Behavioural pharmacologyModafinil disrupts prepulse inhibition in mice: Strain differences and involvement of dopaminergic and serotonergic activation
Introduction
Modafinil is an anti-narcolepsy drug widely used off-label and as a mild stimulant (Kumar, 2008, Minzenberg and Carter, 2008). Modafinil has been trialed in the management of drug abuse and dependence (Martinez-Raga et al., 2008, Heinzerling et al., 2010) and its cognitive and stimulant effects could be useful in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (Morein-Zamir et al., 2007). In addition, modafinil is becoming widely used in social settings, as a doping agent and to combat jet-lag (Kumar, 2008, Minzenberg and Carter, 2008).
The pharmacological mechanism of action of modafinil may be by interacting with the dopamine transporter increasing dopamine release in the basal forebrain (Volkow et al., 2009, Zolkowska et al., 2009, Young and Geyer, 2010) resulting in stimulation of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors (Qu et al., 2008). Thus, modafinil may have effects similar to drugs of abuse such as cocaine and amphetamines (Volkow et al., 2009). In addition to dopaminergic effects, modafinil also increases serotonin release in the cortex (de Saint Hilaire et al., 2001), increases histamine release in the brain which interacts with its behavioural effects (Ishizuka et al., 2008) and may have antidepressant effects (de Saint Hilaire et al., 2001, Ferraro et al., 2005, Regenthal et al., 2009). Therefore the exact pharmacological action of modafinil on behavior remains unclear.
Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is a widely used model of sensorimotor gating, which is the ability to filter extraneous information and focus on relevant input (Swerdlow et al., 2008). Prepulse inhibition is disrupted in schizophrenia and other psychiatric illnesses (Swerdlow et al., 2008) and after treatment with dopamine receptor agonists, dopamine releasing agents and several serotonergic drugs (Geyer et al., 2001). Assessing the effect of modafinil on PPI may therefore inform on its mechanism of action and potential positive and side-effects in schizophrenia. However, in healthy humans and in rats, modafinil had no effect on baseline PPI (Samuels et al., 2007, Regenthal et al., 2009, McFadden et al., 2010). In contrast, after tail pinch stress or REM sleep deprivation in rats, modafinil caused disruption of PPI (Liu et al., 2011) and subchronic modafinil reversed restraint stress-induced deficits in PPI, as well as depression-like behaviors in rats (Regenthal et al., 2009).
The effects of modafinil on PPI have not been investigated in mice, even though this is the most widely used experimental species in psychiatric and psychopharmacological neuroscience because of the wide availability of genetic modifications. Therefore, and to further elucidate the neuropsychopharmacological mechanism of action of modafinil, we examined its effects on PPI and startle in mice. We administered modafinil orally, similarly to its common use in humans, and used two mouse strains, the C57Bl/6 and the Balb/c which differ in the regulation of PPI. We used a number of dopamine and serotonin (5-HT) receptor and uptake blockers to delineate the involvement of these neurotransmitter mechanisms in the action of modafinil on PPI.
Section snippets
Animals
The study used a total of 67 male C57Bl/6 mice and 56 male Balb/c mice divided into six experiments of 8–12 mice each. Two mouse strains were used because we (Van den Buuse et al., 2007) and others (Paylor and Crawley, 1997) have shown marked strain-related differences in PPI regulation and behavioural effects of modafinil have been shown to differ between mouse strains (Simon et al., 1996). The animals were 8 weeks old at the start of the experiments which took 3–4 weeks to complete for each
Modafinil dose-response studies (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1)
Average startle was higher in Balb/c than in C57Bl/6 mice (main effect of Strain F(1,21)=10.1, P=0.004). There was no significant effect of modafinil treatment on startle amplitude in Balb/c mice. In C57Bl/6 mice, the main effect of modafinil dose was significant (F(4,44)=8.7, P<0.001) and further pairwise comparison showed that 100 mg/kg of modafinil, but not any of the other doses, significantly reduced startle amplitudes compared to the control condition in this strain (Fig. 1).
At the 30 ms
Discussion
The most important results in this study were that (1) oral treatment with 100 mg/kg, but not lower doses, of modafinil produced significant reduction of PPI in C57Bl/6 mice but not in Balb/c mice; (2) co-treatment with haloperidol or ketanserin blocked the effect of modafinil on PPI; (3) a dose of modafinil which did not affect PPI blocked the PPI disruption by GBR12909; (4) in contrast, co-treatment with either WAY100,635 or fluoxetine had no effect on the action of modafinil on PPI.
In
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the technical assistance of Jack Kee Low and Sally Martin with parts of the experiments. M. van den Buuse is a Senior Research Fellow of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC). P. Kwek was supported by a project grant from the NHMRC. These studies were furthermore supported by the Percy Baxter Charitable Trust, Australia, and Operational Infrastructure Funding from the State Government of Victoria, Australia. None of these funding sources
References (43)
- et al.
The effect of low estrogen state on serotonin transporter function in mouse hippocampus: a behavioral and electrochemical study
Brain Res.
(2005) - et al.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of modafinil for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2010) - et al.
Involvement of central histaminergic systems in modafinil-induced but not methylphenidate-induced increases in locomotor activity in rats
Euro. J. Pharmacol.
(2008) - et al.
Modafinil inhibits rat midbrain dopaminergic neurons through D2-like receptors
Neuropharmacology
(2007) - et al.
Tail-pinch stress and REM sleep deprivation differentially affect sensorimotor gating function in modafinil-treated rats
Behav. Brain Res.
(2011) - et al.
Age-dependent effects of modafinil on acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition in rats
Behav. Brain Res.
(2010) - et al.
Non-amphetaminic mechanism of stimulant locomotor effect of modafinil in mice
Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.
(1995) - et al.
Effects of WAY 100635 and (-)-5-Me-8-OH-DPAT, a novel 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, on 8-OH-DPAT responses
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
(1998) - et al.
Mesencephalic dopamine neuron number and tyrosine hydroxylase content: genetic control and candidate genes
Neuroscience
(2007) - et al.
Action of modafinil—increased motivation via the dopamine transporter inhibition and D1 receptors? Biol
Psychiatry
(2010)