Elsevier

Ecosystem Services

Volume 39, October 2019, 100973
Ecosystem Services

Environmental change, urbanisation, and socio-ecological resilience in the Pacific: Community narratives from Port Vila, Vanuatu

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100973Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Ecosystem services key in the wellbeing and livelihoods of urban residents.

  • We investigate socio-ecological relationships through a participatory approach.

  • Urbanisation and climate change exacerbate ecosystem degradation in Vila.

  • Community engagement is crucial when developing and implementing policy.

  • Uptake of EbA projects maximised through building capacity in local communities.

Abstract

Ecosystem services play a key role in maintaining community resilience and wellbeing; a function increasingly profiled following the publication of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. However, there is limited understanding of the value of, and threats to, ‘urban’ ecosystem services, especially in relation to Small Island Developing States (SIDS). This study uses a bottom-up approach to investigate the provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural benefits of local ecosystems to urban communities in Port Vila, Vanuatu. The project was based on participatory action research carried out for the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) as part of the Pacific Ecosystem-based Adaptation to Climate Change Project. Based on a survey of 821 households, and 10 community workshops, this paper provides a narrative of the terrestrial, freshwater, and coastal ecosystem services salient to the livelihoods of vulnerable urban communities. This narrative is set in the context of rapid urbanisation and climate change, which are increasingly undermining community resilience. These findings stress the urgent need to better understand, and account for, complex socio-ecological relationships when developing adaptation policies and urban development plans, not only in Vanuatu but across Oceania’s cities and towns.

Introduction

The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Alcamo, 2003) provided a seminal baseline for analysing and understanding the effects of environmental change on human well-being. This analytical framework is based on the concept of ecosystem services, the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems. However, socio-ecological relationships in towns and cities are complex and multi-layered, and need to be better understood to support urban resilience efforts (Elmqvist et al., 2015). As hubs of human activities, towns and cities act to concentrate the demand for ecosystem services, having direct and indirect impacts on local environmental quality. Urban settlements therefore exist within a network of ecosystem service dependencies, with feedbacks between services and human well-being operating across a number of different spatial and temporal scales (Scholes et al., 2013).

Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are recognised as a discrete grouping of countries and territories with unique economic and geospatial circumstances. SIDS have limited natural resources and economic opportunities, extensive coastal zones, and high levels of exposure to climate-related and natural disasters (UNFCCC, 2007). These same factors also increase the dependencies on local ecosystem services by their inhabitants (Balzan et al., 2018). Cities in SIDS have, however, undergone little direct examination in relation to the ecosystem services upon which their citizens depend. There is limited consideration of the inter-relationships between urban environments and the ecosystems that exist within and around them (Balzan et al., 2018).

The majority of SIDS are undergoing urban population growth rates well above rural areas (Kiddle et al., 2017). Lack of planning has resulted in much of this urbanisation being informal, typified by large ‘squatter’ settlements with varying levels of tenure security and community coherence (Bedford and Hugo, 2011, McEvoy et al., 2019). Simultaneously, peri-urban villages, often established by the traditional inhabitants of the island on which the town or city has emerged, are subsumed as the cities expand (Jones, 2016, Trundle, 2017). It is within this mosaic of tenure arrangements, community subgroups, and migratory and historically-established customary systems, that urban ecosystem services in the Pacific are contextualised.

This study investigated ecosystem services in Port Vila, the capital city of Vanuatu; a rapidly urbanising country in the Melanesian sub-region (Fig. 1). A bottom-up assessment formed the basis of the research approach, with formal, informal, and traditional owner groups engaged both in household surveys and community-level workshops. The resilience of ecosystem services was also assessed in light of local and global environmental change. Research findings evidence a wide array of socio-ecological relationships within different types of urban settlements in the Greater Port Vila area.

Section snippets

Environmental and institutional context

Vanuatu is a volcanic archipelago located in a geologically active region in the South Pacific (Fig. 1). The capital Port Vila, on the island of Efate, is the administrative and commercial centre, and main port of Vanuatu. The Port Vila area is characterised by uplifted coral reef terraces induced by seismic activity (Howorth, 1983). Globally, Vanuatu is considered the most exposed country to natural disaster risk, with more than half of the population impacted by annually either

Research methods

The mapping and analysis of ecosystem services in Port Vila was one of six case studies carried out for the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) in Vanuatu, Fiji and the Solomon Islands. This was part of the Pacific Ecosystem-based Adaptation to Climate Change (PEBACC) project funded by the Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit of the German Federal Government. PEBACC Project is aimed at building community resilience to the effects of climate change and

