Original articleLEADOPT: An automatic tool for structure-based lead optimization, and its application in structural optimizations of VEGFR2 and SYK inhibitors
Graphical abstract
A new in silico automatic tool for structure-based lead optimization termed LEADOPT was developed. It was successfully applied to the structural optimizations of the VEGFR2 inhibitor, sorafenib, and the SYK inhibitor, R406.
Introduction
Discovery of drug candidates is a bottleneck in drug research and development (R&D). The whole procedure for the discovery of drug candidates often includes two phases: lead discovery and lead optimization [1]. Currently the lead discovery is no longer a big problem or at least not a key challenge due to that many new technologies for the lead discovery have been well established and applied, such as high-throughput screening, biophysical screening, combinatorial chemistry, as well as virtual screening [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, at present the lead optimization is carried out mostly based on experiences of medicinal chemists, which often suffers from low efficiency. The lead optimization has now become a key challenge in not only the discovery of drug candidates but also the whole process of drug R&D.
Computational methods are often thought to be helpful in improving the efficiency of lead optimization [7], [8], [9], [10]. Thus, some in silico methods have been established and applied in the lead optimization. Among these methods, three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship (3D-QSAR) methods, for example, comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) [11] and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) [12], are the most widely used ones. Numerous studies have demonstrated that 3D-QSAR methods are very useful in lead optimization [13], [14], [15], [16]. Nevertheless, the current 3D-QSAR methods as well as other commonly used in silico methods for lead optimization are often just based on small-molecule ligands, implying ignoring structural information of target protein. This situation may lead to the theoretically optimized molecules having no activity due to bumps between molecules and target protein atoms. Structure-based lead optimization approaches are expected to be able to overcome these shortcomings, in which the structure of ligand is modified to enhance the binding affinity based on the known interaction mode between target protein and ligand [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. Although these approaches have been applied in lead optimization for a long time, they are often used manually by medicinal chemists, which still suffer inevitably from low efficiency. We also noticed that very recently a commercial module for structure-based ligand optimization has been issued in MOE by Chemical Computing Group Inc. However, its implementation details are not known, and it likely does not include the evaluation of pharmacokinetic and toxic properties for the generated molecules, which is also important for lead optimization.
Here we present an automatic tool for structure-based lead optimization, termed LEADOPT. LEADOPT has the following characteristics that make it a practical tool in lead optimization. First, a large number of derivatives of lead compound that have the same binding mode with the active pocket of target protein can be created. These compounds can be accommodated in the active pocket without any atom bump with the target protein. Second, LEADOPT builds up new molecules using an efficient fragment-based strategy. Such a strategy can help avoid producing unreasonable molecular structures and to some extent keep the synthetic accessibility of the derived compounds. Third, ligand efficiency (LE) rather than scoring function is used as a measure to sort the newly generated molecules; LE has been considered as an effective strategy to help narrow focus to lead compounds with optimal combinations of physicochemical properties and pharmacological properties [22], [23]. Fourth, a number of pharmacokinetic and toxic properties of the generated molecules are evaluated, which makes the lead candidates pharmacologically acceptable. We shall in the following describe the details for the algorithm of LEADOPT. Then, LEADOPT will be evaluated with two retrospective cases. Finally, it will be applied to the structural optimizations of sorafenib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), and R406, an inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK).
Section snippets
Fragment library construction
Since LEADOPT adopts a fragment-based approach for structural modifications to derive new molecular structures, a good fragment library is quite important for the quality of derived molecules. To establish such a fragment library, we first collected a total of 17,858 drug or drug-like molecules from CMC database, ChEMBL database [24], and DrugBank database [25]. Then, an in-house program written by us in C/C++ programming language was used to automatically build the fragment library. The
Development of LEADOPT
LEADOPT is an automatic tool developed for structure-based lead optimization. The overall workflow of LEADOPT is schematically depicted in Fig. 1. A detailed description of the algorithms of LEADOPT has been given in the Methods and Materials section. Here we just make a short summary for the workflow of LEADOPT. LEADOPT is started through input of the structure of ligand–receptor complex, which can be from either experimental X-ray crystal structure or molecule docking. Firstly, LEADOPT
Concluding remarks
In this investigation, we developed an automatic tool for structure-based lead optimization, termed LEADOPT. LEADOPT starts its work from an input structure of ligand–receptor complex, which can come from either x-ray crystal structure or molecular docking. The structural modifications in LEADOPT mainly include two operations: fragment growing and fragment replacing, which are restricted to carry out in the active pocket of target protein with the core scaffold structure of ligand kept
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the 973 Program (2013CB967204), the 863 Hi-Tech Programs (2012AA020301, 2012AA020308), the National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar (81325021), the National S&T Major Project (2012ZX09501001-003), and partly by PCSIRT (NO: IRT13031).
