Reproductive biology of the two deep-sea chimaerids, longnose spookfish (Harriotta raleighana) and Pacific spookfish (Rhinochimaera pacifica)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.11.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Reproductive biology of two poorly known deep-sea chimaeras H. raleighana and R. pacifica is described.

  • Both species matured at a large proportion of their maximum length, suggesting late maturation.

  • Sperm storage tubules (SSTs) and sperm bundles were identified in the terminal zone of the oviducal gland.

  • Sexual dimorphism in snout length was found in H. raleighana, suggesting the snout is a male secondary sexual characteristic.

  • All known publications on holocephalan reproduction are reviewed.

Abstract

The family Rhinochimaeridae, the long-nose chimaerids, consists of eight species across three genera, two of which occur in New Zealand waters. Very little is known about the biology of the rhinochimaerids. Longnose spookfish, (Harriotta raleighana, Goode and Bean, 1895), and Pacific spookfish, (Rhinochimaera pacifica, Mitsukuri, 1895), were collected from research trawl surveys and by commercial fishing vessels around New Zealand at depths between 400 and 1300 m. A total of 300 H. raleighana were caught which varied in length from 18.7 to 90.4 cm chimaera length (CL), and 168 R. pacifica at lengths of 20.9–139.9 cm CL. External assessment of male claspers and female gonad mass and oviducal gland width were the best indicators for maturity. Both species matured at a large proportion of their maximum length. Length at maturity was estimated at 62.8 cm CL and 75.8 cm CL for male and female H. raleighana respectively, and 105.3 cm CL and 125.0 cm CL for male and female R. pacifica. Fecundity was low and measured up to 27 eggs for H. raleighana, and 31 eggs for R. pacifica. Sperm storage was confirmed in females of both species. Sexual dimorphism in snout length was found in H. raleighana, where male relative snout size increased at sexual maturity, suggesting the snout is a secondary sexual characteristic. This study contributes to a better understanding of the life histories of H. raleighana and R. pacifica and their vulnerability to exploitation as fisheries bycatch.

Introduction

Chimaerids, also known as ratfish or ghostsharks, form the subclass Holocephali, and along with Elasmobranchii (sharks and rays), make up the class Chondrichthyes (Didier, 1995). The holocephalan family Rhinochimaeridae is globally distributed, consisting of eight species across three genera, and are distinguished from other chimaerids by having long tapered snouts. The longnose spookfish (Harriotta raleighana, Goode & Bean, 1895) is the only chimaerid with a presumed worldwide distribution (Didier et al., 2012). It is relatively common across the continental shelf and ocean floor of the Northern Atlantic, as well as the Northwest and Southwest Pacific (Last and Stevens, 2009). The Pacific spookfish (Rhinochimaera pacifica, Mitsukuri 1895) has a patchy known distribution on the continental shelf of the Pacific and Indian Oceans (Didier and Nakaya, 1999), with reports across the Japanese Archipelago to the South China Sea (Shao and Hwang, 1997, Shinohara et al., 2009), Australia (Last and Stevens, 2009), New Zealand (McMillan et al., 2011), and Peru (Chirichigno, 1974). Around New Zealand, both species are widely distributed on the continental shelf at depths from 400 to 1300 m (Inada and Garrick, 1979; McMillan et al., 2011), with R. pacifica typically found deeper than H. raleighana (Dunn et al., 2010). Elsewhere, H. raleighana has been recorded at depths up to 2600 m (Priede et al., 2006).

Harriotta raleighana and R. pacifica are listed as Least Concern by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), but very little is known about their biology. This is largely due to a lack of targeted sampling and taxonomic confusion (Kyne and Simpfendorfer, 2007, Holt et al., 2013). Chimaerids that have been studied have expressed K-selected characteristics similar to deep-sea elasmobranchs (relatively slow growth, high longevity, late maturation, low fecundity see Barnett et al., 2012; King and McPhie, 2013). These factors, along with their tendency to aggregate (Barnett et al., 2012, Quinn et al., 1980) and distribution overlap with fishing effort (Bagley et al., 2013), make chimaerids susceptible to overfishing.

Harriotta raleighana has been reported to grow to a length of 120 cm, although it has never been recorded larger than 90 cm in New Zealand, and R. pacific to 165 cm (McMillan et al., 2011). Both species are oviparous, and it is likely that individual embryos contained in an egg case are deposited onto the ocean floor as exhibited by other chimaerids (Dean, 1906, Didier et al., 2012). Gestation for chimaerids may last up to 8 months (Barnett et al., 2009), and one report estimated size at birth for H. raleighana to be between 10 and 13 cm (Cox and Francis, 1997). Based on preserved specimens, size at maturity for H. raleighana has previously been estimated between 25 and 30 cm body length (BDL, dorsal edge of gill opening to origin of upper caudal fin) for males and 35 cm BDL for females, and at 50 cm BDL for R. pacifica (Didier, Millersville University, pers. comm).

