Evidence regarding the domains of the CLASS PreK in Head Start classrooms☆
Section snippets
Prior research on the standard domains of the CLASS PreK
The CLASS PreK emerged from a synthesis of developmental theory and research, emphasizing teacher-student (adult-child) interactions as the main driver of children’s development and learning (Pianta et al., 2008). Based on this literature, the 10 CLASS PreK items (referred to as “dimensions” by the scale developers) were organized into three domains—Emotional Support, Classroom Organization, and Instructional Support (see Table 1 for a list of the 10 item names by domain; Pianta et al., 2008).
Prior research on alternative general/specific domains proposed by the CLASS PreK authors
In a publication co-authored by two of the CLASS PreK developers (Hamre et al., 2014), an alternative domain structure was proposed that might address the limitations evident in prior studies. This structure had a general domain that included all 10 CLASS PreK items—referred to by the authors as Responsive Teaching. The authors described this as a “general dyadic systems-level property of teacher-child interactions…hypothesized to foster children’s development across all domains
Patterns of results across prior studies
Across the published studies, two patterns of results emerged that suggested possible alternative structures for the CLASS PreK. The first involved the number of domains and their corresponding items. Regarding the number of domains, the Instructional Support domain was consistently evident as a separate factor, but items from the Emotional Support and Classroom Organization domains were often combined. Regarding corresponding items, the Emotional Support and Classroom Organization domains were
Current study
In the current study, we replicated and extended recent factor analytic research based on CLASS PreK scores. We focused on Head Start classrooms, recognizing the program’s broad importance in the field of early care and education and the specific need to consider whether the use of the three standard CLASS PreK domains in the Head Start DRS is empirically supported. Our research questions were: (a) What alternative factor structures for the CLASS PreK are suggested by exploratory factor
Sample
We used data from the 2009 and 2014 Head Start Family and Child Experiences Surveys (FACES). The FACES studies provide nationally representative samples of Head Start children and the classrooms that they attended. Importantly for our study, the FACES surveys followed children from fall enrollment to spring completion of their first Head Start year, also observing their attended classrooms in the spring.
Data were collected by the policy research organization Mathematica under contract from the
Description of samples
The children in our analysis samples were balanced by gender (50% female in both 2009 and 2014) and diverse racial-ethnically (36% Hispanic, 22% non-Hispanic White, 35% non-Hispanic Black, 8% non-Hispanic Other in 2009, 38%, 31%, 23%, and 8%, respectively, in 2014; see again Appendix A3). As expected, based on Head Start enrollment guidelines, the majority of families (93% in 2009; 92% in 2014) had incomes below 200% of the federal poverty line. Sixty-nine percent of mothers in 2009, and 59% in
Discussion
The current study replicated and extended recent factor analyses of the CLASS PreK, focusing specifically on the measure’s domain structure within two nationally representative Head Start samples (FACES 2009 and 2014). Like earlier studies, we found that whereas the standard CLASS three-domain structure fit better than a one-domain structure, it did not meet absolute fit criteria and other structures were equally or better fitting.
Specifically, we found that a revised three-domain structure fit
Conclusions
In short, our results encourage continued efforts to improve existing and to develop new measures of early childhood classroom quality. As already noted, our results do not necessarily mean that other operationalizations of the theoretical framework underlying the CLASS PreK would not better identify the three expected domains and their anticipated associations with child outcomes. The CLASS PreK may also have value in certain uses, such as when offering formative verbal feedback to teachers
Acknowledgement
This paper was supported by grant R305A130118 from the Institute of Education Sciences.
References (65)
- et al.
New evidence on the validity of the arnett caregiver interaction scale: Results from the early childhood longitudinal study-birth cohort
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
(2013) - et al.
A continuous improvement approach to social and emotional competency measurement
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
(2018) - et al.
Using bifactor models to measure teacher-child interaction in early childhood: Evidence from the Caregiver Interaction Scale
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
(2016) - et al.
Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievement in pre-Kindergarten programs
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
(2008) - et al.
Preliminary construct and concurrent validity of the Preschool Self-Regulation Assessment (PSRA) for field-based research
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
(2007) - et al.
A typical morning in preschool: Observations of teacher-child interactions in German preschools
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
(2014) - et al.
Associations between classroom quality and children’s vocabulary and executive function skills in an urban public prekindergarten program
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
(2013) - et al.
Standards for educational and psychological testing
(2014) - et al.
Factor analysis of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System replicates the three domain structure and reveals no support for the bifactor model in German preschools
Frontiers in Psychology
(2018) - et al.
Confidence intervals for correlations when data are not normal
Behavioral Research Methods
(2017)
School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry
The American Psychologist
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Measuring early care and education quality
Child Development Perspectives
How well do our measures of quality predict child outcomes? A meta-analysis and coordinated analysis of data from large-scale studies of early childhood settings
Quality thresholds, features, and dosage in early care and education: Secondary data analysis of child outcomes
Monographs of the society for research in child development
Classroom interactions, dyadic teacher-child relationships, and child self-regulation in socially disadvantaged young children
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance
Structural Equation Modeling
Transparent and reproducible social science research: How to do open science
Development of an aspect of executive control: Development of the abilities to remember what I said and to “do as I say, not as I do.”
Developmental Psychobiology
Preschool language assessment survey 2000
Test de vocabulario en imagenes peabody
Peabody picture vocabulary test
Anomalous results in g-factor models: Explanations and alternatives
Psychological Methods
On a scale: A social history of writing assessment in America
Teacher and observer ratings of children’s social skills: Validation of the social skills rating system
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
The emergent academic self-image of first graders: Its response to social structure
Child Development
Category functioning of the ECERS-R across eight data sets
AERA Open
Full-information item bifactor analysis
Psychometrika
Full-information item bifactor analysis of graded response data
Applied Psychological Measurement
Measuring constructs in family science: How can item response theory improve precision and validity
Journal of Marriage and Family
Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System – Secondary
The Journal of Early Adolescence
Teachers’ daily interactions with children: An essential ingredient in effective early childhood programs
Child Development Perspectives
Cited by (0)
- ☆
This paper was supported by grant R305A130118 from the Institute of Education Sciences and we gratefully acknowledge the entire project team. The results and statements do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders, and all errors and omissions are our own.