Results: ecosystem services in Port Vila settlements and villages

Ten ‘hotspot’ communities were identified to represent various tenure arrangements and “ridge to reef” landscapes, recognising the interconnectedness of terrestrial, freshwater, and coastal ecosystems in small islands (Delevaux et al., 2018). The choice of these sites was confirmed by Civil Society Organisation (CSO) project partners through local intelligence and ‘ground-truthing’ of socio-cultural structures. The chosen communities were: 1) Blacksands, 2) Erakor Bridge, 3) Erakor Village, 4)

Discussion: current drivers of environmental change

The data from the household surveys and workshops from ten communities revealed four chief drivers of environmental change adversely affecting these communities: 1) urbanisation and land use change; 2) water pollution and access to clean water; 3) overharvesting and poor management of resources; and 4) natural hazards and climate-related impacts (summarised in Table 3). We briefly discuss these contemporary drivers of change in the subsequent subsections.

Outcomes: responses and community-based EbA options

Public policy should be developed taking into account views from the communities. As such, it is essential to involve communities at all stages, so as to cement relationships, foster buy-in, and facilitate implementation of policies and plans. There is need for effective dialogue processes and public fora with simpler messaging, as current fora are still too technical and inaccessible for the general public (e.g. Massing, 2019). Our participatory approach encouraged community discourse in

Conclusions

The community narratives presented in this paper represent an important evidence-base of key socio-ecological relationships. Both informal settlements and peri-urban villages in Port Vila rely heavily on the services provided by ecosystems for subsistence needs, income, shelter and protection, and social benefits. However, these services are now under increasing pressures from the rapid rate of urbanisation, pollution, and a changing climate. Residents in the informal settlements are more

Acknowledgements

This paper was based on research prepared for and funded by the Pacific Ecosystem-based Adaptation to Climate Change (PEBACC) Programme of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) through funds made available by the Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit of the German federal government. We thank David Loubser, Vanuatu SPREP Country Manager, for his support and feedback.

We acknowledge Annick Stevens Iatika, Pastor Shem Temar, and the Vatu Mauri Consortium

References (53)

  • A. Brown et al.

    Vanuatu Report, AusAID Project Towards Effective and Legitimate Governance: States Emerging from Hybrid Political Orders

    (2008)
  • R. Carter

    Baseline Studies of Port Vila and Erakor Lagoons, Vanuatu

    (1983)
  • R. Carter

    Hydraulic and Water Quality Studies, Erakor Lagoons and Port Vila Harbour, Vanuatu

    (1990)
  • Cefas

    Preliminary Outcomes of an Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Port Vila, Efate (Vanuatu)

    (2017)
  • M. Chung et al.

    Urban Informal Settlements in Vanuatu: Challenge for Equitable Development

    (2002)
  • J.A. Church et al.

    Sea level change

  • M. Cox et al.

    Unfinished State: Drivers of Change in Vanuatu

    (2007)
  • J.M.S. Delevaux et al.

    A linked land-sea modeling framework to inform ridge-to-reef management in high oceanic islands

    PLoS One

    (2018)
  • DGMWR

    Reports of the Port Vila Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Program. 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004

    (2004)
  • H.G. Dixson et al.

    Scaling theory of mind in a small-scale society: a case study from Vanuatu

    Child Dev.

    (2018)
  • P. Dumas et al.

    Collective action and lime juice fight crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks in Vanuatu

    SPC Fish. Newsl

    (2015)
  • EcoStrategic Consultants

    Supplementary Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for Star Terminal Development, Port Vila, Vanuatu, April 2010 – Volume 1: Main Report. Report to the Government of Vanuatu and Ifira Trustees Ltd, through Soros Associates (Australia) Pty Ltd. Funded by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)

    (2010)
  • R. Gillett
  • Government of Vanuatu

    Vanuatu Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction Policy 2016–2030

    (2015)
  • Government of Vanuatu Decentralisation Act, 2013. (Cap. 230),...
  • Cited by (42)

    • Port resilience in the post-COVID-19 era

      2023, Ocean and Coastal Management
    • Ol man kam: Emerging governance in the urban South Pacific

      2022, Cities
      Citation Excerpt :

      A common misconception by international planners and scholars is that the chief is the primary party responsible for liaising with people and organisations outside the community. For instance, Komugabe-Dixson et al. (2019) also describe how community-level governance differs from those structures established by the state. However, even though they purport to describe community narratives, these authors rely on a simplistic description of leadership at the community level – those simplistic ideas of chiefs that were a feature of colonial-era desires to simplify community leadership in order to identify the one person who was in charge and capable of speaking on behalf of the community (Smith, 2017).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text