Elsevier

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volume 47, September 2017, Pages 239-243
International Journal of Drug Policy

Short-term injection drug use changes following hepatitis C virus (HCV) assessment and treatment among persons who inject drugs with acute HCV infection

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.033Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

It is unclear whether treatment and care for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can help people who inject drugs (PWID) modify their injection drug use behaviours. This study examined changes in injection drug use among PWID with acute HCV systematically referred for HCV clinical assessment and treatment and offered targeted health care services, over the course of one year.

Methods

The study sample included PWID with documented acute HCV infection recruited and followed-up semi-annually at least twice in IMPACT (2007–2015), a longitudinal community-based prospective study in Montréal, Canada. Following enrolment, participants with contra-indications to treatment due to severe co-morbidity were offered targeted health care services. Pegylated interferon-alpha (12–24 weeks) was offered to all other participants who did not spontaneously resolve their infection. At each study visit, data were collected on socio-demographic factors and drug use patterns. Logistic regression was used to assess changes in injection drug use at one-year follow-up.

Results

Of the 87 eligible participants (mean age: 35.6; 78.2% male), 21.8% received treatment [(RT), Sustained virological response: 84.2%], 25.3% spontaneously resolved their infection (SR), 14.9% had contra-indication(s) (CI) and 37.9% chose not to engage in HCV care post-diagnosis (NE). In multivariate analyses adjusting for age, gender and injection drug use at baseline, the RT [Adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.18; 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.04–0.76], SR (AOR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.08–1.40), and CI (AOR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.05–1.22) groups were less likely to report injection drug use at follow-up relative to the NE group.

Conclusion

PWID who received treatment, spontaneously resolved their infection or presented with treatment contra-indication(s) reported reduced injection drug use at one-year follow-up relative to those who did not engage in therapy. Findings suggest that the benefits of HCV assessment and treatment may extent to helping PWID modify their injection drug use patterns.

Introduction

Among people who inject drugs (PWID), the median global hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence is estimated at 67% and is as high as 90% in certain settings (Nelson et al., 2011). In the United States, the number of HCV-related deaths between 2003–2013 has surpassed 60 other nationally notifiable infectious conditions combined (Ly, Hughes, Jiles, & Holmberg, 2016). It is widely acknowledged that timely engagement in HCV care, involving HCV testing and counselling, and assessment and treatment for those infected is key in reducing HCV-related morbidity and mortality (Grebely et al., 2015, World Health Organization, 2014).

More recently, research has attempted to investigate whether the benefits of HCV care may extend beyond liver-related outcomes (Alavi et al., 2015; Higgs, Wright, & Hellard, 2016; Younossi, Stepanova, Nader, Lam, & Hunt, 2015). Among PWID, there is some evidence to suggest that HCV treatment could have positive impacts on drug use behaviours. PWID engaged in treatment have access to regular monitoring and care, creating opportunities to receive counselling and discuss behaviour change (Aspinall et al., 2014, Bruneau et al., 2014, Spelman et al., 2015). Concurrent access to ancillary health care services and support, including primary care and addiction treatment may also play a role in influencing behaviour changes (Friedmann, Zhang, Hendrickson, Stein, & Gerstein, 2003; Nambiar, Agius, Stoove, Hickman, & Dietze, 2015; Saitz, Horton, Larson, Winter, & Samet, 2005). To date, only one study has specifically examined injection drug use changes in relation to HCV treatment exposure (Alavi et al., 2015). In this study of 124 PWID with acute or early chronic HCV followed for a median of 1.8 years in Australia, no association was found between treatment for HCV infection and past-month injection drug use (Alavi et al., 2015).

For decades, interferon-based therapy has been the standard of care for HCV. In light of the availability of new highly efficacious and well-tolerated therapies for HCV, recently shown to be associated with high cure rates among PWID (Dore et al., 2016), achieving an understanding of the impact of treatment on drug use behaviours in this population is particularly important in order to inform the ongoing debate on which patient groups to prioritize for treatment and related cost-benefit analyses (Scott, McBryde, Thompson, Doyle, & Hellard, 2016).

