; Artenie et al., 2019; Midgard et al., 2017). However, due to variations in study design, comparing the findings of these separate studies is challenging.
Life projects: the transformative potential of direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C among people who inject drugs
2019, International Journal of Drug PolicySofosbuvir and velpatasvir for hepatitis C virus infection in people with recent injection drug use (SIMPLIFY): an open-label, single-arm, phase 4, multicentre trial
2018, The Lancet Gastroenterology and HepatologyCitation Excerpt :The use of injection and non-injection drugs remained relatively stable before and during HCV therapy. This finding is consistent with previous results for interferon-based therapy22–24 in people with either recent injection drug use or receipt of opioid substitution therapy. These results are also consistent with data evaluating elbasvir and grazoprevir therapy for people stable on opioid substitution therapy.8