Biomass estimates show no trends for H. raleighana and R. pacifica (O’Driscoll et al., 2011, Bagley et al., 2013). Nevertheless, there are many documented instances of declining trends in abundance of deep-sea taxa as a result of fishing (Heymans et al., 2010, Norse et al., 2012), and chimaerid populations could be negatively affected with expanding deep-sea fisheries (Simpfendorfer and Kyne, 2009). No target fisheries for H. raleighana or R. pacifica exist in New Zealand, but both are caught as bycatch in deep-sea trawl fisheries (Jacob et al., 1998, Allain et al., 2003, Ministry for Primary Industries, 2015). Harriotta raleighana is caught regularly in New Zealand waters, making it one of the most common bycatch species that is not managed by the fisheries Quota Management System (QMS). An estimated catch of 82 t was recorded between the 2008–09 and 2012–13 fishing years (Ford et al., 2015). In contrast, R. pacifica is only occasionally caught as bycatch, with less than 5 t of estimated catch between the 2008–09 and 2012–13 fishing years (Ford et al., 2015). It is also occasionally recorded by the Ocean Trawl Fishery of Australia at midslope depths of 760–1290 m (Pethybridge et al., 2012).

The purpose of this research was to quantify reproductive parameters to investigate the reproductive biology of H. raleighana and R. pacifica, and determine if these species possess the same biological characteristics that make other deep-sea chondrichthyan vulnerable to overfishing. To add in this comparison, we also review other studies that focused on holocephalan reproductive biology, expanding previous work by Kyne and Simpfendorfer (2007).

Section snippets

Study area and specimen collection

Harriotta raleighana and Rhinochimaera pacifica were collected by RV Tangaroa in 2014 and 2016 from the continental shelf and slope of the Chatham Rise (January surveys) and sub-Antarctic waters (December surveys) of New Zealand. Trawl surveys were stratified-random with a primary objective to provide relative abundance indices of important commercial middle-depth fishes (see O’Driscoll et al., 2011; Bagley et al., 2013). Sampling strata were defined by location and depth, and fishing occurred

Harriotta raleighana

A total of 300 specimens of Harriotta raleighana (180 females, 120 males) were examined. Females ranged from 18.7 to 90.4 cm CL (median=70.0 cm CL) and males 27.4–79.6 cm CL (median=65.1 cm CL). Total mass for females and males varied from 14 to 2189 g and 58–1123 g respectively. Females were more numerous in larger length classes (>60 cm CL) and reached a greater size than males (Fig. 2). The length (cm) to mass (g) relationship of H. raleighana was described by W=1.06×10−3 (CL)3.228. There was a

Discussion

We believe that this study is the first to examine the reproductive strategies of Harriotta raleighana and Rhinochimaera pacifica, and of any member of the family Rhinochimaeridae. Females of both species attained a larger overall size than males and reached maturity at a larger size. These characteristics are commonly observed across chondrichthyans, and are most likely a requirement for increased reproductive maternal investment (Springer, 1967; Hoenig & Gruber, 1990). In R. pacifica,

Conclusions

This is the first reporting of the reproductive biology of H. raleighana and R. pacifica, two poorly known deep-sea chimaerids caught as bycatch in New Zealand deep-sea trawl fisheries. In this study, we have shown that these species are capable of storing sperm, and based on the presence of sexual dimorphism in snout size, we propose the snout of H. raleighana is a secondary sexual characteristic. Both species matured at a large proportion of their maximum length, suggesting both H. raleighana

Acknowledgments

This project was made possible by the cooperation and assistance of the staff and crew of the RV Tangaroa, and the Ministry for Primary Industries Observer Program. Thanks to the Ministry for Primary Industries and National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) for supporting this research. Particular thanks to D. Stevens and N. Bagley (both NIWA) for overseeing sample collection on research surveys, and to S.J. Wakefield (University of Otago) for his advice and assistance with the

References (75)

  • J.D. Bell

    Reproduction and Ageing of Australian Holocephalans and White-fin Swell Shark. PhD dissertation

    (2012)
  • Chirichigno, F., 1974. Registro de dos especies de Peces Tucanes (Familia: Rhinochimaeridae) en las aguas marinas del...
  • G. Cox et al.

    Sharks and Rays of New Zealand

    (1997)
  • B. Dean

    Chimeroid Fishes and Their Development

    (1906)
  • D.A. Didier

    Phylogenetic systematics of extant chimaeroid fishes (Holocephali, Chimeroidei)

    Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. Novit.

