Elsevier

Eating Behaviors

Volume 14, Issue 3, August 2013, Pages 342-347
Eating Behaviors

Dieting in bulimia nervosa is associated with increased food restriction and psychopathology but decreased binge eating

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.06.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We examine the relation of dieting and binge eating in bulimia nervosa (BN).

  • Patients with BN were classified into groups based on dieting status.

  • Those dieting to lose weight reported less frequent binge eating than non-dieters.

  • Regardless of dieting motivation, dieters had higher EDE-Q scores than non-dieters.

  • Implications for current conceptualizations of BN are discussed.

Abstract

The cognitive behavioral model of bulimia nervosa (BN) suggests that dieting is central to the maintenance of binge eating. However, correlational and experimental studies suggest that additional clarification is needed about the nature of this relationship. Dieting, weight, eating disorder psychopathology, and depression were assessed at admission among 166 patients with BN presenting for residential treatment. As in past research, a significant fraction (43%) of patients with BN reported not currently dieting. A comparison of weight loss dieters and non-dieters found greater food restriction and eating disorder psychopathology among weight loss dieters. However, dieters reported less frequent binge eating. There were no significant group differences in depression. Results suggest that 1) while many individuals with BN are attempting to restrict their food intake, the goal of losing weight fundamentally alters the effect of such restriction on binge eating, and 2) treatment may benefit from helping patients to establish a healthier approach to achieving long-term weight stability.

Introduction

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is a serious disorder characterized by a pattern of binge eating and inappropriate compensatory behavior as well as an overemphasis on body weight and shape in self-evaluation (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is regarded as the gold-standard of empirically-based treatments for BN (Shapiro, Berkman, Brownley, Sedway, & Bulik, 2007), but incomplete response and relapse are major concerns (Keel et al., 1999, Wilson et al., 2007). An improved understanding of the maintenance of the disorder is therefore crucial. Dieting is thought to be an important maintenance factor, but conflicting findings have been reported on the relation of dieting and binge eating. The purpose of the present paper is to re-examine the role of dieting in BN and to investigate the relation of different motivations for dieting (e.g., weight loss versus avoidance of weight gain) to psychopathology and eating disorder behaviors.

In the cognitive–behavioral model of BN, dietary restraint is thought to play a central role in the maintenance of the disorder and is a primary treatment target (Fairburn, 2008, Wilson et al., 1997). CBT targets three types of dietary restraint: 1) avoidance of eating for long periods of time, 2) rigid avoidance of certain types of food, and 3) extreme restriction of the total amount of food consumed. Dietary restraint is assumed to be motivated both by concern about shape and weight and by the desire to compensate for instances of perceived or actual overeating (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Dietary restraint is the most proximal cause of binge eating in the CBT model, and could be hypothesized to drive binge eating either in the short term (e.g., food restriction leading to intense feelings of deprivation and binge eating later in the day) or over the long term (e.g., diagnostic crossover from anorexia nervosa (AN) restricting type to AN binge purge type or BN). Consistent with this model, the reduction of dietary restraint partially mediates the reduction in binge eating and purging produced by CBT (Wilson, Fairburn, Agras, Walsh, & Kraemer, 2002). In addition, a recent ecological momentary assessment study, in which women with BN provided information on binge eating at multiple points throughout the day, found that greater restriction was associated with increased likelihood of binge eating on the same day and on the following day (Zunker et al., 2011).

Based on research in non-clinical populations, Lowe and colleagues suggested that restrained eating aimed at avoiding weight gain and dieting with the intention of losing weight are distinct dimensions associated with different effects on eating (Lowe, 1993, Lowe and Levine, 2005). This distinction is based in part on a series of studies (e.g., Stice, Sysko, Roberto, & Allison, 2010) that have shown that restrained eaters, defined by any of several measures of restrained eating, do not naturalistically eat less than unrestrained eaters, suggesting that their food restriction may prevent weight gain but is insufficient to induce weight loss. In contrast to restrained eating, current dieting with the intention of losing weight is reliably associated with decreased rather than increased overeating and binge eating (Lowe & Kral, 2006). The reason for the divergent eating patterns between restrained eaters and those on diets to lose weight is not known, although cognitive weight-loss intentions may play an important role. Nonetheless, in laboratory studies, current dieters have been found to eat less (while restrained nondieters ate more) following a high-calorie preload (Lowe, 1995, Lowe et al., 1991). Another study found that inducing impulsivity led to increased eating in restrained and unrestrained nondieters, but not among participants currently dieting to lose weight (Guerrieri, Nederkoorn, Schrooten, Martijn, & Jansen, 2009). A prospective study comparing adolescents who were successfully restricting their eating (i.e., losing weight) to those with similar self-reported dietary restraint who were unsuccessfully restricting their eating (i.e., maintaining or gaining weight) found that successful dietary restriction was associated with reductions in binge eating and compensatory behaviors over one-year follow-up (Stice, Martinez, Presnell, & Groesz, 2006). These results provide additional evidence for an inverse association between weight-loss dieting and disinhibited eating.

