Research paperDevelopment of a buccal doxepin platform for pain in oral mucositis derived from head and neck cancer treatment
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Oral mucositis (OM) is a common acute reaction after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in head and neck cancer treatment. Although being of ordinary occurrence, current literature reports highly variable incidence (fluctuating from 75% to 99%) [1]. Severity of OM ranges from superficial sore erythema to complete mucosal ulceration in the oral cavity, pharynx and esophagus. Therefore, patient’s quality of life is affected since OM is associated with considerable pain and dysphagia, which also complicates the nutritional intake, increases susceptibility to infections and leads to the cancer treatment interruption [2]. All these problems are reflected in the clinical management of cancer, without undertaking any evaluation of associated cost of medical resources [3], [4]. Currently, there is no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved intervention for the prevention of OM induced by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy [5]. Current strategies against OM are directed to limit its extent and to manage its symptomatology, mainly pain relief. Different alternatives are used to alleviate the acute pain in OM and highly severe cases may imply the use of systemic opioids. For mild and less-severe cases, therapeutic alternatives include cryotherapy, use of mouthwashes, coating agents, low laser therapy and topical anesthetic and/or analgesic agents [1], [3], [4]. Notwithstanding, topical anesthetics and analgesics typically provide less than 30 min of pain relief [6]. In this context, doxepin (DOX), a dibenzoxepin-derivate tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), without being analgesic has shown effective results in the treatment of pain [7], [8]. Concretely, some clinical studies have focused on OM pain relief caused by head and neck cancer therapy with DOX oral rinses [9], [10], [11]. Its therapeutic effect is believed to be caused by the blockade of sodium channels at local level in cutaneous nociceptors [10].
Considering the promising result of DOX oral rinses and the need of new well supported therapies to manage the OM pain induced by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer [12], [13], the present study was initiated with the intention to develop a new dosage form for DOX to be administered in OM. For this purpose, a semisolid buccal formulation was developed to extend the contact time with the affected tissue, to achieve some degree of coating effect and to provide sustained release of DOX. For this task, mucoadhesive paste Orabase® was selected as the DOX platform for the developed formulations.
Equally, in order to enhance its analgesic effect different penetration enhancers were evaluated. Rheological properties of formulations were assayed, as well as, in vitro release and ex vivo permeation from which main parameters were calculated. Finally, the semisolid formulation to be tested in vivo against the reference mouthwash was selected according to the results obtained from previously mentioned studies.
Section snippets
Materials
Doxepin hydrochloride, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (Transcutol®), menthol, myristyl alcohol, sebacic acid, 1-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one (Azone), sodium lauryl sulfate and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). Orabase® was obtained from Acofarma (Madrid, Spain). Ultrapure water purified using a Station 9000 purification unit was used throughout the work. All other chemical and reagents were of analytical grade.
Tissue samples
Porcine buccal mucosa was obtained from
Permeation enhancer selection
Some alternatives can be used to enhance drug delivery and tissue permeation. Among them, the use of chemical penetration enhancers has been broadly investigated in the scientific literature [17]. Chemical penetration enhancers present different mechanisms of action. However, penetration enhancement is tissue and drug specific. Therefore, pertinent studies must be conducted on the desired tissue and with the specific drug [8]. For this reason, several chemical permeation enhancers were tested
Conclusions
An orabase® based DOX topical formulation containing chemical permeation enhancers M (5%) and T (10%) has been developed for its suitable topical use in OM. The addition of M and T to this bioadhesive system for buccal administration decreased its viscosity and viscoelasticity parameters which might produce a beneficious effect on the product spreadability, tissue adherence and patient sensory experience, and despite the low DOX release from the formulation they satisfactorily promoted the
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
References (29)
- et al.
Strategies for managing radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer
Semin. Radiat. Oncol.
(2009) - et al.
Transdermal delivery of imipramine and doxepin from newly oil-in-water nanoemulsions for an analgesic and anti-allodynic activity: development, characterization and in vivo evaluation
Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces
(2013) - et al.
A phase III, randomized double-blind study of doxepin rinse versus magic mouthwash versus placebo in the treatment of acute oral mucositis pain in patients receiving head and neck radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (Alliance A221304)
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
(2016) - et al.
An improved cryopreservation method for porcine buccal mucosa in ex vivo drug permeation studies using Franz diffusion cells
Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.
(2014) Skin penetration enhancers
Int. J. Pharm.
(2013)- et al.
Influence of Transcutol CG on the skin accumulation and transdermal permeation of ultraviolet absorbers
Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.
(2002) - et al.
Pharmacokinetics of doxepin in subjects with pruritic atopic dermatitis
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.
(1999) - et al.
Design, characterisation and preliminary clinical evaluation of a novel mucoadhesive topical formulation containing tetracycline for the treatment of periodontal disease
J. Control. Release
(2000) - et al.
Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery
Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.
(2009) - et al.
A comparison of the physicochemical properties and a sensory test of Acyclovir creams
Int. J. Pharm.
(2012)