IMPACT was a longitudinal prospective cohort study in Montreal designed to investigate the effect of antiviral treatment on behaviour change in a community-based sample of current PWID with acute HCV, who were systematically referred for HCV clinical assessment and offered targeted health care services. The primary objective of this study was to compare eligible IMPACT participants who received treatment to those who chose not to engage in HCV care post-diagnosis with respect to their drug use changes over the course of a year. A subset of participating PWID were not eligible for treatment, either because they had spontaneously cleared the infection, or had contra-indications to therapy. As a secondary objective, we examined one-year injection drug use changes among these two groups and compared them with those who did not engage in HCV care.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

Enrolment in IMPACT took place between November 2007 and March 2015 and participants were recruited from two main sources: (i) the St. Luc Cohort, a community-based ongoing prospective cohort study examining determinants of HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission among current PWID (n = 94, 80.3%) and (ii) local community- and hospital-based collaborating clinics, including the addiction medicine clinic at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) (n = 23, 19.7%).

To

Results

The present study included all participants who had completed three study visits. Of 117 enrolled, one was excluded, as he had developed chronic HCV infection by the time that the clinical assessment was made, 16 (13.7%) had yet to return for their second or third follow-up visits and 13 (11.1%) were lost to follow-up, five of whom are known to have died. Eighty-seven participants formed the sample for this study. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline

Discussion

The primary aim of this study was to compare short-term changes in injection drug use among active PWID with acute HCV infection who received antiviral treatment relative to those who chose not to do so. Our results indicate that treatment receipt was associated with a lower likelihood of reporting injection drug use at follow-up, a few months after the end of the treatment course for most, relative to those who chose not to engage in HCV care. These novel findings support a growing evidence

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP172097] and the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS) [FRQS52905]. AAA is supported through a CIHR PhD scholarship (Frederick Banting and Charles Best Graduate Scholarship) and a Canadian Network on Hepatitis C (CanHepC) PhD trainee scholarship. EF is supported through a CIHR MD/PhD scholarship and a CanHepC PhD trainee scholarship. DJA holds a Clinical researcher career award from FRQS. Funding bodies did not

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Marie-Eve Turcotte, Rachel Bouchard, Élisabeth Deschênes, and other staff members of the St. Luc Cohort study. A special thank you is extended to the cohort participants, without whom this research would not be possible.
Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • Injecting frequency trajectories and hepatitis C virus acquisition: Findings from a cohort of people who inject drugs in Montréal, Canada

    2021, International Journal of Drug Policy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Second, study participants who reported a lifetime history of HCV treatment were overrepresented in trajectory groups featuring an initially low injecting frequency (sporadic, infrequent, increasing). This might suggest a dampening effect of HCV treatment on injecting frequency, potentially explained by repeated counselling throughout the treatment period (Artenie et al., 2017). However, existing evidence on the relationship between HCV treatment and subsequent drug injecting is limited, mixed, and predates availability of direct-acting antiviral treatments (Alavi et al., 2015; Artenie et al., 2017).

  • Elimination of hepatitis C virus infection among people who use drugs: Ensuring equitable access to prevention, treatment, and care for all

    2019, International Journal of Drug Policy
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, further work is needed to address the high costs related to treatment for HCV and opioid dependence to allow these strategies to be more cost-effective and facilitate broader scale-up and implementation. Previous studies have demonstrated that reductions in injecting risk behaviours may occur in the setting of interferon-based treatment (Alavi et al., 2015; Artenie et al., 2017; Artenie et al., 2019; Midgard et al., 2017). In this issue, Caven and colleagues conducted a systematic review of the impact of HCV treatment on drug use risk behaviours among people who inject drugs (Caven, Malaguti, Robinson, Fletcher, & Dillon, 2019).

  • Impact of Hepatitis C treatment on behavioural change in relation to drug use in people who inject drugs: A systematic review

    2019, International Journal of Drug Policy
    Citation Excerpt :

    The most common outcome measure of behaviour change in relation to drug use in the selected studies was past month injecting drug use. Three of the four studies assessing this outcome found treatment significantly reduced the odds of participants reporting past month injecting at follow up (Artenie et al., 2017; Artenie et al., 2019; Midgard et al., 2017). However, due to variations in study design, comparing the findings of these separate studies is challenging.

  • Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for hepatitis C virus infection in people with recent injection drug use (SIMPLIFY): an open-label, single-arm, phase 4, multicentre trial

    2018, The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The use of injection and non-injection drugs remained relatively stable before and during HCV therapy. This finding is consistent with previous results for interferon-based therapy22–24 in people with either recent injection drug use or receipt of opioid substitution therapy. These results are also consistent with data evaluating elbasvir and grazoprevir therapy for people stable on opioid substitution therapy.8

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text