References (46)
- et al.
Novel trends in high-throughput screening
Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.
(2009) Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
(2007)- et al.
Discovery of N6-phenyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine-3,6- diamine derivatives as novel CK1 inhibitors using common-feature pharmacophore model based virtual screening and hit-to-lead optimization
Eur. J. Med. Chem.
(2012) - et al.
Application of 3D QSAR CoMFA/CoMSIA and in silico docking studies on novel renin inhibitors against cardiovascular diseases
Eur. J. Med. Chem.
(2009) - et al.
Ligand efficiency indices as guideposts for drug discovery
Drug Discov. Today
(2005) - et al.
An integrated scheme for feature selection and parameter setting in the support vector machine modeling and its application to the prediction of pharmacokinetic properties of drugs
Artif. Intell. Med.
(2009) - et al.
In silico prediction of mitochondrial toxicity by using GA-CG-SVM approach
Toxicol. Vitro
(2009) - et al.
Three-class classification models of logS and logP derived by using GA-CG-SVM approach
Mol. Divers.
(2009) - et al.
Prediction models of human plasma protein binding rate and oral bioavailability derived by using GA-CG-SVM method
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
(2008) - et al.
SYK is a critical regulator of FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia
Cancer Cell
(2014)
Predicting therapeutic value in the lead optimization phase of drug discovery
Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.
The influence of lead discovery strategies on the properties of drug candidates
Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.
The rise of fragment-based drug discovery
Nat. Chem.
Application of combinatorial chemistry science on modern drug discovery
J. Comb. Chem.
From virtuality to reality – virtual screening in lead discovery and lead optimization: a medicinal chemistry perspective
Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel.
Towards in silico lead optimization: scores from ensembles of protein/ligand conformations reliably correlate with biological activity
Proteins
Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization
Acc. Chem. Res.
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity
J. Med. Chem.
Application of CoMFA and CoMSIA 3D-QSAR and docking studies in optimization of mercaptobenzenesulfonamides as HIV-1 integrase inhibitors
J. Med. Chem.
CoMFA, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of (E)-3-(2-carboxy-2-arylvinyl)-4,6-dichloro-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acids: 3-[2-(3-aminophenyl)-2-carboxyvinyl]-4,6-dichloro-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid, a potent selective glycine-site NMDA receptor antagonist
J. Med. Chem.
Toluidinesulfonamide hypoxia-induced factor 1 inhibitors: alleviating drug-drug interactions through use of PubChem data and comparative molecular field analysis guided synthesis
J. Med. Chem.
Structure-based optimization of tyrosine kinase inhibitor CLM3. Design, synthesis, functional evaluation and molecular modeling studies
J. Med. Chem.
Cited by (22)
Discovery of 3,4-dihydropyrimido[4,5-d]pyrimidin-2(1H)-one and 3,4-dihydropyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-2(1H)-one derivatives as novel ENPP1 inhibitors
2022, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry LettersSynthesis and biological evaluation of diaryl urea derivatives designed as potential anticarcinoma agents using de novo structure-based lead optimization approach
2020, European Journal of Medicinal ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Additionally the unpredictable pharmacokinetic properties and adverse side effects like fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, hypertension and hand-foot skin reaction [10] affect its clinical efficacy [11,12]. Discovery of new chemical entities (NCEs) as a focal point in drug research and development (R&D) includes lead discovery and optimization [13]. Lead discovery may be achieved by large-scale screening of chemical libraries or simply by chance.
New techniques and strategies in drug discovery
2020, Chinese Chemical LettersX-ray crystal structure guided discovery of new selective, substrate-mimicking sirtuin 2 inhibitors that exhibit activities against non-small cell lung cancer cells
2018, European Journal of Medicinal ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Notably, aminothiazoles and thienopyrimidinones were discovered as new types of selective SIRT2 inhibitors, which work via inducing the formation of an allosteric hydrophobic binding pocket, hence providing new insights into inhibitor design [21–24]. With the aid of LEADOPT [25], an automatic structure-based molecule design tool, we successfully identified the N-(3-(phenoxymethyl)phenyl)acetamide derivatives (Fig. 1b and Fig. S2) as selective SIRT2 inhibitors, which exhibited inhibitory activity against human breast cancer cell growth [26]. Here we describe the X-ray crystal structure guided structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of new N-(3-(phenoxymethyl)phenyl)acetamide derivatives and their activities against non-small cell lung cancer.
Structure-based discovery of new maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase inhibitors
2018, Organic and Biomolecular ChemistryTotal Synthesis and Evaluation of B-Homo Palmatine and Berberine Derivatives as p300 Histone Acetyltransferase Inhibitors
2018, European Journal of Organic Chemistry
- 1
These authors contributed equally to this work.