The reliable group differences in eating behavior based on dieting status and weight-loss intentions in non-clinical populations suggest that it is important to investigate whether these patterns hold among individuals with BN, particularly considering the centrality of dieting in current models of BN. Certain studies suggest that additional clarity is needed regarding the role of dieting in maintaining the disorder. For instance, Lowe, Gleaves, and Murphy-Eberenz (1998) divided three samples of individuals with BN into infrequent dieters and frequent dieters. Across these samples, roughly one third were infrequent dieters, raising the question of what maintains binge eating in this group. In two of the three samples, infrequent dieters binged more frequently than frequent dieters. Another study found inverse relationships between binge eating and the EDE Restraint scale as well as an EDE item assessing strength of desire to weigh less (Lowe, Thomas, Safer, & Butryn, 2007). Burton and Stice (2006) provide experimental evidence for an inverse relation between dieting and binge eating in BN: participants randomly assigned to receive a healthy dieting intervention showed greater weight loss and larger decreases in frequency of binge eating compared to controls.

Taken together, these findings suggest that the relationship between dieting to lose weight and binge eating is complex, and raise the possibility that current dieting with the intention of losing weight may be associated with increased control over eating and decreased binge eating in BN, at least in the short term. Thus, research clarifying both the short-term and long-term influences of dieting on binge eating is important for efforts to refine treatment models and maximize treatment gains.

One purpose of the present study was to re-examine the prevalence of dieting with the intention of losing weight and the relation of such dieting to binge eating in BN. In line with the studies reviewed above, it was hypothesized that individuals who reported currently dieting to lose weight would show reduced binge eating relative to those who reported not currently dieting. In addition, because compensatory behaviors such as self-induced vomiting may produce an energy deficit that could be hypothesized to increase binge eating, vomiting frequency was compared across groups to determine whether this variable might partially explain any group differences found in binge eating frequency.

A second aim was to extend previous research by examining the relation of dieting to lose weight to other eating disorder-specific psychopathology and to depression, which is highly prevalent among individuals with BN (Herzog, Nussbaum, & Marmor, 1996). While depression is a complex problem that may interact with eating pathology to varying degrees depending on the individual, there is reason to believe that examining the relation of weight-loss dieting and depression is relevant. First, frequent food deprivation might produce dysphoria among individuals who significantly restrict their eating. In addition, individuals who are currently dieting in an attempt to lose weight might experience higher dissatisfaction with their weight or shape, another potential source of distress that could contribute to depressed mood. It should also be noted that if the above hypothesis about the relation of dieting and binge eating is not supported and dieting to lose weight is associated with increased rather than decreased binge eating, the feelings of loss of control, guilt, and shame associated with binge eating might also contribute to depressed mood as well as heightened concerns about eating. Accordingly, it was hypothesized that individuals currently dieting to lose weight would show higher scores on measures of depression, dietary restraint, and concerns about eating, shape, and weight.

An exploratory aim of the study was to examine whether the purpose of dieting (to lose weight vs. to avoid weight gain) is significant in understanding the relation of dieting and binge eating. Individuals who are dieting to lose weight may be engaging in more intensive food restriction and may thus be more vulnerable to binge eating relative to those who are dieting to avoid weight gain. However, it is also possible that those dieting to lose weight are more highly motivated to exert control over their eating and, in line with the findings described above, may show reduced binge eating relative to those who are dieting to avoid weight gain.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants (N = 166) were admitted between December 2009 and September 2010 to two residential treatment centers specializing in eating disorders (one located in an urban area in the northeast and one in the southeastern United States). During this time period, 81% of admitted patients completed the admission research measures. Patients who did not complete admission measures either missed the opportunity due to scheduling conflicts or refused to consent. All participants were females who met

Results

A series of univariate ANOVAs and chi square tests for independence indicated no significant differences among the dieting groups on age, BMI, marital status, race, duration of illness, or length of stay in residential treatment. Descriptive statistics by dieting group and results of group comparisons are shown in Table 1.

Discussion

Although many individuals with bulimia nervosa chronically try to restrict their food intake, this does not necessarily mean that they are attempting to lose weight at any given point in time (Lowe et al., 1998). Our past study indicated that a meaningful fraction of those with BN reported not currently dieting to lose weight (Lowe et al., 1998); the present results, conducted with individuals who have relatively severe cases of BN (based on the fact that they are entering residential

Conclusions

Evidence is accumulating that the relationship between dieting and binge eating in BN is not straightforward. As noted by Burton and Stice (2006) in regard to their Healthy Weight Program, the fact that this program “resulted in weight loss while simultaneously reducing bulimic symptoms seems incompatible with the assertion that dieting maintains bulimic symptoms. As this is the seventh experimental study to generate data that are inconsistent with this theory, it seems that researchers should

Role of funding sources

The Renfrew Center for Eating Disorders provided a financial incentive for patients to complete the measures reported upon in this study but was not involved in study design, data collection or analysis, or manuscript preparation. No other financial support was provided for this study.

