Non-catalyzed cathodic oxygen reduction at graphite granules in microbial fuel cells
Introduction
Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are an emerging technology for the treatment of reduced organic carbon in aqueous waste [1]. In a MFC, bacteria use an anode as electron acceptor for the oxidation of organic carbon to carbon dioxide (CO2), with production of protons and electrons. The protons and/or other cations in solution are transferred to a cathode through a cation exchange membrane (CEM), while the electrons are transferred via an electrical circuit, where a resistor or power user harvests the energy liberated by the reaction. At the cathode an electron acceptor is reduced using the electrons delivered by the anode. The most sustainable electron acceptor known to date for microbial fuel cells is oxygen, due to its availability in the environment and its high redox potential. However, some limitations reduce the effectiveness of O2 as electron acceptor. First, the low oxygen solubility in water limits the availability of the electron acceptor to the electrode. The oxygen mass transfer limitation in the liquid phase has been alleviated with the use of open air cathodes [2], but the concentration of oxygen can never exceed saturation (7.8 mg/L at 25 °C), as the electrode must be covered by a liquid film in order to allow for cation/proton transfer. Secondly, the high activation energy of O2 reduction to water at a graphite electrode leads to high cathodic activation overpotential, i.e. drop in cathodic potential from open circuit value (EC,OC) to closed circuit value (EC) due to losses associated with the reaction kinetics. By reducing the MFC voltage, overpotentials strongly hinder electron transfer. Zhao et al. [3] demonstrated that graphite foil performs very poorly in a linear sweep voltammogram compared to different catalyzed cathodes. Oh et al. [4] found that during the generation of polarization curves the voltage over a MFC dropped to zero much more rapidly when O2 was reduced on a plain carbon cathode than when catalyzed cathodes were used. Several researchers have investigated graphite-bound catalysts or soluble redox mediators as possible solutions to increase the rates of cathodic oxygen reduction. The use of hexacyanoferrate (Fe(CN)63−) as a soluble redox mediator has been unsuccessful due to the low rates of reoxidation of the compound from ferrous to ferric state [5]. Instead, the use of platinum at MFC cathodes has confirmed the lessons learned from conventional fuel cell technology, by significantly enhancing oxygen reduction rates, even at catalyst loads as low as 0.1 mg/cm2 [6]. However, platinum has some severe drawbacks. First, it is subject to sulfide poisoning in wastewater applications and the cost of catalyst replacement can be prohibitive; secondly, the production of platinum is highly energy-intensive (150–250 kg of ore must be processed to produce 1 g of platinum) and thus the environmental impacts may outweigh the benefits [7]. In the search for cheaper and more sustainable catalysts, transition metal porphyrins and phthalocyanines [3] have emerged, yielding overpotentials in the same range as achieved with platinum. Another strategy has been the use of solubilised ferric iron at low pH (<2.5) as a redox mediator, which could be reoxidised by a population of (for example) Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans [8]. This method reduces the overpotentials because Fe3+, not oxygen is being reduced at the cathode. The results obtained in the aforementioned studies and others are summarized in Table 1.
This study proposes a different approach to reduce the oxygen reduction overpotential. This approach is based on surface area rather than catalysis. Based on electrochemistry principles, the overpotential of oxygen reduction is dependent on the current density, as shown in Eq. (1) (Butler–Volmer equation):In the equation, ηcathode is the cathodic overpotential (EC,OC − EC, V), R the ideal gas constant (8.31 J/mol K), T the absolute temperature (K), β the symmetry factor (a constant which determines the dependence of the activation energy on the electrode potential and for a cathodic process reflects that the activation energy increases with electrode potential), F the Faraday's constant (96,485 C/mol), i the current density (mA/m2) and i0 is the exchange current density, a parameter that depends on the activation energy of the reduction at equilibrium conditions (in a way that higher activation energy corresponds to lower exchange current). If the overpotential is large enough (greater than 80–100 mV at 25 °C) the second term in parenthesis becomes negligible and the equation can be simplified in the form known as Tafel equation:The equation shows that the activation overpotential increases with the current density. Instead of using a catalyst to reduce the activation energy for oxygen reduction (i.e. increasing the parameter i0), our approach has been to reduce the current density through use of a non-catalyzed material with a high surface area. This would still cause a decrease of the overpotential, through a reduction of the current density rather than the activation energy. The material selected was coarse and highly porous industrial grade granular graphite. Some investigators have previously observed currents generated in sediments fuel cells by oxygen reduction on plain graphite in marine environments [9], [10]. However, it was suggested that in those cases bacterial colonization of the cathode may have aided electron transfer through a biocatalytic process. In this study we eliminated every possible chemical and biological catalytic process to test the ability of plain graphite granules to carry out cathodic oxygen reduction.
Section snippets
Microbial fuel cell
A double-chambered microbial fuel cell was built as previously described [11]. Both compartments had a total volume of 350 mL and were filled with granular graphite. The cathode granular graphite (El Carb 100, Graphite Sales Inc., USA) had a diameter <1 mm, a void fraction of 42% (giving a net liquid volume of 147 mL) and a bulk density of 951 kg m−3. The anode contained larger graphite granules (same manufacturer, 2–6 mm diameter, void fraction 48%, giving a net liquid volume of 168 mL). The
Electrode characterisation
The total surface area of the granules (including all pores larger than 6 nm) was determined by mercury porosimetry to be 6.0 × 106 m2/m3. This is the true surface area that should be used for the calculation of current densities in the Tafel equation. This area is three orders of magnitude higher than the nominal surface area (calculated assuming the granules to be spheres of 1 mm diameter) of 3600 m2/m3. As a basis of comparison, the total surface area of graphite felt (Morgan Carbon Australia) was
Discussion
In previous research, the problem of the overpotential of oxygen reduction at microbial fuel cell cathodes has been addressed through specific selection of catalysts and electrode materials. Only few data were generated for non-catalyzed cathodes, as they were thought not to have the ability to sustain the current demanded by microbial fuel cell anodes. Only two studies done on MFC oxygen cathodes have reported data on plain carbon electrodes [3], [4]. In both cases they performed poorly
Conclusions
Despite common belief that oxygen reduction on plain graphite cannot sustain the current densities delivered by microbial fuel cell anodes, in this study we proved that granular graphite is able to support cathodic oxygen reduction thanks to its very large specific surface area. Granular graphite is competitive with low-surface catalyzed cathodes in terms of cost and power production, as it can be summarized as follows:
- •
Granular graphite is able to sustain volumetric power densities of up to 11 W m
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank David Page for his support with the measurements of surface areas by mercury porosimetry and Tony Jong for the measurement of metals by ICP-MS. This work was funded by the Australian Research Council (Grant DP0666927).
References (19)
- et al.
Trends Biotechnol.
(2005) - et al.
Electrochem. Commun.
(2005) - et al.
J. Cleaner Prod.
(2001) - et al.
Electrochem. Commun.
(2005) - et al.
Biosens. Bioelectron.
(2006) - et al.
Fuel
(2003) - et al.
Electrochem. Commun.
(2007) - et al.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
(2004) - et al.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
(2004)
Cited by (0)
- 1
Tel.: +61 7 3365 4729; fax: +61 7 3365 4726.
- 2
Tel.: +61 7 3365 7519; fax: +61 7 3365 4726.
- 3
Tel.: +61 7 3365 4374; fax: +61 7 3365 4726.