    (1995)
  • D.A. Didier et al.

    Redescription of Rhinochimaera pacifica (Mitsukuri) and first record of R. africana Compagno, Stehmann & Ebert from Japan (Chimaeriformes: rhinochimaeridae)

    Ichthyol. Res.

    (1999)
  • D.A. Didier et al.

    Phylogeny, biology, and classification of extant holocephalans

  • E.E. Di Giacomo et al.

    Reproductive biology of cockfish, Callorhinchus callorhynchus (Holocephali: Callorhynchidae), in Patagonian waters

    Fish. Bull.

    (1994)
  • C.A.J. Duffy

    First record of Centrophorus harrissoni from New Zealand, with observations on squamation in Centrophoridae (Squaliformes)

    N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2007)
  • M.R. Dunn et al.

    Feeding habits and niche separation among the deep-sea chimaeroid fishes Harriotta raleighana, Hydrolagus bemisi, and Hydrolagus novaezealandiae

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2010)
  • P. Etnoyer et al.

    A catshark nursery in a deep gorgonian field in the Mississippi Canyon, Gulf of Mexico

    Bull. Mar. Sci.

    (2007)
  • B. Finucci et al.

    Reproductive biology and feeding habits of the prickly dogfish Oxynotus bruniensis

    J. Fish. Biol.

    (2016)
  • J.L. Fitzpatrick et al.

    Assessing the potential for post‐copulatory sexual selection in elasmobranchs

    J. Fish. Biol.

    (2012)
  • R.B. Ford et al.

    Qualitative (Level 1) Risk Assessment of the impact of commercial fishing on New Zealand Chondrichthyans. New Zealand Aquatic

    Environ. Biodivers. Rep. No

    (2015)
  • M.P. Francis

    Spatial and temporal variation in the growth rate of elephantfish (Callorhinchus milii)

    New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh

    (1997)
  • M.P. Francis

    Morphometric minefields—towards a measurement standard for chondrichthyan fishes

    Env. Biol. Fish.

    (2006)
  • D.W.L. Freer et al.

    The fishery for, and general biology of, the St Joseph Callorhinchus capensis (Dumeril) off the south-western Cape, South Africa

    S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci.

    (1993)
  • D.W.L. Freer et al.

    Estimation of age and growth in the St Joseph Callorhinchus capensis (Dumeril)

    S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J.A.F. Garrick et al.

    Dimensions of long‐nosed Chimaera Harriotta Raleighana from New Zealand

    New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh

    (1975)
  • T.B. Gorman

    Biological and economic aspects of the elephant fish, Callorhynchus milii Bory, in Pegasus Bay and the Canterbury bight

    N. Z. Mar. Dep. Fish. Tech. Rep.

    (1963)
  • Goode, G.B., Bean, T.H. 1895. On Harriotta, a new type of chimaeroid fish from the deeper waters of the northwestern...
  • J.J. Heymans et al.

    Do we have enough information to apply the ecosystem approach to management of deep-sea fisheries? An example from the West of Scotland

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2010)
  • G.R. Hoff

    Identification of skate nursery habitat in the eastern Bering Sea

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2010)
  • Hoenig, J.M., Gruber, S.H.,1990. Life-history patterns in the elasmobranchs: implications for fisheries management....
  • R.E. Holt et al.

    Distribution patterns and sexual segregation in chimaeras: implications for conservation and management

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2013)
  • P.L. Horn

    Biology and commercial landings and a stock assessment of ghost sharks (Hydrolagus spp.) in New Zealand waters. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment

    Res. Doc. 97/

    (1997)
  • ICES

    Report of the Workshop on Sexual Maturity Staging of Elasmobranchs (WKMSEL), 11–15 October 2010, Valetta, Malta

    ICES Doc. CM 2010/ACOM

    (2010)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Observations of sperm storage in some deep-sea elasmobranchs

      2020, Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a result, translating the implications of a relatively low productivity environment into encounter probabilities is not straightforward, and we are not aware of this having been done. Opportunistic sperm storage will allow for fertilisation of eggs to occur for an extended period after a mating encounter (Storrie et al., 2008; Bernal et al., 2015; Finucci et al., 2017), and has been observed in insects, fish, reptiles, amphibians, birds and mammals (Lo Bianco, 1909; Holt and Lloyd, 2010). Sperm storage has been reported in several chondrichthyan families, where spermatozoa are stored in tubules in the terminal zone of the oviducal gland; this gland produces egg coverings around the ovulated and fertilized egg (Storrie et al., 2008; Bernal et al., 2015; Finucci et al., 2017,b; Hamlett et al., 2005, 1998; Moura et al., 2011; Serra-Pereira et al., 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text