Contributors

Michael Lowe designed the study, arranged for the administration of study assessments at the clinical facility, and wrote the Discussion section. Ashley Witt conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the Introduction and Results Sections. Stephanie Grossman conducted literature searches, assisted with data management, and wrote the Methods section. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Michael Lowe is a paid research consultant for the Renfrew Center for Eating Disorders, the facility at which data collection for the present study took place. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References (44)

  • C.A. Timko et al.

    The effect of a pre-load experiment on subsequent food consumption: Caloric and macronutrient intake in the days following a pre-load manipulation

    Appetite

    (2012)
  • G.T. Wilson et al.

    Cognitive–behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa

  • C. Zunker et al.

    Ecological momentary assessment of bulimia nervosa: Does dietary restriction predict binge eating?

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (2011)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2000)
  • D.C. Atkins et al.

    Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: A tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models

    Journal of Family Psychology

    (2007)
  • K.C. Berg et al.

    Convergence of scores on the interview and questionnaire versions of the eating disorder examination: A meta-analytic review

    Psychological Assessment

    (2011)
  • K.C. Berg et al.

    Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: A systematic review of the literature

    International Journal of Eating Disorders

    (2012)
  • R.B. Binford et al.

    Eating Disorders Examination versus Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire in adolescents with full and partial-syndrome bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa

    International Journal of Eating Disorders

    (2005)
  • C.G. Fairburn

    Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders

    (2008)
  • C.G. Fairburn et al.

    Assessment of eating disorders: Interview or self-report questionnaire?

    International Journal of Eating Disorders

    (1994)
  • C.G. Fairburn et al.

    The eating disorder examination

    (1993)
  • I.K. Goldberg

    Questions and answers about depression and its treatment: A conversation with a leading psychiatrist

    (1993)
  • Cited by (12)

    • The food restriction wars: Proposed resolution of a primary battle

      2021, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, one study of three samples of individuals with BN found no relationship between self-reported dieting and binge eating frequency in one sample, and that frequent dieters reported reduced binge eating relative to infrequent dieters in two samples [7]. This inverse relationship between dieting and binge eating was replicated in a more recent study [44]. Further, another study found that patients with BN who endorsed frequently having a strong desire to lose weight reported significantly less frequent binge eating than those who did not experience this desire as often [45].

    • When does behavior follow intent? Relationships between trait level dietary restraint and daily eating behaviors

      2018, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      The relationship between dieting intentions and food choices warrants further research. Consistent with theories of cognitive restraint (Boyce et al., 2015; Larsen et al., 2007), self-reported trait level restraint intentions was in fact a predictor of the daily frequency of overeating, providing further evidence for the relationship between intentions to restrict food intake and disinhibited eating patterns (Lowe et al., 2013). Thus, self-report trait level assessment of restraint intentions may be useful tools for identifying disinhibited patterns of eating that are characterized by poor self-regulation and that may be part of a constellation of disordered eating behaviors.

    • Eating disorders need more experimental psychopathology

      2016, Behaviour Research and Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      There were no signs of eating disorder symptoms like overeating or binge eating, fear of fatness, or purging behaviour. Also clinical interventions in samples that are motivated to lose weight show that interventions which increase dietary restraint and calorie restriction result in weight loss, decreased rather than increased overeating, reduced binge eating frequency and reduced eating disorder symptoms (Burton & Stice, 2006; Lowe & Kral, 2006; Lowe & Timko, 2007; Lowe, Gleaves, & Murphy-Eberenz, 1998; Lowe, Witt, & Grossman, 2013; Presnell & Stice, 2003; Stice, Martinez, Presnell, & Groesz, 2006; Stice, Presnell, Groesz, & Shaw, 2005; Williamson et al., 2008). To summarize, most studies that indicated an association between dietary restraint and binge eating were retrospective or of correlational nature, while clinical interventions and well-controlled experimental studies on calorie restriction demonstrate that actual calorie restriction does not naturally lead to binge eating or other eating disorder symptoms.

    • Considering alternative calculations of weight suppression

      2016, Eating Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      EDE-Q #16–18)]. We selected these outcomes of interest due to their past relation to WS (e.g., Lowe, Witt, et al., 2013b). POTS was used to assess for the frequency of peer teasing; the 11-item scale contains 2 subscales, one assessing teasing related to general competency (Cronbach's α = .85) and one specific to weight-related teasing (Cronbach's α = .94).

    • Bidirectional associations between binge eating and restriction in anorexia nervosa. An ecological momentary assessment study

      2014, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      Unexpectedly, skipping meals appears to reduce the likelihood of binge eating, perhaps by limiting exposure to food- or eating-related triggers for binge eating, as discussed above. It is possible that this relationship is not dissimilar from weight loss study findings in which dietary restriction leads to reductions in the frequency of binge eating episodes (e.g., Goodrick et al., 1998; Presnell & Stice, 2003; Stice et al., 2005) and findings in individuals with BN dieting for weight loss who report less frequent binge eating than their counterparts who are not dieting (Lowe, Witt, & Grossman, 2013). Although weight loss interventions do not typically advise skipping meals, individuals participating in these interventions are likely eating foods that they are less likely to incorporate into a binge eating episode (e.g., salad versus a hamburger).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text