Editorial
Introduction: Special Symposium “Carnegie school and organization studies”

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.11.004Get rights and content

Section snippets

The quest for originality and utility

As time goes by, research scholars in management and organization studies seem to forget or disregard their theoretical roots. Beyond the repeated argument about the youth of the organization studies field – the field has not actually “lost memory”, it simply has no history and therefore cannot have a memory – at least three arguments have been advanced to explain – and sometimes justify – the relative amnesia of organization studies scholars.

The first argument points to the “publish or perish”

Limits and interests of fantasy

As time goes by, another syndrome can affect scholars in organization studies: their unusual and unconscious ability to fantasize their readings. Some research may inflict to classics amazing or unlikely extensions and distortions to the extent that other academics eventually come to wonder if they read the “same” thing. Actually, each individual and intimate processes of scientific knowledge creating, involves serendipity, imagination and bricolage. For instance, the semiotician Umberto Eco

The Carnegie School

Building on these insights about what could be a history of thought in organization studies, we offer a symposium on the Carnegie School. The primary aim of the symposium is to situate this school of thought – one of the pioneering schools in Management Science and Organization Studies (Argote & Greve, 2007) – within the historical context of its emergence, and above all, within the academic lives of its founding fathers. The symposium therefore focuses on the lives and contribution of the

References (29)

  • E. Abrahamson

    Management fashion

    Academy of Management Review

    (1996)
  • Adler, P. S. (2009a). Introduction: A social science which forgets its founders is lost. In P. S. Adler (Ed.), The...
  • L. Argote et al.

    A behavioral theory of the firm–40 years and counting: Introduction and impact

    Organization Science

    (2007)
  • M. Augier et al.

    Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organization Studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000

    Organization Science

    (2005)
  • Bauerlein, M., Gad-el-Hak, M., Grody, W., McKelvey, B., & Trimble, S. (2010). We must stop the avalanche of low-quality...
  • Baum, J. A. C. (Ed.). (2002). Companion to organizations. Malden, MA:...
  • K.G. Corley et al.

    Building theory about theory: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?

    Academy Management Review

    (2011)
  • U. Eco et al.

    Interpretation and overinterpretation

    (1992)
  • L. Festinger

    A theory of cognitive dissonance

    (1957)
  • M. Foucault

    Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique

    (1972)
  • M. Foucault

    Questions of method

  • G. Gavetti et al.

    Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future

    Organization Science

    (2007)
  • D.C. Hambrick

    The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?

    Academy Management Journal

    (2007)
  • View full text