Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 75, April 2017, Pages 195-203
European Journal of Cancer

Original Research
The number of extranodal sites assessed by PET/CT scan is a powerful predictor of CNS relapse for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: An international multicenter study of 1532 patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.029Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is predicted by the CNS-IPI.

  • The CNS-IPI remains valid in PET/CT staged diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

  • More than two extranodal sites at diagnosis confer increased risk of CNS relapse.

Abstract

Purpose

Development of secondary central nervous system involvement (SCNS) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is associated with poor outcomes. The CNS International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) has been proposed for identifying patients at greatest risk, but the optimal model is unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma diagnosed between 2001 and 2013, staged with PET/CT and treated with R-CHOP(-like) regimens. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcome data were collected from clinical databases and medical files. We evaluated the association between candidate prognostic factors and modelled different risk models for predicting SCNS.

Results

Of 1532 patients, 62 (4%) subsequently developed SCNS. By multivariate analysis, disease stage III/IV, elevated serum LDH, kidney/adrenal and uterine/testicular involvement were independently associated with SCNS. There was a strong correlation between absolute number of extranodal sites and risk of SCNS; the 144 patients (9%) with >2 extranodal sites had a 3-year cumulative incidence of SCNS of 15.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.2–21.2%) compared with 2.6% (95% CI 1.7–3.5) among those with ≤2 sites (P < 0.001). The 3-year cumulative risks of SCNS for CNS-IPI defined risk groups were 11.2%, 3.1% and 0.4% for high-, intermediate- and low-risk patients, respectively. All risk models analysed had high negative predictive values, but only modest positive predictive values.

Conclusions

Patients with >2 extranodal sites or high-risk disease according to the CNS-IPI should be considered for baseline CNS staging. Clinical risk prediction models suffer from limited positive predictive ability, highlighting the need for more sensitive biomarkers to identify patients at highest risk of this devastating complication.

Introduction

Patients with secondary CNS involvement (SCNS) by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a dismal prognosis, highlighting the pressing need for effective preventative strategies [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. The addition of CNS-penetrating chemotherapeutics such as high-dose methotrexate into frontline protocols appears the most promising prophylactic strategy and has been recommended by recent guidelines [10], [12], [13]. Clinical risk factors for SCNS are well characterised and have been used to construct risk models, which allow targeted application of such prophylaxis [2], [3], [4], [14], [15]. The CNS-IPI, the best validated of these, combines established International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk factors (age >60 years, stage III/IV disease, >1 extranodal site, ECOG performance score >1 and LDH above upper normal limit) with kidney/adrenal involvement into a 6-point score with high-risk patients defined by a total score of ≥4 [16]. Disease stage and extranodal involvement are consistent risk factors for SCNS in most analyses, but their association with SCNS may be influenced by the imaging modality used for baseline staging. In non-hodgkin lymphoma, PET/CT detects more extranodal disease sites than conventional staging, and this leads to upstaging in a relevant number of patients [17]. The aims of this study were to examine risk factors for SCNS and validate the CNS-IPI model in a large independent cohort of PET/CT-staged patients treated with R-CHOP- or R-CHOP-like regimens.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included patients from clinical databases (Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital [London] and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre [Melbourne]) or from regional (British Columbia Cancer Agency [BCCA] Centre for Lymphoid Cancer Database [Vancouver BC]) and national (Danish Lymphoma Registry [LYFO]) lymphoma registries. Data collection was compliant with national and local regulations.

The patients were diagnosed with DLBCL between 2001 and 2013, but the surveyed time period varied

Results

In total, 1532 DLBCL patients were included (Denmark n = 1088, BCCA n = 86, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital n = 147, and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre n = 211). Baseline demographics and treatment information are shown in Table 1. With a median follow-up from diagnosis of 40 months, the 3-year PFS and OS rates were 72% (95% CI 70.75%) and 78% (95% CI 76.80%), respectively. Overall, 1520/1532 (99.2%) patients underwent staging bone marrow biopsy and 90 (5.9%) of those patients had morphologic bone

Discussion

This study highlights the role of PET/CT in identifying DLBCL patients at increased risk of SCNS after R-CHOP chemotherapy. In exploratory analysis of the SCNS risk associated with extranodal DLBCL, we observed a striking proportional correlation between the PET/CT-detected absolute number of extranodal sites of involvement and risk of SCNS. While the association between extranodal dissemination in DLBCL (>1 extranodal site) and SCNS has been reported [8], the marked increase in risk with an

Funding

This work was supported by the Karen Elise Jensen foundation (TCEG), AP Møller Mærsk Foundation (TCEG) and the North Denmark Region (TCEG). JMC receives research support from the Terry Fox Research Institute, Genome Canada, Genome British Columbia, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and the British Columbia Cancer Foundation.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the work of PET physicians at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Rod Hicks and Michael Hofman), BCCA (Don Wilson, Francois Benard), and Danish nuclear medicine specialists working with PET/CT.

References (32)

  • N. Murawski et al.

    The role of radiotherapy and intrathecal CNS prophylaxis in extralymphatic craniofacial aggressive B-cell lymphomas

    Blood

    (2014)
  • G. Benevolo et al.

    Final results of a multicenter trial addressing role of CSF flow cytometric analysis in NHL patients at high risk for CNS dissemination

    Blood

    (2012)
  • S.H. Bernstein et al.

    Natural history of CNS relapse in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a 20-year follow-up analysis of SWOG 8516 – the Southwest Oncology Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (2009)
  • H.R. Guirguis et al.

    Impact of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis on the incidence and risk factors for CNS relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era: a single centre experience and review of the literature

    Br J Haematol

    (2012)
  • A.J. Ferreri et al.

    Risk-tailored CNS prophylaxis in a mono-institutional series of 200 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era

    Br J Haematol

    (2015)
  • P. Maciocia et al.

    Treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with secondary central nervous system involvement: encouraging efficacy using CNS-penetrating R-IDARAM chemotherapy

    Br J Haematol

    (2016)
  • Cited by (65)

    • Integration of PET in DLBCL

      2023, Seminars in Hematology
    • SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Prophylaxis and Management of Secondary CNS Lymphoma

      2022, Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients with high-risk CNS-IPI scores are commonly offered CNS prophylaxis, but this criterium alone is insufficiently sensitive to identify all patients at risk for CNS spread. High-risk CNS-IPI scores capture only 50% of the patients that ultimately develop CNS relapse3,49 and do not account for other high-risk clinical features including testicular,50 uterine,51 or breast52 involvement; widespread extra-nodal involvement53; and pathologic features including the activated B-cell (ABC) subtype and unclassified cell of origin (COO)49 and dual translocations of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6.54 As a result, there is no broad consensus regarding which patients should be offered prophylaxis, and expert panel guidelines and institutional practices vary (Table 4).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text