Fragranced consumer products: Chemicals emitted, ingredients unlisted
Introduction
In the U.S. and other countries, exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) occurs mainly indoors from the use of common products (Wallace, 2001, Edwards et al., 2006). Fragranced products can emit a variety of VOCs (e.g., Wallace et al., 1991, Cooper et al., 1992, Cooper et al., 1995, Nazaroff & Weschler, 2004), and some of them, such as limonene, can dominate VOCs found in homes (Wallace, 1987, Edwards et al., 2001a, Edwards et al., 2001b, Gokhale et al., 2008). Exposure to fragranced products has been associated with health effects such as asthmatic exacerbations, headaches, mucosal symptoms, and contact allergy (e.g., Millqvist & Löwhagen, 1996, Kumar et al., 1995, Kelman, 2004, Elberling et al., 2005, Caress & Steinemann, 2004, Caress & Steinemann, 2005, Johansen, 2003, Rastogi et al., 2007). On the other hand, many studies have evaluated the safety of fragrance ingredients (e.g., Bickers et al., 2003, Ford et al., 2000, Cadby et al., 2002, Smith, 2003, Smith, 2004, Smith et al., 2004), and additional studies have found no evidence that fragranced product exposure is associated with indoor air health risks or asthma ((IEH) Institute for Environment and Health, 1996, Opiekun et al., 2003, (IOM) Institute of Medicine, 2000). Yet fragrance-free policies have been implemented that restrict the use of scented products in workplaces and other environments (e.g., (CDCP) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and HumanServices, 2009, (USAB) United States Access Board, 2000, (CCOHS) Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, 2010). Given these phenomena, the question emerges: What is emitted from these products? A challenge in answering this question is that emissions from widely used products have not been well characterized and reported. Another challenge is that ingredient disclosure requirements and practices vary, and products may list numerous ingredients, some ingredients, only general terms, or no ingredients. Consequently, information on product labels and material safety data sheets (MSDSs) is generally insufficient to understand product constituents, and their potential relationships with exposures, effects, and policies. This article investigates and provides results on fragranced consumer product emissions, and compares these findings to ingredients listed and legislation, which can contribute to our understanding and consideration of these issues.
“Fragranced consumer products,” as termed in this article, refers to products with a fragrance or scent, such as air fresheners, deodorizers, laundry detergents, fabric softeners, dishwashing detergents, hand sanitizers, personal care products, baby shampoo, and cleaning supplies. These products are widely used by individuals, industries, and institutions. For instance, an estimated 37% of the households in America use a best-selling laundry detergent (MarketResearch, 2007); one analyzed in our study. Product formulations are typically complex. In addition to the “product base” mixture, a single “fragrance” in a product may contain up to several hundred substances (Bickers et al., 2003) among more than 2600 substances, both natural and synthetic, documented as fragrance ingredients (Ford et al., 2000, Bickers et al., 2003). Formulations are also confidential, and no U.S. regulation requires the disclosure of any ingredient in a fragrance mixture, or of all ingredients in consumer products (Steinemann, 2009).
Despite the ubiquity of fragranced consumer products, relatively few prior studies have investigated the array of VOCs they emit. Wallace et al., 1991, Cooper et al., 1992 analyzed 31 fragranced consumer products, such as perfumes, fabric softeners, and air fresheners. Rastogi et al. (2001) tested 59 domestic and occupational products, such as soaps, cleaning supplies, and laundry products, for 19 target fragrance compounds associated with hand eczema. Jo et al. (2008) investigated VOC emissions of 26 gel-type air fresheners from the Korean market. Some studies (e.g., Destaillats et al., 2006, Sarwar et al., 2004, Singer et al., 2006), which analyzed secondary emissions,1 also examined specific VOCs (such as terpenes) emitted from a select set of fragranced products (such as air fresheners).
The research reported in this article is, to the best of our knowledge, the first study since the early 1990s to elucidate the range of VOCs emitted from a variety of widely used fragranced consumer products in the U.S. It builds upon and extends the recent work of Steinemann (2009), and previously noted studies, by testing a larger assortment and number of fragranced consumer products, calculating headspace concentrations, and comparing more extensively the identified VOCs with product labels, MSDSs, and regulations. While studies over the past decades have investigated VOCs emitted from consumer products in general (e.g., Knöppel & Schauenburg, 1989, Kwon et al., 2008, Sack et al., 1992), this work is one of the few to investigate fragranced consumer products in particular.
In this study, we (1) identify the range of VOCs emitted from 25 fragranced consumer products, (2) estimate their headspace concentrations, and (3) determine whether and how identified VOCs are listed on product labels and MSDSs. An overall goal of the study is to provide recent data on chemicals emitted by common consumer products, and to compare these emissions with ingredients listed, which can contribute to broader discussion.
Section snippets
Methods
Our study used gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) headspace analysis to identify VOCs emitted from 25 fragranced consumer products, which we categorize as follows: 4 “laundry products” (detergents, dryer sheets, and fabric softener), 9 “personal care products” (soaps, hand sanitizer, lotions, deodorant, shampoo, and baby shampoo), 4 “cleaning supplies” (household and industrial cleaning supplies, disinfectants, and dish detergent), and 8 “air fresheners” (sprays, gels, solids, and
Regulatory context
In the U.S., manufacturers of consumer products, and of fragrance formulations, are not required to disclose all ingredients to the public. This section summarizes the U.S. regulations addressing ingredient disclosure in fragranced consumer products.6 The products analyzed in this study are regulated by either the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), for laundry products, cleaning supplies, air fresheners,
VOCs identified
A total of 133 unique VOCs were detected across the 25 fragranced consumer products, giving a total of 421 occurrences of VOCs. Each product emitted between 6 and 20 VOCs.26 Headspace concentrations ranged from our minimum threshold value of 100 μg/m3 to a maximum value of over 1,600,000 μg/m3.27
Conclusions
Our study provides recent and relevant results on the range of VOCs emitted by common fragranced consumer products. Virtually none of these VOCs were listed on any product label or MSDS. Overall, “green” product emissions of VOCs classified as toxic or hazardous, or as carcinogens, were not significantly different from the other products. Because our study did not analyze exposures or effects, it can draw no conclusion regarding possible risks from product usage.
Collectively, these 25
Acknowledgements
This work received funding from Seattle Public Utilities. We thank Bryan Comstock and the Center for Biomedical Statistics, funded by grant UL1RR025014 from the NIH National Center for Research Resources. We also thank five reviewers for their excellent comments on this manuscript.
References (54)
- et al.
Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
(2008) - et al.
The safety assessment of fragrance materials
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
(2003) - et al.
Consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients: providing estimates for safety evaluation
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
(2002) - et al.
VOC concentrations measured in personal samples and residential indoor, outdoor and workplace microenvironments in EXPOLIS-Helsinki, Finland
Atmos Environ
(2001) - et al.
VOC source identification from personal and residential indoor, outdoor and workplace microenvironment samples in EXPOLIS-Helsinki, Finland
Atmos Environ
(2001) - et al.
Time–activity relationships to VOC personal exposure factors
Atmos Environ
(2006) - et al.
Co-formation of hydroperoxides and ultra-fine particles during the reactions of ozone with a complex VOC mixture under simulated indoor conditions
Atmos Environ
(2005) - et al.
Criteria for development of a database for safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
(2000) - et al.
Source apportionment of human personal exposure to volatile organic compounds in homes, offices and outdoors by chemical mass balance and genetic algorithm receptor models
Sci Total Environ
(2008) - et al.
Head-space, small-chamber and in-vehicle tests for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from air fresheners for the Korean market
Chemosphere
(2008)